What is the relapse after Le Fort I maxillary advancement in cleft lip and palate patients? A systematic review

Abstract

Le Fort I osteotomy is the most common procedure for maxillary advancement in cleft patients, and a significant relapse is expected in the postoperative period. This study purpose is to evaluate the maxillary relapse and associated factors in cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients submitted to standard Le Fort I advancement. This systematic review sought studies in PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane and included papers that evaluated the maxillary relapse with at least 1-year postoperative period. The quality assessment was adapted following PRISMA statement. The initial electronic search found 345 papers, and the final selection included 10 studies. In total, 275 CLP patients were evaluated 198 had unilateral CLP and 41 had bilateral CLP. Isolated maxillary advancement was performed in 166 patients, while 109 had bimaxillary surgery. The mean relapse in horizontal and vertical plane was 1.2 mm (19.7%) and 1.0 mm (29.4%), respectively. In conclusion, a relapse after maxillary advancement in patients with CLP is expected, being higher in vertical plane. Patients with UCLP and those who underwent bimaxillary surgery had a higher relapse rate. Due to the miscellaneous data and methodologies, future prospective clinical trials should apply rigorous selection of CLP patients sample and methods for variable analysis to obtain more accurate results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

References

  1. 1.

    Tolarova MM, Cervenka J (1998) Classification and birth prevalence of orofacial clefts. Am J Med Genet 75(2):126–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Costello B, Ruiz R (2009) Comprehensive management of facial clefts. In: turvey t, editor. Oral and maxillofacial surgery - St Louis (Mo): Saunders Elsevier 2nd edition;3:713–34

  3. 3.

    Gorlin RJ, Cohen Jr MM, Hennekam RC (2001) Syndromes of the head and neck. Oxford university press; 27

  4. 4.

    James JN, Costello BJ, Ruiz RL (2014) Management of cleft lip and palate and cleft orthognathic considerations. Oral Maxillofacial Surg Clin N Am 26(4):565–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Semb G, Shaw WC (1998) Facial growth after different methods of surgical intervention in patients with cleft lip and palate. Acta Odontol Scand 56(6):352–355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Russell K, Long RE, Hathaway R, Daskalo-Giannakis J, Mercado A, Cohen M et al (2011) The Americleft study: an inter-center study of treatment outcomes for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Part 5. General discussion and conclusions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 48:265–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Obwegeser H (1962) Chirugia dell “mordex apparatus.”. Rev Asoc Odontol Argent 50:429

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Yamaguchi K, Lonic D, Lo LJ (2016) Complications following orthognathic surgery for patients with cleft lip/palate: a systematic review. J Formos Med Assoc 115(4):269–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Wong FX, Heggie AA, Shand JM, Schneider PM (2016) Skeletal stability of maxillary advancement with and without a mandibular reduction in the cleft lip and palate patient. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45(12):1501–1507

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Posnick JC, Ewing MP (1990) Skeletal stability after Le Fort I maxillary advancement in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 85(5):706–710

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hirano A, Suzuki H (2001) Factors related to relapse after Le Fort I maxillary advancement osteotomy in patients with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 38(1):1–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Dowling PA, Espeland L, Sandvik L, Mobarak KA, Hogevold HE (2005) Le Fort I maxillary advancement: 3-year stability and risk factors for relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 128(5):560–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Heliövaara A, Ranta R, Hukki J et al (2001) Skeletal stability of Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 35(1):43–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hoffman GR, Brennan PA (2004) The skeletal stability of one-piece Le Fort I osteotomy to advance the maxilla; part 1. Stability resulting from non- bone grafted rigid fixation. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42(3):221–225

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Costa F, Robiony M, Zorzan E, Zerman N, Politi M (2006) Stability of skeletal class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: titanium versus resorbable plates and screws for maxillary fixation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64(4):642–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Posnick JC, Dagys AP (1994) Skeletal stability and relapse patterns after Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy fixed with miniplates: the unilateral cleft lip and palate deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 94(7):924–932

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Prisma Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Higgins JPT, Green S (2011) Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1. 0

  19. 19.

    Ayliffe PR, Banks P, Martin IC (1995) Stability of the Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with cleft lip and palate. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 24(3):201–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Heliövaara A, Ranta R, Hukki J, Rintala A (2002) Skeletal stability of Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with isolated cleft palate and bilateral cleft lip and palate. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 31(4):358–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Landes CA, Ballon A (2006) Five-year experience comparing resorbable to titanium miniplate osteosynthesis in cleft lip and palate orthognathic surgery. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 43(1):67–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Watts GD, Antonarakis GS, Forrest CR, Tompson BD, Phillips JH (2014) Single versus segmental maxillary osteotomies and long-term stability in unilateral cleft lip and palate related malocclusion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 72(12):2514–2521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Séblain D, Bourlet J, Sigaux N, Khonsari RH, Picard JC, Gleizal A (2018) Minimally invasive versus standard approach in Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with history of cleft lip and palate. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 119(3):187–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Chua HD, Hägg MB, Cheung LK (2010) Cleft maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery—which one is more stable in 5 years. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109(6):803–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Cheung LK, Chua HD, Hägg MB (2006) Cleft maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery: clinical morbidities and surgical relapse. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(4):996–1008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Saltaji H, Major MP, Alfakir H, Al-Saleh MA, Flores-Mir C (2012) Maxillary advancement with conventional orthognathic surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate: is it a stable technique? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70(12):2859–2866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Thongdee P, Samman N (2005) Stability of maxillary surgical movement in unilateral cleft lip and palate with preceding alveolar bone grafting. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 42(6):664–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Epker BN, Fish LC (1986) Dentofacial Deformities. Integrated Orthodontic and Surgical Correction. Vol. 1. Simultaneous maxillary advancement and mandibular setback. St. Louis: Mosby:526–540

  29. 29.

    Herber SC, Lehman JA (1993) Orthognathic surgery in the cleft lip and palate patient. Clin Plast Surg 20(4):755–768

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wolford LM, Chemello PD, Hilliard FW (1994) Occlusal plane alteration in orthognathic surgery—part I: effects on function and esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 106(3):304–316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Delcampe P, Duret A, Peron JM (2007) Maxillary sequels in labial-alveolar-velopalatine clefts. The role of orthognathic surgery. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 108(4):306–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Zheng Y, Yin N, Jiang C, Song T (2018) Horizontal maxillary osteotomy stability using mandibular outer cortex bone grafts in patients with cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac Surg 29(7):1747–1750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kuvat SV, Çizmeci O, Biçer A, Marşan G, Hocaoğlu E, Bilgiç B, Emekli U (2009) Improving bony stability in maxillofacial surgery: use of osteogenetic materials in patients with profound (≥ 5 mm) maxillary advancement, a clinical study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet 62(5):639–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Araujo A, Schendel SA, Wolford LM, Epker BN (1978) Total maxillary advancement with and without bone grafting. J Oral Surg (American Dental Association: 1965) 36(11):849–858

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Posnick JC, Sami A (2015) Use of allogenic (iliac) corticocancellous graft for Le Fort I interpositional defects: technique and results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 73(1):168–1e1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Eser C, Gencel E, Gokdogan M, Kesiktas E, Yavuz M (2015) Comparison of autologous and heterologous bone graft stability effects for filling maxillary bone gap after Le Fort I osteotomy. Adv Clin Exp Med 24(2):341–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ragaey M, Van Sickels JE (2017) Prevalence of infection with the use of β-tricalcium phosphate as a bone graft substitute during Le Fort I osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46(1):62–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bibiana Dalsasso Velasques.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Patient consent

Not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 16 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 17 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Velasques, B.D., Moura, L.B., Martins, J.R. et al. What is the relapse after Le Fort I maxillary advancement in cleft lip and palate patients? A systematic review. Oral Maxillofac Surg (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-020-00906-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cleft
  • Relapse
  • Stability
  • Maxillary osteotomy