Attachment and reflective functioning in children with somatic symptom disorders and disruptive behavior disorders
- 263 Downloads
Our goal in conducting this study was to examine whether children with somatic symptom disorders (SSD) and disruptive behavior disorders (DBD) have higher rates of insecure or disorganized attachment and difficulties in mentalizing (operationalized as reflective functioning) as compared to a control group. Participants were 131 children (8–15 years) spanning two groups—a clinical group (n = 85), comprised of children fitting the criteria of our target diagnostic classifications (SSD: N = 45; DBD: N = 40), as well as a comparison group of healthy control children (n = 46). Children completed the Child Attachment Interview, which was later coded by reliable raters for attachment security and reflective functioning (RF). Consistent with our predictions, children in the clinical group had significantly lower RF and were significantly more likely to have insecure (over 80%) and disorganized attachment (over 40%) than children in the comparison group. In addition, RF was significantly lower in children with DBD than children with SSD. Furthermore, in the SSD group, children’s RF regarding self was significantly lower than RF regarding others. Finally, consistent with prior studies, RF and attachment were associated. The findings indicate that school-aged children with SSD and DBD have higher rates of insecure and disorganized attachment. Consistent with theory, RF and attachment were loosely coupled, but RF alone differentiated among the diagnostic subgroups. Implications for treatment and prevention are discussed.
KeywordsAttachment Mentalization Reflective functioning Child psychopathology Somatic symptom disorders Disruptive behavior disorders
We wish to express our special gratitude toward participants for their involvement in the study. We are also grateful to the experts of mental health of Gaslini (Prof. E. Veneselli, Dr. L. Sciarretta, M. Savoini) and interns for their help with data collection.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Human or animal studies
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
- 6.Kurlansik SL, Maffei MS (2016) Somatic symptom disorder. Am Fam Physician 93:49–54Google Scholar
- 15.Marvin RS, Britner PA (1999) Normative development: the ontogeny of attachment. In: Cassidy J, Shaver PR (eds) Handbook of attachment: theory research and clinical application. Guilford Press, New York, pp 44–67Google Scholar
- 16.Ensink K, Borelli JL, Normandin L, Target M, Fonagy P (2018) Childhood sexual abuse and attachment insecurity: independent and interactive associations with children’s psychological adjustment (in press) Google Scholar
- 19.Kobac R, Zajac K, Madsen SD (2016) Attachment disruption, reparative processes, and psychopathology: theoretical and clinical implications. In: Cassidy J, Shaver PR (eds) Handbook of attachment: theory, research and clinical applications, 3rd edn. Guilford Press, New York, pp 25–39Google Scholar
- 25.Brazelton TB (1984) Neonatal behavioral assessment scale. Spastics International Medical Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 27.Ainsworth MDS, Blehar MC, Waters E, Wall S (1978) Patterns of attachment: a psychological study of the strange situation. Erlbaum, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 32.George C, Kaplan N, Main M (1985) Adult Attachment Interview. University of California Department of Psychology, Berkeley (unpublished manuscript) Google Scholar
- 38.Bizzi F (2018) The quality of attachment in children with Somatic Symptom Disorders and related disorders. Psicol Clin dello Svilupp (in press) Google Scholar
- 45.Fearon RP, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, van Ijzendoorn MH et al (2010) The significance of insecure attachment and disorganization in the development of children’s externalizing behavior: a meta-analytic study. Child Dev 81:435–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01405.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 48.Allen JG, Fonagy P, Bateman AW (2008) Mentalizing in clinical Practice. American Psychiatric Publishing, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- 49.Fonagy P, Allison E (2012) What is mentalization? The concept and its foundations in developmental research. In: Midgley N, Vrouva I (eds) Minding the child: mentalization-based interventions with children, young people and their families. Routledge, London, pp 11–34Google Scholar
- 50.Fonagy P, Gergely G, Jurist EL, Target M (2002) Affect regulation mentalization and the development of the self. Karnac, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 52.Fonagy P, Target M (1996) Playing with reality I. Int J Psycho-anal 77:217Google Scholar
- 58.Sharp C, Venta A (2012) Mentalizing problems in children and adolescents. In: Midgley NVI (ed) Minding the child: mentalization-based interventions with children, young people and their families. Routledge, London, pp 35–53Google Scholar
- 59.Bo S, Kongerslev M (2017) Self-reported patterns of impairments in mentalization, attachment, and psychopathology among clinically referred adolescents with and without borderline personality pathology. Borderline Pers Disord Emot Dysregul 4:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40479-017-0055-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 69.Waldinger RJ, Schulz MS, Barsky AJ, Ahern DK (2006) Mapping the road from childhood trauma to adult somatization: the role of attachment. Psychosom Med 68:129–135. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000195834.37094.a4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 72.Madigan S, Moran G, Schuengel C et al (2007) Unresolved maternal attachment representations, disrupted maternal behavior and disorganized attachment in infancy: links to toddler behavior problems. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 48:1042–1050. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01805.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 77.Achenbach T, Rescorla L (2001) Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms and profiles. University of Vermont Research Center for Children Youth and Families, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
- 78.Ensink K, Target M, Duval J, Oandasan C (2015) Child reflective functioning scale scoring manual: for application to the Child Attachment Interview. Anna Freud Centre, University College London, London (unpublished manuscript) Google Scholar
- 80.Cavanna D, Bizzi F, San Martini P, Castellano (2018) Child Attachment Interview: a psychometric Study of an Italian Sample. Psicol Clin dello Svilupp 22:111–137Google Scholar
- 83.Fonagy P, Target M, Steele H, Steele M (1998) Reflective-functioning manual version 5.0: for application to Adult Attachment Interviews. University College London, London (unpublished manuscript) Google Scholar
- 84.Ensink K (2004) Assessing theory of mind affective understanding and reflective functioning in primary school age children. Doctoral dissertation, University College LondonGoogle Scholar
- 85.Cohen J (1988) The effect size. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
- 86.Marty P (1991) Mentalisation et Psychosomatique. Synthélabo, ParisGoogle Scholar
- 88.Slade A, Sadler LS, Mayes LC (2005) Minding the baby: enhancing parental reflective functioning in a nursing/mental health home visiting program. In: Berlin LJ, Ziv Y, Amaya-Jackson L (eds) Duke series in child development and public policy Enhancing early attachments: theory, research, intervention, and policy. Guilford Press, New York, pp 152–177Google Scholar