Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of whitening toothpastes in buccal mucosal cells: a randomized controlled trial

  • Research
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To assess genotoxic and cytotoxic effect of commercially available toothpastes with the different whitening ingredients.

Materials and methods

In vivo assessment of cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of whitening toothpastes with different ingredients using a buccal micronucleus cytome assay (BMCyt assay) comprised 199 participants randomly divided into ten groups based on used whitening or control/conventional toothpaste. The exfoliated buccal mucosal cells were collected, stained, and microscopically evaluated at baseline (T0), 30 days (T1), and 60 days (T2) after the beginning of treatment and 30 days after completing treatment (T3). Statistical evaluation was performed by repeated-measures analysis of variance (two-way ANOVA), Tukey’s test, and multiple regression analysis.

Results

The genotoxic parameters showed no biologically significant changes in any of the observed period for the tested toothpastes, while cytotoxic parameters (number of cells with karyorrhexis and condensed chromatin) showed statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) among evaluation periods for the three peroxide-containing toothpastes.

Conclusions

Peroxide-containing whitening toothpastes exhibit an increase in certain cytotoxic parameters only during the application period, which return to control values after the cessation of application.

Clinical significance

Whitening toothpastes show no genotoxic effect, while peroxide-containing whitening toothpastes may present significant increase of cytotoxicity (measured by the number of karyorrhexis and condensed chromatin) during the application period. However, these changes observed in clinical conditions cannot be considered significant.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04460755.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Demarco FF, Meireles SS, Masotti AS (2009) Over-the-counter whitening agents: a concise review. Braz Oral Res 23:64–70. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242009000500010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tadin A, Gavic L, Govic T, Galic N, Zorica Vladislavic N, Zeljezic D (2019) In vivo evaluation of fluoride and sodium lauryl sulphate in toothpaste on buccal epithelial cells toxicity. Acta Odontol Scand 77:386–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2019.1577988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Camargo SE, Jóias RP, Santana-Melo GF, Ferreira LT, El Achkar VN, Rode Sde M (2014) Conventional and whitening toothpastes: cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and effect on the enamel surface. Am J Dent 27:307–311

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tadin A, Gavic L, Zeravica A, Ugrin K, Galic N, Zeljezic D (2018) Assessment of cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of conventional and whitening kinds of toothpaste on oral mucosa cells. Acta Odontol Scand 76:64–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2017.1384567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ros-Llor I, Lopez-Jornet P (2014) Cytogenetic analysis of oral mucosa cells, induced by chlorhexidine, essential oils in ethanolic solution and triclosan mouthwashes. Environ Res 132:140–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2014.03.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tadin A, Galic N, Mladinic M, Marovic D, Kovacic I, Zeljezic D (2014) Genotoxicity in gingival cells of patients undergoing tooth restoration with two different dental composite materials. Clin Oral Investig 18:87–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0933-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. BrzovićRajić V, Želježić D, MalčićIvanišević A, Verzak Ž, Baraba A, Miletić I (2018) Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of resin based dental materials in human lymphocytes in vitro. Acta Clin Croat 57:278–285. https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2018.57.02.07

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Puizina Mladinic E, Puizina J, Gavic L, Tadin A (2022) Clinical prospective assessment of genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of fluoride toothpaste and mouthwash in buccal mucosal cells. Biomedicines 10:2206. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10092206

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Cunha AS, Castillo WO, Takahashi CS, Küchler EC, Segato RAB, da Silva LAB et al (2018) Genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of Haas appliance in exfoliated buccal mucosa cells during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 88:590–595. https://doi.org/10.2319/101117-687.1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Rode SM, Sato TDP, Matos FS, Correia AMO, Camargo SEA (2021) Toxicity and effect of whitening toothpastes on enamel surface. Braz Oral Res 35:e025. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Barbier O, Arreola-Mendoza L, Del Razo LM (2010) Molecular mechanisms of fluoride toxicity. Chem Biol Interact 188:319–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2010.07.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tredwin CJ, Naik S, Lewis NJ, Scully C (2006) Hydrogen peroxide tooth-whitening (bleaching) products: review of adverse effects and safety issues. Br Dent J 200:371–376. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4813423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Naik S, Tredwin CJ, Scully C (2006) Hydrogen peroxide tooth-whitening (bleaching): review of safety in relation to possible carcinogenesis. Oral Oncol 42:668–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.10.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ribeiro DA, Marques ME, Salvadori DM (2005) Assessment of genetic damage induced by dental bleaching agents on mouse lymphoma cells by single cell gel (comet) assay. J Oral Rehabil 32:766–771. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01500.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ribeiro DA, Marques ME, Salvadori DM (2006) Study of DNA damage induced by dental bleaching agents in vitro. Braz Oral Res 20:47–51. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242006000100009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Monteiro MJF, Lindoso JBC, de Oliveira Conde NC, da Silva LM, Loguercio AD, Pereira JV (2019) Evaluation of the genotoxic potential of different delivery methods of at-home bleaching gels: a single-blind, randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 23:2199–2206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2659-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Holland N, Bolognesi C, Kirsch-Volders M, Bonassi S, Zeiger E, Knasmueller S et al (2008) The micronucleus assay in human buccal cells as a tool for biomonitoring DNA damage: the HUMN project perspective on current status and knowledge gaps. Mutat Res 659:93–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2008.03.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Paiva RL, de Figueiredo MAZ, Cherubini K, Da Silva VD, Salum FG (2022) Cytological screening model of normal oral mucosa exposed to carcinogens: a pilot study. Acta Cytol 66:114–123. https://doi.org/10.1159/000519877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Surrallés J, Autio K, Nylund L, Järventaus H, Norppa H, Veidebaum T et al (1997) Molecular cytogenetic analysis of buccal cells and lymphocytes from benzene-exposed workers. Carcinogenesis 18:817–823. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/18.4.817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Galey WR, Lonsdale HK, Nacht S (1976) The in vitro permeability of skin and buccal mucosa to selected drugs and tritiated water. J Invest Dermatol 67:713–717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Turner L, Shamseer L, Altman DG, Weeks L, Peters J, Kober T et al (2012) Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:MR000030. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000030.pub2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vladislavic NZ, Tadin A, Gavic L, Jerkovic D, Franic I, Verzak Z (2022) In vivo evaluation of whitening toothpaste efficiency and patient treatment satisfaction: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig 26:739–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04052-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Suresh K (2011) An overview of randomization techniques: an unbiased assessement of outcome in clinical research. J Hum Reprod Sci 4:8–11. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.82352

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Bolognesi C, Knasmueller S, Nersesyan A, Thomas P, Fenech M (2013) The HUMNxl scoring criteria for different cell types and nuclear anomalies in the buccal micronucleus cytome assay - an update and expanded photogallery. Mutat Res 753:100–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2013.07.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Thomas P, Fenech M (2011) Buccal micronucleus cytome assay. Methods Mol Biol 682:235–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-409-8_17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fenech M, Holland N, Zeiger E, Chang WP, Burgaz S, Thomas P et al (2011) The HUMN and HUMNxL international collaboration projects on human micronucleus assays in lymphocytes and buccal cells–past, present and future. Mutagenesis 26:239–245. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geq051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tolbert PE, Shy CM, Allen JW (1992) Micronuclei and other nuclear anomalies in buccal smears: methods development. Mutat Res 271:69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1161(92)90033-I

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Thomas P, Holland N, Bolognesi C, Kirsch-Volders M, Bonassi S, Zeiger E et al (2009) Buccal micronucleus cytome assay. Nat Protoc 4:825–837. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2009.53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Torrado A, Valiente M, Zhang W, Li Y, Muñoz CA (2005) Cytotoxicity of a new toothpaste based on an ion exchange resin mixture. Am J Dent 18:267–269

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bruno M, Taddeo F, Medeiros IS, Boaro LC, Moreira MS, Marques MM et al (2016) Relationship between toothpastes properties and patient-reported discomfort: crossover study. Clin Oral Investig 20:485–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1539-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ghapanchi J, Kamali F, Moattari A, Poorshahidi S, Shahin E, Rezazadeh F et al (2015) In vitro comparison of cytotoxic and antibacterial effects of 16 commercial toothpastes. J Int Oral Health 7:39–43

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Joiner A (2010) Whitening toothpastes: a review of the literature. J Dent 38(Suppl 2):e17-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Maldupa I, Brinkmane A, Rendeniece I, Mihailova A (2012) Evidence based toothpaste classification, according to certain characteristics of their chemical composition. Stomatologija 14:12–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Furukawa M, K-Kaneyama JR, Yamada M, Senda A, Manabe A, Miyazaki A (2015) Cytotoxic effects of hydrogen peroxide on human gingival fibroblasts in vitro. Oper Dent 40:430–439. https://doi.org/10.2341/14-059-L

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Del Real García JF, Saldaña-Velasco FR, Sánchez-de la Rosa SV, Ortiz-García YM, Morales-Velazquez G, Gómez-Meda BC et al (2019) In vivo evaluation of the genotoxicity and oxidative damage in individuals exposed to 10% hydrogen peroxide whitening strips. Clin Oral Investig 23:3033–3046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2716-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Klaric E, Par M, Profeta I, Kopjar N, Rozgaj R, Kasuba V et al (2013) Genotoxic effect of two bleaching agents on oral mucosa. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 10:209–215

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rezende M, De Geus JL, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Kossatz D (2016) Clinical evaluation of genotoxicity of in-office bleaching. Oper Dent 41:578–586. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-207-C

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. López-Lázaro M (2007) Dual role of hydrogen peroxide in cancer: possible relevance to cancer chemoprevention and therapy. Cancer Lett 252:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2006.10.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ministry of Environment of Denmark (2021) Survey and risk assessment of teeth-whitening products for personal usehttps://www2.mst.dk/Udgiv/publications/2021/09/978-87-7038-340-0.pdf. Accessed 15 Jun. 2023

  40. Rantanen I, Jutila K, Nicander I, Tenovuo J, Söderling E (2003) The effects of two sodium lauryl sulphate-containing toothpastes with and without betaine on human oral mucosa in vivo. Swed Dent J 27:31–34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bloching M, Reich W, Schubert J, Grummt T, Sandner A (2008) Micronucleus rate of buccal mucosal epithelial cells in relation to oral hygiene and dental factors. Oral Oncol 44:220–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2007.02.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the researchers themselves.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Nada Zorica Vladislavic, Jasen Vladislavic, Ivana Franic, and Antonija Tadin. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Nada Zorica Vladislavic and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nada Zorica Vladislavic.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All participants were introduced to the background and the study’s aim and gave their informed consent in writing before inclusion in the investigation. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb (No. 05-PA-30–9/2018), and Ethics Committee of School of the Medicine, University of Split (No. 2181–198-03–04-17–0063; No. 2181–198-03–04-20–0067), who also confirmed that the study was in full accordance with ethical principles including the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (version 2013).

Consent for publication

Consent to submit has been received from all authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

• All tested whitening toothpastes showed no genotoxic effect.

• Peroxide-containing toothpastes revealed increased cytotoxicity (number of cells with karyorrhexis and condensed chromatin) for the application period only.

• In clinical conditions, the obtained changes cannot be considered significant.

• Generally, whitening toothpastes containing abrasives, peroxides, and/or enzymes and charcoal are safe for usage.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vladislavic, N.Z., Vladislavic, J., Franic, I. et al. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of whitening toothpastes in buccal mucosal cells: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Invest 27, 6245–6259 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05241-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05241-6

Keywords

Navigation