Abstract
Oxygen evolution reaction (OER) at flow-through porous anode was simulated with the aid of a mathematical model. The OER was assumed to be the only reaction that takes place at the electrode. The model accounts for effects of the kinetics, ohmic, hydrodynamics, and structural parameters and bubble formation on the potential and current distributions within the electrode and on the overall performance of the electrode. The latter was evaluated via interpretation of the polarization curves of the OER at the porous anode. The model results were discussed in the light of some controlling dimensionless groups. The conductivities of both the electrolyte and the solid matrix have dramatic effects on the general behavior of the porous anode, and lower performance of the electrode was observed when both and/or one of them have limited conductivity values. The electrode potential, and hence the power required to attain a specific current (rate), is highly dependent on the degree of bubble formation within the bed matrix. The model predictions were compared with collected experimental data of OER from flowing sulfuric acid solution at Pt-loaded reticulated vitreous carbon. Good agreements were obtained at the employed experimental conditions. The present work helped to understand the anode performance for further application for simultaneous gas evolution, e.g., O2 and O3 gases.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10008-006-0227-7/MediaObjects/10008_2006_227_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10008-006-0227-7/MediaObjects/10008_2006_227_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10008-006-0227-7/MediaObjects/10008_2006_227_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10008-006-0227-7/MediaObjects/10008_2006_227_Fig4_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10008-006-0227-7/MediaObjects/10008_2006_227_Fig5_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10008-006-0227-7/MediaObjects/10008_2006_227_Fig6_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10008-006-0227-7/MediaObjects/10008_2006_227_Fig7_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10008-006-0227-7/MediaObjects/10008_2006_227_Fig8_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10008-006-0227-7/MediaObjects/10008_2006_227_Fig9_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Devan S, Subramanian VR, White RE (2004) J Electrochem Soc 151:A905
Du CY, Cheng XQ, Yang T, Yin GP, Shi PF (2005) Electrochem Commun 7:1411
Pilone D, Kelsall GH (2006) J Electrochem Soc 153:D85
Friedrich JM, Ponce-de-Leon CG, Reads W, Walsh FC (2004) J Electroanal Chem 151:203
Yu H, Scott K (2004) Electrochem Commun 6:361
Saleh MM (1999) Electrochim Acta 45:959
Dukovic J, Tobias CW (1987) J Electrochem Soc 134:331
Gorodetskii VV, Russ (2003) J Electrochem Soc 39:650
Kraft A, Stadelmann M, Wunsche M, Blaschke M (2006) Electrochem Commun 8:883
Fujimura K, Izumiy K, Kawashima A, Akiuama E, Habazaki E, Kumagai N (1999) J Appl Electrochem 29:765
Pilalla AS, Cobo EO, Duarte ME, Salinas DR (1997) J Appl Electrochem 27:1283
Santana MHP, Silva LMD, De Faria LA, Boodts JFC (2003) Electrochim Acta 49:1935
Comninellis C, Vercesi GP (1991) J Appl Electrochem 21:335
Tatapudi P, Fenton JM (1994) J Electrochem Soc 141:1174
Wang YH, Cheng S, Chan K, Li XY (2005) J Electrochem Soc 152:D197
Saleh MM, Awad MI, Ohsaka T (2006) Electrochim Acta 51:6331
Huet F, Musiani M, Nogueira RP (2004) J Solid State Electrochem 8:786
Heidrich H, Muller L, Polovchenko BI (1990) J Appl Electrochem 20:686
Waraksa CC, Chen G, Macdonald DD (2003) J Electrochem Soc 150:E429
Ateya GB, El-Anadouli B (1991) J Electrochem Soc 138:1331
Saleh MM, Weidner JW, Ateya BG (1995) J Electrochem Soc 142:4113
Silva LMD, Franco DV, Forti JC, Jardim WF, Boodts JFC (2006) J Appl Electrochem 36:523
Katsuki N, Takahashi E, Toyoda M, Kurosu T, Lida M, J Electrochem Soc 145:2358
Duan T, Weidner JW, White RE (2002) J Power Sources 107:24
Pavlov P, Monahov B (1996) J Electrochem Soc 143:3616
Silva LMD, De Faria LA, Boodts JFC (2003) Electrochim Acta 48:699
Bard AJ, Faulkner LR (1980) Electrochemical methods. Wiley, New York, p 96
Devan S, Subramanian VR, White RE (2004) J Electrochem Soc 151:A905
Meredith RE, Tobias CW (1962) In: Gerischer H, Tobias CW (eds) Conduction in heterogeneous systems. Advances in electrochemistry and electrochemical engineering, vol 2. Wiley, New York, pp 17–48
Doherty T, Sunderland JG, Roberts EPL, Pickett DJ (1996) Electrochim Acta 41:519
Newman J (1991) Electrochemical systems, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, p 552
Alkire R, Gracon B (1975) J Electrochem Soc 122:1594
Trainham JA, Newman J (1977) J Electrochem Soc 124:1528
Saleh MM (2004) J Phys Chem B 108:13419
Trainham JA, Newman J (1978) J Electrochem Soc 125:58
Cheng CY, Kelsall GH, Pilone D (2005) J Appl Electrochem 35:1191
Dobos D (1975) Electrochemical data. Elsevier, New York, p 512
Jiang J, Yi B (2005) J Electroanal Chem 577:107
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saleh, M.M. Simulation of oxygen evolution reaction at porous anode from flowing electrolytes. J Solid State Electrochem 11, 811–820 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-006-0227-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-006-0227-7