Impaired predictability: enhanced fluctuations in the parenting behaviour of mothers of pre-school children with clinical diagnoses across three different play tasks
Fluctuations in parenting behaviour are thought to be important for the development of child psychopathology. This study focusses on fluctuations in the parenting behaviour of mothers with 3–6-year-old children with a clinical diagnosis according to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10) (N = 39) and compared them with a control group of mothers with children without a clinical diagnosis (N = 41). In a laboratory setting, we compared the quality of mother–child interactions between both groups using three increasingly challenging co-operation tasks. At first, the mother and child interacted via a free play task. They then co-operated within a constructional play task and finally within a challenging problem-solving task. We analysed the mothers’ parenting behaviour using the Laboratory Parenting Assessment Battery (LAB-PAB) and children’s problem behaviours by means of their mothers’ rating using the Child Behavior Checklist 1 ½–5 (CBCL). The results corroborated our hypotheses. Mothers of the group of children with clinical diagnoses had a lower parenting quality and higher fluctuations in parenting behaviour across situations compared with the non-clinical group. Further analysis revealed that specific fluctuations in maternal involvement and hostility uniquely predicted child psychopathology, measured with the CBCL, showing incremental validity of fluctuations in maternal involvement, when controlling for parenting quality and maternal difficulties in emotion regulation, measured with the Difficulties in Emotional Regulation scale. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for clinical interventions, as well as theoretical implications and future research.
KeywordsParenting Within-person variability Fluctuation Child psychopathology Pre-school children
We would like to thank Luisa Lampkemeyer, Lara Jegelka, and Mona Hillmann for the recruitment of the non-clinical group. Moreover, we thank the staff from the outpatient and day clinics of the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy at the University Hospital of Münster.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there are no conflicts of interest.
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Association of the Physicians Chamber Westfalen-Lippe. All mothers gave written consent and their children gave oral consent to participate in the study after a detailed explanation of the course of the study and data protection aspects. All participants got a 15 Euro voucher as an expense allowance.
- 4.Holodynski M, Friedlmeier W (2006) Development of emotions and emotion regulation, vol 8. Springer Science & Business Media, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 5.Cummings EM, Valentino K (2015) Developmental psychopathology. Handbook of child psychology and developmental science, pp. 1–41Google Scholar
- 9.Ainsworth MDS, Blehar MC, Waters E, Wall SN (2015) Patterns of attachment: a psychological study of the strange situation. Psychology Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 14.Seifer R, Sameroff AJ, Anagnostopolou R, Elias PK (1992) Mother-infant interaction during the first year: effects of situation, maternal mental illness, and demographic factors. Infant Behav Dev 15(4):405–426Google Scholar
- 15.Thompson SC, Cheek PR, Graham MA (1988) The other side of perceived control: Disadvantages and negative effects. In: Spacapan S, Oskamp S (eds) The claremont symposium on applied social psychology. The social psychology of health. Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, US, pp. 69–93Google Scholar
- 20.Abidin RR (1992) The determinants of parenting behavior. J Clin Child Psychol 21(4):407–412Google Scholar
- 21.Marks DJ, Cyrulnik SE, Kera EC, Berwid OG, Santra A, Halperin JM (2006) Objective and subjective assessments of parenting in hyperactive preschoolers. Infant Child Dev 15(4):439–442Google Scholar
- 24.Madigan S, Plamondon A, Browne D, Jenkins J (2016) Stability of observed maternal behavior across tasks, time, and siblings. Parenting 16(2):108–124Google Scholar
- 28.Webster-Stratton C (1985) Dyadic parent–child interactive coding system-revised (DPICS-R): manual. Unpublished manuscript, University of WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- 30.Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA (2000) Manual for the ASEBA preschool forms and profiles. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
- 34.Nesselroade JR, Salthouse TA (2004) Methodological and theoretical implications of intraindividual variability in perceptual-motor performance. J Gerontol Ser B: Psychol Sci Soc Sci 59(2):P49–P55Google Scholar
- 36.Gratz KL, Roemer L (2004) Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 26(1):41–54Google Scholar
- 38.Neitzel C, Dopkins Stright A (2004) Parenting behaviours during child problem solving: the roles of child temperament, mother education and personality, and the problem-solving context. Int J Behav Dev 28(2):166–179Google Scholar
- 42.Cervone D (1985) Randomization tests to determine significance levels for microanalytic congruences between self-efficacy and behavior. Cognit Ther Res 9(4):357–365Google Scholar
- 43.Furr RM, Funder DC (2004) Situational similarity and behavioral consistency: subjective, objective, variable-centered, and person-centered approaches. J Res Pers 38(5):421–447Google Scholar
- 44.Repetti RL, Wood J (1997) Effects of daily stress at work on mothers’ interactions with preschoolers. J Fam Psychol 11(1):90Google Scholar
- 46.Patterson GR, Fisher PA (2002) Recent developments in our understanding of parenting: bidirectional effects, causal models, and the search for parsimony. Handb Parent 5:59–88Google Scholar
- 47.Patterson GR (1982) Coercive family process, vol 3. Castalia Publishing Company, KouvolaGoogle Scholar
- 50.Müller JM, Wagner K, Esins S, Romer G, Achtergarde S (2015) Das Play-PAB-Verfahren und seine Validierung an einer vorschulpsychiatrischen Inanspruchnahmepopulation/The Play-PAB and its Validation in a Preschool Psychiatric Population. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie 64(9):690–705PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 51.Morawska A, Basha A, Adamson M, Winter L (2015) Microanalytic coding versus global rating of maternal parenting behaviour. Early Child Dev Care 185(3):448–463Google Scholar
- 53.Amato PR, Rivera F (1999) Paternal involvement and children's behavior problems. J Marriage Fam 61(2):375–384Google Scholar
- 54.Pleck JH (2010) Paternal involvement. The role of the father in child development, p 58Google Scholar