Transition to adulthood for young people with intellectual disability: the experiences of their families
- 2.3k Downloads
Whilst the transition from school to adult roles can be challenging for any adolescent, for those with an intellectual disability it can present as a particularly difficult time both for the individual and their family. The process may involve coordinated planning, collaboration and decision-making among school staff, families and community agencies. This mixed-methods study utilised information from two cohorts: young people with Down syndrome in Western Australia (n = 190) and young people with intellectual disability (of any cause) in Queensland, Australia (n = 150). The parent-report questionnaires administered in both states comprised two parts: part 1 collected information about the individual with intellectual disability including information on health, functioning and service needs, and about specific transition related issues; and part 2 collected information about the health and well-being of their family. The majority (87 %) of parents said that they were involved in decision-making about transition planning but less than two-thirds (59.5 %) of young people were involved in this process. The three most helpful strategies indicated by parents that assisted with transition planning related to the provision of more information about financial assistance, the school transition program and the building of informal community-based supports. A number of themes emerged from the qualitative data which included parents’ views and concerns about the capacity of their young adult to adapt and change to life in adulthood, their difficulty navigating services and programs, issues and challenges around their young person building connectedness, strain on family wellbeing and finances and worry about the longer term future.
KeywordsIntellectual disability Down syndrome Transition Families
The authors would like to acknowledge the families who kindly participated in this study. Funding for the study was provided through an Australian Research Council Linkage Grant (#LP0989847).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval for the West Australian study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Women’s and Children’s Health Services in Western Australia (#1715/EP). Ethical approval for the Queensland study was granted by the University of Queensland Behavioural and Social Sciences Ethical Review Committee (Clearance No: 2009001648).
- 1.Forte M, Jahoda A, Dagnan D (2011) An anxious time? Exploring the nature of worries experienced by young people with a mild to moderate intellectual disability as they make the transition to adulthood. Br J Clin Psychol 50(4):398–411. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.2010.02002.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.McCollin MJ, Obiakor FE (2010) Transition from school to adult life. In: Peterson P, Baker E, McGaw B (eds) International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed). Elsevier, Oxford, pp 876–879. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01121-0
- 8.Wehmeyer ML, Palmer SB (2003) Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three-years after high-school: the impact of self-determination. Educ Train Dev Disabil 38(2):131–144Google Scholar
- 11.Morningstar ME, Turnbull AP, Turnbull HR III (1995) What do students with disabilities tell us about the importance of family involvement in the transition from school to adult life? Except Child 62(3):249Google Scholar
- 16.Ravin BH, Rubin JZ (1983) Social psychology, 2nd edn. Wiley, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- 19.Foley KR, Girdler S, Downs J, Jacoby P, Bourke J, Lennox N, Einfeld S, Llewellyn G, Parmenter TR, Leonard H (2014) Relationship between family quality of life and day occupations of young people with Down syndrome. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 49(9):1455–1465. doi: 10.1007/s00127-013-0812-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Lachapelle Y, Wehmeyer ML, Haelewyck MC, Courbois Y, Keith KD, Schalock R, Verdugo MA, Walsh PN (2005) The relationship between quality of life and self-determination: an international study. J Intellect Disabil Res 49(Pt 10):740–744. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00743.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Tuckerman P, Cain P, Long B, Klarkowski J (2012) An exploration of trends in open employment in Australia since 1986. J Vocat Rehabil 37:173–183Google Scholar
- 28.Statacorp (2003) Stata statistical software. Release 80. Stata corporation, College Station, TexasGoogle Scholar
- 30.Wagner M, Newman L, Cameto R, Garza N, Levine P (2005) After high school: a first look at the post-school experiences of youth with disabilities: a report from the national longitudinal transition study—2 (NLTS2). SRI International, Menlo ParkGoogle Scholar
- 31.Agran M, Blanchard C, Wehmeyer ML (2000) Promoting transition goals and self-determination through student self-directed learning: the self-determined learning model of instruction. Educ Train Mental Retard Dev Disabil 35(4):351–364Google Scholar
- 35.Griffin MM, McMillan ED, Hodapp RM (2010) Family perspectives on post-secondary education for students with intellectual disabilities. Educ Train Autism Dev Disabil 45(3):339–346Google Scholar
- 41.Martinez DC, Conroy JW, Cerreto MC (2012) Parent involvement in the transition Process of children with intellectual disabilities: the influence of inclusion on parent desires and expectations for postsecondary education. J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil 9(4):279–288. doi: 10.1111/jppi.12000 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.Kohler PD (1998) Taxonomy for transition programming: linking research and practice. Transition Research Institute, Champaigne, University of IllinoisGoogle Scholar
- 48.United Nations (2006) Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. United Nations, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 51.Parmenter T, Riches V (1991) Transition education: a pilot program for students with disabilities in transition in the NSW department of school education. Aust Disabil Rev 1:1–9Google Scholar