Sleep duration and problem behaviour in 8-year-old children in the Childhood Obesity Project


There is growing evidence that insufficient sleep has negative effects on the mental health of children. The aim of this study is to examine the associations between device-measured sleep duration and internalizing and externalizing problems in 8-year-old children. The study is a secondary analysis of data from the Childhood Obesity Project conducted in five European countries. Nocturnal sleep duration was measured with the SenseWear™ Armband 2. Parents rated their child’s internalizing and externalizing problems on the Child Behaviour Checklist. Behaviour scores were dichotomized at the 90th percentile based on sex- and country-specific z-scores. Logistic regression models were applied to test the associations between sleep duration and behaviour. Data were available for 406 8-year-old children. The average sleep duration was 9.25 h per night (SD: 0.67) with 1464 nights measured in total. The sleep duration recommendation of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine for school-aged children (9–12 h) was met by 66.7% of children. One hour of additional sleep per night significantly reduced the risk of having internalizing problems (adjusted OR = 0.51; 95% CI 0.29–0.91). Children who adhered to the sleep duration recommendation had a lower risk for internalizing problems (adjusted OR = 0.45; 95% CI 0.21–0.99). Sleep duration and externalizing problems showed no significant association. Longer sleep duration was associated with a reduced risk of having internalizing problems but not externalizing problems. Results highlight that it is important to ensure adequate sleep duration throughout primary-school years for the optimal emotional health of children. Trial registration number: NCT00338689. Registered: June 19, 2006.


Up to 20% of children and adolescents worldwide experience mental health problems [1, 2]. It represents one of the major public health challenges in the current century [3]. Internalizing problems, like anxiety and depression, and externalizing problems, like hyperactivity, inattention or aggression, have their onset often in childhood or adolescents with tracks into adulthood [4, 5]. Therefore, it is necessary to identify potential risk factors to develop effective intervention strategies. The literature shows that health-related factors like smoking and alcohol in pregnancy or maternal overweight [6], psychosocial stressors like depression and violence [6, 7] and socio-economic factors like poverty and low education [8] can have an effect on internalizing and externalizing problems in children. Sleep might be an additional modifiable stressor that needs to be considered [9, 10].

Sleep is essential for children’s healthy development and contributes to normal mental functioning and health. Insufficient sleep is associated with negative effects on learning, memory, concentration and school performance in children [10]. Chaput et al. [11] reported in a systematic review that longer sleep duration is associated with better emotional regulation and higher quality of life in 5- to 17-year-old children and adolescents. A recent review on sleep and its relation to behaviour in preschool children demonstrated that a higher quantity of sleep is associated with better behavioural and cognitive outcomes [12]. Astill et al. [13] conducted a meta-analysis showing small but significant associations of shorter sleep duration with poorer cognition and problem behaviour in healthy school-aged children between the ages of 5 and 12 years.

However, researchers concluded that the available evidence of these studies is mainly based on parent- or self-reported sleep duration whereas more objective sleep measurement methods in children are rarely used [11, 12]. Subjective reports like questionnaires or sleep diaries often overestimate the actual sleep duration and are susceptible to reporting bias compared to device-based measurement methods like accelerometer or polysomnography [14]. Device-measured sleep is mainly used in experimental studies which have consistently shown effects of decreased sleep duration on emotional regulation, affective responses and moodiness in children and adolescents [15,16,17]. Only a few observational studies in children looked at associations of device-measured sleep duration and problem behaviour. They reported associations of short sleep duration with internalizing and externalizing problems as well as hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms in school-aged children [18,19,20].

The main objective of our study was to examine the association of night sleep duration, measured with an accelerometer, with internalizing or externalizing symptoms in 8-year-old children, assessed with the Child Behaviour Checklist, a standardized screening questionnaire on mental health [21].

Patients and methods

Study design and study population

The underlying study uses data from the Childhood Obesity Project (CHOP), a double-blind randomized controlled intervention trial ( NCT00338689. URL:, initiated in 2002. Across five European countries (Belgium, Germany, Poland, Italy, Spain), 1678 healthy infants were recruited during their first eight weeks of life and randomized to either receive a higher or lower protein-content formula, with a reference group of breastfed children as control. The primary aim of the trial was to investigate whether different levels of protein-content in infant formula have an effect on infant growth and later risk of obesity. Detailed information on the whole study is published elsewhere [22, 23]. For this secondary analysis we used data from the 8-year follow-up (N = 589). Local ethical committees approved the trial and parents and children gave their informed consent. All research was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Sleep duration

The nocturnal sleep duration was measured with the SenseWear Armband 2 (BodyMedia Inc., Pittsburgh, PA) in 8-year-old children. As intended in the study protocol, children wore the device day and night on at least three consecutive days for at least 20 h per day. For the analyses, we included all children with at least two nights of sleep measurements. The SenseWear Armband is worn on the right arm over the triceps muscle and collects data in 1 min epochs through five sensors: two-axis accelerometer, heat flux, galvanic skin response, skin temperature and near body temperature [24]. The two-axis accelerometer measures whether the child is lying or not. The body heat sensor can detect non-wear-time and prevents from identifying non-wear-periods as sleep [25]. Studies have shown that the SenseWear Armband can give good sleep estimates compared to polysomnography [25, 26].

Sensor parameters combined with anthropometric data were edited with the Professional InnerView Software 6.1 (BodyMedia Inc., Pittsburgh, PA), which uses an undisclosed algorithm to distinguish between sleep and wake periods. Due to the lack of standardization of scoring rules for the armband, data were processed guided by scoring rules used in other studies with device-based measurements [27]. In contrast to other devices, the armband measurement differentiates lying and sleeping time. Therefore, we defined the nocturnal sleep duration as time from sleep onset (first minute of at least 3 consecutive minutes scored as lying down followed by at least 1 min scored as sleeping) to sleep offset (last minute of at least 5 consecutive minutes scored as lying). We applied the scoring rules to timeframes from 6 pm to 11 am as we could not see regular sleep duration periods during daytime.

We categorized the children in two sleep groups based on age-appropriate recommendations of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) (9–12 h sleep per night: yes/no) [28]. Based on the armband-wear-dates the season of measurement was defined (winter [Dec–Feb], spring [Mar–May], summer [June–Aug], autumn [Sept–Nov]).

Internalizing and externalizing problems

At the 8-year follow-up parents rated their child’s behaviour on the Achenbachs’ Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL 6/18). The CBCL is a widely used, standardized questionnaire with 113 symptom items assessed on a three-point Likert scale (‘not true = 0’, ‘somewhat or sometimes true = 1’, ‘very true or often true = 2’) [21]. From the responses, eight subscales (anxious/depressed, withdrawn/depressed, somatic complaints, rule-breaking behaviour, aggressive behaviour, thought problems, attention problems, social problems) and three broadband scales (internalizing, externalizing, total) are evaluated. The internalizing score, consists of the sum of the three subscales anxious/depressed, withdrawn/depressed and somatic complaints. The externalizing score, includes the subscales rule-breaking and aggressive behaviour. The CBCL has strong internal consistency ranging from 0.78 to 0.97 and a good test–retest reliability (r = 0.90) [29].

CBCL scores were z-standardized by sex and country to get each child’s standing relative to other children of the same sex and country in the sample [30]. All CBCL scales were positively skewed, which is typical for problem behaviour scores in a general population where most of the children have relatively low scores. Therefore, to define high internalizing and externalizing problems, we decided to dichotomize the CBCL scales at the 90th percentile of the calculated z-scores (cut-offs: internalizing problems: 1.53, externalizing problems: 1.32) following other studies [31, 32].


Additional to gender and country, various parental background information were collected at study entry. The highest education level reached by one of the parents was assessed according to the International Standard Classification of Education 1997 levels and defined as low (level 0–2), middle (level 3–4) or high (level 5–6) [33]. The mother reported her smoking status during pregnancy (yes/no) and her age at the child’s birth (years). During the 8-year follow-up the current mental health status of the mother, or in some cases of the father was measured with the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) and z-standardized by country and respondent [34]. A higher GHQ-12 score represents poorer mental health.

Statistical analyses

Night sleep duration was presented in decimal hours. Sex- and country-specific CBCL z-scores were calculated by subtracting the individual score from the corresponding country- and sex-specific mean and dividing it by the corresponding country- and sex-specific standard deviation. Differences in problem behaviour scores and nocturnal sleep duration were assessed by t-test and ANOVA. We applied logistic regression models to test the associations between night sleep duration and internalizing (low/high) or externalizing (low/high) problems at 8 years of age. The main predictor of the models was nocturnal sleep duration analysed as continuous (hours) and categorical data (adherence to AASM-recommendation: yes/no). Sex and country were regarded as fixed covariates for adjustment in the base models. Additional covariates for the adjusted models were selected based on a p-value < 0.25 in bivariate analyses (Online Resource Table 1) and the literature: highest education level reached by one of the parents, smoking in pregnancy, mother’s age at child’s birth and GHQ-12 z-score [6,7,8, 35].

Excluding children with only two nights of sleep measurements from logistic regression models, we performed a sensitivity analysis with children who had at least three nights of sleep recording as intended in the study protocol. In an additional sensitivity analysis we did not adjust for sex and country in the logistic regression models as they are already incorporated in the CBCL z-scores.

Statistical significance was assumed at a maximum error probability of 0.05. Statistical analysis was carried out with SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics 26).


At the 8-year follow-up 589 children participated. CBCL data were available for 524 children (89.0%). The participation rate in armband measurement was 75.4% (444 children). CBCL scores of children who took part in the armband measurement did not differ from those who did not participate. Complete data on CBCL and sleep measurements were available for 416 children; further ten children were excluded from analysis with only one night of sleep recording. Thus, 406 children remained for the final analysis (Fig. 1). In 39 cases, fathers instead of mothers filled in the CBCL, but as there were no detectable differences of scores between fathers or mothers, we analysed them together.

Fig. 1

Number of participating children and available data

Table 1 shows the characteristics of the study children and their parents. About one-third of the participating children were from Spain. Most of the parents had a middle or high level of education. Every tenth child was categorized to have high internalizing or externalizing problems as defined by decile and 27% of these children had both internalizing and externalizing problems.

Table 1 Characteristics of participating children and their parents

Overall, we measured sleep duration for 1464 nights ranging from 2 to 5 nights per child. Children slept on average 9.25 h per night (SD: 0.67). We could not observe significant differences in night sleep duration due to day of sleep measurement (weekday or weekend day). Sixty-seven percent of children slept on average within the recommended range of 9–12 h per night. Boys had significantly (p < 0.001) shorter night sleep durations (about 15 min less) than girls (Table 2). Sleep duration differed between countries, with children from Belgium and Germany showing a longer nocturnal sleep duration than children from Italy and Spain (Table 2). There was no significant difference in sleep duration measurements based on seasons.

Table 2 Nocturnal sleep duration of participating children by sex, country and season of sleep duration measurement

Table 3 shows the associations of night sleep duration (continuous in hours and dichotomized) with internalizing and externalizing problems (low/high). An increase of 1 h sleep duration per night was significantly related to a lower risk of having internalizing problems (adjusted OR = 0.51; 95% CI 0.29, 0.91). Further, children who adhere to the recommendation of the AASM had a lower risk for internalizing problems (adjusted OR = 0.45; 95% CI 0.21, 0.99). Base models delivered similar results (Online Resource Table 2). A poorer mental health status of the mother or father (GHQ-12 z-score) was significantly associated with a higher risk of internalizing problems of the child in both adjusted models (OR = 1.63; 95% CI 1.23, 2.17; OR = 1.64; 95% CI 1.24, 2.18), while none of the other covariates showed a significant association with internalizing problems.

Table 3 Adjusted associations between nocturnal sleep duration and internalizing and externalizing problems of children at 8 years of age

Nocturnal sleep duration in hours and externalizing problems showed no significant association (adjusted OR = 0.77; 95% CI 0.44–1.35). Further, there was no association between adherence to AASM recommendation and externalizing problems (adjusted OR = 0.53; 95% CI 0.25–1.16). Base models obtained similar results (Online Resource Table 2). A poorer mental health status of the mother or father was significantly associated with a higher risk of externalizing problems of the child in both adjusted models (OR = 1.56; 95% CI 1.19, 2.05; OR = 1.55; 95% CI 1.18, 2.03). Furthermore, the mother’s age at child’s birth showed a significant association with externalizing problems (adjusted OR = 0.91; 95% CI 0.83, 0.99; adjusted OR = 0.91; 95% CI 0.83, 0.99). None of the other covariates were significantly associated with externalizing problems.

Sensitivity analysis on the sample with three or more nights of sleep recording and without adjusting for sex and country delivered similar results (Online Resource Tables 3 and 4). Online Resource Table 5 shows the associations of night sleep duration with the subscales of internalizing and externalizing problems. There was no significant association in a specific subscale.


The present study investigated device-measured nocturnal sleep duration and its association with internalizing and externalizing problems in 8-year-old children from five European countries. Besides sex and country differences in sleep durations, we observed that an increase of 1 h sleep duration per night or the adherence to the AASM recommendation was significantly related to a lower risk of having internalizing problems even when controlling for other variables, while sleep duration and externalizing problems were not associated.

Some observational and experimental studies looked at device-measured sleep and different spectrums of problem behaviour in children. Most of the observational studies have a cross-sectional design. In the study of Nixon et al. [18] sleep of 519 7-year-old children was measured by actigraphs and dichotomized into less than 9 h and more than 9 h sleep per night. Similar to our results, less than 9 h sleep was significantly associated with higher emotional lability scores compared to children sleeping more than 9 h per night. Externalizing symptoms like attention deficit or hyperactivity disorder scores did not differ with sleep duration. Emotional lability scores and externalizing symptoms were measured by the Conners Rating Scale Parent Form. However, the results were based on sleep duration of just one night measurement. Another actigraph-study observed that a decreased sleep duration was not associated with parent-reported CBCL externalizing symptoms in 49 school-aged children but with teacher-reported externalizing symptoms measured by the Teacher’s Report Form [19]. The results suggest that externalizing problems seem to be more evident in the school environment than at home. This could be a reason why we did not find an association between sleep and parent-reported externalizing problems.

Paavonen et al. [20] showed that 280 8-year-old children with less than 7.7 h of sleep per night, measured by actigraphs, had an increased risk for behavioural problems like hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms using maternal ratings of the ADHD Rating Scale IV. Differences to our results can be due to other cut-offs to define short sleep (7.7 vs. 9 h in our study) and the focus on attention problems and hyperactivity symptoms rather than on aggressive and rule-breaking behaviour. As attention problems and hyperactivity are not part of the CBCL externalizing score, this spectrum of behavioural problems was not included in our analysis.

Longitudinal studies with objective sleep measurement methods are relatively rare in children and have suggested that reduced sleep is associated with an increased risk of future occurrence of emotional and externalizing symptoms [36, 37].

A few studies in children have examined experimentally induced sleep deprivation. Vriend et al. [15] showed in 8- to 12-year-old children that going to bed 1 h later for four nights relative to the typical bedtime had significant consequences on emotion regulation and positive affective responses measured by the parent-reported Emotion Questionnaire and an Affective Response Task. Another study in 50 adolescents aged 14–17 years reported that sleep restriction to 6.5 h in bed per night for five nights resulted in poorer emotional regulation and more feelings of anxiety, anger and tension (self-reports on Profile of Moods States) compared to the healthy sleep duration group (10 h in bed per night for five nights) [16]. Gruber et al. [17] observed that a restriction of sleep over five nights in 7- to 11-year-old children had negative effects on emotionality and moodiness in school, measured by the Conners’ Global Index—Teachers, compared to children with extended sleep. These findings imply that even a modest sleep restriction of a realistic amount of sleep over a few nights can weaken the ability to regulate emotions, which can lead to problem behaviour in children. This emphasizes the importance of perceiving sleep as a potentially modifiable factor in children’s emotional health.

In the literature, several hypotheses try to explain how sleep and behaviour might be related. The overnight therapy hypothesis for example proposed that sleep provides a timeframe for resetting the neuronal systems [38]. One experimental study in adults showed that severe sleep deprivation leads to a more intense amygdala response to negative emotional stimuli compared to individuals who were not sleep-deprived [39]. As this system is involved in the affect regulation and processing of emotions, insufficient sleep can have negative impacts on emotional regulation and mood. The applicability of this hypothesis for children needs further clarification.

Our analysis showed sex and country-specific differences in sleep duration. Girls slept on average 15 min longer than boys, a finding which is consistent with previous studies in school-aged children [40, 41]. The cause for the observed sex difference is still unclear, but there is some support that girls are more sensitive to their sleep requirements and that parenting styles or socio-cultural effects may play a role [40, 41].

Nocturnal sleep duration differed between countries, with children from middle Europe (Germany, Belgium) showing a longer sleep duration than children in southern (Italy, Spain) or eastern (Poland) countries. This is in line with results from the IDEFICS study that reported significant differences between sleep durations in eight European countries, with children from northern countries sleeping longer than children in middle or southern Europe [42]. One reason could be cultural differences in sleep habits [42]. Norms and expectations regarding normal and problematic sleep of children may differ between countries and can lead to various bedtime routines. In addition, social demands like school starting times can vary in countries and regulate the sleep of school-children differently [43].

Strengths and limitations

One strength of the study is the multicentre design with participants from metropolitan areas of five European countries. This makes it possible to generalize the results to other European children with similar demographic backgrounds and living conditions.

Another strength includes the device-measured nocturnal sleep duration. The gold standard for sleep measurements is laboratory measurements like polysomnography, which are not applicable in larger epidemiological studies. The SenseWear Armband is easy to handle and does not disturb the usual sleep habits of children [25, 26]. There is a paucity of validation studies for the SenseWear Armband and its use for sleep in normative samples of children. Two studies have shown that the armband was less accurate on an individual level compared to polysomnography measurements which prevents the armband from being used as a clinical tool [25, 26]. Furthermore, due to the lack of standardization of scoring rules for the armband, we based our sleep definition on scoring rules used in actigraph-studies even if we used an arm placement and not a wrist or waist placement [27].

It is difficult to directly compare the results of accelerometer-studies with our study due to various devices used and a different number of days measured. One limitation of our study is the relatively short observation time from 2 to 5 nights. The AASM recommends for actigraph studies a recording time for a minimum of 72 h and other studies reported four to seven nights [44, 45]. However, our measurements provided reasonable values for night sleep duration and are comparable to a meta-analysis of actigraphically-measured sleep in 6- to 8-year-old children (range of the pooled mean sleep duration: 8.53–9.43 h) [46].

Furthermore, the CBCL assessment was based on parent-reported data and could be affected by socially desirable answers despite guaranteed anonymity. Parents’ expectations regarding a normal or problematic behaviour of children could have been affected the scores. Additionally, the selection of externalizing problem items in the CBCL does not cover attention problems and hyperactivity. Nevertheless, the CBCL is a well-standardized screening tool fitting exactly for the age group and is designed to be filled by parents.

A further limitation is the cross-sectional design of the study that does not allow an interpretation of longitudinal relationships.


In a cross-sectional multicentre study in 8-year-old European children, each additional hour of nocturnal sleep duration and the adherence to the AASM recommendation reduced the risk of having internalizing problems. Externalizing problems were not associated with night sleep duration.

Adequate sleep duration throughout primary-school years is important for children’s optimal emotional health. Pediatricians should consider sleep as a potential risk factor for internalizing problems in children. Further research on longitudinal associations is needed to determine whether short sleep is a cause or consequence of problem behaviour.

Data availability

The authors support sharing data with other researchers for legitimate research purposes. However, the study is still ongoing and data cannot yet be anonymized as we currently plan a further follow-up. Therefore, according to the General Data Protection Regulation and the institution’s data protection rules individual study participant data cannot be put in the public domain but can only be shared after establishing a written data sharing agreement ensuring that collaborating researchers do not violate privacy regulations and are in keeping with informed consent that is provided by study participants. Written requests to access the data may be submitted to:

Code availability

Statistical analysis was carried out with SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics 26).



American Academy of Sleep Medicine


Child Behaviour Checklist


Childhood Obesity Project


Confidence interval


General Health Questionnaire


Odds ratio


Standard deviation


  1. 1.

    Braddick F, Carral V, Jenkins R, Jané-Llopis E (2009) Child and Adolescent Mental Health in Europe: Infrastructures, Policy and Programmes. European Communities, Luxembourg. Accessed 29 May 2020

  2. 2.

    World Health Organization (2001) The World health report 2001. Mental health: new understanding, new hope. World Health Organization, Accessed 18 May 2020

  3. 3.

    Ravens-Sieberer U, Ottová-Jordan V (2016) Children's Mental Health in Europe: the current situation and its implications. In: Matthes M, Pulkkinen L, Heys B, Clouder C, Pinto LM (eds) Improving the Quality of Childhood in Europe, vol 6. Alliance for Childhood European Network Foundation, Brussels, Belgium, pp 98–111. Accessed 28 Apr 2020

  4. 4.

    World Health Organization (2018) Adolescent mental health in the European Region: WHO Regional Office for Europe: Factsheet for World Mental Health Day 2018. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark. Accessed 29 May 2020

  5. 5.

    Patel V, Flisher AJ, Hetrick S, McGorry P (2007) Mental health of young people: a global public-health challenge. Lancet 369(9569):1302–1313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Tien J, Lewis GD, Liu J (2020) Prenatal risk factors for internalizing and externalizing problems in childhood. World J Pediatr 16(4):341–355.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bernard-Bonnin A-C, Canadian Paediatric Society, Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Committee (2004) Maternal depression and child development. Paediatr Child Health 9(8):575–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Letourneau NL, Duffett-Leger L, Levac L, Watson B, Young-Morris C (2011) Socioeconomic status and child development: a meta-analysis. J Emot Behav Disord 21(3):211–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Tarokh L, Hamann C, Schimmelmann BG (2014) Sleep in child and adolescent psychiatry: overlooked and underappreciated. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 23(6):369–372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Gruber R, Carrey N, Weiss SK, Frappier JY, Rourke L, Brouillette RT, Wise MS (2014) Position statement on pediatric sleep for psychiatrists. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 23(3):174–195

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Chaput JP, Gray CE, Poitras VJ, Carson V, Gruber R, Olds T, Weiss SK, Connor Gorber S, Kho ME, Sampson M, Belanger K, Eryuzlu S, Callender L, Tremblay MS (2016) Systematic review of the relationships between sleep duration and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 41(6 Suppl 3):S266-282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Reynaud E, Vecchierini MF, Heude B, Charles MA, Plancoulaine S (2018) Sleep and its relation to cognition and behaviour in preschool-aged children of the general population: a systematic review. J Sleep Res 27(3):e12636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Astill RG, Van der Heijden KB, Van Ijzendoorn MH, Van Someren EJ (2012) Sleep, cognition, and behavioral problems in school-age children: a century of research meta-analyzed. Psychol Bull 138(6):1109–1138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Dayyat EA, Spruyt K, Molfese DL, Gozal D (2011) Sleep estimates in children: parental versus actigraphic assessments. Nat Sci Sleep 3:115–123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Vriend JL, Davidson FD, Corkum PV, Rusak B, Chambers CT, McLaughlin EN (2013) Manipulating sleep duration alters emotional functioning and cognitive performance in children. J Pediatr Psychol 38(10):1058–1069.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Baum KT, Desai A, Field J, Miller LE, Rausch J, Beebe DW (2014) Sleep restriction worsens mood and emotion regulation in adolescents. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 55(2):180–190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gruber R, Cassoff J, Frenette S, Wiebe S, Carrier J (2012) Impact of sleep extension and restriction on children’s emotional lability and impulsivity. Pediatrics 130(5):e1155-1161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Nixon GM, Thompson JM, Han DY, Becroft DM, Clark PM, Robinson E, Waldie KE, Wild CJ, Black PN, Mitchell EA (2008) Short sleep duration in middle childhood: risk factors and consequences. Sleep 31(1):71–78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Aronen ET, Paavonen EJ, Fjallberg M, Soininen M, Torronen J (2000) Sleep and psychiatric symptoms in school-age children. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 39(4):502–508.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Paavonen EJ, Raikkonen K, Lahti J, Komsi N, Heinonen K, Pesonen AK, Jarvenpaa AL, Strandberg T, Kajantie E, Porkka-Heiskanen T (2009) Short sleep duration and behavioral symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in healthy 7- to 8-year-old children. Pediatrics 123(5):e857-864.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Achenbach TM (1991) Manual for the child behavior checklist/4–18 and 1991 Profile. University of Vermont, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Koletzko B, von Kries R, Closa R, Escribano J, Scaglioni S, Giovannini M, Beyer J, Demmelmair H, Gruszfeld D, Dobrzanska A, Sengier A, Langhendries JP, Rolland Cachera MF, Grote V, European Childhood Obesity Trial Study Group (2009) Lower protein in infant formula is associated with lower weight up to age 2 y: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Clin Nutr 89(6):1836–1845.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Weber M, Grote V, Closa-Monasterolo R, Escribano J, Langhendries JP, Dain E, Giovannini M, Verduci E, Gruszfeld D, Socha P, Koletzko B, European Childhood Obesity Trial Study Group (2014) Lower protein content in infant formula reduces BMI and obesity risk at school age: follow-up of a randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr 99(5):1041–1051.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Andre D, Pelletier R, Farringdon J, Safier S (2006) The Development of the SenseWear Armband, a Revolutionary Energy Assessment Device to Assess Physical Activity and Lifestyle. BodyMedia Inc, Pittsburgh, PA.

  25. 25.

    Soric M, Turkalj M, Kucic D, Marusic I, Plavec D, Misigoj-Durakovic M (2013) Validation of a multi-sensor activity monitor for assessing sleep in children and adolescents. Sleep Med 14(2):201–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Roane BM, Van Reen E, Hart CN, Wing R, Carskadon MA (2015) Estimating sleep from multisensory armband measurements: validity and reliability in teens. J Sleep Res 24(6):714–721.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Meltzer LJ, Montgomery-Downs HE, Insana SP, Walsh CM (2012) Use of actigraphy for assessment in pediatric sleep research. Sleep Med Rev 16(5):463–475.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Paruthi S, Brooks LJ, D’Ambrosio C, Hall WA, Kotagal S, Lloyd RM, Malow BA, Maski K, Nichols C, Quan SF, Rosen CL, Troester MM, Wise MS (2016) Consensus statement of the American academy of sleep medicine on the recommended amount of sleep for healthy children: methodology and discussion. J Clin Sleep Med 12(11):1549–1561.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA (2001) Manual for the ASEBA schoolage forms and profiles. University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Perez-Garcia M, Luna JD, Torres-Espinola FJ, Martinez-Zaldivar C, Anjos T, Steenweg-de Graaff J, Weber M, Grote V, Gruszfeld D, Verduci E, Poncelet P, Escribano J, Tiemeier H, Koletzko B, Campoy C (2019) Cultural effects on neurodevelopmental testing in children from six European countries: an analysis of NUTRIMENTHE Global Database. Br J Nutr 122(s1):S59-67.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Reynaud E, Forhan A, Heude B, Charles MA, Plancoulaine S, Eden Mother-Child Cohort Study Group (2018) Night-waking and behavior in preschoolers: a developmental trajectory approach. Sleep Med 43:90–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Paavonen EJ, Porkka-Heiskanen T, Lahikainen AR (2009) Sleep quality, duration and behavioral symptoms among 5–6-year-old children. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 18(12):747–754.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Unesco (1997) International Standard Classification of Education, ISCED 1997.

  34. 34.

    Goldberg D, Williams P (1988) A user’s guide to the General Health Questionnaire. NFER-NELSON, Windsor

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Closa-Monasterolo R, Gispert-Llaurado M, Canals J, Luque V, Zaragoza-Jordana M, Koletzko B, Grote V, Weber M, Gruszfeld D, Szott K, Verduci E, ReDionigi A, Hoyos J, Brasselle G, Escribano Subias J (2017) The Effect of postpartum depression and current mental health problems of the mother on child behaviour at eight years. Matern Child Health J 21(7):1563–1572.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Ranum BM, Wichstrom L, Pallesen S, Falch-Madsen J, Halse M, Steinsbekk S (2019) Association between objectively measured sleep duration and symptoms of psychiatric disorders in middle childhood. JAMA Netw Open 2(12):e1918281.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kelly RJ, El-Sheikh M (2014) Reciprocal relations between children’s sleep and their adjustment over time. Dev Psychol 50(4):1137–1147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Walker MP, van der Helm E (2009) Overnight therapy? The role of sleep in emotional brain processing. Psychol Bull 135(5):731–748.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Yoo SS, Gujar N, Hu P, Jolesz FA, Walker MP (2007) The human emotional brain without sleep-a prefrontal amygdala disconnect. Curr Biol 17(20):R877-878.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Biggs SN, Lushington K, James MA, van den Heuvel C, Kennedy JD (2013) Gender, socioeconomic, and ethnic differences in sleep patterns in school-aged children. Sleep Med 14(12):1304–1309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Ekstedt M, Nyberg G, Ingre M, Ekblom O, Marcus C (2013) Sleep, physical activity and BMI in six to ten-year-old children measured by accelerometry: a cross-sectional study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 10:82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Hense S, Barba G, Pohlabeln H, De Henauw S, Marild S, Molnar D, Moreno LA, Hadjigeorgiou C, Veidebaum T, Ahrens W (2011) Factors that influence weekday sleep duration in European children. Sleep 34(5):633–639.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Jenni OG, O’Connor BB (2005) Children’s sleep: an interplay between culture and biology. Pediatrics 115(1 Suppl):204–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Littner M, Kushida CA, Anderson WM, Bailey D, Berry RB, Davila DG, Hirshkowitz M, Kapen S, Kramer M, Loube D, Wise M, Johnson SF, Standards of Practice Committee of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (2003) Practice parameters for the role of actigraphy in the study of sleep and circadian rhythms: an update for 2002. Sleep 26(3):337–341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Taylor RW, Williams SM, Farmer VL, Taylor BJ (2015) The stability of sleep patterns in children 3 to 7 years of age. J Pediatr 166(3):697–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Galland BC, Short MA, Terrill P, Rigney G, Haszard JJ, Coussens S, Foster-Owens M, Biggs SN (2018) Establishing normal values for pediatric nighttime sleep measured by actigraphy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep 41(4):zsy017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank the participating families and all project partners for their enthusiastic support of the project. Furthermore, thanks to the European Childhood Obesity Trial Study Group, who designed and conducted the study, entered the data, and participated in the data analysis.


Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The study reported has been carried out with partial financial support from the Commission of the European Community; specific research, technological development, and demonstration program "Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources", within the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013); project EarlyNutrition under grant agreement no. 289346; the European Union H2020 project LIFECYCLE under grant no. 733206; the European Research Council Advanced Grant META-GROWTH (ERC-2012-AdG: no.322605) and partial financial support from the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (2571/7.PR/2012/2). This article does not necessarily reflect the views of the Commission and in no way anticipates the future policy in this area. No funding bodies had any role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information




KG analyzed the data and drafted and finalized the manuscript. DG, JCK, NF, RCM, FM, PP and EV conducted the study, entered data at study sites, and critically reviewed the manuscript. BK designed the research and critically reviewed the manuscript. VG designed the research, participated in the data analysis, and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veit Grote.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All research was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Local ethics committees of each study center approved the trial: Belgium (Comité d’Ethique de L’Hopital Universitaire des Enfants Reine Fabiola; No. CEH 14/02), Germany (Bayerische Landesärztekammer Ethik-Kommission; No. 02070), Italy (Azienda Ospedaliera San Paolo Comitato Etico; No 14/2002), Poland (Instytut Pomnik-Centrum Zdrowia Dziecka Komitet Etyczny; No 243/KE/2001), and Spain (Comité ético de investigación clínica del Hospital Universitario de Tarragona Joan XXIII).

Consent to participate

Parents and children gave their written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 30 KB)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guerlich, K., Gruszfeld, D., Czech-Kowalska, J. et al. Sleep duration and problem behaviour in 8-year-old children in the Childhood Obesity Project. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry (2021).

Download citation


  • Sleep quantity
  • Child Behaviour Checklist
  • Emotional health
  • Behavioural problems
  • Schoolchildren