International Journal on Digital Libraries

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 233–249 | Cite as

Tape music archives: from preservation to access

  • Carlo Fantozzi
  • Federica Bressan
  • Niccolò Pretto
  • Sergio Canazza
Article

Abstract

This article presents a methodology for the active preservation of, and the access to, magnetic tapes of audio archives. The methodology has been defined and implemented by a multidisciplinary team involving engineers as well as musicians, composers and archivists. The strong point of the methodology is the philological awareness that influenced the development of digital tools, which consider the critical questions in the historian and musicologist’s approach: the secondary information and the history of transmission of an audio document.

Keywords

Cultural memory Audio collections Tape music A/D transfer Metadata 

References

  1. 1.
    Adenot, P., Wilson, C.: Web audio API, W3C working draft, Dec 08 2015. Technical Report, W3C (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agosti, M.: Information access using the guide of user requirements. In: Agosti, M. (ed.) Information Access Through Search Engines and Digital Libraries. The Information Retrieval Series, vol. 22, pp. 1–12. Springer, Berlin (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Algazi, V., Duda, R.: Headphone-based spatial sound. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 28(1), 33–42 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Avanzini, F., Canazza, S.: Virtual analogue instruments: an approach to active preservation of the studio di fonologia musicale. In: Novati, M.M., Dack, J. (eds.) The studio di fonologia—a musical journey, pp. 89–108. Ricordi, Milan (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bonardi, A., Barthélemy, J.: The preservation, emulation, migration, and virtualization of live electronics for performing arts: an overview of musical and technical issues. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 1(1), 6:1–6:16 (2008). doi:10.1145/1367080.1367086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boston, G.: Digitisation for preservation and access. Technical Report, UNESCO, Paris (France) (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bressan, F.: The preservation of sound archives: a computer based approach to quality control. Ph.D. thesis, Sciences Engineering Medicine, Verona (Italy) (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bressan, F., Bertani, R., Furlan, C., Simionato, F., Canazza, S.: An ATR FTIR and ESEM study on magnetic tapes for the assessment of the degradation of historical audio recordings. J. Cult. Herit. 18, 313–320 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bressan, F., Canazza, S.: A systemic approach to the preservation of audio documents: methodology and software tools. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. (2013). doi:10.1155/2013/489515
  10. 10.
    Bressan, F., Canazza, S., Bertani, R.: Honey, I burnt the tapes! A study on thermal treatment for the recovery of magnetic tapes affected by Sticky Shed Syndrome. IASA J. 44, 53–64 (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bressan, F., Canazza, S., Bertani, R., Rodà, A., Fontana, F.: The safeguard of audio collections: a computer science based approach to quality control in the archive of the Arena di Verona. Adv. Multimed. (2013). doi:10.1155/2013/276354
  12. 12.
    Bressan, F., Rodà, A., Canazza, S., Fontana, F.: Toward an informed procedural approach to the preservation of audio documents: the case of the Fondazione Arena di Verona archive. In: Lira, S., Amoêda, R., Pinheiro, C. (eds.) Proceedings of Sharing Cultures 2011—2nd International Conference on Intangible Heritage, pp. 177–185. Green Lines Institute, Tomar (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Canazza, S.: The digital curation of ethnic music audio archives: from preservation to restoration. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 12(2–3), 121–135 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Canazza, S., Dattolo, A.: The past through the future: a hypermedia model for handling the information stored in the audio documents. J. New Music Res. 38(4), 381–396 (2009). doi:10.1080/09298210903388947 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Canazza, S., Fantozzi, C., Pretto, N.: Accessing tape music documents on mobile devices. ACM Trans. Multimed. Comput. Commun. Appl. 12(1s), 20:1–20:20 (2015). doi:10.1145/2808200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Canazza, S., Poli, G.D., Mian, G.A.: Restoration of audio documents by means of extended Kalman filter. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 18(6), 1107–1115 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Canazza, S., Vidolin, A.: Preserving electroacoustic music. J. New Music Res. 30(4), 351–363 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Casey, M.: Facet (field audio collection evaluation tool)—format characteristics and preservation problems version 1.0. Technical Report, Indiana University (2008). http://www.dlib.indiana.edu/projects/sounddirections/facet/facet_formats_large.pdf
  19. 19.
    Casey, M., Gordon, B.: Sound Directions: Best Practices for Audio Preservation. Harvard University, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cohen, E.: Preservation of audio in folk heritage collections in crisis. In: Proceedings of Council on Library and Information Resources. Washington, DC, USA (2001)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Columbia University: survey instrument for audio and moving image collections. http://library.columbia.edu/services/preservation/audiosurvey.html (2008)
  22. 22.
    Duranti, L.: Interpares3—team Canada final report. Technical Report, University of British Columbia (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Edkins, G.D., Pollock, C.M.: The influence of sustained attention on railway accidents. Accid. Anal. Prev. 29(4), 533–539 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Edmonson, R.: Memory of the World: General Guidelines to Safeguard Documentary Heritage. UNESCO, Paris (2002)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    IASA: The IASA Cataloguing Rules. IASA Editorial Group, Hungary (1999)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    IASA-TC 03: The safeguarding of the audio heritage: ethics, principles and preservation strategy. Technical Report, International Association of Sound and Audiovisual Archives (IASA), Hungary (2005)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    IASA-TC 04: Guidelines on the Production and Preservation of Digital Objects. IASA Technical Committee (2004)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    IASA-TC 05: Handling and Storage of Audio and Video Carriers. IASA Technical Committee (2014)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    IFLA—Audiovisual and multimedia section: guidelines for digitization projects: for collections and holdings in the public domain, particularly those held by libraries and archives. Technical Report, International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA), Paris (France) (2002)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Indiana University: The field audio collection evaluation tool (FACET). http://www.dlib.indiana.edu/projects/sounddirections/facet/ (2008)
  31. 31.
    Mayer, R., Antunes, G., Caetano, A., Bakhshandeh, M., Rauber, A., Borbinha, J.: Using ontologies to capture the semantics of a (business) process for digital preservation. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 15(2), 129–152 (2015). doi:10.1007/s00799-015-0141-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Menczel, J.D., Prime, R.B.: Thermal Analysis of Polymers: Fundamentals and Applications. Wiley, New York (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Micheloni, C., Canazza, S., Foresti, G.L.: Audio–video biometric recognition for non-collaborative access granting. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 20(6), 353–367 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Miotto, R., Orio, N.: An efficient identification methodology for improved access to music heritage collections. J. Multimed. 7, 145–158 (2012)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Najman, L., Talbot, H.: Mathematical Morphology. Wiley, New York (2013)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Norris, S.: Tape baking (contribution to Stanford University’s audio preservation manual ’Introduction to Audio Preservation’). Technical Report, Stanford University (2007)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Novati, M., Dack, J. (eds.): The Studio di Fonologia—A Musical Journey. Ricordi, Milan (2012)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Orio, N., Snidaro, L., Canazza, S., Foresti, G.L.: Methodologies and tools for audio digital archives. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 10(4), 201–220 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pendharkar, C., Bäck, P., Wyse, L.: Adventures in scheduling, buffers and parameters: porting a dynamic audio engine to web audio. In: Proceedings of the Web Audio Conference, Paris, France (2015)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pretto, N., Canazza, S.: REWIND: simulazione di un’esperienza d’ascolto storicamente fedele di dischi fonografici digitalizzati. In: Proceedings of the 20th Colloquium on Music Informatics, pp. 29–34 (2014)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Roberts, C., Wakefield, G., Wright, M., Kuchera-Morin, J.: Designing musical instruments for the browser. Comput. Music J. 39(1), 27–40 (2015). doi:10.1162/COMJ_a_00283 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Salvati, D., Canazza, S.: Adaptive time delay estimation using filter length constraints for source localization in reverberant acoustic environments. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 20(5), 507–510 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Salvati, D., Canazza, S.: Incident signal power comparison for localization of concurrent multiple acoustic sources. Sci. World J. 2014, 582397 (2014)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Schüller, D.: Preserving the facts for the future: principles and practices for the transfer of analog audio documents into the digital domain. J. Audio Eng. Soc. 49(7–8), 618–621 (2001)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Silverstein, R.M., Webster, F.X., Kiemle, D.: Spectrometric Identification of Organic Compounds, 7th edn. Wiley, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Six, J., Leman, M.: Panako—a scalable acoustic fingerprinting system handling time-scale and pitch modification. In: Proceedings of the 15th ISMIR Conference (ISMIR 2014) (2014)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Storm, W.D.: The establishment of international re-recording standards. Phonogr. Bull. 27, 26–37 (1980)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sueiro, M.: AVDb—Audio and Moving Image Survey Tool. Columbia University Libraries, New York, NY (2008)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    The National Film and Sound Archive of Australia: An explanation of audiovisual terms in preservation. http://nfsa.gov.au/preservation/glossary/
  50. 50.
    Wyse, L., Subramanian, S.: The viability of the web browser as a computer music platform. Comput. Music J. 37(4), 10–23 (2013). doi:10.1162/COMJ_a_00213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information EngineeringUniversity of PadovaPadovaItaly
  2. 2.IPEM Research Centre, Department of Art, Music and Theater StudiesGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations