Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Elucidation of specific aspects of dielectric constants of conjugated organic compounds: a QSPR approach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The characteristic aspects of dielectric constants of π-conjugated compounds are elucidated by a quantitative structure property relationship (QSPR) study. To develop a QSPR model, among 141 collected π-conjugated compounds, a subset of 116 compounds was used as the training set for the model building and the rest was used as the test set for the model validation. Statistical regression models using 396 molecular descriptors were generated based on the genetic function approximation algorithm. The predicted dielectric constants obtained by the best model are highly correlated with the experimental values (squared correlation coefficient R 2 of 0.93 and 0.97 for the training and test sets, respectively), while a previous prediction model for general organic molecules (Sild S, Karelson M (2002) J Chem Inf Comput Sci 42:360–367) is not valid for our collected π-conjugated organic compounds. It has been known that the dielectric constants of organic materials are largely influenced by orientational correlations of the constituent molecules. In general, hydrogen bonding is one of the most important intermolecular interactions affecting orientational correlation. In the case of π-conjugated compounds, however, π−π interaction could be another comparable interaction with the hydrogen bonding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Politzer P, Murray JS, Clark T (2010) Halogen bonding: an electrostatically-driven highly directional noncovalent interaction. Phys Chem Chem Phys 12:7748–7757

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Murray JS, Riley KE, Politzer P, Clark T (2010) Directional weak intermolecular interaction: σ-Hole bonding. Aust J Chem 63:1598–1607

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldman S, Joslin C (1993) Why hydrogen-bonded liquids tend to have high static dielectric constants. J Phys Chem 97:12349–12355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Raj CJ, Dinakaran S, Krishnan S, Milton B, Robert R, Das SJ (2008) Studies on optical, mechanical and transport properties of NLO active L-alanine formate single crystal grown by modified Sankaranarayanan–Ramasamy (SR) method. Opt Commun 281:2285–2290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dhas SAMB, Natarajan S (2008) Growth and characterization of two new NLO materials from the amino acid family: L-Histidine nitrate and L-Cysteine tartrate monohydrate. Opt Commun 281:457–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lenin M, Ramasamy P (2008) Synthesis, growth and characterization of 3-nitroacetanilide—A new organic nonlinear optical crystal by Bridgman technique. J Cryst Growth 310:4451–4455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao X, Wang M, Zhang B (2008) Structural and dielectric properties of conjugated polynitrile thin films deposited by plasma polymerization. Thin Solid Films 516:8272–8277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dhara MG, Banerjee S (2010) Fluorinated high-performance polymers: Poly(arylene ether)s and aromatic polyimides containing trifluoromethyl groups. Prog Polym Sci 35:1022–1077

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Katritzky AR, Maran U, Lobanov VS, Karelson M (2000) Structurally diverse quantitative structure-property relationship correlations of technologically relevant physical properties. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 40:1–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schweitzer RC, Morris JB (1999) The development of a quantitative structure property relationship (QSPR) for the prediction of dielectric constants using neural networks. Anal Chim Acta 384:285–303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schweitzer RC, Morris JB (2000) Improved quantitative structure property relationships for the prediction of dielectric constants for a set of diverse compounds by Subsetting of the data set. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 40:1253–1261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sild S, Karelson M (2002) A general QSPR treatment for dielectric constants of organic compounds. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 42:360–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu J, Wilding WV, Giles NF, Rowley RL (2010) A quantitative structure property relation correlation of the dielectric constant for organic chemicals. J Chem Eng Data 55:41–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cocchi M, De Benedetti PG, Seeber R, Tassi L, Ulrici A (1999) Development of quantitative structure-property relationships using calculated descriptors for the prediction of the physicochemical properties (nD, ρ, bp, ε, η) of a series of organic solvents. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 39:1190–1203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu A, Wang X, Wang L, Wang H, Wang H (2007) Prediction of dielectric constants and glass transition temperatures of polymers by quantitative structure property relationships. Euro P J 43:989–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Clipper Controls. Dielectric Constant Reference Guide. http://clippercontrols.com/pages/dielectric-constant-values. Accessed 18 Jan 2010

  17. Lide DR (2000) CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 81st edn. CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  18. Delley B (2000) From molecules to solids with the DMol3 approach. J Chem Phys 113:7756–7764

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77:3865–3868

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Delley B (1990) An all-electron numerical method for solving the local density functional for polyatomic molecules. J Chem Phys 92:508–517

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hall LH, Kier LB (1995) Electrotopological State Indices for Atom Types: A Novel Combination of Electronic, Topological, and Valence State Information. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 35:1039–1045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rogers D, Hopfinger AJ (1994) Application of genetic function approximation to quantitative structure−activity relationships and quantitative structure−property relationships. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 34:854–866

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Stanton DT, Jurs PC (1990) Development and use of charged partial surface area structural descriptors in computer-assisted quantitative structure-property relationship studies. Anal Chem 62:2323–2329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Onsager L (1936) Electric moments of molecules in liquids. J Am Chem Soc 58:1486–1493

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhao Y, Truhlar DG (2008) Density functionals with broad applicability in chemistry. Acc Chem Res 41:157–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grant No. 10031803 from the Industrial Source Technology Development Programs funded by the Ministry of Knowledge Economy, Republic of Korea. We thank Accelrys Korea for support with the modeling software.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong Hyun Jung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, A., Kim, D., Kim, KH. et al. Elucidation of specific aspects of dielectric constants of conjugated organic compounds: a QSPR approach. J Mol Model 18, 251–256 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-011-1067-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-011-1067-7

Keywords

Navigation