Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of bone quality using buccal and palatal autogenous cortical shells harvested from two different mandibular donor sites for maxillary alveolar ridge augmentation: a histomorphometric randomized clinical trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to compare the quality of free autogenous bone grafts harvested from two different mandibular donor sites, used as onlay shells to augment horizontally and vertically deficient anterior maxillary alveolar ridges.

Methods

Fourteen patients with edentulous and atrophic anterior maxillae are randomly allocated into two groups. Seven symphyseal chin (group I) and seven retromolar (group II) mandibular bone grafts were harvested and fashioned to construct buccal and palatal frameworks, fixed in place with mini-screws, followed by compacting the inter-positional gaps with an equal particulate mix of xenograft and autogenous cancellous particulates. Six months later, 42 core biopsies, three from each patient, 21 for each study group, were retrieved before the implants’ insertion and subjected to histomorphometric bone area percent analysis.

Results

The bone area percent of the newly formed bone augmented with the chin shells was 52.53 ± 1.68% versus 47.97 ± 1.83% for the retromolar grafts. The mean area percent difference between both groups was statistically significant (p = 0.0004).

Conclusion

A higher bone quality and more volumetric stability were associated with the symphyseal cortical shells.

Clinical trial registration

The study was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov (#: NCT03607006) in July 2018 by Ola Alaa El Morsy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CBCT:

cone beam computed tomography

EDTA:

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

H&E:

hematoxylin and eosin stain

References

  1. Nguyen TTH, Eo MY, Kuk TS, Myoung H, Kim SM (2019 Mar 19) Rehabilitation of atrophic jaw using iliac onlay bone graft combined with dental implants. Int J Implant Dent 5(1):11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Myeroff C, Archdeacon M (2011) Autogenous bone graft: donor sites and techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(23):2227–2236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Higgins TF, Marchand LS (2018) Basic science and clinical application of reamed sources for autogenous bone graft harvest. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 26(12):420–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pape HC, Evans A, Kobbe P (2010) Autologous bone graft: properties and techniques. J Orthop Trauma 24(Suppl 1):S36–S40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Marx RE (2007) Bone and bone graft healing. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 19(4):455–466 v

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Solheim E, Pinholt EM, Talsnes O, Larsen TB, Kirkeby OJ (1995) Bone formation in cranial, mandibular, tibial, and iliac bone grafts in rats. J Craniofac Surg 6(2):139–142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Khoury F, Ponte A (2004) The three-dimensional reconstruction of the alveolar crest with mandibular bone block graft: a clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19:795–766

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pikos MA (2000) Block autografts for localized ridge augmentation: part II. The posterior mandible. Implant Dent 9:67–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Khoury F, Khoury CH (2006) Mandibular bone block grafts: instrumentation, harvesting technique, and application. J Par Impl Orale 25:15–34

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schmitt CM, Moest T, Lutz R et al (2015) Anorganic bovine bone (ABB) vs. autologous bone (AB) plus ABB in maxillary sinus grafting. A prospective nonrandomized clinical and histomorphometrical trial. Clin Oral Impl Res 26:1043–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Matić S, Vucković C, Lesić A et al (2020) Pedicled vascularized bone grafts compared with xenografts in the treatment of scaphoid nonunion. Int Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04828-y

  12. Khoury F, Hanser T (2015) Mandibular bone block harvesting from the retromolar region: a 10-year prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 30(3):688–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Khoury F, Hanser T (2019) Three-dimensional vertical alveolar ridge augmentation in the posterior maxilla: a 10-year clinical study. Int J OralMaxillofac Implants 34:471–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zeltner M, Flückiger L, Hämmerle B et al (2016) Volumetric analysis of chin and mandibular retromolar region as donor sites for cortico-cancellous bone blocks. Clin Oral Implants Res 27(8):999–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Noura M. Kamal, Assistant Lecturer of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, for her help in the statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

1. Mohamed Mounir: the leading operator in all the cases and assisted in the writing of the manuscript.

2. Ola Alaa: assisted in the operative work and the writing of the manuscript.

3. Samy Mounir: assisted in the operative work and the writing of the manuscript.

4. Hatem Amer: the histology sample work and assisted in the writing of the manuscript.

5. Amr Gibaly: the corresponding author, assisted in the operative work and writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amr Gibaly.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The ethics and research committee of the Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, authorized both the purpose and design of the study. The clinical trial was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov (registration number NCT03607006).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. All the patients were informed clearly about the study’s nature and the expected outcomes of the surgical interference as well as the related complications before obtaining the written informed consents.

Approval of final manuscript

All authors discussed and approved the final form of the manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(DOCX 27 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mounir, M., Morsy, O.A.E., Amer, H. et al. Assessment of bone quality using buccal and palatal autogenous cortical shells harvested from two different mandibular donor sites for maxillary alveolar ridge augmentation: a histomorphometric randomized clinical trial. Oral Maxillofac Surg 25, 263–269 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-020-00924-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-020-00924-w

Keywords

Navigation