Skip to main content
Log in

Continuity in the Treatment of Carotid Artery Disease: Results of a Carotid Stenting Program Initiated by Vascular Surgeons

  • Papers Presented to the Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society—Winter Meeting
  • Published:
Annals of Vascular Surgery

Abstract

The treatment of carotid artery stenosis currently constitutes a major component of vascular surgical practice. Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS), however, is mainly performed by nonvascular surgeon interventionalists with cerebral protection devices available only through investigational protocols. This study reports the initial results of a CAS program initiated and performed by vascular surgeons using commercially available cerebral protection devices. Fifty-seven patients were enrolled in the study over a 14-month period. All patients were at high risk for conventional endarterectomy (7 resentosis, 4 irradiation, and 46 medically high-risk ASA III). Mean age was 75.7 years (range, 45-93 years). High-grade stenosis of the carotid artery was present in all cases (mean stenosis, 85%; range, 80-99%). Twenty-four percent of patients were symptomatic. Cerebral protection was performed with an occlusion balloon-wire in 32 cases and with a filter-wire device in 24; no cerebral protection was used in 1 patient with restenosis after endarterectomy. Initially in the study, atropine was administered selectively for the development of bradycardia. Currently atropine is administered routinely prior to the initial balloon angioplasty of the carotid bulb. Clopidogrel (75 mg/day) was administered for 5 days prior to CAS and for 30 days after CAS. All 57 patients underwent successful dilatation of their carotid stenoses without occlusion or dissection. Ten of 32 patients in whom balloon occlusion was used for cerebral protection exhibited transient evidence of cerebral ischemia during protection balloon occlusion. These symptoms resolved completely without permanent neurological deficit in all cases. Development of bradycardia with a heart rate <50 bpm was significantly reduced by routine administration of atropine prior to the initial dilatation within the carotid bulb (p = 0.01). Mean hospital length of stay was 1.33 days (range, 1-5 days). There were two periprocedure myocardial infarctions, two postprocedure transient ischemic attacks, and one reversible ischemic neurologic deficit. There was no 30-day mortality. There have been no instances of hemodynamically significant restenosis during a mean follow-up period of 5.4 months. From these results we have concluded that CAS can be performed effectively and safely using commercially available cerebral protection devices. A program initiated and performed exclusively by vascular surgeons is effective and should be the standard model used in the endovascular treatment of carotid artery stenosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. JS Yadav GS Roubin S Iyer J Vitek P King WD Jordan et al. (1997) ArticleTitleElective stenting of the extreacranial carotid arteries Circulation 95 376–381 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiC287hvFE%3D Occurrence Handle9008452

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. EB Deitrich M Ndiaye DB Reid (1996) ArticleTitleStenting in the carotid artery: initial experience in 110 patients J. Endovasc. Surg. 3 42–62

    Google Scholar 

  3. JG Theron GG Payelle O Couskun HF Huet L Guimaraens (1996) ArticleTitleCarotid artery stenosis: treatment with protedced balloon angioplasty and stent placement Radiology 201 627–636 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiD1MzmslU%3D Occurrence Handle8939208

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. (2001) “Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomised trial” Lancet 357: 1729–1737

  5. GS Roubin G New SS Iyer JJ Vitek N Al-Mubarek MW Lin JS Yadav et al. (2001) ArticleTitleImmediate and late clinical outcomes of carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a 5-year prospective analysis Circulation 103 532–537 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3is1aqtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11157718

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. MH Wholey N Al-Mubarek MH Wholey (2003) ArticleTitleUpdated review of the global carotid artery stent registry Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv. 60 259–260

    Google Scholar 

  7. G Dangas JR Laird SuffixJr R Mehran et al. (2001) ArticleTitleCarotid artery stenting in patients with high-risk anatomy for carotid endarterectomy J. Endovasc. Ther. 8 39–43

    Google Scholar 

  8. M Henry I Henry C Klonaris et al. (2002) ArticleTitleBenefits of cerebral protection during carotid stenting with the PercuSurge GuardWire system: midterm results J. Endovasc. Ther. 9 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  9. JC Parodi R La Mura LM Ferreira et al. (2000) ArticleTitleInitial evaluation of carotid angioplasty and stenting with three different cerebral protection devices J. Vasc. Surg. 32 1127–1136

    Google Scholar 

  10. JS Yadav (2002) ArticleTitleStenting and angioplasty with protection in patients at high risk for endarterectomy: the SAPPHIRE study Circulation 106 2986–a

    Google Scholar 

  11. JL Mas G Chantellier B Beyssen InstitutionalAuthorNamefor EVA-3S Investigators (2004) ArticleTitleCarotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection: clinical alert from the Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) trial Stroke 35 e18–20 Occurrence Handle14657456

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. T Ohki FJ Veith S Grenell et al. (2002) ArticleTitleInitial experience with cerebral protection devices to prevent embolization during carotid artery stenting J. Vasc. Surg. 36 1175–1185

    Google Scholar 

  13. S Macdonald GS Venables TJ Cleveland PA Gaines (2002) ArticleTitleProtected carotid stenting: safety and efficacy of the MedNova NeuroShield filter J. Vasc. Surg. 35 966–972

    Google Scholar 

  14. FJ Criado JM Lingelbach DF Ledesma PR Lucas (2002) ArticleTitleCarotid artery stenting in a vascular surgery practice J. Vasc. Surg. 35 430–434

    Google Scholar 

  15. MH Wholey MH Wholey WA Tan G Eles C Jarmolowski S Cho (2003) ArticleTitleA comparison of balloon-mounted and self-expanding stents in the carotid arteries: immediate and long-term results of more than 500 patients J. Endovasc. Ther. 10 171–181

    Google Scholar 

  16. RW Hobson Suffix2nd BK Lal E Chakhtoura et al. (2003) ArticleTitleCarotid artery stenting: analysis of data for 105 patients at high risk J. Vasc. Surg. 37 1234–1239

    Google Scholar 

  17. A Cremonesi R Manette F Setacci C Setacci F Castriota (2003) ArticleTitleProtected carotid stenting: clinical advantages and complications of embolic protection devices in 442 consecutive patients Stroke 34 1936–1941 Occurrence Handle10.1161/01.STR.0000081000.23561.61 Occurrence Handle12843347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter L. Faries MD.

About this article

Cite this article

Faries, P.L., Dayal, R., Clair, D.G. et al. Continuity in the Treatment of Carotid Artery Disease: Results of a Carotid Stenting Program Initiated by Vascular Surgeons. Ann Vasc Surg 18, 669–676 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10016-004-0101-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10016-004-0101-y

Keywords

Navigation