Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Randomized clinical trial of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion with two and three segments for nasal breathing

  • Research
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME), with osteotomies separating the maxilla into two segments (SARME-2S) and three segments (SARME-3S), on obstruction symptoms and nasal cavity dimensions in patients with maxillary transverse skeletal deficiency (MTSD).

Materials and methods

Sixteen patients with MTSD of 7 mm or above were evaluated in each group, for a total of 32 patients. All patients were evaluated pre- and postoperatively up to 10 months after the expander activations. The minimum cross-sectional area (MCA) and the volume of the nasal cavities were identified by acoustic rhinometry. The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale questionnaire was applied. The palate surface area (PSA) was measured, via digitized maxillary models, as a criterion for comparison with the other variables studied.

Results

There was no difference between the groups (p = 0.370) and was verified a significant increase in PSA postoperatively. MCA showed a small increase without statistical significance, and together with the volume of the nasal cavities remained constant during the study. NOSE scale scores decreased significantly in the postoperative periods, implying a decrease in nasal obstruction symptoms in both groups.

Conclusions

SARME with two and three segments show similar results, and both may improve nasal obstruction symptoms when present in patients with MTSD.

Clinical relevance

SARME, regardless of the chosen surgical technique, should follow the recommendation to correct just the MTSD. While an improvement in nasal breathing is expected, this must be understood as likely, but not certain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data analyzed in this study are available upon request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Aloise AC, Pereira MD, Hino CT, Filho AG, Ferreira LM (2007) Stability of the transverse dimension of the maxilla after surgically assisted rapid expansion. J Craniofac Surg 18:860–865. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0b013e3180a77237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Haas Junior OL, Guijarro-Martínez R, de Sousa Gil AP, da Silva ML, de Oliveira RB, Hernández-Alfaro F (2017) Stability and surgical complications in segmental Le Fort I osteotomy: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46:1071–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.05.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barone TR, Cahali MB, Vasconcelos C, Barone JR (2020) A comparison of tooth-borne and bone-anchored expansion devices in SARME. Oral Maxillofac Surg 24:181–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-020-00837-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Manganello-Souza LC, Pacheco DF, da Silva AA (2003) Dentofacial deformity secondary to a severe trauma of the middle third of the face in infancy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61:1220–1224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(03)00687-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chhatwani S, Schudlich K, Möhlhenrich SC, Pugachev A, Bicsak A, Ludwig B, Hassfeld S, Danesh G, Bonitz L (2021) Evaluation of symmetry behavior of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion with simulation-driven targeted bone weakening. Clin Oral Investig 25:6717–6728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03958-w

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Landes CA, Laudemann K, Schübel F, Petruchin O, Mack M, Kopp S, Sader RA (2009) Comparison of tooth- and bone-borne devices in surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion by three-dimensional computed tomography monitoring: transverse dental and skeletal maxillary expansion, segmental inclination, dental tipping, and vestibular bone resorption. J Craniofac Surg 20:1132–1141. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0b013e3181abb430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lo Giudice A, Spinuzza P, Rustico L, Messina G, Nucera R (2020) Short-term treatment effects produced by rapid maxillary expansion evaluated with computed tomography: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Korean J Orthod 50:314–323. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2020.50.5.314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pereira MD, de Abreu RAM, Prado GPR, Ferreira LM (2012) Strategies for surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion according to the region of transverse maxillary deficiency. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41:1127–1130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2012.03.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lin L, Ahn HW, Kim SJ, Moon SC, Kim SH, Nelson G (2015) Tooth-borne vs bone-borne rapid maxillary expanders in late adolescence. Angle Orthod 85:253–262. https://doi.org/10.2319/030514-156.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Oliveira TFM, Pereira-Filho VA, Gabrielli MAC, Gonçales ES, Santos-Pinto A (2016) Effects of lateral osteotomy on surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45:490–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.11.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Al-Ouf K, Krenkel C, Hajeer MY, Sakka S (2010) Osteogenic uni- or bilateral form of the guided rapid maxillary expansion. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 38:160–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2009.03.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Habersack K, Becker J, Ristow O, Paulus GW (2014) Dental and skeletal effects of two-piece and three-piece surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion with complete mobilization: a retrospective cohort study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 72:2278–2288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2014.04.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Prado GPR, Koga AF, Furtado FMGP, Ferreira LM, Pereira MD (2021) Two- and three-segment surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: a clinical trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 148:1086–1097. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000008491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pereira PAA, Canellas JV, Souza RB, Tiwana PS, Medeiros PJ, Ritto FG (2022) Three-segment versus 2-segment surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 133:264–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2021.06.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith T, Ghoneima A, Stewart K, Liu S, Eckert G, Halum S, Kula K (2012) Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of airway volume changes after rapid maxillary expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 141:618–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.12.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yavan MA, Kaya S, Kervancioglu P, Kocahan S (2021) Evaluation of effects of a modified asymmetric rapid maxillary expansion appliance on the upper airway volume by cone beam computed tomography. J Dent Sci 16:58–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2020.05.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mitsuda ST, Pereira MD, Passos AP, Hino CT, Ferreira LM (2010) Effects of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion on nasal dimensions using acoustic rhinometry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109:191–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.09.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Görgülü S, Gokce SM, Olmez H, Sagdic D, Ors F (2011) Nasal cavity volume changes after rapid maxillary expansion in adolescents evaluated with 3-dimensional simulation and modeling programs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 140:633–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.12.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. El Bahrawy M, Shuman M (2021) The role of fiberoptic sinoscopy in evaluation the effect of surgically rapid maxillary expansion on the nasal airways. Al-Azhar Assiut Dent J 4:21–30. https://doi.org/10.21608/aadj.2021.163349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Magnusson A, Bjerklin K, Nilsson P, Jönsson F, Marcusson A (2011) Nasal cavity size, airway resistance, and subjective sensation after surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: a prospective longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 140:641–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.11.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pereira-Filho VA, Monnazzi MS, Gabrielli MA, Spin-Neto R, Watanabe ER, Gimenez CM, Santos-Pinto A, Gabrielli MF (2014) Volumetric upper airway assessment in patients with transverse maxillary deficiency after surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:581–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2013.11.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Menegat F, Monnazzi MS, Silva BN, de Moraes M, Gabrielli MA, Pereira-Filho VA (2015) Assessment of nasal obstruction symptoms using the NOSE scale after surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:1346–1350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.06.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Alagoz E, Unver T, Seker ED, Kurt G, Senturk E, Ozdem A, Dolanmaz D (2022) Evaluating the changes in nasal airway volume and nasal airflow after surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 134:533–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2022.04.047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, Weaver EM (2004) Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130:157–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2003.09.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Camps-Perepérez I, Guijarro-Martínez R, Peiró-Guijarro MA, Hernández-Alfaro F (2017) The value of cone beam computed tomography imaging in surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46:827–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.01.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu K, Wei H, Dai J, Wang X (2020) Does nasal cavity enlargement associated with respiratory function improvement after surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion? J Craniofac Surg 31:829–831. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000006245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Calvo-Henriquez C, Megias-Barrera J, Chiesa-Estomba C, Lechien JR, Maldonado Alvarado B, Ibrahim B, Suarez-Quintanilla D, Kahn S, Capasso R (2021) The impact of maxillary expansion on adults’ nasal breathing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Rhinol Allergy 35:923–934. https://doi.org/10.1177/1945892421995350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG (2010) CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 340:c869. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c869

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Betts NJ, Vanarsdall RL, Barber HD, Higgins-Barber K, Fonseca RJ (1995) Diagnosis and treatment of transverse maxillary deficiency. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 10:75–96

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Betts NJ (2016) Surgically assisted maxillary expansion. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 24:67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cxom.2015.10.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Landes CA, Laudemann K, Petruchin O, Revilla C, Seitz O, Kopp S, Ludwig B, Sader RA (2012) Advantages and limits of 3-segment (paramedian) versus 2-segment (median) surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 113:29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.01.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bezerra TF, Padua FG, Pilan RR, Stewart MG, Voegels RL (2011) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a quality of life questionnaire: the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation questionnaire. Rhinology 49:227–231. https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhino10.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ribeiro Prado GP, Pereira MD, Rocha Biló JP, Furtado F, Ferreira LM (2013) Stability of surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion: a randomized trial. J Dent Res 92:49S-54S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513486899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hilberg O, Jackson AC, Swift DL, Pedersen OF (1989) Acoustic rhinometry: evaluation of nasal cavity geometry by acoustic reflection. J Appl Physiol (1985) 66(1):295–303. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1989.66.1.295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Doruk C, Sökücü O, Biçakçi AA, Yilmaz U, Taş F (2007) Comparison of nasal volume changes during rapid maxillary expansion using acoustic rhinometry and computed tomography. Eur J Orthod 29:251–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjl069

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zambon CE, Ceccheti MM, Utumi ER, Pinna FR, Machado GG, Peres MP, Voegels RL (2012) Orthodontic measurements and nasal respiratory function after surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: an acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41:1120–1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2011.12.037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Aras A, Akay MC, Cukurova I, Günbay T, Işiksal E, Aras I (2010) Dimensional changes of the nasal cavity after transpalatal distraction using bone-borne distractor: an acoustic rhinometry and computed tomography evaluation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:1487–1497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.079

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Seeberger R, Kater W, Davids R, Thiele OC (2010) Long term effects of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion without performing osteotomy of the pterygoid plates. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 38:175–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2009.07.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Baraldi CE, Pretto SM, Puricelli E (2007) Evaluation of surgically assisted maxillary expansion using acoustic rhinometry and postero-anterior cephalometry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36:305–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2006.10.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Babacan H, Sokucu O, Doruk C, Ay S (2006) Rapid maxillary expansion and surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion effects on nasal volume. Angle Orthod 76:66–71. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0066:RMEASA]2.0.CO;2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Berretin-Felix G, Yamashita RP, Filho HN, Gonales ES, Trindade AS Jr, Trindade IE (2006) Short- and long-term effect of surgically assisted maxillary expansion on nasal airway size. J Craniofac Surg 17:1045–1049. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.scs.0000234987.84615.0c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Zambon CE, Cherobin GB, Utumi ER, Machado GG, de Vasconcellos FAF, Peres MPSM, Pilan RRM, Voegels RL, Pinna FR (2022) Computational fluid dynamics and NOSE scale to assess nasal respiratory function, and correlation with linear maxillary measurements after surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52(8):875–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2022.10.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Buck LM, Dalci O, Darendeliler MA, Papadopoulou AK (2016) Effect of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion on upper airway volume: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 74:1025–1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.11.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Mitti Koyama for her support in the statistical analysis and also to all the patients who participated in this research.

Funding

This study was supported by the governmental agency Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (grant number10/52179–6).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.A.F.S.: contributed to design, data acquisition, analysis and interpretation, draft, and critical revision of the manuscript; G.P.R.P.: contributed to data acquisition, analysis and interpretation, and critical revision of the manuscript; M.D.P.: contributed to conception, design, data acquisition and interpretation, and critical revision of the manuscript. All authors gave final approval and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Max Domingues Pereira.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures involving human participants followed the ethical standards of the 1964 Helsinki declaration. This study was approval by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil, under number 517.722. It was registered in the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ensaiosclinicos.gov.br) under code RBR-8rhkm25.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

da Silva, A.A.F., Prado, G.P.R. & Pereira, M.D. Randomized clinical trial of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion with two and three segments for nasal breathing. Clin Oral Invest 27, 6209–6219 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05237-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05237-2

Keywords

Navigation