Skip to main content

Response perseveration and sensitivity to reward and punishment in boys with oppositional defiant disorder

Abstract

Response perseveration is the tendency to continue a response set for reward despite punishment. In the present study, response perseveration and sensitivity to reward and punishment were assessed in boys with oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). The study also examined the relation between punishment sensitivity and autonomic arousal. Nineteen ODD boys (mean age 9.8 years) and 20 normal control boys (NC) (mean age 9.7 years) were administered the door-opening task. In this task, the subject chooses either to open the next door or to stop playing; the opening of doors is initially rewarded and then increasingly punished. ODD boys opened more doors than NC boys. Following punishment, ODD boys took less time than NC boys before opening the next door, but did not differ from NC boys in time after reward. Mean skin conductance level was lower in ODD boys than in NC boys. The correlation coefficient between time after punishment and skin conductance level was moderately positive in the total sample. These results suggest that response perseveration in ODD boys is related to low punishment sensitivity and that skin conductance level is a marker of punishment sensitivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Achenbach TM (1991) Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4–18 and 1991 Profile. University of Vermont Deartment of Psychiatry, Burlington

  2. 2.

    American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edn (DSMIV). American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC

  3. 3.

    Daugherty TK, Quay HC (1991) Response perseveration and delayed responding in childhood behavior disorders. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 32:453–461

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Fonseca AC, Yule W (1995) Personality and antisocial behavior in children and adolescents: an enquiry into Eysenck’s and Gray’s theories. J Abnorm Child Psychol 23:767–781

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Fowles DC (1980) The three arousal model: implications of Gray’s two factor learning theory for hear rate, electrodermal activity and psychopathy. Psychophysiology 17:87–104

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hinshaw SP, Lahey BJ, Hart EL (1993) Issues of taxonomy and comorbidity in the development of conduct disorder. Dev Psychopathol 5:31–49

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Matthys W, van Goozen SHM, de Vries H, Cohen-Kettenis PT, van Engeland H (1998) The dominance of behavioural activation over behavioural inhibition in conduct disordered boys with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 39:643–651

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    McCleary R (1966) Response-modulating function of the limbic system: initiation and suppression. In: Stellar E, Sprague J (eds) Progress in physiological psychology (volume 1). Academic Press, New York, pp 209–271

  9. 9.

    Raine A (1993) The psychopathology of crime: criminal behavior as a clinical disorder. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Shapiro SK, Quay HC, Hogan AE, Schwartz KP (1988) Response perseveration and delayed responding in undersocialized aggressive conduct disorder. J Abn Psychol 97:371–373

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Van Goozen SHM, Matthys W, Cohen-Kettenis PT, Buitelaar JK, van Engeland H (2000) Hypothalamic-pituitaryadrenal and autonomic nervous system activity during stress: a comparison of disruptive children and normal controls. J Am Acad Child Adolescent Psychiatry 39:1438–1445

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter Matthys.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matthys, W., van Goozen, S.H.M., Snoek, H. et al. Response perseveration and sensitivity to reward and punishment in boys with oppositional defiant disorder. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 13, 362–364 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-004-0395-x

Download citation

Key words

  • oppositional defiant disorder
  • conduct disorder
  • autonomic arousal
  • inhibition
  • punishment