International Journal on Digital Libraries

, Volume 14, Issue 3–4, pp 181–195 | Cite as

Sustainability of digital libraries: a conceptual model and a research framework

  • Gobinda ChowdhuryEmail author


This paper aims to develop a conceptual model and a research framework for study of the economic, social and environmental sustainability of digital libraries. The major factors that are related to the economic, social and environmental sustainability of digital libraries have been identified. Relevant research in digital information systems and services in general, and digital libraries in particular, have been discussed to illustrate different issues and challenges associated with each of the three forms of sustainability. Based on the discussions of relevant research that have implications on sustainability of information systems and services, the paper proposes a conceptual model and a theoretical research framework for study of the sustainability of digital libraries. It shows that the sustainable business models to support digital libraries should also support equitable access supported by specific design and usability guidelines that facilitate easier, better and cheaper access; support the personal, institutional and social culture of users; and at the same time conform with the policy and regulatory frameworks of the respective regions, countries and institutions. It is also shown that measures taken to improve the economic and social sustainability should also support the environmental sustainability guidelines, i.e. reduce the overall environmental impact of digital libraries. It is argued that the various factors affecting the different sustainability issues of digital libraries need to be studied together to build digital libraries that are economically, socially and environmentally sustainable.


Digital libraries Sustainability Social sustainability Economic sustainability Environmental sustainability 


  1. 1.
    EPA: Sustainability. (2013). Accessed 23 Jan 2014
  2. 2.
    Nolin, J.: Sustainable information and information science. Inf. Res. 15(2) (2010). Accessed 8 Aug 2011
  3. 3.
    Chowdhury, G.G.: Building sustainable information services: a Green IS research agenda. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 63(4), 633–647 (2012)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Chowdhury, G.G.: Sustainability of digital information services. J. Doc. 69(5), 602–622 (2013)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Houghton, J., Rasmussen, B., Sheehan, P., Oppenheim, C., Morris, A., Creaser, C., Greenwood, H., Summers, M., Gourlay, A.: Economic implications of alternative scholarly publishing models: exploring the costs and benefits. JISC. (2009) Accessed 8 Aug 2013
  7. 7.
    Liew, C.L.: Digital library research 1997–2007: organisational and people issues. J. Doc. 65(2), 245–266 (2009)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chowdhury, G.G.: Carbon footprint of the knowledge sector: what’s the future? J. Doc. 66(6), 934–946 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chowdhury, G.G.: An agenda for green information retrieval research. Inf. Process. Manag. 48(6), 1067–1077 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chowdhury, G.G.: How digital information services can reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Online Inf. Rev. 36(4), 489–506 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Collier, M.: Sustainability of digital libraries: economic and business planning. In: Law, D. (ed.) Libraries in a Digital Age: Fundamentals and Latest Thinking. The Biomedical & Life Sciences Collection, Henry Stewart Talks Ltd, London (2012).
  12. 12.
    Europeana Professional. Accessed 23 Jan 2014
  13. 13.
    Chowdhury, G., McMenemy, D., Poulter, A.: MEDLIS: model for evaluation of digital libraries and information services. World Dig. Libr. 1(1), 35–46 (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Europeana: the case for funding. (2013). Accessed 23 Jan 2014
  15. 15.
    Burns, C.S., Lana, A., Budd, J.M.: Institutional repositories: exploration of costs and value. D-Lib Mag. 19(1/2) (2013).
  16. 16.
    Swan, A.: Modelling scholarly communication options: costs and benefits for universities. Report to the JISC. February (2010). Accessed 23 Jan 2014
  17. 17.
    Finch, J.: Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: how to expand access to research publications. Report of the Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings. (2012). Accessed 23 Sept 2013
  18. 18.
    Dobreva, M., Ruusalepp, R.: Digital preservation: interoperability ad modum. In: Chowdhury, G. G. and Foo, S. (eds.) Digital Libraries and Information Access: Research Perspectives, pp. 193–215. Facet Publishing, London (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    DPimpact.: Socio-economic Drivers and Impact of Longer Term Digital Preservation. Final Report, Accessed 23 September 2013 (2009)
  20. 20.
    Blue Ribbon Task Force on Sustainable Digital Preservation and Access: Sustainable economics for a digital planet: ensuring long-term access to digital information. Final report Accessed 23 September 2013 (2010)
  21. 21.
    Rusbridge and Lavoie: Draft economic sustainability reference model. (2011). Accessed 23 Jan 2014
  22. 22.
    SHAMAN Reference Architecture: EU FP7 Large Scale Integrated project. Final report. (2102). Accessed 23 Sept 2013
  23. 23.
    Jisc 13 partners from across Europe join together to improve digital curation. (2013). Accessed 23 Jan 2014
  24. 24.
    The WorldBank Group: Beyond economic growth: meeting the challenges of global development. Growth of the services sector. Chapter IX. (2000) Accessed 23 Sept 2013
  25. 25.
    Mak, M.Y., Peacock, C.J.: Social Sustainability: A Comparison of Case Studies in UK, USA and Australia. 17th Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference, Gold Coast, 16–19 Jan 2011. (2011). Accessed 23 Sept 2013
  26. 26.
    Hutchins, M.J., Gierke, J.S., Sutherland, J.W.: Decision making for social sustainability: a lifecycle assessment approach. In: IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society, 2009, pp. 1–5. ISTAS ’09. 18–20 May 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hutchins, M., Sutherland, J.W.: An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. J. Clean. Prod. 16(15), 1688–1698 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Goncalves, M.A., Fox, E.A., Watson, L.T., Kipp, N.A.: (n.d.). Streams, structures, spaces, scenarios, societies (5S): a formal model for digital libraries. Accessed 23 Sept 2013
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
    Isah, A., mutshewa, A., Serema, B., Kenosi, L.: Digital libraries: analysis of Delos reference model and 5S theory. J. Inf. Sci. Theory Pract. 1(4), 38–47 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wilson, T.: On user studies and information needs. J. Doc. Spec. Publ., 174–186 (2009)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ruthven, I., Kelly, D. (eds.): Interactive Information Seeking, Behaviour and Retrieval. Facet Publishing, London (2011)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ingwersen, P., Järvelin, K.: The turn: integration of information seeking and retrieval in context. Springer, Dordrecht (2005)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wilson, T.D., Maceviciute, E.: Users’ interactions with digital libraries. In: Chowdhury, G.G., Foo, S. (eds.) Digital Libraries and Information Access: Research Perspectives, pp. 113–128. Facet Publishing, London (2012)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dobreva, M., O’Dwyer, A. (eds.): User Studies for Digital Library Development. Facet Publishing, London (2012)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    BBC news. (2012). Accessed 23 Sept 2013
  37. 37.
    Chowdhury, G.G., Chowdhury, S.: Information Users and Usability in the Digital Age. Facet Publishing, London (2011)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dobreva, M., Chowdhury, S.: A user-centric evaluation of the europeana digital library. In: The Role of Digital Libraries in a Time of Global Change. 12th International Conference on Asia-Pacific Digital Libraries, ICADL 2010, Gold Coast, Australia, June 21–25, 2010. Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series no. 6102, pp. 148–157. Springer, Berlin (2010)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    NIH.: Accessed 23 Sept 2013
  40. 40.
  41. 41.
  42. 42.
    Chowdhury, G.G.: Towards the conceptual model of a content service network. In: Globalizing Academic Libraries Vision 2020, Proceedings of the International Conference on Academic Libraries, pp. 215–220, Delhi, Oct. 5–8, 2009. Delhi Mittal Publications, Delhi (2009)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Chowdhury, G.G., Fraser, M.: Carbon footprint of the knowledge industry and ways to reduce it. World Dig. Libr. 4(1), 9–18 (2011)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hargreaves, I.: Digital opportunity: a review of intellectual property and growth. An Independent Report. (2011). Accessed 23 Sept 2013
  45. 45.
    Hooper, R., Lynch, R.: Copyright works: streaming copyright licensing for the digital age. UK Intellectual Property Office. (2012). Accessed 23 Sept 2013
  46. 46.
    IPCC: Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2007a). Accessed 23 Sept 2013
  47. 47.
    Albanesius, C.: How much electricity does Google consume each year?,2817,2392654,00.asp (2011)
  48. 48.
    Gombiner, J.: Carbon footprinting the internet. Cons. J. Sustain. Dev. 5(1), 119–124 (2011)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Raghavan, B., Ma, J.: The energy and emergy of the internet. In: Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (Hotnets). Cambridge, November 2011. (2011)
  50. 50.
    Sinha, P., Schew, W.A., Sawant, A., Kolwaite, K.J., Strode, S.A.: Greenhouse gas emissions from US institutions of higher education. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 60(5), 568–573 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    James, P., Hopkinson, L.: Green ICT: managing sustainable ICT in education and research. (2009). Accessed 23 Sept 2013
  52. 52.
    Nicholas, D., Rowlands, I., Watkinson, A., Brown, D., Jamali, H.R.: Digital repositories ten years on: what do scientific researchers think of them and how do they use them? Learn. Publ. 25(3), 195–206 (2012)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Nicholas, D., Clark, D., Rowlands, I., Jamali, H.R.: Information on the go: a case study of Europeana mobile users. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 64(7), 1311–1322 (2013) Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Nathan, L.P.: Sustainable information practice: an ethnographic investigation. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 63(11), 2254–2268 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northumbria UniversityNewcastleUK

Personalised recommendations