Abstract
Objective
To histologically analyze the effect of a curettage of the granulation tissue on healing at implants installed immediately after the extraction of teeth presenting periapical lesions.
Material and methods
In seven dogs, the dental pulp was removed from the pulp chamber and from the root canals of the right and left third and the fourth mandibular premolars and of the left second premolar. The chambers were left opened and, after 3 months, apical lesions were present, and the premolars were extracted. One alveolus each premolar was selected and, before implant installation, the apical lesions of two alveoli were curetted (curettage group) while the other three were not treated (no-treatment group). The second right premolar was also extracted (Negative control group). Six implants each dog were installed, and a fully submerged healing was allowed. Four months after, biopsies were collected, and histological analyses were performed.
Results
The proportions of new bone at the entire body of the implant was 70.2 ± 10.7% at the no-treatment group, 72.1 ± 14.8% at the curettage group, and 69.6 ± 3.7% at the negative control group. The respective new bone proportion at the apical aspect of the implants was 68.4 ± 17.5%, 61.5 ± 27.3%, and 78.1 ± 5.7%. None of the differences among the various groups were statistically significant. No inflammatory infiltrates were seen in the apical region.
Conclusions
In this experimental study, it is concluded that the removal of the granulation tissue seems not to be necessary to obtain a proper osseointegration of implants installed immediately after the extraction of teeth presenting a periapical lesion.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Polizzi G, Grunder U, Goené R, Hatano N, Henry P, Jackson WJ, Kawamura K, Renouard F, Rosenberg R, Triplett G, Werbitt M, Lithner B (2000) Immediate and delayed implant placement into extraction sockets: a 5-year report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2(2):93–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00111.x
Botticelli D, Renzi A, Lindhe J, Berglundh T (2008) Implants in fresh extraction sockets: a prospective 5-year follow-up clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 19(12):1226–1232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01620.x
Chrcanovic BR, Martins MD, Wennerberg A (2015) Immediate placement of implants into infected sites: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 17(Suppl 1):e1–e16. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12098
Zuffetti F, Capelli M, Galli F, Del Fabbro M, Testori T (2017) Post-extraction implant placement into infected versus non-infected sites: a multicenter retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 19(5):833–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12523
Lefever D, Van Assche N, Temmerman A, Teughels W, Quirynen M (2013) Aetiology, microbiology and therapy of periapical lesions around oral implants: a retrospective analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 40(3):296–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12045
Crespi R, Capparé P, Crespi G, Lo Giudice G, Gastaldi G, Gherlone E (2017) Immediate implant placement in sockets with asymptomatic apical periodontitis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 19(1):20–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12422
Novaes AB Jr, Vidigal Júnior GM, Novaes AB, Grisi MF, Polloni S, Rosa A (1998) Immediate implants placed into infected sites: a histomorphometric study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 13(3):422–427
Caneva M, Lang NP, Calvo Guirado JL, Spriano S, Iezzi G, Botticelli D (2015) Bone healing at bicortically installed implants with different surface configurations. An experimental study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res. 26(3):293–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12475
Chang SW, Shin SY, Hong JR, Yang SM, Yoo HM, Park DS, Oh TS, Kye SB (2009) Immediate implant placement into infected and noninfected extraction sockets: a pilot study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 107(2):197–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.06.003
Fugazzotto PA (2012) A retrospective analysis of implants immediately placed in sites with and without periapical pathology in sixty-four patients. J Periodontol. 83(2):182–186. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2011.110016
Casap N, Zeltser C, Wexler A, Tarazi E, Zeltser R (2007) Immediate placement of dental implants into debrided infected dentoalveolar sockets. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 65(3):384–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.02.031
Waasdorp JA, Evian CI, Mandracchia M (2010) Immediate placement of implants into infected sites: a systematic review of the literature. J Periodontol. 81(6):801–808. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.090706
Chen H, Zhang G, Weigl P, Gu X (2018) Immediate placement of dental implants into infected versus noninfected sites in the esthetic zone: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 120(5):658–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.12.008
Saijeva A, Juodzbalys G (2020) Immediate implant placement in non-infected sockets versus infected sockets: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Res 11(2):e1. Published 2020 Jun 30. https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2020.11201
Quirynen M, Vogels R, Alsaadi G, Naert I, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D (2005) Predisposing conditions for retrograde peri-implantitis, and treatment suggestions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 16(5):599–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01147.x
Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Blaya-Tárraga JA, Menéndez-Nieto I, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Peñarrocha-Diago M (2020) Factors associated with early apical peri-implantitis: a retrospective study covering a 20-year period. Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 13(1):65–73
Botticelli D, Lang NP (2017) Dynamics of osseointegration in various human and animal models - a comparative analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 28(6):742–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12872
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. Karol Alí Apaza Alccayhuaman (KAAA) for the time spent for the radiographic measurements.
Funding
The experiment was economically supported by Sweden & Martina, Due Carrare, PD, Italy, and by ARDEC Academy, Rimini, Italy. The implants were provided free of charge by Sweden & Martina.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Informed consent
This article does not contain any studies with human participants
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rea, M., Bengazi, F., Velez, J.U. et al. Implants placed into alveoli with periapical lesions: an experimental study in dogs. Oral Maxillofac Surg 25, 351–357 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-020-00926-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-020-00926-8