Skip to main content
Log in

MRT oder Münzwurf? Kein Unterschied!

Kommentar zur Bedeutung bildgebender Verfahren bei Rückenschmerzen

  • DGS
  • Published:
Schmerzmedizin Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. von der Lippe E, Krause L, Porst M, Wengler A, Leddin J et al. Prävalenz von Rücken- und Nackenschmerzen in Deutschland. Ergebnisse der Krankheitslast-Studie BURDEN 2020. Journal of Health Monitoring. 2021;6(S3):2-14

  2. Wu A et al. Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Ann Trans Med. 2020; 8(6): 299-313

  3. GBA-Ergebnisbericht (gemäß Nr. 14.1 ANBest-IF) Innovationsfondprojekt: Determinanten bei der Versorgung von Patienten mit Wirbelsäulenoperation (DEWI; 01VSF16045)

  4. Brinjikji W et al. Systematic literature review of imaging features of spinal degeneration in asymptomatic populations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(4):811-6

  5. Kasch R et al. Association of Lumbar MRI Findings with Current and Future Back Pain in a Population-based Cohort Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022;47(3):201-11

  6. Jacobs et al. Observational study of the downstream consequences of inappropriate MRI of the lumbar spine. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(12):3605-12

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

A. Überall, M., Küster, M. & Müller-Schwefe, G. MRT oder Münzwurf? Kein Unterschied!. Schmerzmed. 39, 56–61 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00940-023-4257-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00940-023-4257-3

Navigation