Skip to main content
Log in

Awl versus intravenous cannula stillete in circummandibular wiring—a prospective comparative study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The management of paediatric mandibular fractures using an acrylic splint is a time-tested procedure. Traditionally, an awl is used to place wires to secure such splints. In this article, we have designed prospective study to compare a new technique of using intravenous cannula stillete (IVCS) as against conventional awl in placement of the circummandibular wires.

Methods

A total of 45 patients were included in the study. Group I included 22 subjects in whom an awl was used, and group II included 23 subjects in whom IVCS was used for placement of circummandibular wires. Parameters such as post-operative pain, swelling and ease of penetration, size of entry and exit wound and injury to adjacent structures were compared.

Results

Statistically significant reduction in post-operative pain and swelling were noticed in groupie. The operating surgeons experienced greater ease in using IVCS, and the size of the entry and exit wounds were also relatively small as compared to using an awl.

Conclusion

The IVCS, which is disposable, having finer diameter, a sharp bevel and internal wire carrying capacity, clearly demonstrates statistically significant advantages over the usage of a conventional awl.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Demianczuk AN, Verchere C, Phillips JH (1999) The effect on facial growth of paediatric mandibular fractures. J Craniofac Surg 10(4):323–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Eppley BL (2005) Use of resorbable plates and screws in paediatric facial fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63:385–391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Graham GG, Peltier JR (1960) The management of mandibular fractures in children. J Oral Surg 18:416–423

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lida S, Matsuya T (2002) Paediatric maxillofacial fractures: their aetiological characters and fracture patterns. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 30(4):237–241

    Google Scholar 

  5. James D (1985) Maxillofacial injuries in children. In: Rowes NL, Jl W (eds) Maxillofacial injuries, 1st edn. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, pp 538–558

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kaban LB (2004) Facial trauma II: dentoalveolar injuries and mandibular fractures. In: Kaban LB (ed) Paediatric oral and maxillofacial surgery, 1st edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 441–462

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rudolf RM (2005) Treatment of paediatric facial fractures—the case for metallic fixation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63:382–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Senel FC, Tekin US, Imamoglu M, Trabzon, Kirikkale (2006) Treatment of mandibular fractures with bioresorbable plates in an infant: report of a case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Radiol Endod 101:448–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Thomas S, Yuvaraj V (2010) Atraumatic placement of circummandibular wires: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39(1):83–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tanaka N et al (1993) Maxillofacial fractures in children. J Craniofac Surg 21(7):289–293

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zimmermann CE, Troulis MJ, kaban LB (2006) Paediatric facial fractures: recent advances in prevention, diagnosis amd management. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35:2–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuvaraj Vaithilingam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vaithilingam, Y., Thomas, S., Singh, D. et al. Awl versus intravenous cannula stillete in circummandibular wiring—a prospective comparative study. Oral Maxillofac Surg 15, 21–25 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-010-0228-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-010-0228-7

Keywords

Navigation