Skip to main content
Log in

Radiographic evaluation of condylar positioning in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate alterations in condylar positioning through submentovertex projection (Hirtz Radiographic Technique) in patients who underwent orthognathic surgery for maxillary advancement and mandibular setback with stable internal fixation.

Methods

A prospective longitudinal clinical study of 40 surgical patients presenting dentofacial deformity admitted in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department of Federal University of Paraná (UFPR) in the period between March 2013 and December 2015. We performed two submentovertex digital radiographs, one 7 days before surgery and the other one 30 days after the procedure. Cephalometric tracings were made using Radiocef® Studio 2 Software and measured the intercondylar and condylar angles (right and left).

Results

There was a decrease in the intercondylar angle (p < 0.001) and an increase in condylar angles both the right and the left side (p < 0.001) when compared with the pre and postoperative period. There was a larger increase in condylar angle on the right side in males (p = 0.007).

Conclusion

There is a tendency of decreasing of the intercondylar angle after orthognathic surgery, regardless of the alteration in the condylar angles, creating a new position of the condyle in the glenoid fossa. Patients with asymmetry may present greater alterations in the positioning of the opposite condylar to the deviation of the mandibular midline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bettega G, Dessene V, Raphael B, Cinquin P (1996) Computer-assisted mandibular condyle positioning in orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54:553–558

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Harris MD, Van Sickels JR, Alder M (1999) Factors influencing condylar position after the bilateral sagittal slit osteotomy fixed with bicortical screws. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 57(6):650–654

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bettega G, Cinquin P, Lebeau J, RAaphael B (2002) Computer-assisted orthognathic surgery: clinical evaluation of a mandibular condyle repositioning system. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:27–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bell WH, Schendel SA (1977) Biologic basis for modification of the sagittal ramus split operation. J Oral Surg 35:362–369

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Leonard M (1976) Preventing rotation of the proximal fragment in the sagittal ramus split operation. J Oral Surg 34:942

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. EllisIII E (1994) Condylar positioning devices for orthognathic surgery: are they necessary? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52(6):536–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gerressen M, Stockbrink G, Smeets R, Riediger D, Ghassemi A (2007) Skeletal stability following bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) with and without condylar positioning device. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65:1297–1302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Costa F, Robiony M, Toro C, Sembronio S, Polini F, Politi M (2008) Condylar positioning devices for orthognathic surgery: a literature review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 106:179–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ueki K, Nakagawa K, Takatsuka S, Yamamoto E (2001) Plate fixation after mandibular osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30:490–496

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cortez ALV, Passeri LA (2007) Position after Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with asymptomatic temporomandibular joints: a prospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65:237–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nishimura SS, Iwase M, Nagumo M (1997) Positional changes in the mandibular condyle and amount of mouth opening after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with rigid or nonrigid osteosynthesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55:672–676

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim YJ, Oh KM, Hong JS, Lee JH, Kim HM, Reyes M, Cevidanes LH, Park YH (2012) Condylar positioning after jaw surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:2143–2152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baek SH, Kim TK, Kim MJ (2006) Is there any difference in the condylar position and angulation after asymmetric mandibular setback? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 101:155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee W, Park JU (2002) Three-dimensional evaluation of positional change of the condyle after mandibular setback by means of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 94:305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Choi B-J, Choi Y-H, Lee B-S, Kwon Y-D, Choo Y-J, Ohe J-Y (2014) A CBCT study on positional change in mandibular condyle according to metallic anchorage methods in skeletal class III patients after orthognathic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 42:1617–1622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ueki K, Yoshizawa K, Moroi A, Iguchi R, Kosaka A, Ikawa H, Saida Y, Hotta A, Tsutsui T (2015) Changes in computed tomography values of mandibular condyle and temporomandibular joint disc position after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 43:1208–1217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee BR, Kang DK, Son WS (2011) The relationship between condyle position morphology and chin deviation in skeletal class III patients with facial asymmetry using cone-beam CT. Korean J Orthod 41:87

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There was no source of support in the form of grants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wanderley da Silva Félix Junior.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

da Silva Félix Junior, W., Klüppel, L.E., da Costa, D.J. et al. Radiographic evaluation of condylar positioning in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg 21, 419–423 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-017-0649-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-017-0649-7

Keywords

Navigation