Skip to main content
Log in

Distributed sensor swarms for monitoring bird behavior: an integrated system using wildlife acoustics recorders

  • Special Feature: Original Article
  • Published:
Artificial Life and Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Birds are frequently vocal. Monitoring their songs and calls has provided much useful information about their ecology and behavior. Recording bird songs and locations can be resource intensive, frequently requiring two or more observers, causing considerable disturbance and possible only for short times. Passive arrays of acoustic sensors offer the possibility of greatly increasing our ability to monitor bird activity. The desirability of such arrays is obvious: they are less intrusive, can monitor continuously over long periods, permit collaboration which enables better localization, provide fault tolerance, and facilitate sharing to optimize scarce resources. That the interest has been increasing so much lately is in large part, because we are now at the point, where the promise of such arrays is realizable with current or reasonably anticipated technologies. Controlling collaborative arrays can be difficult. Engineered solutions are sometimes available, but they are often brittle and appropriate only for ideal environments. We would like our systems to be: robust, in that they can handle changing environments or agents and are untroubled by occasionally wrong or noisy messages; adaptive in that they can learn to deal with unanticipated source or events, form new concepts, and communicate in languages that are specialized for particular agents; and finally, they should be self-configuring, to deal with changing situations and goals. After reviewing research employing sensor arrays by others to monitor bird behavior, we will describe research in our laboratory. Our focus will be on the construction of such systems, especially how such arrays can extract information from the environment and communicate to arrive at a collective understanding of their region and events occurring there.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Estrin D, Michener W, Bonito G (2003) Environmental infrastructure needs for distributed sensor networks: a report from a national science foundation workshop, 12–14 august, 2003, Scripps Institute of Oceanography

  2. Porter JH, Nagy E, Kratz TK, Hanson P, Collins SL, Arzberger P (2009) New eyes on the world: advanced sensors for ecology. BioScience 59(5):385–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blumstein DT, Mennill DJ, Clemins P, Girod L, Yao K, Patricelli G, Deppe JL, Krakauer AH, Clark C, Cortopassi KA, Hanser SF, McCowan B, Ali AM, Kirschel ANG (2011) Acoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: applications, technological considerations and prospectus. J Appl Ecol 48:758–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gage S (2015) Remote environmental assessment laboratory. http://www.real.msu.edu/, June 2015. Accessed 2015 June 03

  5. Pijanowski BC, Farina A, Gage SH, Dumyahn SL, Krause BL (2011) What is soundscape ecology? an introduction and overview of an emerging new science. Landsc Ecol 26:1213–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Digby A, Towsey M, Bell BD, Teal PD (2013) A practical comparison of manual and autonomous methods for acoustic monitoring. Methods Ecol Evol 4:675–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hobson KA, Rempel RS, Greenzuood H, Bull B, Van Wilgenburg SL (2002) Acoustic surveys of birds using electronic recordings: new potential from an omnidirectional microphone system. Wildl Soc Bull 30:709–720

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mennill DJ, Burt JM, Fristrup KM, Vehrencamp SL (2006) Accuracy of an acoustic location system for monitoring the position of duetting songbirds in tropical forest. J Acoust Soc Am 119(5):2832–2839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mennill DJ, Battiston M, Wilson DR, Foote JR, Doucet SM (2012) Field test of an affordable, portable, wireless microphone array for spatial monitoring of animal ecology and behavior. Methods Ecol Evol 3(4):704–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kirschel ANG, Cody ML, Harlow Z, Promponas VJ, Vallejo EE, Taylor CE (2011) Territorial dynamics of mexican antthrushes revealed by individual recognition of their songs. Ibis 153:255–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Harlow Z (2013) Complex singing behavior of the White-breasted Wood Wren (Henicorhina leucosticta). PhD thesis, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles

  12. Collier TC (2010) Wireless sensor network-based acoustic localization for studying animal communication in terrestrial environments. PhD thesis, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles

  13. Pottie GJ, Kaiser WJ (2000) Wireless integrated network sensors. Commun ACM 43(5):51–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ali AM, Asgari S, Collier TC, Allen M, Girod L, Hudson RE, Yao K, Taylor CE, Blumstein DT (2009) An empirical study of collaborative acoustic source localization. J Signal Process Syst 57:415–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kershenbaum A et al (2014) Acoustic sequences in non-human animals: a tutorial review and prospectus. Biol Rev 91:13–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Collier TC, Kirschel ANG, Taylor CE (2010) Acoustic localization of antbirds in a mexican rainforest using a wireless sensor network. J Acoust Soc Am 128:182–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Collier TC, Blumstein DT, Girod L, Taylor CE (2010) Is alarm calling risky? marmots avoid calling from risky places. Ethology 116:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Collier T (2015) Voxnet: a deployable bioacoustic sensor network. https://grassi2.ucdavis.edu/~travc/voxnet/Hardware/

  19. Wang N-C, Hudson RE, Tan LN, Taylor CE, Alwan A, Yao K (2013) Bird phrase segmentation by entropy-driven change point detection. In: The 38th international conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing (ICASSP), Vancouver, Canada, May 16–31, 2013

  20. Kantapon K, Tan LN, Alwan A, Taylor CE (2015) A robust automatic phrase classifier using dynamic time-warping with prominent region identification, pp 1–5

  21. Harlow Z, Collier T, Burkholder V, Taylor CE (2013) IEEE China summit and international conference on signal and information processing (ChinaSIP), Beijing, July, 6–10, 2013. In: Acoustic 3D localization of a tropical song bird

  22. Lee J-Y, Hudson RE, Yao K (2014) Acoustic DOA estimation: an approximate maximum likelihood approach. IEEE Syst J 13–141:1069–1080

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ali A, Hudson R, Yao K (2014) Tracking of acoustic sources using random set theory. IEEE Syst J 8:151–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen JC, Yao K (2005) Beamforming. In: Iyengar SS, Brooks R (eds) Frontiers in distributed sensor networks, vol 12, pp 1067–1105

  25. Chen JC, Hudson RE, Yao K (2002) Maximum-likelihood source localization and unknown sensor location estimation for wideband signals in the near-field. IEEE Trans Signal Process 50:1843–1854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Scott Brandes T (2008) Automated sound recording and analysis techniques for bird surveys and conservation. Bird Conserv Int 18:S163–S173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tan LN, Alwan A, Kossan G, Cody M, Taylor CE (2015) Dynamic time warping and sparse representation classification for birdsong phrase classification using limited training data. J Acoust Soc Am 137:1069–1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Arriaga JG, Sanchez H, Hedley R, Vallejo EE, Taylor CE (2014) Using song to identify cassin+s vireo individuals. a comparative study of pattern recognition algorithms. Pattern Recognit pp 291–300

  29. Yao Y (2008) Studies of vocal communications in cooperatively breeding acorn woodpeckers (melanerpes formicivorus). PhD thesis, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles

  30. Arriaga J, Cody ML, Vallejo EE, Taylor CE (2014) Bird-db database for annotated bird song sequences. http://taylor0.biology.ucla.edu/birdDBQuery/. Accessed 2014 Aug 07

  31. National Science Foundation (2014) Finalizing an integrated behavior ontology for the behavioral science community. http://grantome.com/grant/NSF/IOS-1439561#panel-abstract

  32. Wee K, Collier T, Kobele G, Stabler EP, Taylor C (2001) Natural language interface to an intrusion detection system. In: International conference on control, automation and systems, ICASE’01. http://taylor0.biology.ucla.edu/al/

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation Award No. 0410438.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles E. Taylor.

Additional information

This work was presented in part at the 1st International Symposium on Swam Behavior and Bio-inspired Robotics, Kyoto, Japan, October 28–30, 2015.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taylor, C.E., Huang, Y. & Yao, K. Distributed sensor swarms for monitoring bird behavior: an integrated system using wildlife acoustics recorders. Artif Life Robotics 21, 268–273 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-016-0295-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-016-0295-4

Keywords

Navigation