Skip to main content
Log in

Improvement of comparative modeling by the application of conserved motifs amongst distantly related proteins as additional restraints

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Protein comparative modeling has useful applications in large-scale structural initiatives and in rational design of drug targets in medicinal chemistry. The reliability of a homology model is dependent on the sequence identity between the query and the structural homologue used as a template for modeling. Here, we present a method for the utilization and conservation of important structural features of template structures by providing additional spatial restraints in comparative modeling programs like MODELLER. We show that root mean square deviation at Cα positions between the model and the corresponding experimental structure and the quality of the models can be significantly improved for distantly related systems by utilizing additional spatial restraints of the template structures. We demonstrate the influence of such approaches to homology modeling during distant relationships in understanding functional properties of protein such as ligand binding using cytochrome P450 as an example.

Figure Example of a modeling triad. Structures of flavodoxin from Clostridium beijerinckii (PDB code, 5nul) and flavodoxin from Chondrus crispus (PDB code, 2fcr) that are equidistant in sequence identity (Seq. ID.) and structural similarity (RMSDFootnote 1) to the third flavodoxin member (from Desulfovibrio vulgaris, PDB code, 1akr)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Root mean square deviation

References

  1. Sali A, Blundell TL (1993) J Mol Biol 234:779–815

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sanchez R, Pieper U, Melo F, Eswar N, Marti-Renom MA, Madhusudhan MS, Mirkovic N, Sali A (2000) Nat Struct Biol 7(Suppl):986–990

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dunbrack RL, Gerloff DL, Bower M, Chen X, Lichtarge O, Cohen FE (1997) Fold Des 2:R27–R42

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mosimann S, Meleshko R, James MNG (1995) Proteins: Struct, Funct, Genet 23:301–317

    Google Scholar 

  5. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C (1995) J Mol Biol 247:536–540

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mallika V, Bhaduri A, Sowdhamini R (2002) Nucleic Acids Res 30:284–288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chakrabarti S, Venkataramanan K, Sowdhamini R (2003) Nucleic Acids Reshttp://www3.oup.co.uk/nar/database/summary/275

  8. Russell RB, Barton GJ (1992) Proteins: Struct, Funct, Genet 14:309–323

    Google Scholar 

  9. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ (1997) Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–4002

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kelley LA, MacCallum RM, Sternberg MJ (2000) J Mol Biol 299:499–520

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jones DT (1999) J Mol Biol 287:797–815

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Eisenberg D, Luthy R, Bowie JU (1997) Methods Enzymol 277:396–404

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Morris AL, MacArthur MW, Hutchinson EG, Thornton JM (1992) Proteins: Struct, Funct, Genet 12:345–364

    Google Scholar 

  14. Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM (1993) J Appl Cryst 26:283–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lovell SC, Davis IW, Arendall 3rd WB, de Bakker PI, Word JM, Prisant MG, Richardson JS, Richardson DC (2003) Proteins: Struct, Funct, Genet 50:437–450

  16. Sowdhamini R, Burke DF, Huang JF, Mizuguchi K, Nagarajaram HA, Srinivasan N, Steward RE, Blundell TL (1998) Structure 6:1087–1094

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Srinivasan N, Blundell TL (1993) Protein Eng 6:501–512

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Graham-Lorence S, Amarneh B, White RE, Peterson JA, Simpson ER (1995) Protein Sci 4:1065–1080

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kraulis P (1991) J Appl Crystallogr 24:945–949

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sayle RA, Milner-White EJ (1995) Trends Biochem Sci 20:374–375

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

RS is a recipient of a Senior Research Fellowship awarded by Wellcome Trust. Financial and infrastructural support from NCBS (TIFR) is also acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramanathan Sowdhamini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chakrabarti, S., John, J. & Sowdhamini, R. Improvement of comparative modeling by the application of conserved motifs amongst distantly related proteins as additional restraints. J Mol Model 10, 69–75 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-003-0169-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-003-0169-2

Keywords

Navigation