Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anti-tubercular drug designing by structure based screening of combinatorial libraries

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the current study, the applicability and scope of descriptor based QSAR models to complement virtual screening using molecular docking approach have been applied to identify potential virtual screening hits targeting DNA gyrase A from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, an effective and validated anti-mycobacterial target. Initially QSAR models were developed against M. fortuitum and M. smegmatis using a series of structurally related fluoroquinolone derivatives as DNA gyrase inhibitors. Both the QSAR models yielded significant cross validated Q(2) values of 0.6715 and 0.6944 and R(2) values of 0.7250 and 0.7420, respectively. The statistically significant models were validated by a test set of 22 compounds with predictive R(2) value of 0.7562 and 0.7087 for M. fortuitum and M. smegmatis respectively. To aid the creation of novel antituberculosis compounds, combinatorial library was developed on fluoroquinolone template to derive a data set of 5280 compounds whose activity values have been measured by the above models. Highly active compounds predicted from the models were subjected to molecular docking study to investigate the mechanism of drug binding with the DNA gyrase A protein of M. tuberculosis and the compounds showing similar type of binding patterns with that of the existing drug molecules, like sparfloxacin, were finally reported. It is seen that hydrophobic characteristics of molecular structure together with few hydrogen bond interactions are playing an essential role in antimicrobial activity for the fluoroquinolone derivatives. A representative set of seven compounds with high predicted MIC values were sorted out in the present study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cambau E, Sougakoff W, Besson M, Truffot-Pernot C, Grosset J, Jarlier V (1994) Selection of a gyrA mutant of Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistant to fluoroquinolones during treatment with ofloxacin. J Infect Dis 170:479–483

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Grosset JH (1992) Treatment of tuberculosis in HIV infection. Tuberc Lung Dis 73:378–383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tsukamura M, Nakamura E, Yoshii S, Amano H (1985) Therapeutic effect of a new antibacterial substance ofloxacin (DL8280) on pulmonary tuberculosis. Am Rev Respir Dis 131:352–356

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Blumberg HM, Burman WJ, Chaisson RE, Daley CL, Etkind SC et al. (2003) American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America: treatment of tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 167:603–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Crofton J, Chaulet P, Maher D, Grosset J, Harris W et al. (1997) Guidelines for the management of drug-resistant tuberculosis. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  6. Takiff HE, Salazar L, Guerrero C, Philipp W, Huang WM et al. (1994) Cloning and nucleotide sequence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis gyrA and gyrB genes and detection of quinolone resistance mutations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 38:773–780

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Aubry A, Pan XS, Fisher LM, Jarlier V, Cambau E (2004) Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA gyrase: interaction with quinolones and correlation with antimycobacterial drug activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:1281–1288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Maxwell A (1997) DNA gyrase as a drug target. Trends Microbiol 5:102–109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Willmott CJR, Maxwell A (1993) A single point mutation in the DNA gyrase A protein greatly reduces binding of fluoroquinolones to the gyrase-DNA complex. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 37:126–127

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Barnard FM, Maxwell A (2001) Interaction between DNA Gyrase and Quinolones: effects of Alanine mutations at GyrA subunit residues Ser83 and Asp87. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:1994–2000

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hiasa H, Shea ME (2000) DNA gyrase-mediated wrapping of the DNA strand is required for the replication fork arrest by the DNA gyrase-quinolone-DNA ternary complex. J Biol Chem 275:34780–34786

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wentzell LM, Maxwell A (2000) The complex of DNA gyrase and quinolone drugs on DNA forms a barrier to the T7 DNA polymerase replication complex. J Mol Biol 304:779–791

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Renau TE, Sanchiez JP, Gage JW, Dever JA, Shapiro MA et al. (1996) Structure-activity relationships of the Quinolone antibacterials against mycobacteria: effect of structural changes at N-1 and C-7. J Med Chem 39:729–735

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Renau TE, Gage JW, Dever JA, Roland GE, Joannides ET et al. (1996) Structure-activity relationships of Quinolone agents against mycobacteria: effect of structural modifications at the 8 position. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 40:2363–2368

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bagchi MC, Maiti BC, Mills D, Basak SC (2004) Usefulness of graphical invariants in quantitative structure-activity correlations of tuberculostatic drugs of the isonicotinic acid hydrazide type. J Mol Model 10:102–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ghosh P, Thanadath M, Bagchi MC (2006) On an aspect of calculated molecular descriptors in QSAR studies of quinolone antibacterials. Mol Divers 10:415–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bagchi MC, Mills D, Basak SC (2007) Quantitative structure-activity relationship(QSAR) studies of antibacterials against M. fortuitum and M. smegmatis using theoretical molecular descriptors. J Mol Model 13:111–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ghosh P, Vracko M, Chattopadhyay AK, Bagchi MC (2008) On application of constitutional descriptors for merging of Quinoxaline data sets using linear statistical methods. Chem Biol Drug Design 72:155–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Golbraikh A, Tropsha A (2002) Predictive QSAR modeling based on diversity sampling of experimental datasets for the training and test set selection. J Comput Aided Mol Des 16:357–369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Molecular Design Suite 3.5, VLife Technologies, Pune, India. www.vlifesciences.com

  21. Guyon I, Elisseeff A (2003) An introduction to variable and feature selection. J Mach Learn Res 3:1157–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hasegawa K, Kimura T, Funatsu K (1999) GA strategy for variable selection in QSAR studies:enhancement of comparative molecular binding energy analysis by GA-based PLS method. Quant Struct Act Relat 18:262–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ghosh P, Bagchi MC (2009) QSAR modeling for Quinoxaline derivatives using genetic algorithm and simulated annealing based feature selection. Curr Med Chem 16:4032–4048

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ghosh P, Bagchi MC (2009) Comparative QSAR studies of nitrofuranyl amide derivatives using theoretical structural properties. Mol Simulat 35:1185–1200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Holland JH (1992) Genetic algorithms. Sci Am 267:66–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Luco JM, Ferretti FH (1997) QSAR based on multiple linear regression and PLS methods for the anti-HIV activity of a large group of HEPT derivatives. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 37:392–401

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Leonard JT, Roy K (2006) QSAR by LFER model of HIV protease inhibitor mannitol derivatives using FA-MLR, PCRA, and PLS techniques. Bioorg Med Chem 14:1039–1046

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Leach AR, Gillet VJ (2003) An Introduction to Chemoinformatics. Kluwer, Boston, pp 79–81

    Google Scholar 

  29. Martin YC (2001) Diverse viewpoints on computational aspects of molecular diversity. J Comb Chem 3:231–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Böhm HJ, Stahl M (2000) Structure-based library design: molecular modeling merges with combinatorial chemistry. Curr Opin Chem Biol 4:283–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Beavers MP, Chen Z (2002) Structure-based combinatorial library design: methodologies and applications. J Mol Graph Model 20:463–468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hansch C, Leo A (1995) Exploring QSAR:Fundamentals and Applications in Chemistry and Biology. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lajiness M (1990) Computational Chemical Graph Theory. Ed Rouvray, DH (Nova, New York), pp 299–316

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ (1997) Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 23:3–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Arnold K, Bordoli L, Kopp J, Schwede T (2006) The SWISS-MODEL Workspace: a web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics 22:195–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Schwede T, Kopp J, Guex N, Peitsch MC (2003) SWISS-MODEL: an automated protein homology-modeling server. Nucl Acids Res 31:3381–3385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss D, Thornton JM (1993) PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J Appl Crystallogr 26:283–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Gehlhaar DK, Verkhivker GM, Rejto PA, Sherman CJ, Fogel D et al. (1995) Molecular recognition of the inhibitor AC-1343 by HIV-l protease: conformationally flexible docking by evolutionary programming. Chem Biol 2:317–324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Verkhivker GM, Bouzida D, Gehlhaar DK, Rejto PA, Arthurs S et al. (2000) Deciphering common failures in molecular docking of ligand–protein complexes. J Comput Aided Mol Des 14:731–751

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ajmani S, Karanam S, Kulkarni SA (2009) Rationalizing protein-ligand interactions for PTP1B inhibitors using computational methods. Chem Biol Drug Des 74:582–595

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Tretter EM, Schoeffler AJ, Weisfield SR, Berger JM (2010) Crystal structure of the DNA Gyrase GyrA N-terminal domain from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proteins 78:492–495

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Madurga S, Sánchez-Céspedes J, Belda I, Vila J, Giralt E (2008) Mechanism of binding of fluoroquinolones to the quinolone resistance-determining region of DNA gyrase: towards an understanding of the molecular basis of quinolone resistance. Chem Bio Chem 9(13):2081–2086

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Maxwell A (1992) The molecular basis of quinolone action. J Antimicrob Chemother 30:409–416

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Tropsha A, Gramatica P, Gombar VK (2003) The importance of being earnest: validation is the absolute essential for successful application and interpretation of QSPR models. QSAR Comb Sci 22:69–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Payel Ghosh thanks the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi 110001, India, for the grant of a Senior Research Fellowship to her. MCB acknowledges the Department of Biotechnology, New Delhi, India, for the grant of a project. The infrastructural support received from Bioinformatics Centre, IICB is also acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manish C. Bagchi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghosh, P., Bagchi, M.C. Anti-tubercular drug designing by structure based screening of combinatorial libraries. J Mol Model 17, 1607–1620 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-010-0861-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-010-0861-y

Keywords

Navigation