Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evidence-based fact checking for selective procedures in restorative dentistry

  • Review
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Similar to other dental specialties, there are many clinical procedures in restorative dentistry that may or may not be supported by good evidence. Thus, the effectiveness of these procedures is uncertain. The aim of this paper is to reduce this knowledge gap by critically inspecting selective procedures in restorative dentistry and exploring if these well-established or widely advocated treatment modalities are necessary for improving treatment outcomes based on the best available evidence.

Materials and methods

A MEDLINE search was conducted to identify research on selective procedures while focusing on clinical trials and systematic reviews. Due to their practical relevance in the decision-making process, cost-effectiveness analyses were also included.

Results

Mixed results were identified regarding the included interventions. Some procedures had adequate evidence supporting them while others were mostly based on beliefs.

Conclusions

A critical review of the available literature indicates that some common restorative procedures lack adequate support from high-quality research evidence.

Clinical relevance

This paper attempts to highlight the need to critically examine the scientific validity of traditional knowledge and techniques through the context of current research evidence. This will not only help generate consensus between educators, clinicians, and researchers regarding restorative procedures but will also lead to improved patient care and outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ADA Center for Evidence-Based Dentistry. [cited 2021 June 6]; Available from: https://ebd.ada.org/en/about

  2. Le HPN (2016) Eminence-based medicine vs. evidence-based medicine. Available from: https://www.students4bestevidence.net/blog/2016/01/12/eminence-based-medicine-vs-evidence-based-medicine/

  3. Schwendicke F, Doméjean S, Ricketts D, Peters M (2015) Managing caries: the need to close the gap between the evidence base and current practice. Br Dent J 219:433–438. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Innes NP, Frencken JE, Schwendicke F (2016) Don’t know, can’t do, won’t change: barriers to moving knowledge to action in managing the carious lesion. J Dent Res 95:485–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516638512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 64:401–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Frencken JE, Innes NP, Schwendicke F (2016) Managing carious lesions: why do we need consensus on terminology and clinical recommendations on carious tissue removal? Adv Dent Res 28:46–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516639272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA et al (2004) Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 328(7454):1490. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang Y, Li C, Yuan H et al (2016) Rubber dam isolation for restorative treatment in dental patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9(9):CD009858. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009858.pub2

  9. Lynch CD, McConnell RJ, Wilson NH (2006) Teaching the placement of posterior resin-based composite restorations in U.S. dental schools. J Am Dent Assoc 137:619–625. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lynch CD, McConnell RJ, Hannigan A, Wilson NH (2006) Teaching the use of resin composites in Canadian dental schools: how do current educational practices compare with North American trends? J Can Dent Assoc 72:321

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reid JS, Callis PD, Patterson CJ (1991) Rubber dam in clinical practice. Quintessence Publishing, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lynch CD, McConnell RJ (2003) The use of microabrasion to remove discolored enamel: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 90:417–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00503-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Susini G, Pommel L, Camps J (2007) Accidental ingestion and aspiration of root canal instruments and other dental foreign bodies in a French population. Int Endod J 40:585–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01249.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Harrel SK, Molinari J (2004) Aerosols and splatter in dentistry: a brief review of the literature and infection control implications. J Am Dent Assoc 135:429–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dental Manual/Forms (2021) Available from: https://srta.org/dental/dental-manual/. Accessed 3 Juy 2022

  16. DDS Info: Manuals (2021) Available from: https://www.citaexam.com/dds/manuals. Accessed 3 July 2022

  17. Forms and Manuals (2021) Available from: https://crdts.org/Default.aspx?PageID=28. Accessed 3 July 2022

  18. 2021 Dental Exam Manuals (2021) Available from: https://www.cdcaexams.org/dental-exams/dental-exam-manuals/. Accessed 3 July 2022

  19. Banerji S, Mehta SB (2017) Teeth isolation. In: Practical procedures in aesthetic dentistry, 1st edn. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp 113–116. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119324911.ch5.2

  20. Christensen GJ (1994) Using rubber dams to boost quality, quantity of restorative services. J Am Dent Assoc 125:81–82. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1994.0019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Barros de Campos PR, Maia RR, Rodrigues de Menezes L, Barbosa IF, Carneiro da Cunha A, da Silveira Pereira GD (2015) Rubber dam isolation—key to success in diastema closure technique with direct composite resin. Int J Esthet Dent 10:564–574

    Google Scholar 

  22. Small BW (2002) The rubber dam—a first step toward clinical excellence. Compend Contin Educ Dent 23:276–282

    Google Scholar 

  23. Barghi N, Knight GT, Berry TG (1991) Comparing two methods of moisture control in bonding to enamel: a clinical study. Oper Dent 16:130–135

    Google Scholar 

  24. Knight GT, Berry TG, Barghi N, Burns TR (1993) Effects of two methods of moisture control on marginal microleakage between resin composite and etched enamel: a clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 6:475–479

    Google Scholar 

  25. Carvalho TS, Sampaio FC, Diniz A, Bönecker M, Van Amerongen WE (2010) Two years survival rate of Class II ART restorations in primary molars using two ways to avoid saliva contamination. Int J Paediatr Dent 20:419–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2010.01060.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kemoli AM, van Amerongen WE, Opinya G (2009) Influence of the experience of operator and assistant on the survival rate of proximal ART restorations: two-year results. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 10:227–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03262687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ma J (2012) Influence of rubber dam isolation on the performance of restorations for teeth wedge-shaped defects. Chinese Community Doctors 14(309):164

    Google Scholar 

  28. Loguercio AD, Luque-Martinez I, Lisboa AH et al (2015) Influence of isolation method of the operative field on gingival damage, patients’ preference, and restoration retention in noncarious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 40:581–593. https://doi.org/10.2341/14-089-C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hill EE, Rubel BS (2008) Do dental educators need to improve their approach to teaching rubber dam use? J Dent Educ 72:1177–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gilbert GH, Litaker MS, Pihlstrom DJ, Amundson CW, Gordan VV, DPBRN Collaborative Group (2010) Rubber dam use during routine operative dentistry procedures: findings from the Dental PBRN. Oper Dent 35:491–499. https://doi.org/10.2341/09-287C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Miao C, Yang X, Wong MC et al (2021) Rubber dam isolation for restorative treatment in dental patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 5(5):CD009858. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009858.pub3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mendes ACB, Restrepo M, Azevedo ER, Cordeiro RCL, Santos-Pinto L, Zuanon ACC (2018) Effect of rubber dam clamps on demineralized cervical enamel of permanent teeth. J Dent Child (Chic) 85:3–7

    Google Scholar 

  33. Stewardson DA, McHugh ES (2002) Patients' attitudes to rubber dam. Int Endod J 35:812–819. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00571.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Heintze SD, Rousson V, Hickel R (2015) Clinical effectiveness of direct anterior restorations—a meta-analysis. Dent Mater 31:481–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.01.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mahn E, Rousson V, Heintze S (2015) Meta-analysis of the influence of bonding parameters on the clinical outcome of tooth-colored cervical restorations. J Adhes Dent 17:391–403. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a35008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Heintze SD, Rousson V (2012) Clinical effectiveness of direct class II restorations - a meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent 14:407–431. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a28390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Cajazeira MR, De Sabóia TM, Maia LC (2014) Influence of the operatory field isolation technique on tooth-colored direct dental restorations. Am J Dent 27:155–159

    Google Scholar 

  38. Black GV (1908) Cavity preparation. Volume 2: The technical procedures in filling teeth, in a work on operative dentistry in two volumes. Medico-Dental Publishing Company, Chicago

  39. Murray PE, Smith AJ, Windsor LJ, Mjör IA (2003) Remaining dentine thickness and human pulp responses. Int Endod J 36:33–43. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0143-2885.2003.00609.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Barthel CR, Rosenkranz B, Leuenberg A, Roulet JF (2000) Pulp capping of carious exposures: treatment outcome after 5 and 10 years: a retrospective study. J Endod 26:525–528. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200009000-00010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ricketts D, Lamont T, Innes NP, Kidd E, Clarkson JE (2013) Operative caries management in adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD003808. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003808.pub3

  42. Schwendicke F, Frencken JE, Bjørndal L et al (2016) Managing carious lesions: consensus recommendations on carious tissue removal. Adv Dent Res 28:58–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516639271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Innes NP, Frencken JE, Bjørndal L et al (2016) Managing carious lesions: consensus recommendations on terminology. Adv Dent Res 28:49–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516639276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Schwendicke F, Dörfer CE, Paris S (2013) Incomplete caries removal: a systematic review and meta-analysis [published correction appears in J Dent Res 2013;92(8):759]. J Dent Res 92:306–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513477425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hoefler V, Nagaoka H, Miller CS (2016) Long-term survival and vitality outcomes of permanent teeth following deep caries treatment with step-wise and partial-caries-removal: a systematic review. J Dent 54:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Barros MMAF, De Queiroz Rodrigues MI, Muniz FWMG, Rodrigues LKA (2020) Selective, stepwise, or nonselective removal of carious tissue: which technique offers lower risk for the treatment of dental caries in permanent teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 24:521–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03114-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Briso AL, Mestrener SR, Delício G et al (2007) Clinical assessment of postoperative sensitivity in posterior composite restorations. Oper Dent 32:421–426. https://doi.org/10.2341/06-141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH (1996) A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 21:17–24

    Google Scholar 

  49. Schenkel AB, Veitz-Keenan A (2019) Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations. Cochrane Database Syst Re 3(3):CD010526. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010526.pub3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Mazzoni A, Scaffa P, Carrilho M et al (2013) Effects of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives on dentin MMP-2 and MMP-9. J Dent Res 92:82–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034512467034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Göstemeyer G, Schwendicke F (2016) Inhibition of hybrid layer degradation by cavity pretreatment: meta- and trial sequential analysis. J Dent 49:14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Tyas MJ (2005) Placement and replacement of restorations by selected practitioners. Aust Dent J 50:81–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2005.tb00345.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Burke FJ, Cheung SW, Mjör IA, Wilson NH (1999) Reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations in vocational training practices. Prim Dent Care 6:17–20

    Google Scholar 

  54. Blum IR, Younis N, Wilson NH (2017) Use of lining materials under posterior resin composite restorations in the UK. J Dent 57:66–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Deliperi S, Bardwell DN (2002) An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations [published correction appears in J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133(12):1614]. J Am Dent Assoc 133:1387–1398. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Hilton TJ (2016) Sealers, liners, and bases. J Esthet Restor Dent 28:141–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Murray PE, About I, Franquin JC, Remusat M, Smith AJ (2001) Restorative pulpal and repair responses [published correction appears in J Am Dent Assoc 2001 Aug;132(8):1095]. J Am Dent Assoc 132:482–491. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Zandoná AGF, Ritter AV, Eidson RS (2019) Chapter 2 - Dental caries: etiology, clinical characteristics, risk assessment, and management. In: Sturdevant’s art and science of operative dentistry, 7th edn. Elsevier, pp 40–49

  59. Unemori M, Matsuya Y, Hyakutake H, Matsuya S, Goto Y, Akamine A (2007) Long-term follow-up of composite resin restorations with self-etching adhesives. J Dent 35:535–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Blum IR, Wilson NHF (2018) An end to linings under posterior composites? J Am Dent Assoc 149:209–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2017.09.053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Blum IR, Wilson NHF (2019) Consequences of no more linings under composite restorations. Br Dent J 226:749–752. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-019-0270-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA (2007) Longevity and reasons for failure of sandwich and total-etch posterior composite resin restorations. J Adhes Dent 9:469–475

    Google Scholar 

  63. Pallesen U, van Dijken JW, Halken J, Hallonsten AL, Höigaard R (2013) Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in permanent teeth in Public Dental Health Service: a prospective 8 years follow up [published correction appears in J Dent 2013;41(11):1132-3]. J Dent 41:297–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.11.021

  64. Schüpbach P, Lutz F, Finger WJ (1997) Closing of dentinal tubules by Gluma desensitizer. Eur J Oral Sci 105:414–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb02138.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Dondi dall’Orologio G, Lone A, Finger WJ (2002) Clinical evaluation of the role of glutardialdehyde in a one-bottle adhesive. Am J Dent 15:330–334

    Google Scholar 

  66. Montagner AF, Sarkis-Onofre R, Pereira-Cenci T, Cenci MS (2014) MMP inhibitors on dentin stability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 93:733–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Agee KA, Uchiyama T et al (2011) The inhibitory effects of quaternary ammonium methacrylates on soluble and matrix-bound MMPs. J Dent Res 90:535–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510389472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Coelho A, Amaro I, Rascão B, Marcelino I, Paula A et al (2020) Effect of cavity disinfectants on dentin bond strength and clinical success of composite restorations—a systematic review of in vitro, in situ and clinical studies. Int J Mol Sci 22:353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. de Souza LC, Rodrigues NS, Cunha DA et al (2020) Two-year clinical evaluation of a proanthocyanidins-based primer in non-carious cervical lesions: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Dent 96:103325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Perdigão J, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2013) Dentin adhesion and MMPs: a comprehensive review. J Esthet Restor Dent 25:219–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Magne P (2005) Immediate dentin sealing: a fundamental procedure for indirect bonded restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 17:144–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2005.tb00103.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Pashley EL, Comer RW, Simpson MD, Horner JA, Pashley DH, Caughman WF (1992) Dentin permeability: sealing the dentin in crown preparations. Oper Dent 17:13–20

    Google Scholar 

  73. Gresnigt MM, Cune MS, de Roos JG, Özcan M (2016) Effect of immediate and delayed dentin sealing on the fracture strength, failure type and Weilbull characteristics of lithiumdisilicate laminate veneers. Dent Mater 32:e73–e81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Choi YS, Cho IH (2010) An effect of immediate dentin sealing on the shear bond strength of resin cement to porcelain restoration. J Adv Prosthodont 2:39–45. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2010.2.2.39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Duarte S Jr, de Freitas CR, Saad JR, Sadan A (2009) The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives. J Prosthet Dent 102:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)00073-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Hu J, Zhu Q (2010) Effect of immediate dentin sealing on preventive treatment for postcementation hypersensitivity. Int J Prosthodont 23:49–52

    Google Scholar 

  77. Samartzi TK, Papalexopoulos D, Sarafianou A, Kourtis S (2021) Immediate dentin sealing: a literature review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 13:233–256. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S307939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Qanungo A, Aras MA, Chitre V, Mysore A, Amin B, Daswani SR (2016) Immediate dentin sealing for indirect bonded restorations. J Prosthodont Res 60:240–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2016.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Schwendicke F, Tu YK, Hsu LY, Göstemeyer G (2015) Antibacterial effects of cavity lining: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Dent 43:1298–1307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Torres CRG, Mailart MC, Rocha RS et al (2020) The influence of a liner on deep bulk-fill restorations: randomized clinical trial. J Dent 102:103454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. de Oliveira ILM, Hanzen TA, de Paula AM, Perdigão J, Montes MAJR, Loguercio AD, Monteiro GQM (2022) Postoperative sensitivity in posterior resin composite restorations with prior application of a glutaraldehyde-based desensitizing solution: a randomized clinical trial. J Dent 117:103918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Chermont AB, Carneiro KK, Lobato MF, Machado SM, Silva e Souza Junior MH (2010) Clinical evaluation of postoperative sensitivity using self-etching adhesives containing glutaraldehyde. Braz Oral Res 24:349–354. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1806-83242010000300015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Sobral MA, Garone-Netto N, Luz MA, Santos AP (2005) Prevention of postoperative tooth sensitivity: a preliminary clinical trial. J Oral Rehabil 32:661–668. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01479.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Hajizadeh H, Ghavamnasiri M, Majidinia S (2013) Randomized clinical evaluation of the effect of chlorhexidine on postoperative sensitivity of posterior composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 44:793–798. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a30176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Araújo MS, Souza LC, Apolonio FM et al (2015) Two-year clinical evaluation of chlorhexidine incorporation in two-step self-etch adhesive. J Dent 43:140–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Favetti M, Schroeder T, Montagner AF, Correa MB, Pereira-Cenci T, Cenci MS (2017) Effectiveness of pre-treatment with chlorhexidine in restoration retention: a 36-month follow-up randomized clinical trial. J Dent 60:44–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.02.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. de Souza LC, Rodrigues NS, Cunha DA et al (2019) Two-year clinical evaluation of proanthocyanidins added to a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive. J Dent 81:7–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.12.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. van den Breemer CRG, Cune MS, Özcan M, Naves LZ, Kerdijk W, Gresnigt MMM (2019) Randomized clinical trial on the survival of lithium disilicate posterior partial restorations bonded using immediate or delayed dentin sealing after 3 years of function. J Dent 85:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. van den Breemer C, Gresnigt M, Özcan M, Kerdijk W, Cune MS (2019) Prospective randomized clinical trial on the survival of lithium disilicate posterior partial crowns bonded using immediate or delayed dentin sealing: short-term results on tooth sensitivity and patient satisfaction. Oper Dent 44:E212–E222. https://doi.org/10.2341/18-047-C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Sequeira-Byron P, Fedorowicz Z, Carter B, Nasser M, Alrowaili EF (2015) Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root-filled teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (9):CD009109. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009109.pub3

  91. Skupien JA, Cenci MS, Opdam NJ, Kreulen CM, Huysmans MC, Pereira-Cenci T (2016) Crown vs. composite for post-retained restorations: a randomized clinical trial. J Dent 48:34–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Shu X, Mai QQ, Blatz M, Price R, Wang XD, Zhao K (2018) Direct and indirect restorations for endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis, iaad 2017 consensus conference paper. J Adhes Dent 20:183–194. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a40762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Bolla M, Muller-Bolla M, Borg C, Lupi-Pegurier L, Laplanche O, Leforestier E (2007) Root canal posts for the restoration of root filled teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD004623. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004623.pub2

  94. Marchionatti AME, Wandscher VF, Rippe MP, Kaizer OB, Valandro LF (2017) Clinical performance and failure modes of pulpless teeth restored with posts: a systematic review. Braz Oral Res 31:e64. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Bronkhorst EM, Creugers NH (2007) Up to 17-year controlled clinical study on post-and-cores and covering crowns. J Dent 35:778–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Fadda GM et al (2012) A randomized controlled trial of endodontically treated and restored premolars. J Dent Res 91:72S–78S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034512447949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Juloski J, Radovic I, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M (2012) Ferrule effect: a literature review. J Endod 38:11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ (1990) Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 63:529–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90070-s

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Stankiewicz N, Wilson P (2008) The ferrule effect. Dent Update 35:222–228. https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2008.35.4.222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Naumann M, Schmitter M, Frankenberger R, Krastl G (2018) “Ferrule comes first. Post is second!” fake news and alternative facts? A Systematic Review. J Endod 44:212–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.09.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Grandini S, De Sanctis M, Goracci C (2007) Post placement affects survival of endodontically treated premolars. J Dent Res 86:729–734. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910708600808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Juloski J, Fadda GM, Monticelli F, Fajó-Pascual M, Goracci C, Ferrari M (2014) Four-year survival of endodontically treated premolars restored with fiber posts. J Dent Res 93:52S–58S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514527970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Batista VES, Bitencourt SB, Bastos NA, Pellizzer EP, Goiato MC, Dos Santos DM (2020) Influence of the ferrule effect on the failure of fiber-reinforced composite post-and-core restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 123:239–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Mannocci F, Bertelli E, Sherriff M, Watson TF, Ford TR (2002) Three-year clinical comparison of survival of endodontically treated teeth restored with either full cast coverage or with direct composite restoration. J Prosthet Dent 88:297–301. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.128492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Schmitter M, Hamadi K, Rammelsberg P (2011) Survival of two post systems—five-year results of a randomized clinical trial. Quintessence Int 42:843–850

    Google Scholar 

  106. Qian YM, Zhong Q, Chen S (2017) Comparison of clinical effects of Co-Cr alloy cast post-core and everStick fiber post in restoration of labially or lingually inclined maxillary central incisor. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 26:89–93

    Google Scholar 

  107. Bitter K, Noetzel J, Stamm O et al (2009) Randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of post placement on failure rate of postendodontic restorations: preliminary results of a mean period of 32 months. J Endod 35:1477–1482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.07.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Sarkis-Onofre R, Fergusson D, Cenci MS, Moher D, Pereira-Cenci T (2017) Performance of post-retained single crowns: a systematic review of related risk factors. J Endod 43:175–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Afrashtehfar KI, Ahmadi M, Emami E, Abi-Nader S, Tamimi F (2017) Failure of single-unit restorations on root filled posterior teeth: a systematic review. Int Endod J 50:951–966. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Schwendicke F, Stolpe M (2018) Restoring root-canal treated molars: cost-effectiveness-analysis of direct versus indirect restorations. J Dent 77:37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. The use of dental crowns for endodontically treated teeth: a review of the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and guidelines, in CADTH rapid response reports. 2015, Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health: Ottawa (ON)

  112. Zhu Z, Dong XY, He S, Pan X, Tang L (2015) Effect of post placement on the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 28:475-483. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4120

  113. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Bronkhorst EM, Creugers NH (2008) Composite resin core-crown reconstructions: an up to 17-year follow-up of a controlled clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont 21:109–115

    Google Scholar 

  114. The Use of Dental Crowns for Vital and Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Review of the Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness and Guidelines, in CADTH Rapid Response Reports. 2013, Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health: Ottawa (ON)

  115. Cloet E, Debels E, Naert I (2017) controlled clinical trial on the outcome of glass fiber composite cores versus wrought posts and cast cores for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a 5-year follow-up study. Int J Prosthodont 30:71–79. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Sarkis-Onofre R, Jacinto RC, Boscato N, Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T (2014) Cast metal vs. glass fibre posts: a randomized controlled trial with up to 3 years of follow up. J Dent 42:582–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Gbadebo OS, Ajayi DM, Oyekunle OO, Shaba PO (2014) Randomized clinical study comparing metallic and glass fiber post in restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Indian J Dent Res 25:58–63. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.131126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Ferrari M, Vichi A, García-Godoy F (2000) Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 13:15B–18B

    Google Scholar 

  119. Schwendicke F, Stolpe M (2017) Cost-effectiveness of different post-retained restorations. J Endod 43:709–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Ellner S, Bergendal T, Bergman B (2003) Four post-and-core combinations as abutments for fixed single crowns: a prospective up to 10-year study. Int J Prosthodont 16:249–254

    Google Scholar 

  121. Kugel G, Perry RD, Hoang E, Scherer W (1997) Effective tooth bleaching in 5 days: using a combined in-office and at-home bleaching system. Compend Contin Educ Dent 18:378–383

    Google Scholar 

  122. Deliperi S, Bardwell DN, Papathanasiou A (2004) Clinical evaluation of a combined in-office and take-home bleaching system. J Am Dent Assoc 135:628–634. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Bernardon JK, Sartori N, Ballarin A, Perdigão J, Lopes GC, Baratieri LN (2010) Clinical performance of vital bleaching techniques. Oper Dent 35:3–10. https://doi.org/10.2341/09-008CR

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Ontiveros JC, Paravina RD (2009) Color change of vital teeth exposed to bleaching performed with and without supplementary light. J Dent 37:840–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.06.015

  125. Ontiveros JC (2011) In-office vital bleaching with adjunct light. Dent Clin North Am 55:241-viii. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2011.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Buchalla W, Attin T (2007) External bleaching therapy with activation by heat, light or laser—a systematic review. Dent Mater 23:586–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Ritter AV, Leonard RH Jr, St Georges AJ, Caplan DJ, Haywood VB (2002) Safety and stability of nightguard vital bleaching: 9 to 12 years post-treatment. J Esthet Restor Dent 14:275–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2002.tb00523.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Boushell LW, Ritter AV, Garland GE et al (2012) Nightguard vital bleaching: side effects and patient satisfaction 10 to 17 years post-treatment. J Esthet Restor Dent 24:211–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00479.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Leonard RH Jr, Van Haywood B, Caplan DJ, Tart ND (2003) Nightguard vital bleaching of tetracycline-stained teeth: 90 months post treatment. J Esthet Restor Dent 15:142–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2003.tb00184.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Matis BA, Cochran MA, Eckert G (2009) Review of the effectiveness of various tooth whitening systems. Oper Dent 34:230–235. https://doi.org/10.2341/08-74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Bizhang M, Chun YH, Damerau K, Singh P, Raab WH, Zimmer S (2009) Comparative clinical study of the effectiveness of three different bleaching methods. Oper Dent 34:635–641. https://doi.org/10.2341/08-069-C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Matis BA, Cochran MA, Wang G, Eckert GJ (2009) A clinical evaluation of two in-office bleaching regimens with and without tray bleaching. Oper Dent 34:142–149. https://doi.org/10.2341/08-64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Rodrigues JL, Rocha PS, Pardim SLS, Machado ACV, Faria-E-Silva AL, Seraidarian PI (2018) Association between in-office and at-home tooth bleaching: a single blind randomized clinical trial. Braz Dent J 29:133–139. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201801726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. Kothari S, Jum’ah AA, Gray AR, Lyons MK, Yap M, Brunton PA (2020) A randomized clinical trial investigating three vital tooth bleaching protocols and associated efficacy, effectiveness and participants’ satisfaction. J Dent 95:103322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Vaez SC, Correia A, Santana TR et al (2019) Is a single preliminary session of in-office bleaching beneficial for the effectiveness of at-home tooth bleaching? A randomized controlled clinical trial. Oper Dent 44:E180–E189. https://doi.org/10.2341/18-196-C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. He LB, Shao MY, Tan K, Xu X, Li JY (2012) The effects of light on bleaching and tooth sensitivity during in-office vital bleaching: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 40:644–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. Briso ALF, Rahal V, Gallinari MO, Soares DG, de Souza Costa CA (2016) Complications from the use of peroxides. In: Tooth whitening: an evidence-based perspective. Springer, Cham, pp 45–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38849-6_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  138. Costa CA, Riehl H, Kina JF, Sacono NT, Hebling J (2010) Human pulp responses to in-office tooth bleaching. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109:e59–e64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. de Almeida LC, Soares DG, Gallinari MO, de Souza Costa CA, Dos Santos PH, Briso AL (2015) Color alteration, hydrogen peroxide diffusion, and cytotoxicity caused by in-office bleaching protocols. Clin Oral Investig 19:673–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1285-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Gonçalves RS, Costa CA, Soares DG, dos Santos PH, Cintra LT, Briso AL (2016) Effect of different light sources and enamel preconditioning on color change, H2O2 penetration, and cytotoxicity in bleached teeth. Oper Dent 41:83–92. https://doi.org/10.2341/14-364-L

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Rezende M, Loguercio AD, Kossatz S, Reis A (2016) Predictive factors on the efficacy and risk/intensity of tooth sensitivity of dental bleaching: a multi regression and logistic analysis. J Dent 45:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Pontes M, Gomes J, Lemos C et al (2020) Effect of bleaching gel concentration on tooth color and sensitivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oper Dent 45:265–275. https://doi.org/10.2341/17-376-L

    Article  Google Scholar 

  143. Maran BM, Matos TP, de Castro ADS et al (2020) In-office bleaching with low/medium vs. high concentrate hydrogen peroxide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 103:103499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. Eachempati P, Kumbargere Nagraj S, Kiran Kumar Krishanappa S, Gupta P, Yaylali IE (2018) Home-based chemically-induced whitening (bleaching) of teeth in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12(12):CD006202. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006202.pub2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. de Geus JL, Wambier LM, Boing TF, Loguercio AD, Reis A (2018) At-home bleaching with 10% vs more concentrated carbamide peroxide gels: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oper Dent 43:E210–E222. https://doi.org/10.2341/17-222-L

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. Maran BM, Burey A, de Paris Matos T, Loguercio AD, Reis A (2018) In-office dental bleaching with light vs. without light: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 70:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.11.007

  147. SoutoMaior JR, de Moraes S, Lemos C, Vasconcelos BDE, Montes M, Pellizzer EP (2019) Effectiveness of light sources on in-office dental bleaching: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Oper Dent 44:E105–E117. https://doi.org/10.2341/17-280-L

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Maran BM, Ziegelmann PK, Burey A, de Paris Matos T, Loguercio AD, Reis A (2019) Different light-activation systems associated with dental bleaching: a systematic review and a network meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 23:1499–1512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02835-x/

  149. Casado B, Pellizzer EP, Souto Maior JR, Lemos C, Vasconcelos B, Moraes S (2020) Laser influence on dental sensitivity compared to other light sources used during in-office dental bleaching: systematic review and meta-analysis. Oper Dent 45:589–597. https://doi.org/10.2341/19-064-L

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. de Geus JL, Wambier LM, Kossatz S, Loguercio AD, Reis A (2016) At-home vs in-office bleaching: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oper Dent 41:341–356. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-287-LIT

    Article  Google Scholar 

  151. Cardenas AFM, Maran BM, Araújo LCR et al (2019) Are combined bleaching techniques better than their sole application? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 23:3673–3689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03042-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  152. Reis A, Dourado Loguercio A, Schroeder M, Luque-Martinez I, Masterson D, Cople Maia L (2015) Does the adhesive strategy influence the post-operative sensitivity in adult patients with posterior resin composite restorations?: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Mater 31:1052–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  153. Szesz A, Parreiras S, Reis A, Loguercio A (2016) Selective enamel etching in cervical lesions for self-etch adhesives: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 53:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  154. Schroeder M, Reis A, Luque-Martinez I, Loguercio AD, Masterson D, Maia LC (2015) Effect of enamel bevel on retention of cervical composite resin restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 43:777–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.02.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  155. Sedrez-Porto JA, Rosa WL, da Silva AF, Münchow EA, Pereira-Cenci T (2016) Endocrown restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 52:8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. Thomas RM, Kelly A, Tagiyeva N, Kanagasingam S (2020) Comparing endocrown restorations on permanent molars and premolars: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br Dent J. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-020-2279-y

  157. Penedones A, Alves C, Batel-Marques F (2019) Recommendations to conduct and report systematic reviews in medical literature: a scoping review. BMC Med Res Methodol 19:234. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0870-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. Afrashtehfar KI, Saeed MH (2021) Comments about the appraisal of systematic reviews in restorative dentistry. F1000Res 10:442. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.53117.3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  159. Afrashtehfar KI, Tamimi F (2017) An online tool that provides access to evidence-based literature on dental restorations: www.crownorfill.com. J Prosthet Dent 118:696-697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.02.001

  160. EBHnow - Instant Evidence Based Healthcare. Available at: http://ebhnow.com/wp/. Accessed 12 Dec 2022

Download references

Data availability

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Park Dental Group, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    Sanket Nagarkar

  2. Department of Restorative Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    Sanket Nagarkar

  3. School of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil

    Alessandro D Loguercio

  4. Division of Operative Dentistry, Department of Restorative Sciences, University of Minnesota, 515 SE Delaware St, 8-450 Moos Tower, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA

    Jorge Perdigão

Authors
  1. Sanket Nagarkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alessandro D Loguercio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jorge Perdigão
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Sanket Nagarkar - full literature review, wrote the manuscript and response to reviewers. Alessandro D Loguercio - wrote the bleaching techniques section of the paper, edited the manuscript. Jorge Perdigão - research idea, edited the manuscript, revised all versions.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge Perdigão.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests of financial or personal nature.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nagarkar, S., Loguercio, A.D. & Perdigão, J. Evidence-based fact checking for selective procedures in restorative dentistry. Clin Oral Invest 27, 475–488 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04832-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04832-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation