Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preoperative chronic sinusitis as significant cause of postoperative infection and implant loss after sinus augmentation from a lateral approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Among intra/postoperative complications of sinus augmentation from a lateral approach, postoperative infection and implant loss are particularly important because they have irreversible consequences. The purpose of this study was to determine the causes of postoperative infection and implant loss after a lateral approach and to determine the appropriate prophylaxis and therapy.

Materials and methods

In total, 109 patients (121 sinuses, 252 implants) were included in this study. The correlation between postoperative infection and implant loss and clinical variables was assessed using logistic regression analyses.

Results

Postoperative infection and implant loss occurred in 8/121 sinuses (6.6%). Infection had the strongest correlation to preoperative chronic sinusitis (p = 0.007), followed by timing of implant insertion. Implant loss had the strongest correlation to preoperative chronic sinusitis (p = 0.007), followed by sex, diabetes, postoperative use of dentures, and intraoperative perforation of the sinus membrane.

Conclusions

Preoperative chronic sinusitis could be a significant cause of postoperative infection and implant loss when using sinus augmentation from a lateral approach. For appropriate prophylaxis and therapy, it is necessary to diagnose the presence of chronic sinusitis that should be treated with proper methods prior to sinus augmentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boyne PJ, James RA (1980) Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 38:613–616

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Testori T, Weinstein RL, Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M (2012) Risk factor analysis following maxillary sinus augmentation: a retrospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27:1170–1176

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zijderveld SA, van den Bergh JP, Schulten EA, ten Bruggenkate CM (2008) Anatomical and surgical findings and complications in 100 consecutive maxillary sinus floor elevation procedures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 66:1426–1438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wallace SS, Froum SJ (2003) Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 8:328–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Del Fabbro M, Rosano G, Taschieri S (2008) Implant survival rates after maxillary sinus augmentation. Eur J Oral Sci 116:497–506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fugazzotto PA, Vlassis J (1998) Long-term success of sinus augmentation using various surgical approaches and grafting materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13:52–58

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Woo I, Le BT (2004) Maxillary sinus floor elevation: review of anatomy and two techniques. Implant Dent 13:28–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nkenke E, Stelzle F (2009) Clinical outcomes of sinus floor augmentation for implant placement using autogenous bone or bone substitutes: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 20(Suppl 4):124–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Valentini P, Abensur DJ (2003) Maxillary sinus grafting with anorganic bovine bone: a clinical report of long-term results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18:556–560

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mazor Z, Peleg M, Garg AK, Luboshitz J (2004) Platelet-rich plasma for bone graft enhancement in sinus floor augmentation with simultaneous implant placement: patient series study. Implant Dent 13:65–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Engelke W, Schwarzwaller W, Behnsen A, Jacobs HG (2003) Subantroscopic laterobasal sinus floor augmentation (SALSA): an up-to-5-year clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18:135–143

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kahnberg KE, Vannas-Lofqvist L (2008) Sinus lift procedure using a 2-stage surgical technique: I. Clinical and radiographic report up to 5 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 23:876–884

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee HW, Lin WS, Morton D (2013) A retrospective study of acmplications associated with 100 consecutive maxillary sinus augmentations via the lateral window approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28:860–868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP (2008) A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. J Clin Periodontol 35:216–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tidwell JK, Blijdorp PA, Stoelinga PJ, Brouns JB, Hinderks F (1992) Composite grafting of the maxillary sinus for placement of endosteal implants. A preliminary report of 48 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 21:204–209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J,et al (2012) European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2012. Rhinol Suppl 2012:3 p preceding table of contents, 1–298.

  17. Shimizu T, Shimizu S, Hattori R, Gabazza EC, Majima Y (2003) In vivo and in vitro effects of macrolide antibiotics on mucus secretion in airway epithelial cells. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 168:581–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kitano M, Ishinaga H, Shimizu T, Takeuchi K, Majima Y (2011) Effects of clarithromycin and dexamethasone on mucus production in isografted rat trachea. Pharmacology 87:56–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ikeda K, Tanno N, Tamura G et al (1999) Endoscopic sinus surgery improves pulmonary function in patients with asthma associated with chronic sinusitis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 108:355–359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Proimos E, Papadakis CE, Chimona TS, Kiagiadaki D, Ferekidis E, Yiotakis J (2010) The effect of functional endoscopic sinus surgery on patients with asthma and CRS with nasal polyps. Rhinology 48:331–338

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Matsuwaki Y, Ookushi T, Asaka D et al (2008) Chronic rhinosinusitis: risk factors for the recurrence of chronic rhinosinusitis based on 5-year follow-up after endoscopic sinus surgery. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 146(Suppl 1):77–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Majima Y, Kurono Y, Hirakawa K et al (2010) Reliability and validity assessments of a Japanese version of QOL 20-Item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test for chronic rhinosinusitis. Auris Nasus Larynx 37:443–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Piccirillo JF, Merritt MG Jr, Richards ML (2002) Psychometric and clinimetric validity of the 20-Item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126:41–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bradley DT, Kountakis SE (2005) Correlation between computed tomography scores and symptomatic improvement after endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 115:466–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ragab SM, Lund VJ, Scadding G (2004) Evaluation of the medical and surgical treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. Laryngoscope 114:923–930

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Felice P, Pistilli R, Piattelli M, Soardi E, Barausse C, Esposito M (2014) 1-stage versus 2-stage lateral sinus lift procedures: 1-year post-loading results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 7:65–75

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Palinkas M, Nassar MS, Cecilio FA et al (2010) Age and gender influence on maximal bite force and masticatory muscles thickness. Arch Oral Biol 55:797–802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Peleg M, Garg AK, Mazor Z (2006) Healing in smokers versus nonsmokers: survival rates for sinus floor augmentation with simultaneous implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 21:551–559

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hurzeler MB, Quinones CR, Morrison EC, Caffesse RG (1995) Treatment of peri-implantitis using guided bone regeneration and bone grafts, alone or in combination, in beagle dogs. Part 1: clinical findings and histologic observations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 10:474–484

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Moy PK, Medina D, Shetty V, Aghaloo TL (2005) Dental implant failure rates and associated risk factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 20:569–577

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tawil G, Younan R, Azar P, Sleilati G (2008) Conventional and advanced implant treatment in the type II diabetic patient: surgical protocol and long-term clinical results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 23:744–752

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hanefeld M, Temelkova-Kurktschiev T (2002) Control of post-prandial hyperglycemia—an essential part of good diabetes treatment and prevention of cardiovascular complications. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 12:98–107

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zerr KJ, Furnary AP, Grunkemeier GL et al (1997) Glucose control lowers the risk of wound infection in diabetics after open heart operations. Ann Thorac Surg 63:356–361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rassias AJ, Marrin CA, Arruda J et al (1999) Insulin infusion improves neutrophil function in diabetic cardiac surgery patients. Anesth Analg 88:1011–1016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Golden SH, Peart-Vigilance C, Kao WH et al (1999) Perioperative glycemic control and the risk of infectious complications in a cohort of adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care 22:1408–1414

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hou CJ, Liu JL, Li X et al (2012) Insulin promotes bone formation in augmented maxillary sinus in diabetic rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41:400–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Karabuda C, Arisan V, Ozyuvaci H (2006) Effects of sinus membrane perforations on the success of dental implants placed in the augmented sinus. J Periodontol 77:1991–1997

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kaptein ML, de Putter C, de Lange GL et al (1998) Survival of cylindrical implants in composite grafted maxillary sinuses. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56:1376–1380 discussion 1380-1371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masanori Sasaki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kyushu University Hospital, and all participants signed informed consent forms.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kozuma, A., Sasaki, M., Seki, K. et al. Preoperative chronic sinusitis as significant cause of postoperative infection and implant loss after sinus augmentation from a lateral approach. Oral Maxillofac Surg 21, 193–200 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-017-0611-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-017-0611-8

Keywords

Navigation