Skip to main content

Effects of Hydrophilicity and Microtopography of Titanium Implant Surfaces on Initial Supragingival Plaque Biofilm Formation. A Pilot Study

Einfluss der Hydrophilizität und Mikrotopografie von Titanimplantatoberflächen auf die initiale supragingivale Plaque-Biofilmbildung. Eine Pilotstudie

Abstract

Objective

The aim of the present pilot study is to investigate the effects of hydrophilicity and microtopography of titanium implant surfaces on initial supragingival plaque biofilm formation.

Materials and Methods

Test specimens were manufactured from commercially pure grade 2 titanium according to one of the following procedures: polished (P), acid-etched (A), chemically modified (mod) A (modA), sand-blasted large grit and A (SLA), and modSLA. Intraoral splints were used to collect an in vivo supragingival plaque biofilm in each group at 12, 24, and 48 h. Stained plaque biofilm (PB) areas (%) were morphometrically assessed.

Results

All groups exhibited significant increases of mean PB areas over time (p < 0.001; respectively). Morphometrical analysis revealed the following mean PB areas: 12 h: SLA = modSLA > P > A = modA (p < 0.001; respectively); 24 h: SLA > modSLA = P >A = modA (p < 0.001; respectively); 48h: SLA = modSLA = P >A = modA (p < 0.001; respectively).

Conclusions

Within the limits of a pilot study, it could be concluded that hydrophilicity had no apparent effect, while microtopography had a highly uneven and unpredictable influence on supragingival plaque biofilm formation.

Zusammenfassung

Fragestellung

Das Ziel der vorliegenden Pilotuntersuchung war, den Einfluss der Hydrophilizität und Mikrotopografie von Titanimplantatoberflächen auf die supragingivale Plaque Biofilmbildung zu untersuchen.

Material und Methode

Standardisierte Titanplättchen wurden mit nachfolgenden Oberflächencharakteristika hergestellt: poliert (P), säuregeätzt (A), chemisch modifiziert hydrophil (mod) A (modA), sandgestrahlt und säuregeätzt (SLA) und modSLA. Ein intraorales Schienensystem diente zur in vivo supragingivalen Plaque-Biofilmformation in jeder Gruppe nach 12, 24 und 48 Stunden. Die Bewertung gefärbter Plaque-Biofilm (PB) Areale (%) erfolgte morphometrisch.

Ergebnisse

Alle Gruppen zeigten einen signifikanten Anstieg der mittleren PB-Areale über die Zeit (p < 0,001; respektive). Die morphometrische Analyse ergab die nachfolgenden mittleren PB Areale: 12 h: SLA = modSLA > P >A = modA (p < 0,001; respektive); 24h: SLA > modSLA =P > A = modA (p < 0,001; respektive); 48 h: SLA =modSLA = P > A = modA (p < 0,001; respektive).

Schlussfolgerung

Die Ergebnisse der vorliegenden Pilotuntersuchung haben gezeigt, dass die Hydrophilizität keinen Effekt und die Mikrotopografie einen nur uneinheitlichen sowie unvorhersehbaren Einfluss auf die supragingivale Plaque-Biofilmformation auf Titanimplantatoberflächen hatte.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Glantz PO, Lindhe J (1998) The mucosal attachment at different abutments. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 25:721–727

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Wennström J, Lindhe J (1996) The peri-implant hard and soft tissues at different implant systems. A comparative study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 7:212–219

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Abrahamsson I, Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T, Linder E, Wennerberg A, Lindhe J (2002) The mucosal attachment to titanium implants with different surface characteristics: an experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 29:448–455

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Albrektsson T, Isidor F (1994) Consensus report of session IV. In Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Periodontology, eds. Lang NP & Karring T. 365–369. London: Quintessence.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baier RE, Meyer AE (1988) Implant surface preparation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 3:9–20

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Becker W, Becker BE, Newman MG, Nyman S (1990) Clinical and microbiologic findings that may contribute to dental implant failure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 5:31–38

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M (1997) Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 13:258–269

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, Schenk RK, Denzer AJ, Cochran DL, Hoffmann B, Lussi A, Steinemann SG (2004) Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res 83:529–533

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chehroudi B, Gould TR, Brunette DM (1989) Effects of a grooved titanium-coated implant surface on epithelial cell behavior in vitro and in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res 23:1067–1085

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chehroudi B, Gould TR, Brunette DM (1992) The role of connective tissue in inhibiting epithelial downgrowth on titanium-coated percutaneous implants. J Biomed Mater Res 26:493–515

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gatewood RR, Cobb CM, Killoy WJ (1993) Microbial colonization on natural tooth structure compared with smooth and plasma-sprayed dental implant surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res 4:53–64

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hahn R, Netuschil L, Löst C (1992) Initiale Plaquebesiedlung auf keramischen Restaurationsmaterialien. Dtsch zahnärztl Z 47:330–334

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leonhardt A, Olsson J, Dahlen G (1995) Bacterial colonization on titanium, hydroxyapatite, and amalgam surfaces in vivo. J Dent Res 74:1607–1612

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Löe H (1967) The Gingival Index, the Plaque Index and the Retention Index Systems. J Periodontol [Suppl] 38:610–616

    Google Scholar 

  15. Masaki C, Schneider GB, Zaharias R, Seabold D, Stanford C (2005) Effects of implant surface microtopography on osteoblast gene expression. Clin Oral Implants Res 16:650–656

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mombelli A, Buser D, Lang NP (1988) Colonization of osseointegrated titanium implants in edentulous patients. Early results. Oral Microbiol Immunol 3:113–120

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mouhyi J, Sennerby L, Wennerberg A, Louette P, Dourov N, van Reck J (2000) Re-establishment of the atomic composition and the oxide structure of contaminated titanium surfaces by means of carbon dioxide laser and hydrogen peroxide: an in vitro study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2:190–202

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Quirynen M, Marechal M, Busscher HJ, Weerkamp AH, Arends J, Darius PL, van Steenberghe D (1989) The influence of surface free-energy on planimetric plaque growth in man. J Dent Res 68:796–799

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Quirynen M, Marechal M, Busscher HJ, Weerkamp AH, Darius PL, van Steenberghe D (1990) The influence of surface free energy and surface roughness on early plaque formation. An in vivo study in man. J Clin Periodontol 17:138–144

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Quirynen M, van der Mei HC, Bollen CM, Schotte A, Marechal M, Doornbusch GI, Naert I, Busscher HJ, van Steenberghe D (1993) An in vivo study of the influence of the surface roughness of implants on the microbiology of supra- and subgingival plaque. J Dent Res 72:1304–1309

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rasperini G, Maglione M, Cocconcelli P, Simion M (1998) In vivo early plaque formation on pure titanium and ceramic abutments: a comparative microbiological and SEM analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 9:357–364

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rimondini L, Fare S, Brambilla E, Felloni A, Consonni C, Brossa F, Carrassi A (1997) The effect of surface roughness on early in vivo plaque colonization on titanium. J Periodontol 68:556–562

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rupp F, Scheideler L, Olshanska N, de Wild M, Wieland M, Geis-Gerstorfer J (2006) Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity through chemical modification of microstructured titanium implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 76:323–334

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Bieling K, Sculean A, Becker J (2007) Comparison of naturally occurring and ligature-induced peri-implantitis bone defects in humans and dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 18:161–170

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Wieland M, Dard M, Becker J (2007) Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of initial and early osseous integration at chemically modified and conventional SLA((R)) titanium implants: preliminary results of a pilot study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 18:481–488

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Wieland M, Dard M, Becker J (2007) Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of initial and early subepithelial connective tissue attachment at chemically modified and conventional SLA(R)titanium implants. A pilot study in dogs. Clin Oral Investig 11:245–255

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schwarz F, Herten M, Wieland M, Dard M, Becker J (2007) Chemically modified, ultra-hydrophilic titanium implant surfaces. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 11:11–17

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schwarz F, Papanicolau P, Rothamel D, Beck B, Herten M, Becker J (2006) Influence of plaque biofilm removal on reestablishment of the biocompatibility of contaminated titanium surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 77:437–444

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schwarz F, Sculean A, Romanos G, Herten M, Horn N, Scherbaum W, Becker J (2005) Influence of different treatment approaches on the removal of early plaque biofilms and the viability of SAOS2 osteoblasts grown on titanium implants. Clin Oral Investig 9:111–117

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sennerby L, Lekholm U (1993) The soft tissue response to titanium abutments retrieved from humans and reimplanted in rats. A light microscopic study. Clin Oral Implants Res 4:23–27

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Siegrist BE, Brecx MC, Gusberti FA, Joss A, Lang NP (1991) In vivo early human dental plaque formation on different supporting substances. A scanning electron microscopic and bacteriological study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2:38–46

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhao G, Schwartz Z, Wieland M, Rupp F, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Cochran DL, Boyan BD (2005) High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure. J Biomed Mater Res A 74:49–58

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zitzmann NU, Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Lindhe J (2002) Soft tissue reactions to plaque formation at implant abutments with different surface topography. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 29:456–461

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study materials were kindly provided by Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Schwarz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwarz, F., Sculean, A., Wieland, M. et al. Effects of Hydrophilicity and Microtopography of Titanium Implant Surfaces on Initial Supragingival Plaque Biofilm Formation. A Pilot Study. Mund Kiefer GesichtsChir 11, 333–338 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-007-0079-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-007-0079-z

Keywords

  • Biofilm model
  • Titanium surface
  • Surface roughness
  • Hydrophilic surfaces
  • Surface free energy

Schlüsselwörter

  • Biofilmmodell
  • Titanoberfläche
  • Oberflächenrauigkeit
  • Hydrophile Oberflächen
  • Freie Oberflächenenergie