Abstract
The community of software testing and that of protocol testing are traditionally disjoint. It is seldom the case that protocol testing experts present papers at the large software testing conferences and vice versa. This raises the question about the peculiarities of protocol testing with respect to general software testing. Here we will examine those peculiarities and the consequences in terms of specific methodology developed for protocol testing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ITU-T, Geneva, Switzerland (1999) Specification and description language (SDL). ITU-T Recommendation Z.100
Ellsberger J, Hogrefe D, Sarma A (1997) SDL – object oriented language for communication systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
ITU-T, Geneva, Switzerland (1999) Message sequence charts (MSC). ITU-T Recommendation Z.100
Grabowski J, Hogrefe D (1999) An introduction to TTCN-3. Proceedings of the 12th IFIP international workshop on testing communicating systems (IWTCS’99). Kluwer, Budapest
ETSI (2002) Methods for testing and specification (MTS). The tree and tabular combined notation version 3. TTCN-3. ES/MTS-00063, Sophia Antipolis, France
ISO/IEC (1989) Information technology – OSI conformance testing methodology and framework. International Standard IS 9646
John Larmouth (1999) ASN.1 complete. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco
ITU-T (2000) Encoding control notation (ECN), Rec. X.692. Geneva, Switzerland
Schmitt M, Grabowski J, Hogrefe D, Koch B, Ek A (1998) Autolink – putting SDL-based test generation into practice. In: Proceedings of the 11th international IFIP workshop on testing of communicating systems (IWTCS’98), Tomsk, Russia, August 1998
http://www.etsi.org/frameset/home.htm?/pressroom/ Previous/2002/MTS_IPT.htm
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hogrefe, D. Main issues in protocol testing. STTT 4, 397–400 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10009-003-0109-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10009-003-0109-6