Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does successful training of temporal processing of sound and phoneme stimuli improve reading and spelling?

  • ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
  • Published:
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to measure and train auditory temporal processing in children with dyslexia and to examine whether there was a transfer of improved auditory temporal processing to reading and spelling skills.

Methods

Computer-based procedures to measure and train temporal processing of sound and phoneme stimuli were developed. Test-scores for a normal control group consisting of 8-year-olds were established. Second graders with dyslexia were included in the training condition and divided into three groups: a control group, a group specifically trained in sound processing, and a third group specifically trained in phoneme processing. After an initial diagnostic procedure, both training groups received specific training every day for 4 weeks. All children, regardless of the group, received the same standard reading training programme designed for children with dyslexia at school. Outcome measures were assessed immediately after training as well as 6 and 12 months later.

Results

Tests for temporal processing of sound and phoneme stimuli proved to be highly reliable. Children with dyslexia (N=44) showed impaired auditory processing of sound and phoneme stimuli compared to normal controls (N=51). There was a specific significant improvement in sound, respectively phoneme, processing for the training groups immediately after the end of training. The improvement of phoneme processing remained stable after 6 months and as a trend after 12 months. After 6 and 12 months of training, children of all three groups improved significantly in reading no matter what group. In spelling, the sound training group had a slight advantage after 6 months, which was not stable after 12 months.

Conclusions

Auditory temporal processing could be trained effectively at the sound and phoneme levels. However, no significant stable transfer of these improved abilities on reading and spelling exceeding the effect of the school-based standard training was demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amitay S, Ahissar M, Nelken I (2002) Auditory processing deficits in reading disabled adults. J Ass Res Otolaryngol 3:302–320

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aylward EH, Richards TL, Berninger VW, Nagy WE, Field KM, Grimme AC, Richards BS, Thomson JB, Cramer SC (2003) Instructional treatment associated with changes in brain activation in children with dyslexia. Neurology 61:212–219

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Badian NA, McAnulty GB, Duffy FH, Als H (1990) Prediction of dyslexia in kindergarten boys. Ann Dyslexia 40:152–169

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bailey PJ, Snowling MJ (2002) Auditory processing and the development of language and literacy. Br Med Bull 63:135–146

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Birkel P (1995) WRT1+: Weingarten Basic Vocabulary Orthography Test for 1st- and 2nd-graders. Hogrefe, Goettingen, Germany

  6. Birkel P (1994) WRT2+: Weingarten Basic Vocabulary Orthography Test for 2nd- and 3rd-graders. Hogrefe, Goettingen, Germany

  7. Birkel P (1994) WRT3+: Weingarten Basic Vocabulary Orthography Test for 3rd- and 4th-graders. Hogrefe, Goettingen, Germany

  8. Bishop DV, Carlyon RP, Deeks JM, Bishop SJ (1999) Auditory temporal processing impairment: neither necessary nor sufficient for causing language impairment in children. J Speech Lang Hear Res 42:1295–1310

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Farmer ME (1995) The evidence for a temporal processing deficit linked to dyslexia: a review. Psychon Bull Rev 2:460–493

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gibbons RD, Hedeker D, Elkin I, Waternaux C, Kraemer HC, Greenhouse JB, Shea MT, Imber SD, Sotsky SM, Watkins JT (1993) Some conceptual and statistical issues in analysis of longitudinal psychiatric data. Arch Gen Psychiatry 50:739–750

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gillam RB, Loeb DF, Friel-Patti S (2001) Looking back: A summary of five exploratory studies of FastForWord. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 10:269–273

    Google Scholar 

  12. Habib M, Rey V, Daffaure V, Camps R, Espesser R, Joly-Pottuz B, Démonet JF (2002) Phonological training in children with dyslexia using temporally modified speech: a three-step pilot investigation. Int J Lang Commun Disord 37:289–308

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hautus MJ, Setchell GJ, Waldie KE, Kirk IJ (2003) Age-related improvements in auditory temporal resolution in reading impaired children. Dyslexia 9:37–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hayes EA, Warrier CM, Nicol TG, Zecker SG, Kraus N (2003) Neural plasticity following auditory training in children with learning problems. Clin Neurophysiol 114:673–684

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Heath SM, Hogben JH, Clark CD (1999) Auditory temporal processing in disabled readers with and without oral language delay. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 40:637–647

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Heath SM, Hogben JH (2004) The reliability and validity of tasks measuring perception of rapid sequences in children with dyslexia. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 45:1275–1287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Heiervang E, Stevenson J, Hugdahl K (2002) Auditory processing in children with dyslexia. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 43:931–938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kujala T, Myllyviita K, Tervaniemi M, Alho K, Kallio J, Näätänen R (2000) Basic auditory dysfunction in dyslexia as demonstrated by brain activity measurements. Psychophysiology 37:262–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Landerl K, Wimmer H, Moser E (1997) SLRT. Salzburg Reading and Orthography Test. Hans Huber, Bern, Switzerland

  20. Lundberg I, Frost J, Petersen OP (1988) Effects of an extensive program stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading research Quarterly 23:253–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McAnnaly KI, Hansen PC, Cornelissen PL, Stein JF (1997) Effect of Time and Frequency Manipulation on Syllable Perception in Developmental Dylexics. J Speech Lang Hear Res 40:912–924

    Google Scholar 

  22. McArthur GM, Hogben JH, Edwards VT, Heath SM, Mengler ED (2000) On the “specifics” of specific reading disability and specific language impairment. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 41:869–874

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Merzenich MM, Sameshima K (1993) Cortical plasticity and memory. Curr Opin Neurol 3:187–197

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Merzenich MM, Jenkins WM, Johnston P, Schreiner C, Miller SL, Tallal P (1996) Temporal Processing Deficits of Language-Learning Impaired Children Ameliorated by Training. Science 271:77–80

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nagarajan S, Mahncke H, Salz T, Tallal P, Roberts T, Merzenich MM (1999) Cortical auditory signal processing in poor readers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:6483–6488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Poldrack RA, Temple E, Protopapas A, Nagarajan S, Tallal P, Merzenich MM. Gabrieli JDE (2001) Relations between the neural bases of dynamic auditory processing and phonological processing: evidence from fMRI. J Cogn Neurosci 13:687–697

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ramus F, Rosen S, Dakin SC, Day BL, Castellote JM, White S, Frith, U (2003) Theories of developmental dyslexia: insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults. Brain 126:841–865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rey V, De Martino S, Espesser R, Habib M (2002) Temporal processing and phonological impairment in dyslexia: effects of phoneme lengthening on order judgement of two consonants. Brain Lang 80:576–591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schneider W, Kuspert P, Roth E, Vise M, Marx H (1997) Short- and long-term effects of training phonological awareness in kindergarten: evidence from two German studies. J Exp Child Psychol 66:311–340

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schulte-Körne G, Bartling J, Deimel W, Remschmidt H (1998) The role of auditory temporal processing for reading and spelling disability. Percept Mot Skills 86:1043–1047

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Scientific Learning Corporation (1996) Fast ForWord TM (Computer software). Berkeley, CA: Author

  32. Share DL, Jorm AF, Maclean R, Matthews R (2002) Temporal processing and reading disability. Reading and Writing 15:151–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. StataCorp (2003) Stata Statistical Software: Release 8.2. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation

  34. Talcott JB, Witton C, Hebb GS, Stoodley CJ, Westwood EA, France SJ, Hannsen PC, Stein JF (2002) On the relationship between dynamic visual and auditory processing and literacy skills, results from a large primary-school study. Dyslexia 8:204–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tallal P (1980) Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children. Brain Lang 9:182–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tallal P, Miller SL, Bedi G, Byma G, Wang X, Nagarajan SS, Schreiner C, Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM (1996) Language Comprehension in Language-Learning Impaired Children Improved with Acoustically Modified Speech. Science 271:81–84

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Temple E, Deutsch GK, Poldrack RA, Miller SL, Tallal P, Merzenich MM, Gabrieli DE (2003) Neural deficits in children with dyslexia ameliorated by behavioral remediation: evidence from functional MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:2860–2865

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Trei L (2003) Remediation training improves reading ability of dyslexic children. Stanford Report, February 25. (http://news-service.standford.edu/news/february26/dyslexia-2)

  39. Uwer R, Albrecht R, v. Suchodoletz W (1997) Mismatch Negativity to speech stimuli in language-impaired children. Psychophysiology 34:91

    Google Scholar 

  40. Watson EU, Miller TK (1993) Auditory perception, phonological processing, and reading ability/disability. J Speech Hear Res 36:850–863

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Weiss R, Osterland J (1997) CFT1 Culture Fair Intelligence Test, Scale1,—German version. Hogrefe, Goettingen, Germany

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Klinik an der Lindenhöhe, Bertha-von-Suttner-Str. 1, 77654, Offenburg, Germany

    Ulrich Strehlow

  2. Dept. of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

    Johann Haffner, Jürgen Bischof, Volker Gratzka, Peter Parzer & Franz Resch

Authors
  1. Ulrich Strehlow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Johann Haffner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jürgen Bischof
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Volker Gratzka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Peter Parzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Franz Resch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrich Strehlow.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strehlow, U., Haffner, J., Bischof, J. et al. Does successful training of temporal processing of sound and phoneme stimuli improve reading and spelling?. Europ.Child & Adolescent Psych 15, 19–29 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-006-0500-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-006-0500-4

Key words

Search

Navigation