Advertisement

Artificial Life and Robotics

, Volume 18, Issue 3–4, pp 204–211 | Cite as

Design of a quadruped robot for human–elephant conflict mitigation

Original Article
  • 270 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

Human–elephant conflict is a major problem leading to crop damage, human death by elephants and elephants being killed by people. The surveillance and tracking of elephant herds are difficult due to their size and nature of movement.

Materials

In this article, we propose a four-wheeled quadruped robot to mitigate human–elephant conflict. The robot can detect movement of wild pachyderms in certain pockets along the forest borders through which the elephants enter into the human living areas from the forest. The robot is so designed that it can navigate with wheels on flat terrains and with legs on unfriendly rugged terrains with the help of mounted cameras.

Methods

The images of the wild elephant are captured and transmitted to the base stations and an SMS is sent to the forest officials indicating an elephant is found. We obtain a suitable kinematic model for both legs and wheels with control algorithm for the quadruped robot to move along a predetermined path.

Conclusion

The quadruped robot proposed is a solution to detect elephant movement without affecting the ecological conditions to overcome human–elephant conflict. The unpredictability of time and location of elephant arrival into the villages are considered the major issues that are resolved in this work. The results of our work contribute to elephant conservation issues and are suitable for the detection of elephants in forest border areas.

Keywords

Kinematic Degree of freedom Legged robot Quadruped Leg-wheeled robot 

References

  1. 1.
    Kumara HN, Rathnakumar S, Ananda Kumar M, Singh M (2012) Estimating Asian elephant, Elephas maximus, density through distance sampling in the tropical forests of Biligiri Rangaswamy Temple tiger reserve, India. Trop Conserv Sci 5.2:163–172Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lenin J, Sukumar R (2008) Action plan for the mitigation of elephant–human conflict in India. Transformation 10:35Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Böttcher S (2006) Principles of robot locomotion. In: Proceedings of human robot interaction seminarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bruzzone L, Quaglia G (2012) Robots in unstructured environments. Mech Sci 3:49–62Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Belter D, Walas K, Kasinski A (2008) Distributed control system of DC servomotors for six legged walking robot. In: 13th international power electronics and motion control conference, IEEE, pp 1044–1049Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Amaral PFS, Pinto BGM (2010) A four legged walking robot with obstacle overcoming capabilities. In: 3rd conference on human system interactions (HSI), IEEE, pp 374–379Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Szrek J, Wójtowicz P (2010) Idea of wheel-legged robot and its control system design. Bull Pol Ac Sci Tech Sci 58(1):43–50Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Raibert M, Blankespoor K, Nelson G, Playter R (2008) Bigdog, the rough-terrain quadruped robot. In: Proceedings of the 17th World Congress, pp 10823–10825Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sugumar SJ, Jayaparvathy R (2013) An early warning system for elephant intrusion along the forest border areas. Curr Sci 104(11):1515–1526Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen J, Dixon WE, Dawson M, McIntyre M (2006) Homography-based visual servo tracking control of a wheeled mobile robot. IEEE Trans Robot 22(2):406–415Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Solid Works (2011) User guideGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dahari M, Tan JD (2011) Forward and inverse kinematics model for robotic welding process using KR-16KS KUKA robot. In: Modeling, simulation and applied optimization (ICMSAO), 4th international conference on IEEE, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Denavit J (1955) A kinematic notation for lower-pair mechanisms based on matrices. Transaction of the ASME. J Appl Mech 22:215–221MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kucuk S, Bingul Z (2006) Robot kinematics: forward and inverse kinematics. Industrial robotics theory modeling & control. ARS/pIV, Germany, pp 117–148Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Calderon CA, Alfaro EMRP, Gan JQ, Hu H (2004) Trajectory generation and tracking of a 5-DOF robotic arm. ControlGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang, H, Qi Z, Xu G, Xi F, Hu G, Huang Z (2010) Kinematics analysis and motion simulation of a quadruped walking robot with parallel leg mechanism. Open Mech Engg J 4(1):77–85Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kozłowski K, Pazderski D (2004) Modeling and control of a 4-wheel skid-steering mobile robot. Int J Appl Math Comp Sci 14:477–496MATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kumar U, Sukavanam N (2007) Dynamic modeling and tracking control of a four wheeled nonholonomic mobile robot. In: 13th national conference on mechanics and machines (NaCoMM07), December 12–13Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee D, Martinez-Palafox O, Spong MW (2006) Bilateral teleoperation of a wheeled mobile robot over delayed communication network. In: Robotics and Automation, ICRA, Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation Orlando, pp 3298–3303Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rong X, Song R, Li B (2012) Simulation for sagittal plane motions of a quadruped robot using MATLAB and Simulink. J Info Comput Sci 9(8):2165–2173Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Alshamasin MS, Ionescu F, Al-Kasasbeh RT (2012) Modeling and simulation of a SCARA robot using solid dynamics and verification by MATLAB/Simulink. Int J Model Identif Control 15(1):28–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISAROB 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Coimbatore Institute of TechnologyCoimbatoreIndia
  2. 2.SSN College of EngineeringChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations