Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of the effect on costochondral graft for TMJ ankylosis with jaw deformities in pediatrics

  • Research
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the effects of costochondral grafting (CCG) used for temporomandibular joint ankylosis (TMJA) in growing patients.

Materials and methods

Pediatric patients with TMJA treated by CCG from 2010.5 to 2021.7 were included in the study. CT scans were performed before and after operations with at least 1 year follow-up. The height of the mandibular ramus, menton deviation or retraction, osteotomy gap, etc. were measured by ProPlan CMF1.4 software. CCG growth, resorption, and relapse were evaluated and analyzed with influencing factors such as age, ostectomy gap, etc. by generalized estimating equation.

Results

There were 24 patients (29 joints) with an average age of 6.30 ± 3.13 years in the study. After operation, the mandibular ramus was elongated by 5.97 ± 3.53 mm. Mandibular deviation or retrusion was corrected by 4.82 ± 2.84 mm and 3.76 ± 2.97 mm respectively. After a mean follow-up of 38.91 ± 29.20 months, 58.62% CCG grew (4.18 ± 7.70 mm), 20.69% absorbed (2.23 ± 1.16 mm), and 20.69% re-ankylosed. The re-ankylosis was negatively correlated with the osteotomy gap (OR:0.348,0.172–0.702 95%CI, critical value = 6.10 mm). CCG resorption was positively correlated with the distance of CCG ramus elongation (OR:3.353,1.173–9.586 95%CI, critical value = 7.40 mm).

Conclusions

An adequate osteotomy gap and CCG ramus elongation distance are the key factors for successful treatment of TMJA with jaw deformities in growing patients.

Clinical relevance

TMJA affects mouth opening and jaw development in pediatric patients. The most common autogenous bone graft for pediatric patients is CCG due to its growth potential, convenient access and easy contouring. Also, it can simultaneously reconstruct the TMJ and improve jaw deformity by lengthening the mandibular ramus. But the growth of CCG is unpredictable. In this study, we explored several factors that may affect the absorption and re-ankylosis of CCG, expecting to provide several suggestions to improve future CCG treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Ko EW, Huang CS, Chen YR (1999) Temporomandibular joint reconstruction in children using costochondral grafts. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 57(7):789–798 discussion 799-800

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Adekeye (1983) Ankylosis of the mandible: analysis of 76 cases. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 41(7):442–449

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Güven O (2004) Treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis by a modified fossa prosthesis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 32(4):236–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Roychoudhury A, Parkash H, Trikha A (1999) Functional restoration by gap arthroplasty in temporomandibular joint ankylosis: a report of 50 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 87(2):166–169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rowe NL (1972) Surgery of the temporomandibular joint. Proc R Soc Med 65(4):383–388

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. He D et al (2011) Traumatic temporomandibular joint ankylosis: our classification and treatment experience. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69(6):1600–1607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Saeed NR, Kent JN (2003) A retrospective study of the costochondral graft in TMJ reconstruction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 32(6):606–609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohanty S, Verma A (2021) Ankylosis management with autogenous grafts: a systematic review. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 11(3):402–409

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Xu F, Jiang L, Man C (2017) A comparative study of different surgical methods in the treatment of traumatic temporomandibular joint ankylosis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46(2):198–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sahoo NK et al (2012) Selecting reconstruction option for TMJ ankylosis: a surgeon’s dilemma. J Craniofac Surg 23(6):1796–1801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bi R et al (2020) A new clinical classification and treatment strategies for temporomandibular joint ankylosis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49(11):1449–1458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ma Y et al (2019) Simultaneous arthroplasty and distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint and secondary mandibular deformities in children. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 57(2):135–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lu C et al (2014) Digital occlusal splint for condylar reconstruction in children with temporomandibular joint ankylosis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 72(8):1585–1593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao J et al (2017) 3-D computed tomography measurement of mandibular growth after costochondral grafting in growing children with temporomandibular joint ankylosis and jaw deformity. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 124(4):333–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Link JO, Hoffman DC, Laskin DM (1993) Hyperplasia of a costochondral graft in an adult. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51(12):1392–1394

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaban LB, Bouchard C, Troulis MJ (2009) A protocol for management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis in children. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67(9):1966–1978

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ding R et al (2022) Heterotopic ossification after alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement: a case cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 23(1):638

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen S et al (2019) Recurrence-related factors of Temporomandibular Joint Ankylosis: a 10-Year experience. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 77(12):2512–2521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang Y et al (2013) Prognostic nomogram for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after partial hepatectomy. J Clin Oncol 31(9):1188–1195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaban LB, Perrott DH, Fisher K (1990) A protocol for management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48(11):1145–1151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lakshmanan S et al (2021) Can costochondral grafts fulfil ramus-condyle unit reconstruction goals in children with temporomandibular joint ankylosis? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59(2):184–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tideman H, Doddridge M (1987) Temporomandibular joint ankylosis. Aust Dent J 32(3):171–177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yan YB et al (2013) Surgical induction of TMJ bony ankylosis in growing sheep and the role of injury severity of the glenoid fossa on the development of bony ankylosis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 41(6):476–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fan K et al (2012) Protection of the temporomandibular joint during syndromic neonatal mandibular distraction using condylar unloading. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(5):1151–1161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Katsnelson A et al (2012) Operative management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70(3):531–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ellis E 3rd and, Carlson DS (1986) Histologic comparison of the costochondral, sternoclavicular, and temporomandibular joints during growth in Macaca mulatta. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44(4):312–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Daniels S, Ellis E 3rd, and, Carlson DS (1987) Histologic analysis of costochondral and sternoclavicular grafts in the TMJ of the juvenile monkey. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45(8):675–683

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Peltomäki T et al (2002) Histology of surgically removed overgrown osteochondral rib grafts. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 30(6):355–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Peltomäki T, Vähätalo K, Rönning O (2002) The effect of a unilateral costochondral graft on the growth of the marmoset mandible J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 60(11): pp. 1307-14; discussion 1314-5

  30. Chugh A, Mehrotra D, Yadav PK (2021) A systematic review on the outcome of distraction osteogenesis in TMJ ankylosis. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 11(4):581–595

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Xia L et al (2020) Evaluating the remodeling of condyles reconstructed by transport distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 48(5):494–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mittal N, Goyal M, Sardana D (2022) Autogenous grafts for reconstruction arthroplasty in temporomandibular joint ankylosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60(9):1151–1158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Medra AM (2005) Follow up of mandibular costochondral grafts after release of ankylosis of the temporomandibular joints. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43(2):118–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mao Y et al (2022) [Influence of bilateral coronoidectomy on temporomandibular joint stress distribution after costochondral graft reconstruction: a finite element analysis]. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 31(2):126–131

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sharma H et al (2015) Costochondral Graft as interpositional material for TMJ ankylosis in children: a clinical study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 14(3):565–572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Awal DH et al (2018) Costochondral grafting for paediatric temporomandibular joint reconstruction: 10-year outcomes in 55 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47(11):1433–1438

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yan Y et al (2011) The relationship between mouth opening and computerized tomographic features of posttraumatic bony ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 111(3):354–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Babu L et al (2013) Is aggressive gap arthroplasty essential in the management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis?-a prospective clinical study of 15 cases. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51(6):473–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. He Y et al (2017) Application of a computer-assisted surgical navigation system in temporomandibular joint ankylosis surgery: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46(2):189–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32071313, 82270996); Cross-disciplinary Research Fund, Rare diseases registration project, Fund of Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (JYJC202203, JYHJB202304, 2023-03), Shanghai’s Top Priority Research Center (2022ZZ01017), CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS, 2019-I2M-5-037).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

XL.Z: data curation, formal analysis, validation, writing the main manuscript text. D.H: methodology, investigation, writing the main manuscript text. C.L: prepared Figs. 1, 2 and 3. JY.Z: prepared Figs. 4, 5 and 6. DM.H and C.Y: conceptualization, resources, supervision, reviewing and editing the manuscript.

XL.Z and D.H contributed equally to this work.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chi Yang or Dongmei He.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics committee and institutional review board of Ninth People’s Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (No. SH9H-2023-T368-1). The patient provided written informed consent for publishing of this case report and accompanying photographs. The written consent is available on request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no financial or personal interests related to the present work.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, X., Huang, D., Lu, C. et al. Analysis of the effect on costochondral graft for TMJ ankylosis with jaw deformities in pediatrics. Clin Oral Invest 28, 317 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05708-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05708-0

Keywords

Navigation