Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is dipyrone effective as a preemptive analgesic in third molar surgery? A pilot study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Studies on preemptive analgesia in maxillofacial surgery have shown several controversial clinical results, mainly due to the absence of a methodological standard, besides a wide variety of studied drugs. This study intended to answer the following hypothesis: Is the administration of dipyrone preemptively capable of decreasing trans- and postoperative pain in the third molar surgical extraction?

Methods

A pilot prospective double-blind placebo-controlled study was carried out with 25 patients submitted to the third molar surgical extraction at two moments, one side in each intervention. Dipyrone (1 g) was preemptively administered (study group) for the extraction of two third molars on the same side and, in a second surgical procedure, dipyrone (1 g) was administered in the immediate postoperative period (control group). Evaluated variables were the amount of anesthetic, pain perceived through the visual analogue scale (VAS) in transoperative and immediate postoperative periods, and over 12-h investigation period, analgesic consumption, duration of surgery, and time to rescue analgesia.

Results

The results were submitted to Student’s t test and statistical differences were observed in transoperative (p < 0.05) and immediate postoperative (p < 0.01) periods, while the other studied variables did not present statistical differences.

Conclusion

The preemptive administration of dipyrone decreased the perception of transoperative and immediate postoperative pain when compared to its use after surgery only.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bromley L (2006) Pre-emptive analgesia and protective premedication. What is the difference? Biomed Pharmacother 60(7):336–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2006.06.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gottschalk A, Smith DS (2001) New concepts in acute pain therapy: preemptive analgesia. Am Fam Physician 63(10):1979–1984

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bauer HC, Duarte FL, Horliana AC, Tortamano IP, Perez FE, Simone JL, Jorge WA (2013) Assessment of preemptive analgesia with ibuprofen coadministered or not with dexamethasone in third molar surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial. Oral Maxillofac Surg 17(3):165–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-012-0360-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ong CKS, Lirk P, Seymour RA, Jenkins BJ (2005) The efficacy of preemptive analgesia for acute postoperative pain management: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 100(3):757–773. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ANE.0000144428.98767.0E

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Savage MG, Henry MA, Colo D (2004) Preoperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents: review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 98(2):146–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.01.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jung YS, Kim MK, Um YJ, Park HS, Lee EW, Kang JW (2005) The effects on postoperative oral surgery pain by varying NSAID administration times: comparison on effect of preemptive analgesia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 100(5):559–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.02.065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gutta R, Koehn CR, James LE (2013) Does ketorolac have a preemptive analgesic effect? A randomized, double-blind, control study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 71(12):2029–2034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2013.06.220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cavalcanti IL, Cantinho FAF, Assad A. Medicina Perioperatória (2006). Rio de Janeiro: Sociedade de Anestesiologia do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, 1107–23

  9. Neupert EA, Lee JW, Philput CB, Gordon JR (1992) Evaluation of dexamethasone for reduction of postsurgical sequelae of third molar removal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50(11):1177–1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(92)90149-T

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Alcantara CEP, Falci SGM, Ferreira FO, Santos CRR, Pinheiro MLP (2014) Pre-emptive effect of dexamethasone and methylprednisolone on pain, swelling, and trismus after third molar surgery: a split-mouth randomized triple-blind clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43(1):93–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2013.05.016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ong KS, Seymour RA, Chen FG, Ho VCL (2004) Preoperative ketorolac has a preemptive effect for postoperative third molar surgical pain. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 33(8):771–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2004.01.020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ong KS, Tan JML (2004) Preoperative intravenous tramadol versus ketorolac for preventing postoperative pain after third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 33(3):274–278. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijom.2003.0515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaczmarzyk T, Wichlinski J, Stypulkowska J, Zaleska M, Woron J (2010) Preemptive effect of ketoprofen on postoperative pain following third molar surgery. A prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39(7):647–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2010.02.019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bridgman JB, Gillgrass TG, Zacharias M (1996) The absence of any pre-emptive analgesic effect for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 34(5):428–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-4356(96)90101-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fábio Ricardo Loureiro Sato.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Favarini, V.T., Lima, C.A.A., da Silva, R.A. et al. Is dipyrone effective as a preemptive analgesic in third molar surgery? A pilot study. Oral Maxillofac Surg 22, 71–75 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-018-0669-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-018-0669-y

Keywords

Navigation