Advertisement

The Chemical Educator

, Volume 7, Issue 5, pp 249–257 | Cite as

Toward a Dynamic Lewis Notation

  • Roy W. ClarkEmail author
In the Classroom
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

Because the presently used Lewis diagrams have their roots in static electron theories of the early twentieth century, this paper proposes substituting a double-arrow symbolism for the customary double dots. This means that students should be taught that a bond line (or “stick” as some call it) means a double arrow, not a double dot. Lone pairs are to be represented by double-curved arrows and later abbreviated to the old familiar double dot. There are obvious advantages to this new notation when atoms have different electronegativities. The double arrows can suggest the shifting of the bond pair equilibrium toward the most electronegative atom. The new notation is more compatible with VSEPR theory, and it seems to suggest the loci of largely imaginary MOs and AOs by the configuration of the arrows. With the help of some imagination, the new symbolism can clarify resonance in aromatic molecules and conjugated chains. The most radical suggestion is that resonance forms be abandoned in favor of conjugated blur bonds. The concept of blur bonds has the merit of being easily extendable to the explanation of metal bonding and electron conduction.

Keywords

Twentieth Century Static Electron Electron Conduction Lone Pair Obvious Advantage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryMiddle Tennessee State UniversityMurfreesboro

Personalised recommendations