Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to compare the quality of free autogenous bone grafts harvested from two different mandibular donor sites, used as onlay shells to augment horizontally and vertically deficient anterior maxillary alveolar ridges.
Methods
Fourteen patients with edentulous and atrophic anterior maxillae are randomly allocated into two groups. Seven symphyseal chin (group I) and seven retromolar (group II) mandibular bone grafts were harvested and fashioned to construct buccal and palatal frameworks, fixed in place with mini-screws, followed by compacting the inter-positional gaps with an equal particulate mix of xenograft and autogenous cancellous particulates. Six months later, 42 core biopsies, three from each patient, 21 for each study group, were retrieved before the implants’ insertion and subjected to histomorphometric bone area percent analysis.
Results
The bone area percent of the newly formed bone augmented with the chin shells was 52.53 ± 1.68% versus 47.97 ± 1.83% for the retromolar grafts. The mean area percent difference between both groups was statistically significant (p = 0.0004).
Conclusion
A higher bone quality and more volumetric stability were associated with the symphyseal cortical shells.
Clinical trial registration
The study was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov (#: NCT03607006) in July 2018 by Ola Alaa El Morsy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CBCT:
-
cone beam computed tomography
- EDTA:
-
ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
- H&E:
-
hematoxylin and eosin stain
References
Nguyen TTH, Eo MY, Kuk TS, Myoung H, Kim SM (2019 Mar 19) Rehabilitation of atrophic jaw using iliac onlay bone graft combined with dental implants. Int J Implant Dent 5(1):11
Myeroff C, Archdeacon M (2011) Autogenous bone graft: donor sites and techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(23):2227–2236
Higgins TF, Marchand LS (2018) Basic science and clinical application of reamed sources for autogenous bone graft harvest. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 26(12):420–428
Pape HC, Evans A, Kobbe P (2010) Autologous bone graft: properties and techniques. J Orthop Trauma 24(Suppl 1):S36–S40
Marx RE (2007) Bone and bone graft healing. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 19(4):455–466 v
Solheim E, Pinholt EM, Talsnes O, Larsen TB, Kirkeby OJ (1995) Bone formation in cranial, mandibular, tibial, and iliac bone grafts in rats. J Craniofac Surg 6(2):139–142
Khoury F, Ponte A (2004) The three-dimensional reconstruction of the alveolar crest with mandibular bone block graft: a clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19:795–766
Pikos MA (2000) Block autografts for localized ridge augmentation: part II. The posterior mandible. Implant Dent 9:67–75
Khoury F, Khoury CH (2006) Mandibular bone block grafts: instrumentation, harvesting technique, and application. J Par Impl Orale 25:15–34
Schmitt CM, Moest T, Lutz R et al (2015) Anorganic bovine bone (ABB) vs. autologous bone (AB) plus ABB in maxillary sinus grafting. A prospective nonrandomized clinical and histomorphometrical trial. Clin Oral Impl Res 26:1043–1050
Matić S, Vucković C, Lesić A et al (2020) Pedicled vascularized bone grafts compared with xenografts in the treatment of scaphoid nonunion. Int Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04828-y
Khoury F, Hanser T (2015) Mandibular bone block harvesting from the retromolar region: a 10-year prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 30(3):688–697
Khoury F, Hanser T (2019) Three-dimensional vertical alveolar ridge augmentation in the posterior maxilla: a 10-year clinical study. Int J OralMaxillofac Implants 34:471–480
Zeltner M, Flückiger L, Hämmerle B et al (2016) Volumetric analysis of chin and mandibular retromolar region as donor sites for cortico-cancellous bone blocks. Clin Oral Implants Res 27(8):999–1004
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge Noura M. Kamal, Assistant Lecturer of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, for her help in the statistical analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
1. Mohamed Mounir: the leading operator in all the cases and assisted in the writing of the manuscript.
2. Ola Alaa: assisted in the operative work and the writing of the manuscript.
3. Samy Mounir: assisted in the operative work and the writing of the manuscript.
4. Hatem Amer: the histology sample work and assisted in the writing of the manuscript.
5. Amr Gibaly: the corresponding author, assisted in the operative work and writing of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The ethics and research committee of the Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, authorized both the purpose and design of the study. The clinical trial was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov (registration number NCT03607006).
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. All the patients were informed clearly about the study’s nature and the expected outcomes of the surgical interference as well as the related complications before obtaining the written informed consents.
Approval of final manuscript
All authors discussed and approved the final form of the manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
ESM 1
(DOCX 27 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mounir, M., Morsy, O.A.E., Amer, H. et al. Assessment of bone quality using buccal and palatal autogenous cortical shells harvested from two different mandibular donor sites for maxillary alveolar ridge augmentation: a histomorphometric randomized clinical trial. Oral Maxillofac Surg 25, 263–269 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-020-00924-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-020-00924-w