Abstract
We propose a kind of self-amendment game, Minimum Nomic, as a model to study rule dynamics. Nomic is a game in which changing a rule of the game is a move. Minimum Nomic is a reduced version of the original Nomic, which keeps the essence but promotes the evolvability of the self-amendment game. We discuss the characteristics of Minimum Nomic from the viewpoint of how the changeability of the rules and the durability of the games change with the progress of the game. By analyzing the dynamics of purpose and goals, and the self-referential property in observations of the games played, we claim that Minimum Nomic is an interesting tool to study rule dynamics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hashimoto T (2007) Three undecomposabilities in complex systems. European Conference on Complex Systems (ECCS’07), Dresden, October 1–5
Odling-Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman MW (2003) Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Suber P (1990) The paradox of self-amendment. A study of logic, law, omnipotence, and change. Peter Lang, New York
Hofstadter DR (1985) Metamagical themas: questing for the essence of mind and pattern: Basic Books, New York
Juul J (2003) The game, the player, the world: looking for a heart of gameness. In: Level Up: Digital Games Research Conference Proceedings, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, pp 30–45. http://www.digra.org/dl
Hofstadter DR (1979) Gödel, Escher, Bach: an eternal golden braid. Basic Books, New York
Kim SJ, Aizawa Y (1999) Synchronization phenomena in rule dynamical systems. Prog Theor Phys 102:729–748
Namikawa J, Hashimoto T (2004) Dynamics and computation in functional shifts. Nonlineality 17:1317–1336
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was presented in part at the 13th International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics, Oita, Japan, January 31–February 2, 2008
About this article
Cite this article
Hatakeyama, M., Hashimoto, T. Minimum Nomic: a tool for studying rule dynamics. Artif Life Robotics 13, 500–503 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-008-0605-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-008-0605-6