Skip to main content
Log in

3D-QSAR study of microsomal prostaglandin E2 synthase(mPGES-1) inhibitors

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microsomal prostaglandin E2 synthase (mPGES-1) has been identified recently as a novel target for treating pain and inflammation. The aim of this study is to understand the binding affinities of reported inhibitors for mPGES-1 and further to design potential new mPGES-1 inhibitors. 3D-QSAR-CoMFA (comparative molecular field analysis) and CoMSIA (comparative molecular similarity indices analysis) - techniques were employed on a series of indole derivatives that act as selective mPGES-1 inhibitors. The lowest energy conformer of the most active compound obtained from systematic conformational search was used as a template for the alignment of 32 compounds. The models obtained were used to predict the activities of the test set of eight compounds, and the predicted values were in good agreement with the experimental results. The 3D-QSAR models derived from the training set of 24 compounds were all statistically significant (CoMFA; q 2 = 0.89, r 2 = 0.95, \( r^{{\text{2}}}_{{{\text{bs}}}} = 0.98 \), \( r^{{\text{2}}}_{{{\text{pred}}}} = 0.83 \) and CoMSIA; q 2 = 0.84, r 2 = 0.93, \( r^{{\text{2}}}_{{{\text{bs}}}} = 0.93 \), \( r^{{\text{2}}}_{{{\text{pred}}}} = 0.94 \)). Contour plots generated for the CoMFA and CoMSIA models reveal useful clues for improving the activity of mPGES-1 inhibitors. In particular, substitutions of an electronegative fluorine atom or a bulky hydrophilic phenoxy group at the meta or para positions of the biphenyl rings might improve inhibitory activity. A plausible binding mode between the ligands and mPGES-1 is also proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schmidt RF, Schaible HG, Messlinger K, Heppelmann B, Hanesch U, Pawlak M (1994) Progress in pain and management. In: Gebhart GF, Hammond DL, Jensen TS (eds) Proc 7th World Congress on Pain (2nd edn.) Seattle, IASP, Chap 16

  2. Hoogerwerf WA, Zou L, Shenoy M, Sun D, Micci MA, Lee-Hellmich H, Xiao SY, Winston JH, Pasricha PJ (2001) J Neurosci 21(22):9036–9042

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang HYT, Iadarola MJ (2006) Peptides 27(5):943–952

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wan WZ, Zhang N (2006) Zhongguo Shengwu Huaxue Yu Fenzi Shengwu Xuebao 22(2):101–105

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shukla AK, Haase W, Reinhart C, Michel H (2006) Biol Chem 387(5):569–576

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Qin X, Zhang H (2005) Zhongguo Linchuang Kangfu 9(17):145–147

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gilmour RS, Mitchell MD (2001) Exp Biol Med 226:1–4

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kudo I, Murakami M (2005) J Biochem Mol Biol 38(6):633–638

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Murakami K, Kudo M (2004) Prog Lipid Res 43:3–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sampey AV, Monrad S, Crofford LJ (2005) Arthritis Res Therapy 7(3):114–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Trebino CE, Stock JL, Gibbons CP, Naiman BN, Wachtmann TS, Umland JP, Pandher K, Lapointe JM, Saha S, Roach ML, Carter D, Thomas NA, Durtschi BA, McNeish JD, Hambor JE, Jakobsson P, Carty TJ, Perez JR, Audoly LP (2003) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:9044–9049

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Duffy D, Seachord C, Dozier B (2005) Hum Reprod 20(6):1485–1492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Uematsu S, Matsumoto M, Takeda K, Akira S (2002) J Immunol 168:5811–5816

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Thoren S, Jakobsson PJ (2000) Eur J Biochem 267:6428–6434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Quraishi O, Mancini J, Riendeau D (2002) Biochem Pharmacol 63:1183–1189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Riendeau D, Aspiotis R, Ethier D, Gareau Y, Grimm E, Guay J, Guiral S, Juteau H, Mancini J, Methot N, Rubin J, Friesen R (2005) Bioorg Med Chem Lett 15:3352–3355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cramer III RD, Patterson DE, Bunce JD (1988) J Am Chem Soc 110:5959–5967

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Klebe G, Abraham U, Mietzner T (1994) J of Med Chem 37:4130–4146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. SYBYL 7.2 (2006) Tripos Inc., St. Louis, MO 63144

  20. Clark M, Cramer III R, Van Opdenbosch N (1989) J Comput Chem 10:982–1012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim K, Greco G, Novellino E (1998) Perspect Drug Discov Des 12–14:257–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wold S, Albano C, Dunn W, Edlund U, Esbensen K, Geladi P, Hellberg S, Johansson E, Lindberg W, Sjosstrom M (1987) Chemometrics: mathematics and statistics in chemistry. In: Kowalski B (ed) Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands pp 17–95

  23. Bush BL, Nachbar RB (1993) J Comput Aided Mol Des 7:587–619

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Stahle L, Wold S (1988) Prog Med Chem 25:292–338

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cramer III RD, Bunce JD, Patterson DE, Frank IE (1988) Quant Struc-Act Relat 7:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Clark RD, Sprous DG, Leonard JM (2001) Validating models based on large data sets. In: Höltje HD, Sippl W (eds) 13th european symposium on quantitative structure-activity relationships: rational approaches to drug design. Prous Science, Barcelona-Philadelphia pp 475–485

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mancini JA, Blood K, Guay J, Gordon R, Claveau D, Chan C, Riendeau D (2001) J Biol Chem 276(6):4469–4475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jakobsson P, Morgenstern R, Mancini J, Hutchinson AF, Persson B (1999) Prot Sci 8:689–692

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The study was supported by the Korea Research Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seung Joo Cho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

San Juan, A.A., Cho, S.J. 3D-QSAR study of microsomal prostaglandin E2 synthase(mPGES-1) inhibitors. J Mol Model 13, 601–610 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-007-0172-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-007-0172-0

Keywords

Navigation