International Journal on Digital Libraries

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 25–39 | Cite as

Mapping metadata to DDC classification structures for searching and browsing

  • Xia Lin
  • Michael Khoo
  • Jae-Wook Ahn
  • Doug Tudhope
  • Ceri Binding
  • Diana Massam
  • Hilary Jones
Article

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a metadata visual interface based on metadata aggregation and automatic classification mapping. We demonstrate that it is possible to aggregate metadata records from multiple unrelated repositories, enhance them through automatic classification, and present them in a unified visual interface. The main features of the interface include dynamic querying using DDC classes as filters, interactive visual views of search results and related DDC classes, and drill-down options for searching and browsing in different levels of details. The interface was tested in a user study of 30 subjects. A comparison was done on three modules of the interface, namely ‘search interface’, ‘hierarchical interface’, and ‘visual interface.’ The results indicate that subjects performed well with all the three interfaces, and they had more positive experience with the hierarchical interface than with the search interface and the visual interface.

Keywords

Metadata integration Automatic classification mapping Dewey decimal classification Visual interface design Visualization interfaces 

References

  1. 1.
    Lin, X., Ahn, J.W.: Challenges of knowledge structure visualization. In: Classification and visualization: interfaces to knowledge: Proceedings of the International UDC Seminar, October 24-25, 2013, The Hague, The Netherlands. Ergon Verlag, 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johnson, B., Shneiderman, B.: Tree-maps: a space-filling approach to the visual-ization of hierarchical information structures. In: VIS ’91: Proceedings of the 2nd conference on visualization ’91. pp. 284–291. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, USA. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=949654 (1991)
  3. 3.
    Sintek, M.: Ontoviz, http://protegewiki.stanford.edu/wiki/OntoViz. Accessed Nov 2016
  4. 4.
    Grefenstette, G.: Explorations in automatic thesaurus discovery. Springer, New York (1994)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koopman, R., Wang, S., Scharnhorst, A.: Contextualization of topics—browsing through terms, authors, journals and cluster allocations. In: Proceedings of 15th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics. Istanbul, Turkey (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kleiberg, E., Van De Wetering, H., Van Wijk, J.J.: Botanical visualization of huge hierarchies. In: Information visualization, IEEE symposium on. pp. 87–87. IEEE Computer Society (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    OCLC.: Introduction to the Dewey Decimal Classification. http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/dewey/versions/print/intro.pdf. Accessed Nov 2016
  8. 8.
    Sweeney, R.: The development of the Dewey decimal classification. J. Doc. 39(3), 192–205 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pollitt, A.S., Tinker, A.J.: Enhanced view-based searching through the decomposition of Dewey decimal classification codes. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference of the International Society for Knowledge Organization, 10–13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Eds. C. Beghtol, L. Howarth and N. J. Williamson. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag, 2000. (Advances in Knowledge Organization 7). 288–294 (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chowdhury, S., Chowdhury, G.: Using DDC to create a visual knowledge map as an aid to online information retrieval. In: 8th international ISKO conference: knowledge organization and the Global Information Society, 2004-07-13 - 2004-07-16, London. http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/2624/1/strathprints002624.pdf (2004). Accessed Nov 2016
  11. 11.
    Vizine-Goetz, D.: Dewey browser. Catal. Classif. Q. 42(3–4), 213–220 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Digging into data challenge.: http://diggingintodata.org/. Accessed Nov 2016
  13. 13.
    Khoo, M., Ahn, J.W., Binding, C., Jones, H., Lin, X., Massam, D., Tudhope, D.: Augmenting Dublin core digital library metadata with Dewey decimal classification. J. Doc. 71(5), 976–998 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khoo, M., Tudhope, D., Binding, C., Jones, H., Orrego, I.: “OAI-PMH and metadata aggregation from heterogeneous digital libraries: three case studies”, iConference, Fort Worth, TX, February 12–15, pp. 497–501. www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/42563 (2013). Accessed Nov 2016
  15. 15.
    Frant, iK, Ananiadou, S., Mima, H.: Automatic recognition of multi-word terms. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 3(2), 117–132 (2000)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Khoo, M., Tudhope, D., Binding, C., Abels, E., Lin, X., Massam, D.: Towards digital repository interoperability: the document indexing and semantic tagging interface for libraries (DISTIL). In: Zaphiris, P., Buchanan, G., Rasmussen, E., Loizides, F. (eds.) Theory and practice of digital libraries, lecture notes in computer science, vol. 7489, pp. 439–444. Springer, Berlin (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33290-6_49. Accessed Nov 2016
  17. 17.
    Voorhees, E.: The TREC-8 question answering track report. In: Voorhees, E.M., Harman, D.K. (eds), Proceedings of the 8th Text Retrieval Conference, NIST Special Publication 500-246, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersberg, MD, pp. 77–82. http://trec.nist.gov/pubs/trec8/t8_proceedings.html (1999). Accessed 10 Jun 2016
  18. 18.
    Jacomy, M., Heymann, S., Venturini, T., Bastian, M.: Forceatlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software. PLOS One. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098679 (2014). Accessed Nov 2016
  19. 19.
    Eades, P.: A heuristic for graph drawing. Congr. Numer. 42, 149–160 (1984)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Khoo, M., Massam, D., Jones, H.: “I Go Into a Lot of Different Places to Get my Research”: graduate students’ mental models of research tools. iConference, California (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Khoo, M., Hall, C.: Managing metadata: networks of practice, technological frames, and technical work in a digital library. Inf. Org. 23(2), 81–106 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Whitelaw, M.: Generous interfaces for digital cultural collections. Digit. Hum. Q. 9(1). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/9/1/000205/000205.html (2015). Accessed Nov 2016
  23. 23.
    Nielsen, J.: Tabs, used right. Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/tabs-used-right/ (2007). Accessed Nov 2016
  24. 24.
    Zeng, M.L.: Knowledge organization systems. Knowl. Org. 35(2–3), 160–182 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Computing and InformaticsDrexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Hypermedia Research UnitUniversity of South WalesPontypriddUK
  3. 3.MIMAS, The University of ManchesterManchesterUK
  4. 4.JISCManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations