Abstract
Pillared graphene bubble framework is selected as the methane storage vessel in this article. All investigations of methane adsorption are executed by using the MD simulations. The average adsorption energy of methane on different bubble models is between − 4.3 and − 5.2 kcal/mol, which is desirable for absorbing and desorbing gas molecules. The methane adsorption properties of bubble models are obviously different from those of pillared graphene. The effect of graphene interlayer spacing on methane adsorption in selected bubble models can be negligible. Nevertheless, bubble density and temperature have a significant influence on methane adsorption. The amount of adsorbed methane on pillared bubble models at room temperature can reach up to 18.2 mmol/g. This performance of methane adsorption on pillared graphene bubble structures may bring new enlightenment to the investigations of gas storage materials.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chang GG, Wen HM, Li B, Zhou W, Wang HL, Alfooty K, Bao ZB, Chen BL (2016) A fluorinated metal−organic framework for high methane storage at room temperature. Cryst. Growth Des. 16:3395–3399
Ning G, Xu C, Mu L, Chen G, Wang G, Gao J et al (2012) High capacity gas storage in corrugated porous graphene with a specific surface area-lossless tightly stacking manner. Chem. Commun. 48:6815–6817
Tian T, Zeng ZX, Vulpe D, Casco ME, Divitini G, Midgley PA, Silvestre-Albero J, Tan JC, Moghadam PZ, David FJ (2018) A sol–gel monolithic metal–organic framework with enhanced methane uptake. Nat. Mater. 17:174–179
He Y, Zhou W, Qian G, Chen B (2014) Methane storage in metal_organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43:5657–5678
Policicchio A, Maccallini E, Agostino RG, Ciuchi F, Aloise A, Giordano G (2013) Higher methane storage at low pressure and room temperature in new easily scalable large-scale production activated carbon for static and vehicular applications. Fuel 104:813–821
Khalili S, Khoshandam B, Jahanshahi M (2016) A comparative study of CO2 and CH4 adsorption using activated carbon prepared from pine cone by phosphoric acid activation. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 33(10):2943–2952
Sawant SY, Munusamy K, Somani RS, John M, Newalkar BL, Bajaj HC (2017) Precursor suitability and pilot scale production of super activated carbon for greenhouse gas adsorption and fuel gas storage. Chem. Eng. J. 315:415–425
Hu JH, Zhao JF, Yan TY (2015) Methane uptakes in covalent organic frameworks with double halogen substitution. J. Phys. Chem. C 119(4):2010–2014
Vicent-Luna JM, Luna-Triguero A, Calero S (2017) Storage and separation of carbon dioxide and methane in hydrated covalent organic frameworks. J. Phys. Chem. C 120(41):23756–23762
Sharma A, Babarao R, Medhekar NV, Malani A (2018) Methane adsorption and separation in slipped and functionalized covalent organic frameworks. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57(14):4767–4778.
Wu Y, Tang D, Verploegh RJ, Xi HX, Sholl DS (2017) Impacts of gas impurities from pipeline natural gas on methane storage in metal−organic frameworks during long-term cycling. J. Phys. Chem. C 121:15735–15745
Yan Y, Kolokolov DI, Silva ID, Stepanov AG, Blake AJ, Dailly A, Manuel P, Tang CC, Yang SH, Schröder M Porous metal–organic polyhedral frameworks with optimal molecular dynamics and pore geometry for methane storage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b05453
Muller P, Bon V, Senkovska I, Getzschmann J, Weiss MS, Kaskel S (2017) Crystal engineering of phenylenebis(azanetriyl)tetrabenzoate based metal−organic frameworks for gas storage applications. Cryst. Growth Des. 17:3221–3228
Chen CX, Wei ZW, Jiang JJ, Zheng SP, Wang HP, Qiu QF, Cao CC, Fenske D, Su CY (2017) Dynamic spacer installation for multirole metal−organic frameworks: a new direction toward multifunctional MOFs achieving ultrahigh methane storage working capacity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139:6034–6037
Lin K, Yuan Q, Zhao YP (2017) Using graphene to simplify the adsorption of methane on shale in MD simulations. Comput. Mater. Sci. 133:99–107
Hassani A, Mosavian MTH, Ahmadpour A, Farhadian N (2017) Improvement of methane storage in nitrogen, boron and lithium doped pillared graphene: a hybrid molecular simulation. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 46:265–274
Pedrielli A, Taioli S, Garberoglio G, Pugno NM (2018) Gas adsorption and dynamics in pillared graphene frameworks. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 257:222–231
Hassani A, Mosavian MTH, Ahmadpour A, Farhadian N (2015) Hybrid molecular simulation of methane storage inside pillared graphene. J. Chem. Phys. 142:234704
Mahmoudian L, Rashidi A, Dehghani H, Rahighi R (2016) Single-step scalable synthesis of three-dimensional highly porous graphene with favorable methane adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 304:784–792
Hassani A, Mosavian MTH, Ahmadpour A, Farhadian N (2017) Improvement of methane uptake inside graphene sheets using nitrogen,boron and lithium-doped structures: a hybrid molecular simulation. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 34(3):876–884
Jiang H, Cheng XL, Zhang H, Tang YJ, Zhao CX (2015) Molecular dynamic simulation of high-quality hydrogen storage in pillared bilayer graphene bubble structure. Comput. Theor. Chem. 1068:97–103
Tomori H, Kanda A, Goto H, Ootuka Y, Tsukagoshi K, Moriyama S, Watanabe E, Tsuya D (2011) Introducing nonuniform strain to graphene using dielectric Nanopillars. Appl. Phys. Express 4:0751021–0751023
Zamborlini G, Imam M, Patera LL, Menteş TO, Stojić N, Africh C, Sala A, Binggeli N, Comelli G, Locatelli A (2015) Nanobubbles at GPa pressure under graphene. Nano Lett. 15:6162–6169
Khestanova E, Guinea F, Fumagalli L, Geim AK, Grigorieva IV (2016) Universal shape and pressure inside bubbles appearing in van der Waals heterostructures. Nat. Commun. 7:1–10
Ghorbanfekr-Kalashami H, Vasu KS, Nair RR, Peeters FM, Neek-Amal M (2017) Dependence of the shape of graphene nanobubbles on trapped. substance 8:1–11
Wang G, Dai Z, Wang Y, Tan P, Liu L, Xu Z, Wei Y, Huang R, Zhang Z (2017) Measuring interlayer shear stress in bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119:0361011–0361017
Agrawal BK, Agrawal S, Singh S, Srivastava R (2006) Ab initio study of curvature effects on the physical properties of CH4-doped nanotubes and nanoropes. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 18(19):4649–4675
Shayeganfar F, Neek-Amal M (2012) Methane molecule over the defected and rippled graphene sheet. Solid State Commun. 152:1493–1496
Smith DGA, Patkowski K (2014) Toward an accurate description of methane physisorption on carbon nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. C 118:544–550
Waqar Z (2007) Hydrogen accumulation in graphite and etching of graphite on hydrogen desorption. J. Mater. Sci. 42:1169–1176
Levy N, Burke SA, Meaker KL, Panlasigui M, Zettl A, Guinea F, Castro Neto AH, Crommie MF (2010) Strain-induced pseudo–magnetic fields greater than 300 tesla in graphene nanobubbles. Science 329:544–546
Sun H (1998) COMPASS: an ab initio force-field optimized for condensed-phase applicationss overview with details on alkane and benzene compounds. J. Phys. Chem. B 102:7338–7364
Rigby D, Sun H, Eichinger BE (1997) Computer simulations of poly(ethylene oxide): force field, PVT diagram and cyclization behaviour. Polym. Int. 44:311–330
Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 117:1–19
Zheng M, Li XX, Guo L (2013) Algorithms of GPU-enabled reactive force field (ReaxFF) molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. Model 41:1–11
Saeid Y, Fatemeh G (2016) Simulation of methane adsorption and diffusion in a carbon nanotube channel. Chem. Eng. Sci. 140:62–70
Wu HA, Chen J, Liu H (2015) Molecular dynamics simulations about adsorption and displacement of methane in carbon nanochannels. J. Phys. Chem. C 119:13652–13657
Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14:33–38
Sing KS (1985) Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure Appl. Chem. 57:603–619
Lu XQ, Jin DL, Wei SX, Wang ZJ, An CH, Guo WY (2015) Strategies to enhance CO2 capture and separation based on engineering absorbent materials. J. Mater. Chem. A 3:12118–12132
Okamoto Y, Miyamoto Y (2001) Ab initio investigation of physisorption of molecular hydrogen on planar and curved graphenes. J. Phys. Chem. B 105:3470–3474
Chandrakumar KRS, Srinivasu K, Ghosh SK (2008) Nanoscale curvature-induced hydrogen adsorption in alkali metal doped carbon nanomaterials. J. Phys. Chem. C 112:15670–15679
Jiang H, Cheng XL, Zhang H, Tang YJ, Zhao CX (2015) Molecular dynamic investigations of hydrogen storage efficiency of graphene sheets with the bubble structure. Struct. Chem. 26:531–537
Lan J, Cao D, Wang W (2009) High uptakes of methane in Li-doped 3D covalent organic frameworks. Langmuir 26(1):220–226
Peng X, Zhou J, Wang W, Cao D (2010) Computer simulation for storage of methane and capture of carbon dioxide in carbon nanoscrolls by expansion of interlayer spacing. Carbon 48:3760–3768
Razmkhah M, Moosavi F, Mosavian MTH, Ahmadpour A (2018) Tunable gas adsorption in graphene oxide framework. Appl. Surf. Sci. 443:198–208
Szczęśniak B, Choma J, Jaroniec M (2018) Effect of graphene oxide on the adsorption properties of ordered mesoporous carbons toward H2, C6H6, CH4 and CO2. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 261:105–110
Peredo-Mancilla D, Hort C, Jeguirim M, Ghimbeu CM, Limousy L, Bessieres D (2018) Experimental determination of the CH4 and CO2 pure gas adsorption isotherms on different activated carbons. J. Chem. Eng. Data 63:3027–3034
Acknowledgments
We thank the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11774248 and 11474207). Meanwhile, we are grateful to the support of our calculation from Analytical & Testing Center Sichuan University, People’s Republic of China.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOC 3780 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jiang, H., Cheng, XL. MD simulation of methane adsorption properties on pillared graphene bubble models. J Mol Model 25, 236 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-019-4132-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-019-4132-2