Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-acting medications for the hyperkinetic disorders

A systematic review and European treatment guideline

  • ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
  • Published:
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A systematic review of published and unpublished data on the use of long-acting medications in ADHD and hyperkinetic disorder is reported, giving effect sizes and numbers-to-treat for extended-release stimulant preparations and atomoxetine (ATX). A panel of experts from several European countries used the review to make recommendations about the use of these drugs in practice, and conclusions are reported: (1) Long-acting preparations should be available and used; (2) They should not replace short-acting drugs (which will be the initial treatment for many children for reasons of cost and flexibility of dosing). Individual clinical choice is needed. (3) Both ATX and extended-release preparations of stimulants should be available. The choice will depend upon the circumstances, and detailed recommendations are made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The spelling of dexamfetamine reflects the changes made in ‘Recommended International Non-proprietary Names’ (rINN) and ‘New British Approved Names’ (BAN) and follow European Directive 92/27/EEC. “Amphetamine” has not yet followed the convention. We are therefore following this inconsistent rule of spelling to help people using electronic retrieval. Trade rather than generic names of drugs have been used to distinguish the different preparations conveniently.

  2. Useful websites with fuller information about these interactions can be found at http://medicine.iupui.edu/flockhart/table.htm or at http://www.medscape.com/druginfo/druginterchecker?src=ads

  3. However, the IR MPH overcoat of the capsule could still be misused.

  4. Since these are determined by price, and price will vary from time to time and place to place, the prescriber is advised to check these generalisations against current circumstances. When considering the total medication costs there is more than just the cost of one pill to consider. Many patients taking one medication require longer coverage, top-up doses and medication for comorbidities or side effects. One should not choose a long-acting medication purely based on price.

  5. It has to be mentioned that clinician ratings were based on different sources of information. The Medikinet retard and Equasym XL studies used direct observations (lab-school ratings). In the Strattera trials, clinical investigators were specifically instructed not to use any other information as the basis for the rating except parent interviews (most Strattera studies), respectively teacher reports (one Strattera study; 75. Weiss M, Tannock R, Kratochvil C, Dunn D, Velez-Borras J, Thomason C, Tamura R, Kelsey D, Stevens L, Allen AJ (2005) A randomised, placebo-controlled study of once-daily ATX in the school setting in children with ADHD. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 44:647–655).

  6. The appearance of placebo and Concerta XL was different, i.e. it was not a blinded study.

References

  1. Adler LA, Spencer TJ, Milton DR, Moore RJ, Michelson D (2005) Long-term, open-label study of the safety and efficacy of atomoxetine in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: an interim analysis. J Clin Psychiatry 66:294–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Allen AJ, Kurlan RM, Gilbert DL, Coffey BJ, Linder SL, Lewis DW, Winner PK, Dunn DW, Dure LS, Sallee FR, Milton DR, Mintz MI, Ricardi RK, Erenberg G, Layton LL, Feldman PD, Kelsey DK, Spencer TJ (2005) Atomoxetine treatment in children and adolescents with ADHD and comorbid tic disorders. Neurology 65:1941–1949

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bangs ME, Hazell P, Danckaerts M, Williams D, Moore RJ, Levine L (2006) Atomoxetine for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and oppositional defiant disorder in children and adolescents (accepted for oral presentation). 159th Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association. Atlanta, GA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bangs ME, Tauscher-Wisniewski S, Polzer J, Zhang S, Acharya N, Desaiah D, Allen AJ (2005) Meta-analysis of suicide-related events in atomoxetine-treated patients (Poster). 52nd Annual AACAP Meeting, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  5. Biederman J, Mick E, Faraone SV (2000) Age-dependent decline of symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: impact of remission definition and symptom type. Am J Psychiatry 157:816–818

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Biederman J, Mick E, Surman C, Doyle R, Hammerness P, Harpold T, Dunkel S, Dougherty M, Aleardi M, Spencer T (2005) a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of oros methylphenidate in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry 59:829–835

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Biederman J, Quinn D, Weiss M, Markabi S, Weidenman M, Edson K, Karlsson G, Pohlmann H, Wigal S (2003) Efficacy and safety of Ritalin LA, a new, once daily, extended-release dosage form of methylphenidate, in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Paediatr Drugs 5:833–841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Clarke SA, Eiser C (2004) The measurement of health-related quality of life (QoL) in paediatric clinical trials: a systematic review. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2:66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Connor DF, Glatt SJ, Lopez ID, Jackson D, Melloni RH Jr (2002) Psychopharmacology and aggression. I: a meta-analysis of stimulant effects on overt/covert aggression-related behaviors in ADHD. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 41:253–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Döpfner M, Banaschewski T, Schmidt J, Uebel H, Schmeck K, Gerber WD, Günther M, Knölke U, Gehrke M, Häßler F, Resch F, Brünger M, Ose C, Fischer R, Poustka A, Rothenberger A, Lehmkuhl G (2003) Langzeitwirksames Methylphenidat bei Kindern mit Aufmerksamkeits-Hyperaktivitätsstörungen. Nervenheilkunde 22:85–92

    Google Scholar 

  11. Döpfner M, Gerber WD, Banaschewski T, Breuer D, Freisleder FJ, Gerber-von Muller G, Gunter M, Hassler F, Ose C, Rothenberger A, Schmeck K, Sinzig J, Stadler C, Uebel H, Lehmkuhl G (2004) Comparative efficacy of once-a-day extended-release methylphenidate, two-times-daily immediate-release methylphenidate, and placebo in a laboratory school setting. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 13(Suppl 1):I93–101

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Faraone SV, Biederman J (2004) Using meta-analysis to draw conclusions about ADHD medication effects. 17th ECNP Congress. Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  13. Faraone SV, Biederman J, Mick E (in press) The age dependent decline of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analysis of follow-up studies. Psychol Med 36:159–165

  14. Faraone SV, Biederman J, Spencer T, Aleardi M, Pagano C (2003) Using a meta-analysis to draw conclusions about ADHD medication effects (Poster). 156th Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association. San Francisco, California

    Google Scholar 

  15. Faraone SV, Biederman J, Spencer T, Aleardi M, Pagano C, META-ANALYSIS CTEOMFAU (in press) Comparing the efficacy of medications for ADHD using meta-analysis

  16. Faraone SV, Biederman J, Spencer T, Wilens T, Seidman LJ, Mick E, Doyle AE (2000) Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults: an overview. Biol Psychiatry 48:9–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Faraone SV, Spencer T, Aleardi M, Pagano C, Biederman J (2004) Meta-analysis of the efficacy of methylphenidate for treating adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychopharmacol 24:24–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Findling RL, Quinn D, Hatch S, Cameron S, DeCory H, McDowell M (submitted) Comparison of the clinical efficacy of twice-daily Ritalin®) and once-daily Equasym® XL with placebo in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Data on file UCB, submitted

  19. Fischer M, Barkley RA, Smallish L, Fletcher K (2002) Young adult follow-up of hyperactive children: self-reported psychiatric disorders, comorbidity, and the role of childhood conduct problems and teen CD. J Abnorm Child Psychol 30:463–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Geddes J, Butler R (2002) Depressive disorders. Clin Evid 7:867–882

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gonzalez MA, Pentikis HS, Anderl N, Benedict MF, DeCory HH, Dirksen SJ, Hatch SJ (2002) Methylphenidate bioavailability from two extended-release formulations. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 40:175–184

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Greenhill L, Vitiello B, Abikoff H, Kollins S, Wigal S, Swanson J (2004) Outcome results from the NIMH, multi-site, preschool ADHD treatment study (PATS). 51th Annual MCAP meeting, Washington, DC

  23. Greenhill LL, Findling RL, Swanson JM (2002) A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of modified-release methylphenidate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics 109:E39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jasinski DR, Faries D, Moore RJ, Allen AJ (2004) Abuse liability assessment of atomoxetine in a drug-abusing population. In: CINP; Abstract in Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 7, Suppl. 1, June 2004, p. S310

  25. Kaplan S, Heiligenstein J, West S, Busner J, Harder D, Dittmann R, Casat C, Wernicke JF (2004) Efficacy and safety of atomoxetine in childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder with comorbid oppositional defiant disorder. J Atten Disord 8:45–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kelsey D, Sutton V, Lewis D, Schuh K, Sumner C, Quintana H (2005) Morning- versus evening-dosed atomoxetine: effects on core ADHD symptoms. 158th Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association. Atlanta, GA

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kelsey DK, Sumner CR, Casat CD, Coury DL, Quintana H, Saylor KE, Sutton VK, Gonzales J, Malcolm SK, Schuh KJ, Allen AJ (2004) Once-daily atomoxetine treatment for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, including an assessment of evening and morning behavior: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Pediatrics 114:e1–e8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kemner JE, Wan GJ (2003) Increased persistency with once-daily OROS®Methylphenidate: an analysis of healthcare claims. 16th US Psychiatric & Mental Health Congress, Orlando, FL

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kimko HC, Cross JT, Abernethy DR (1999) Pharmacokinetics and clinical effectiveness of methylphenidate. Clin Pharmacokinet 37:457–470

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. King S, Griffin S, Hodges Z, Weatherly H, Asseburg C, Richardson G, Golder S, Taylor E, Drummond M, Riemsma R (2004) Methylphenidate, dexamfetamine and atomoxetine for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children (commercial in confidence information removed); produced by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD). http://www.nice.org.uk/pdf/ADHD_assessment_report.pdf

  31. Klassen AF, Miller A, Fine S (2004) Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents who have a diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics 114:e541–e547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kollins SH, Rush CR, Pazzaglia PJ, Ali JA (1998) Comparison of acute behavioral effects of sustained-release and immediate-release methylphenidate. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 6:367–374

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kratochvil CJ, Greenhill LL, March JS, Burke WJ, Vaughan BS (2004) The role of stimulants in the treatment of preschool children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. CNS Drugs 18:957–966

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lage M, Hwang P (2004) Effect of methylphenidate formulation for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder on patterns and outcomes of treatment. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 14:575–581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Leucht S, Pitschel-Walz G, Abraham D, Kissling W (1999) Efficacy and extrapyramidal side-effects of the new antipsychotics olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and sertindole compared to conventional antipsychotics and placebo. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Schizophr Res 35:51–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lopez F, Silva R, Pestreich L, Muniz R (2003) Comparative efficacy of two once daily methylphenidate formulations (Ritalin LA and Concerta) and placebo in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder across the school day. Paediatr Drugs 5:545–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lopez FA, Chandler MC, Biederman J, Spencer T, Mays DA, Michaels MA, Tulloch SJ (2003) Long-term Adderall XR treatment improves quality of life in ADHD children. 156th Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, San Francisco, California

    Google Scholar 

  38. Marchetti A, Magar R, Lau H, Murphy EL, Jensen PS, Conners CK, Findling R, Wineburg E, Carotenuto I, Einarson TR, Iskedjian M (2001) Pharmacotherapies for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: expected-cost analysis. Clin Ther 23:1904–1921

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Markowitz JS, Straughn AB, Patrick KS, DeVane CL, Pestreich L, Lee J, Wang Y, Muniz R (2003) Pharmacokinetics of methylphenidate after oral administration of two modified-release formulations in healthy adults. Clin Pharmacokinet 42:393–401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Matza LS, Rentz AM, Secnik K, Swensen AR, Revicki DA, Michelson D, Spencer T, Newcorn JH, Kratochvil CJ (2004) The link between health-related quality of life and clinical symptoms among children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Dev Behav Pediatr 25:166–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. McCabe SE, Teter CJ, Boyd CJ, Knight JR, Wechsler H (2005) Non-medical use of prescription opioids among U.S. college students: prevalence and correlates from a national survey. Addict Behav 30:789–805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. McGough JJ, Biederman J, Greenhill LL, McCracken JT, Spencer TJ, Posner K, Wigal S, Gornbein J, Tulloch S, Swanson JM (2003) Pharmacokinetics of SLI381 (ADDERALL XR), an extended-release formulation of Adderall. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 42:684–691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Michelson D (2004) Results from a double-blind study of atomoxetine, OROS methylphenidate, and placebo. Scientific Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 20D, p. 49

  44. Michelson D, Adler L, Spencer T, Reimherr FW, West SA, Allen AJ, Kelsey D, Wernicke J, Dietrich A, Milton D (2003) Atomoxetine in adults with ADHD: two randomized, placebo-controlled studies. Biol Psychiatry 53:112–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. MTA-Cooperative-Group (1999) A 14-month randomized clinical trial of treatment strategies for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. The MTA Cooperative Group. Multimodal treatment study of children with ADHD. Arch Gen Psychiatry 56:1073–1086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Newcorn JH, Spencer TJ, Biederman J, Milton DR, Michelson D (2005) Atomoxetine treatment in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and comorbid oppositional defiant disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 44:240–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Palumbo D, Spencer T, Lynch J, Co-Chien H, Faraone SV (2004) Emergence of tics in children with ADHD: impact of once-daily OROS methylphenidate therapy. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 14:185–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Pelham WE, Gnagy EM, Burrows-Maclean L, Williams A, Fabiano GA, Morrisey SM, Chronis AM, Forehand GL, Nguyen CA, Hoffman MT, Lock TM, Fielbelkorn K, Coles EK, Panahon CJ, Steiner RL, Meichenbaum DL, Onyango AN, Morse GD (2001) Once-a-day Concerta methylphenidate versus three-times-daily methylphenidate in laboratory and natural settings. Pediatrics 107:E105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Perwien AR, Faries DE, Kratochvil CJ, Sumner CR, Kelsey DK, Allen AJ (2004) Improvement in health-related quality of life in children with ADHD: an analysis of placebo controlled studies of atomoxetine. J Dev Behav Pediatr 25:264–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Rasmussen P, Gillberg C (2000) Natural outcome of ADHD with developmental coordination disorder at age 22 years: a controlled, longitudinal, community-based study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 39:1424–1431

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Read HA, Bangs ME, Jin L, Zhang S, Allen AJ (2005) Review of hepatic events associated with atomoxetine treatment in ADHD. 52nd Annual AACAP Meeting. Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  52. Rentz AM, Matza LS, Secnik K, Swensen A, Revicki DA (2005) Psychometric validation of the child health questionnaire (CHQ) in a sample of children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Qual Life Res 14:719–734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. SAMHSA (US Department of Health and Human Services—Substance Abuse & Mental Health Service Administration) (2005) US National Survey on Drug Use and Health 2004. http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/p0000016.htm#2k4

  54. SIGN (Scottish Intercoligiate Guidelines Networt) (2001) Attention deficit and hyperkinetic disorders in children and young people: a national clinical guideline. Vol. 52. Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  55. SIGN (Scottish Intercoligiate Guidelines Networt) (2004) A guidelines developer’s handbook. SIGN, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  56. Simpson D, Plosker GL (2004) Atomoxetine: a review of its use in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Drugs 64:205–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Sinzig JK, Döpfner M, Pluck J, Banaschewski T, Stephani U, Lehmkuhl G, Rothenberger A (2004) [Does a morning dose of Methylphenidate Retard reduce hyperkinetic symptoms in the afternoon?]. Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother 32:225–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Sonuga-Barke E, Daley D, Thompson MJS (2003) The management of preschool AD/HD; Addressing uncertainties about syndrome validity, diagnostic utility and treatment safety. Expert Rev Neurotherapeutics 3:89–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Sonuga-Barke EJ, Auerbach J, Campbell SB, Daley D, Thompson M (2005) Varieties of preschool hyperactivity: multiple pathways from risk to disorder. Dev Sci 8:141–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Sonuga-Barke EJ, Swanson JM, Coghill D, DeCory HH, Hatch SJ (2004) Efficacy of two once-daily methylphenidate formulations compared across dose levels at different times of the day: preliminary indications from a secondary analysis of the COMACS study data. BMC Psychiatry 4:28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Soomro GM (2002) Obsessive-compulsive disorder. Clin Evid 7:896–905

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Spencer T, Abikoff H, Connor DF, Biederman J, Pliszka S, Boellner S, Read SC, Pratt R (2006) The safety and efficacy of mixed amphetamine salts extended release Adderall XR in the Management of oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) with or without comorbid attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in School-age Children and Adolescents. Clin Ther 28:402–418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Spencer T, Biederman J, Abikoff HB, Pliszka SR, Boellner SW, Lopez FA, Read SC, Tulloch SJ (2004) Safety and efficacy of mixed amphetamine salts extended release in children and adolescents with oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). 157th Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, New York

    Google Scholar 

  64. Spencer T, Biederman J, Wilens T, Doyle R, Surman C, Prince J, Mick E, Aleardi M, Herzig K, Faraone S (2005) A large, double-blind, randomized clinical trial of methylphenidate in the treatment of adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry 57:456–463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Steele M, Weiss M, Swanson J, Wang J, Prinzo R, Binder C (2006) A randomized, controlled effectiveness trail of OROS-methylphenidate compared to usual care with immediate-release methylphenidate in ADHD. Can J Clin Pharmacol 13:e50–62

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Stein MA, Sarampote CS, Waldman ID, Robb AS, Conlon C, Pearl PL, Black DO, Seymour KE, Newcorn JH (2003) A dose-response study of OROS methylphenidate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics 112:e404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Sumner C, Donnelly C, Lopez FA, Sutton V, Bakken R, Paczkowski M, Kelsey D (2005) Atomoxetine treatment for pediatric patients with ADHD and comorbid anxiety. 158th Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association. Atlanta, GA

  68. Swanson J, Greenhill L, Pelham W, Wilens T, Wolraich M, Abikoff H, Atkins M, August G, Biederman J, Bukstein O, Conners CK, Efron L, Fiebelkorn K, Fried J, Hoffman M, Lambrecht L, Lerner M, Leventhal B, McBurnett K, Morse E, Palumbo D, Pfiffner L, Stein M, Wigal SB, Winans E (2000) Initiating Concerta TM (Oros® methylphenidate HCl) qu in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Res 3:59–76

    Google Scholar 

  69. Swanson J, Gupta S, Lam A, Shoulson I, Lerner M, Modi N, Lindemulder E, Wigal S (2003) Development of a new once-a-day formulation of methylphenidate for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: proof-of-concept and proof-of-product studies. Arch Gen Psychiatry 60:204–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Swanson JM, Wigal SB, Wigal T, Sonuga-Barke E, Greenhill LL, Biederman J, Kollins S, Nguyen AS, DeCory HH, Hirshe Dirksen SJ, Hatch SJ (2004) A comparison of once-daily extended-release methylphenidate formulations in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the laboratory school (the Comacs Study). Pediatrics 113:e206–e216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Taylor E, Döpfner M, Sergeant J, Asherson P, Banaschewski T, Buitelaar J, Coghill D, Danckaerts M, Rothenberger A, Sonuga-Barke E, Steinhausen HC, Zuddas A (2004) European clinical guidelines for hyperkinetic disorder—first upgrade. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 13(Suppl 1):I7–30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Tourette-Syndrome-Study-Group (2002) Treatment of ADHD in children with tics: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology 58:527–536

    Google Scholar 

  73. Volkow ND, Fowler JS, Wang GJ, Swanson JM (2004) Dopamine in drug abuse and addiction: results from imaging studies and treatment implications. Mol Psychiatry 9:557–569

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Wan GJ, Cooper KM (2004) Reduced symptoms of opposition and defiance in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder treated with methylphenidate. 17th US Psychiatric & Mental Health Congress, 2004, San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  75. Weiss M, Tannock R, Kratochvil C, Dunn D, Velez-Borras J, Thomason C, Tamura R, Kelsey D, Stevens L, Allen AJ (2005) A randomized, placebo-controlled study of once-daily atomoxetine in the school setting in children with ADHD. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 44:647–655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Wigal SB, McGough JJ, McCracken JT, Biederman J, Spencer TJ, Posner KL, Wigal TL, Kollins SH, Clark TM, Mays DA, Zhang Y, Tulloch SJ (2005) A laboratory school comparison of mixed amphetamine salts extended release (Adderall XR) and atomoxetine (Strattera) in school-aged children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Atten Disord 9:275–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Wilens T, Gignac M, Sweezey A, Monuteaux M, Biederman J (2006) Characteristics of Adolescents and Young Adults with ADHD Who Divert or Misuse their Prescribed Medications. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 45:408–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Wilens T, McBurnett K, Stein M, Lerner M, Spencer T, Wolraich M (2005) ADHD treatment with once-daily OROS methylphenidate: final results from a long-term open-label study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 44:1015–1023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Wilens TE (2003) Does the medicating ADHD increase or decrease the risk for later substance abuse? Rev Bras Psiquiatr 25:127–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Wolraich ML, Greenhill LL, Pelham W, Swanson J, Wilens T, Palumbo D, Atkins M, McBurnett K, Bukstein O, August G (2001) Randomized, controlled trial of oros methylphenidate once a day in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics 108:883–892

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors’ meeting was funded by equal contributions from several companies. The authors’ expenses for travel were paid but they received no fees. Some had potential competing interests, and these are detailed separately (appendix 2).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias Banaschewski.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Excerpts from: “SIGN 50: A guideline developers’ handbook Section 6: Forming guideline recommendations” [55]

These excerpts are included to assist the reader understand the grading system used in this guideline. They are not intended as a substitute for the full SIGN guidance and anyone wishing to explore this area further should consult the full guidance [55]:

“Guideline recommendations are graded to differentiate between those based on strong evidence and those based on weak evidence. This judgment is made on the basis of an (objective) assessment of the design and quality of each study and a (perhaps more subjective) judgment on the consistency, clinical relevance and external validity of the whole body of evidence. The aim is to produce a recommendation that is evidence-based, but which is relevant to the way in which health care is delivered and is therefore implementable.

It is important to emphasise that the grading does not relate to the importance of the recommendation, but to the strength of the supporting evidence and, in particular, to the predictive power of the study designs from which that data was obtained. Thus, the grading assigned to a recommendation indicates to users the likelihood that, if that recommendation is implemented, the predicted outcome will be achieved.” SIGN grading system

Levels of evidence

1++

High quality meta analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs, or RCTs with a very low risk of bias

1+

Well conducted meta analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs, or RCTs with a low risk of bias

1−

Meta analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs, or RCTs with a high risk of bias

2++

High quality systematic reviews of case-control or cohort studies, High quality case–control or cohort studies with a very low risk of confounding, bias, or chance and a high probability that the relationship is causal

2+

Well conducted case–control or cohort studies with a low risk of confounding, bias, or chance and a moderate probability that the relationship is causal

2−

Case–control or cohort studies with a high risk of confounding, bias, or chance and a significant risk that the relationship is not causal

3

Non-analytic studies, e.g. case reports, case series

4

Expert opinion

Grades of recommendation

A

At least one meta-analysis, systematic review, or RCT rated as 1++, and directly applicable to the target population; or A systematic review of RCTs or a body of evidence consisting principally of studies rated as 1+, directly applicable to the target population, and demonstrating overall consistency of results

B

A body of evidence including studies rated as 2++, directly applicable to the target population, and demonstrating overall consistency of results; or Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 1++ or 1+

C

A body of evidence including studies rated as 2+, directly applicable to the target population and demonstrating overall consistency of results; or Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 2++

D

Evidence level 3 or 4; or Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 2+

Good practice points

✓ Recommended best practice based on the clinical experience of the guideline development group

On occasion, guideline development groups find that there is an important practical point that they wish to emphasise but for which there is not, nor is their likely to be, any research evidence. This will typically be where some aspect of treatment is regarded as such sound clinical practice that nobody is likely to question it. These are marked in the guideline as Good Practice Points, and are indicated . It must be emphasised that these are not an alternative to evidence-based recommendations, and should only be used where there is no alternative means of highlighting the issue.

Appendix 2

Potential conflicts of interest

 

UCB

Lilly

Janssen/McNeil

Medice

Shire

Cephalon

Novartis

A or C

Other

A or C

Other

A or C

Other

A or C

Other

A or C

Other

A or C

Other

A or C

Other

Asherson

   

X

X

X

        

Banaschewski

X

 

X

X

 

X

X

X

X

     

Buitelaar

X

X

X

X

X

X

 

X

X

     

Coghill

X

X

X

X

X

X

  

X

 

X

   

Danckaerts

X

 

X

X

X

X

    

X

 

X

X

Döpfner

X

X

X

X

 

X

X

X

X

 

X

   

Faraone

  

X

X

X

X

  

X

X

 

X

X

X

Rothenberger

X

 

X

X

X

X

X

X

  

X

   

Santosh

X

 

X

X

 

X

        

Sergeant

  

X

X

X

X

X

 

X

     

Sonuga-Barke

X

X

X

X

 

X

  

X

     

Steinhausen

X

 

X

X

          

Taylor

              

Zuddas

X

 

X

X

X

X

  

X

 

X

  

X

  1. Note—A or C = served in an advisory or consultancy role either personally or for ones employer. This includes advisory boards
  2. Other—Paid public speaking/conference attendance support/unrestricted research support/meeting or conference grants

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Banaschewski, T., Coghill, D., Santosh, P. et al. Long-acting medications for the hyperkinetic disorders. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 15, 476–495 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-006-0549-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-006-0549-0

Keywords

Navigation