Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Caries removal techniques and instrumentation: a review

  • REVIEW
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The invention of rotary instruments not only improved the speed of caries removal but also the destruction of sound tooth substance. Hence, as early as the 1950s, there were attempts to develop a less invasive technique, such as the air-abrasive and ultrasonic techniques, for the purpose of caries removal. The proposed use of air-polishing was published in the early 1980s. Subsequent better understanding of the carious process saw the introduction of the enzyme technique in the late 1980s. Other techniques, such as chemomechanical caries removal and laser systems, have also been attempted and researched during the last four decades to minimise the unnecessary removal of sound tooth substance, although these and other techniques reviewed in this article have not yet superseded the use of rotary instruments. Furthermore, the concept of micro-cavity preparation developed in recent years and the introduction of acid-etch techniques, resin bonding and the use of glass-ionomer cements have also revolutionised the principles of cavity preparation in conservative dentistry. This article reviews the development of these various caries removal techniques and instrumentation and the evolutionary philosophies of cavity preparation promulgated over the last century or so.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 4 May 1998 / Accepted: 20 July 1998

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yip, H., Samaranayake, L. Caries removal techniques and instrumentation: a review. Clinical Oral Investigations 2, 148–154 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s007840050062

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s007840050062

Navigation