Skip to main content
Log in

Risk and protective factors of suicidal tendencies among freshmen in China revealed by a hierarchical regression model

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to identify risk and protective factors for suicidal tendencies among college students by exploring current mental health, personal experiences, family environment, and school adaptation. A total of 11,504 freshmen in China were recruited. Suicidal tendencies were assessed using the Adolescents Suicidal Tendencies Scale (ASTS), while explored risk and protective factors included mental health assessed by the Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90), campus adaptation using the College Student School Adaptation Scale, and Personal Situation Survey. Single-factor Logistic regression analysis, correlation analysis, and hierarchical regression analysis were used to analyze the risk and protective factors affecting suicidal tendencies. The results showed that in terms of personal experience, self-injury behavior (OR = 3.522, 95% CI [3.256, 3.811]), sexual assault experience (OR = 2.603, 95% CI [2.374, 2.855]) and lack of friendship relationship (OR = 2.249, 95% CI [2.076, 2.436]) were the most significant risk factors. Regarding family environment, parenting style (OR = 2.455, 95% CI [2.272, 2.652]), parent–child relationship (OR = 2.255, 95% CI [2.092, 2.429]) and violent conflict (OR = 2.164, 95% CI [2.015, 2.324]) were the most prominent risk factors. For protective factors, life satisfaction (OR = 0.330, 95% CI [0.304, 0.359]) and rest quality (OR = 0.415, 95% CI [0.386, 0.447]) were the most significant protective factors. In addition, Symptom Checklist-90 was positively correlated with suicidal tendencies (r = 0.541, 95% CI [0.522, 0.560], p < 0.001), while school adaptation was negatively correlated with suicidal tendencies (r = − 0.590, 95% CI [− 0.579, − 0.601], p < 0.001). After considering demographic variables, psychological symptoms, school adaptation and other risk and protective factors, the hierarchical regression model could explain 48.9% of the variance of suicidal tendencies. The study emphasizes a range of multidimensional risk and protective factors for suicidal tendencies. This enhanced understanding is crucial in aiding the design of future intervention studies targeted at improving the mental health of college students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The data will not be available as it is currently being analyzed.

References

  1. Organization WH (2021) Suicide worldwide in 2019: global health estimates.

  2. Forkmann T, Teismann T (2017) Entrapment, perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness as predictors of suicide ideation. Psychiatry Res 257:84–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.07.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mars B, Heron J, Crane C, Hawton K, Lewis G, Macleod J, Tilling K, Gunnell D (2014) Clinical and social outcomes of adolescent self harm: population based birth cohort study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g5954

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Miron O, Yu K-H, Wilf-Miron R, Kohane IS (2019) Suicide rates among adolescents and young adults in the United States, 2000–2017. JAMA 321:2362–2364. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMA.2019.5054

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Doupnik SK, Rudd B, Schmutte T, Worsley D, Bowden CF, McCarthy E, Eggan E, Bridge JA, Marcus SC (2020) Association of suicide prevention interventions with subsequent suicide attempts, linkage to follow-up care, and depression symptoms for acute care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiat 77:1021–1030. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.1586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller DN, Eckert TL, Mazza JJ (2009) Suicide prevention programs in the schools: a review and public health perspective. Sch Psychol Rev 38:168–188. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.44.1.4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Asarnow JR, Mehlum L (2019) Practitioner review: treatment for suicidal and self-harming adolescents—advances in suicide prevention care. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 60:1046–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13130

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lew B, Chistopolskaya K, Osman A, Huen JMY, Abu Talib M, Leung ANM (2020) Meaning in life as a protective factor against suicidal tendencies in Chinese University students. BMC Psychiatry 20:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02485-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ray JV, Poythress NG, Weir JM, Rickelm A (2009) Relationships between psychopathy and impulsivity in the domain of self-reported personality features. Personality Individ Differ 46:83–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheung VH, Chan CY, Au RK (2019) The influence of resilience and coping strategies on suicidal ideation among Chinese undergraduate freshmen in Hong Kong. Asia Pac Psychiatry 11:e12339. https://doi.org/10.1111/appy.12339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Borges G, Nock MK, Abad JMH, Hwang I, Sampson NA, Alonso J, Andrade LH, Angermeyer MC, Beautrais A, Bromet E (2010) Twelve-month prevalence of and risk factors for suicide attempts in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. J Clin Psychiatry 71:21777. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.08m04967blu

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Millner AJ, Lee MD, Hoyt K, Buckholtz JW, Auerbach RP, Nock MK (2020) Are suicide attempters more impulsive than suicide ideators? Gen Hosp Psychiatry 63:103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2018.08.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lumontod RZ III (2020) Seeing the invisible: Extracting signs of depression and suicidal ideation from college students’ writing using LIWC a computerized text analysis. Int J Res 9:31–44. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2020.5007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Taliaferro LA, Muehlenkamp JJ (2014) Risk and protective factors that distinguish adolescents who attempt suicide from those who only consider suicide in the past year. Suicide Life Threat Behav 44:6–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang Q, Zhang L (2016) Analysis of risk factors for non-suicidal self-injury behavior among college students. Chin J Ment Health 30:618–623. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2016.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Naghavi M (2019) Global, regional, and national burden of suicide mortality 1990 to 2016: systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l94

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang S, Jing H, Chen L, Li Y (2020) The influence of negative life events on suicidal ideation in college students: the role of rumination. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17:2646. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082646

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Tan L, Chen J, Xia T, Hu J (2018) Predictors of suicidal ideation among children and adolescents: roles of mental health status and meaning in life. Child Youth Care Forum 47:219–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-017-9427-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yan Y, Gai X (2022) Prevalence and correlational factors of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among Chinese adolescents. Front Psychol 13:911502. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.911502

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Li D, Zhang R, Liu S, Liu J, Zhang T (2019) The characteristics of Chinese adolescents with suicidal ideation: a mixed-methods approach. J Adolesc Res 34:201–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/074355841772360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu X, Tein J-Y (2005) Life events, psychopathology, and suicidal behavior in Chinese adolescents. J Affect Disord 86:195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2005.01.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Li W, Dorstyn DS, Jarmon E (2020) Identifying suicide risk among college students: a systematic review. Death Stud 44:450–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2019.1578305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen X, Sun Y, Li Z, Yu B, Gao G, Wang P (2019) Historical trends in suicide risk for the residents of mainland China: APC modeling of the archived national suicide mortality rates during 1987–2012. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 54:99–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1593-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Conno RC (2003) Suicidal behavior as a cry of pain: test of a psychological model. Arch Suicide Res 7:297–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/713848941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Klonsky ED, May AM (2015) The three-step theory (3ST): a new theory of suicide rooted in the “ideation-to-action” framework. Int J Cogn Ther 8:114–129. https://doi.org/10.1521/ijct.2015.8.2.114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lu S, Zhang Y, Sui X, Zhong J (2020) Analysis of validity and reliability of adolescent suicide tendency scale in college students. Chin J Ment Health. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20201210-06639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Derogatis LR, Cleary PA (1977) Confirmation of the dimensional structure of the SCL-90: a study in construct validation. J Clin Psychol 33:981–989. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(197710)33:43.0.CO;2-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shulin C, Lingjiang L (2003) SCL-90 reliability validity test and norm recomparison. Chin J Neuropsychiatry 5:323–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-003-0089-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dong Y, Dang L, Li S, Yang X (2021) Effects of facets of mindfulness on college adjustment among first-year Chinese college students: the mediating role of resilience. Psychol Res Behav Manag 14:1101–1109. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S319145

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Evans R, White J, Turley R, Slater T, Morgan H, Strange H, Scourfield J (2017) Comparison of suicidal ideation, suicide attempt and suicide in children and young people in care and non-care populations: systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence. Child Youth Serv Rev 82:122–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.09.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang X, Huang P-f, Li B-q, Xu W-j, Li W, Zhou B (2021) The influence of interpersonal relationships on school adaptation among Chinese university students during COVID-19 control period: multiple mediating roles of social support and resilience. J Affect Disord 285:97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.02.040

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Diamond G, Kodish T, Ewing ESK, Hunt QA, Russon JM (2022) Family processes: risk, protective and treatment factors for youth at risk for suicide. Aggress Violent Behav 64:101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by three funding sources. Firstly, the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 62006197] provided substantial support. Additionally, this research was part of the outcomes of the project funded by the Sichuan Provincial Department of Education under the program for Sichuan University Mental Health Education and Training Base [project number 2022SXJP003]. Lastly, support was also received from the National Center for Mental Health and Mental Hygiene Prevention and Control and the China Education Development Foundation funded the “Mental Health Project for College Students” project [project number C008].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ZW and TZ wrote the main manuscript text and data analysis, and XL and HX collected and analysised the data. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tao Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

The study gained prior approval from the Institution Research Ethics Board of Xihua University.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all the participating schools.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 18 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Z., Li, X., Xu, H. et al. Risk and protective factors of suicidal tendencies among freshmen in China revealed by a hierarchical regression model. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-024-02370-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-024-02370-5

Keywords

Navigation