Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of the ceramic laminate veneer-tooth interface after different resin cement excess removal techniques

  • Research
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To compare, in vitro, resin cement excess removal techniques at the veneer-tooth interface.

Materials and methods

Anterior human teeth were restored with ceramic veneers and randomly divided according to the following techniques (n = 10): removal of excess resin cement with brush and dental floss, followed by light-curing with Valo (Group 1) or Elipar (Group 2) for 1 min and 40 s; tack-curing with Valo (Group 3) or Elipar (Group 4) for 1 s; and tack-curing with Valo (Group 5) or Elipar (Group 6) for 5 s. The tack-curing was followed by removal of excess with probe and dental floss and light-curing for 1 min and 40 s. The area of excess resin cement (mm2) was measured in micro-CT images using AutoCAD program. The failures at the cervical margin in the X, Y, and Z axes (µm) of greater value were measured using the DataViewer program. The specimens were submitted to microleakage with 2% basic fuchsin.

Results

According to the Kruskal–Wallis and multiple comparison test, the highest area of excess resin cement was found in Group 1 (5.06 mm2), which did not differ statistically from Groups 2 (3.70 mm2) and 5 (2.19 mm2). Groups 2, 3 (1.73 mm2), 4 (1.14 mm2), and 5 (2.18 mm2) did not differ statistically. Group 6 (0.77 mm2) obtained the lowest value, which did not differ statistically from Groups 3 and 4. According to the Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn test, there was no significant difference in failures in X (p = 0.981), Y (p = 0.860), and Z (p = 0.638) axes and no significant difference in microleakage (p = 0.203) among the groups.

Conclusions

Tack-curing for 1 s or 5 s, followed by removal of excess resin cement using a probe and a dental floss, tended to result in a lower amount of excess material around the margin.

Clinical relevance

The technique used for resin cement excess removal influences the amount of excess leaved at the veneer-tooth interface. Tack-curing for 1 s or 5 s is recommended to mitigate the excess resin cement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beier US, Kapferer I, Burtscher D, Dumfahrt H (2012) Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers for up to 20 years. Int J Prosthodont 25:79–85

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (2000) Porcelain veneers: a review of the literatura. J Dent 28:163–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712(99)00066-4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Baig MR, Qasim SSB, Baskaradoss JK (2022) Marginal and internal fit of porcelain laminate veneers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 5(22):00052–X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pissaia JF, Guanaes BKA, Kintopp CCA, Correr GM, Cunha LF, Gonzaga CC (2019) Color stability of ceramic veneers as a function of resin cement curing mode and shade: 3-year follow-up. PLoS ONE 14:e0219183. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219183

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Faria-e-Silva AL, Pfeifer CS (2017) Effectiveness of high-power LEDs to polymerize resin cements through ceramic: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 118:631–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.12.013

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Al-Ali A, Khalifa N, Hadj-Hamou A, Sheela S, El-Damanhoury HM (2023) Effect of thickness and bonding technique on fatigue and fracture resistance of feldspathic ultra-thin laminate veneers. Eur J Dent 17:431–438. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1745770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Saati K, Valizadeh S, Anaraki SN, Moosavi N (2021) Effect of aging on color stability of amine-free resin cement through the ceramic laminate veneer. Dent Res J 22:18–99. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.330880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shafiei F, Memarpour M, Jowkar Z (2017) Marginal sealing of a porcelain laminate veneer luted with three different resin cements on fluorosed teeth. Int J Esthet Dent 12:60–71

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferracane JL (2017) Models of caries formation around dental composite restorations. J Dent Res 96:364–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516683395

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Morimoto S, Albanesi RB, Sesma N, Agra CM, Braga MM (2016) Main clinical outcomes of feldsphatic porcelain and glass-ceramic laminate veneers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and complication rates. Int J Prosthod 29:38–49. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gresnigt MMM, Kalk W, Özcan M (2013) Clinical longevity of ceramic laminate veneers bonded to teeth with and without existing composite restorations up to 40 months. Clin Oral Investig 17:823–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0790-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bharali K, Das M, Jalan S, Paul R, Deka A (2017) To compare and evaluate the sorption and solubility of four luting cements after immersion in artificial saliva of different pH values. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 9(Suppl 1):S103–S106. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_153_17

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Anami LC, Pereira CA, Guerra E, Assunção Souza RO, Jorge AO, Bottino MA (2012) Morphology and bacterial colonisation of tooth/ceramic restoration interface after different cement excess removal techniques. J Dent 40:742–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.05.005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pereira SMB, Anami LC, Pereira CA, Souza ROA, Kantorski KZ, Bottino MA, Jorge AOC, Valandro LF (2016) Bacterial colonization in the marginal region of ceramic restorations: effects of different cement removal methods and polishing. Oper Dent 41:642–654. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-206-L

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Arweiler N, Netuschil L (2016) The oral microbiota. Adv Exp Med Biol 902:45–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31248-4_4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chee WWL, Duncan J, Afshar M, Moshaverinia A (2013) Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement – retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method. J Prosthet Dent 109:216–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60047-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brito OFF, Sandes JM, de Lima FCG, Oliveira Júnior JB, Alves LC, Brayner FA, de Melo Monteiro GQ (2022) The influence of cement removal techniques on in situ bacterial adhesion and biodegradation at the marginal interface of ceramic laminates. Oper Dent 47:190–201. https://doi.org/10.2341/20-269-L

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mansour YF, Pintado MR, Mitchell CA (2006) Optimizing resin cement removal around esthetic crown margins. Acta Odontol Scand 64:231–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350600613443

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gaile M, Papia E, Zalite V, Locs J, Soboleva U (2022) Resin cement residue removal techniques: in vitro analysis of marginal defects and discoloration intensity using micro-CT and stereomicroscopy. Dent J 10:55. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10040055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kalra M, Kurian N, Varghese KG (2023) A technique to remove polymerized excess of resin cement from interproximal regions following bonding of porcelain laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent 19(23):00414–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.06.014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Çelik C, Gemalmaz D (2002) Comparison of marginal integrity of ceramic and composite veneer restorations luted with two different resin agents: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 15:59–64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Farah RI, Aldhafeeri AF, Alogalli RS (2018) A technique to facilitate ceramic veneer cementation. J Prosthet Dent 120:194–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.09.021

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Peciuliene V (2021) The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement-retained implant restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res 22:1379–1384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02119.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Soares CJ, Braga SSL, Price RB (2021) Relationship between the cost of 12 light-curing units and their radiant power, emission spectrum, radiant exitance, and beam profile. Oper Dent 46:283–292. https://doi.org/10.2341/19-274-L

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Stegall D, Tantbirojn D, Perdigão J, Versluis A (2017) Does tack curing luting cements affect the final cure? J Adhes Dent 19:239–243. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a38410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Modena RA, Sinhoreti MAC, Palin W, Cavalcante LM, Schneider LF (2021) Light and viscosity effects on the curing potential of bulk-fill composites placed in deep cavities. Odontology 109:874–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-021-00614-3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jung JH, Park SH (2017) Comparison of polymerization shrinkage, physical properties, and marginal adaptation of flowable and restorative bulk fill resin-based composites. Oper Dent 42:375–386. https://doi.org/10.2341/16-254-L

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sampaio CS, Pizarro PG, Atria PJ, Hirata R, Giannini M, Mahn E (2020) Effect of shortened light-curing modes on bulk-fill resin composites. Oper Dent 45:496–505. https://doi.org/10.2341/19-101-L

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Varshney I, Jha P, Nikhil V (2022) Effect of monowave and polywave light curing on the degree of conversion and microhardness of composites with different photoinitiators: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 25:661–665. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_223_22

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cardoso IO, Machado AC, Fernandes LO, Soares PV, Raposo LHA (2022) Influence of tip diameter and light spectrum of curing units on the properties of bulk-fill resin composites. Eur J Dent 16:360–366. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lima RBW, Troconis CCM, Moreno MBP, Murillo-Gómez F, De Goes MF (2018) Depth of cure of bulk fill resin composites: a systematic review. J Esthet Restor Dent 30:492–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ganapathy D, Sathyamoorthy A, Ranganathan H, Murthykumar K (2016) Effect of resin bonded luting agents influencing marginal discrepancy in all ceramic complete veneer crowns. J Clin Diag Res 10:67–70. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/21447.9028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Al-Dwairi ZN, Alkhatatbeh RM, Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ (2019) A comparison of the marginal and internal fit of porcelain laminate veneers fabricated by pressing and CAD-CAM milling and cemented with 2 different resin cements. J Prosthet Dent 21:470–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.04.008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sulaiman F, Chai J, Jameson LM, Wozniak WT (1997) A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont 10:478–484

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ioannidis A, Park JM, Hüsler J, Bomze D, Mühlemann S, Özcan M (2022) An in vitro comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of ultrathin occlusal veneers made of 3D-printed zirconia, milled zirconia, and heat-pressed lithium disilicate. J Prosthet Dent 128:709–7015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.053

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Aboushelib MN, Elmahy WA, Ghazy MH (2012) Internal adaptation, marginal accuracy and microleakage of a pressable versus a machinable ceramic laminate veneers. J Dent 40:670–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.04.019

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Al-Dwairi ZN, Al-Sardi M, Goodacre BJ, Goodacre CJ, Al Hamda KQ, Özcan M, Husain NA, Baba NZ (2023) Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic laminate veneers fabricated with five intraoral scanners and indirect digitization. Materials 16:2181. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16062181

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Pinna R, Usai P, Filigheddu E, Garcia-Godoy F, Milia E (2017) The role of adhesive materials and oral biofilm in the failure of adhesive resin restorations. Am J Dent 30:285–292

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhou W, Liu S, Zhou X, Hanning M, Rupf S, Feng J, Peng X, Cheng L (2019) Modifying adhesive materials to improve the longevity of resinous restorations. Int J Mol Sci 20:723. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20030723

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. de Goes MF, Shinohara MS, Freitas MS (2014) Performance of a new one-step multi-mode adhesive on etched vs non-etched enamel on bond strength and interfacial morphology. J Adhes Dent 16:243–250. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a32033

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Gamarra VSS, Borges GA, Burnett Júnior LH, Spohr AM (2018) Marginal adaptation and microleakage of a bulk-fill composite resin photopolymerized with different techniques. Odontology 106:56–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-017-0294-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Zaimoglu A, Karaagaçlioglu L, Uçtasli (1992) Influence of porcelain material and composite luting resino n microleakage of porcelain laminate veneers. J Oral Rehabil 19:319–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1992.tb01574.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Lacy AM, Wada C, Du W, Watanabe L (1992) In vitro microleakage at the gingival margino f porcelain and resin veneers. J Prosthet Dent 67:7–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90038-c

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Uusital E, Varrela J, Lissila L, Vallittu PK (2016) Transmission of curing light through moist, air-dried, and EDTA treated dentine and enamel. Biomed Res Int 2016:5713962. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5713962

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Fidalgo-Pereira R, Torres O, Carvalho O, Silva FS, Catarino SO, Ozcan M, Souza JCM (2023) A scoping review on the polymerization of resin matrix cements used in restorative dentistry. Materials 16:1560. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16041560

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Tomaselli LO, Oliveira DCRS, Favarão J, Silva AF, Pires-de-Souza FCP, Geraldeli S, Sinhoreto MAC (2019) Influence of pre-heating regular resin composites and flowable composites on luting ceramic veneers with different thicknesses. Braz Dent J 30:459–466. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201902513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Gugelmin BP, Miguel LCM, Baratto Filho F, Cunha LF, Correr GM, Gonzaga CC (2020) Color stability of ceramic veneers luted with resin cements and pre-heated composites: 12 months follow-up. Braz Dent J 31(69):77. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202002842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang X, Zjang Q, Meng X, Ye Y, Feng D, Xue J, Wang H, Huang H, Wang M, Wang J (2021) Rheological and mechanical properties of resin-based materials applied in dental restorations. Polymers 13:2975. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13172975

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior — Brasil (CAPES) — Finance Code 001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Post-Graduate Program in Dentistry, School of Health and Life Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Avenida Ipiranga 6681, Block 6, Porto Alegre, RS, 90619-900, Brazil

    Aline Campos Otani, Ana Maria Spohr & Márcio Lima Grossi

  2. Post-Graduate Program in Public Health, Vale do Rio dos Sinos University (UNISINOS), Avenida Unisinos, São Leopoldo, RS, 950, Brazil

    Marcos Pascoal Pattussi

Authors
  1. Aline Campos Otani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marcos Pascoal Pattussi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ana Maria Spohr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Márcio Lima Grossi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ACO, AMS, and MLG. conceived and designed the experiment. ACO performed the experiments. ACO, AMS, MPP, and MLG analyzed the data. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript, and all authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Maria Spohr.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This laboratory investigation was approved by the scientific review committee and by the ethical committee of the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (31890920.7.0000.5336). The teeth used in the study were donated by patients by signing the tooth donation form.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Otani, A.C., Pattussi, M.P., Spohr, A.M. et al. Evaluation of the ceramic laminate veneer-tooth interface after different resin cement excess removal techniques. Clin Oral Invest 28, 136 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05536-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05536-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation