Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validity of partial protocols to evaluate the prevalence of developmental defects of enamel in permanent dentition: a birth cohort study in Southern Brazil

  • Research
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the validity of partial protocols (PP) to assess the prevalence of developmental defects of enamel (DDE) in permanent teeth and identify the strength of the association between DDE and some risk factors, using PP compared to the full-mouth (FM) exam.

Materials and methods

This study was conducted in a population-based birth cohort of children born in 2004 in Pelotas, Southern Brazil. Socioeconomic, demographic, pre-, per-, and post-birth variables were collected. A subsample of 994 children was clinically examined for DDE in 2017, using the modified DDE index, using the “full- mouth” (FM) protocol. After FM had been performed, a dataset was created. Two different partial protocols (PP) were simulated from FM data: “only buccal surfaces (BS)” and “incisive and molars only (IM).” Sensitivity, absolute and relative bias, and inflation factors were calculated.

Results

For any DDE, FM had prevalence of 40.8%. The prevalence of DDE was 38.8% and 36.0%, for BS and IM protocols, respectively. When tested for any DDE, PP “BS” and “IM” showed high sensitivity. The underestimation of the true prevalence did not exceed 6.9% for PP “BS” and 16.1% for PP “IM.” All protocols showed similar magnitude of association with the selected risk factors.

Conclusion

Both PP “BS” and “IM” can be used to estimate the prevalence of DDE in epidemiological studies.

Clinical relevance

Oral health surveys now have the option of using PP to collect DDE prevalence and investigate their association with risk factors, being less time-consuming, expensive, and labor intensive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clarkson J (1989) Review of terminology, classifications, and indices of developmental defects of enamel. Adv Dent Res 3:104–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374890030020601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Clarkson J, O’mullane D (1989) A modified DDE index for use in epidemiological studies of enamel defects. J Dent Res 68:445–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680030201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. FDI (1992) A review of the developmental defects of enamel index (DDE index). Commission on Oral Health, Research & Epidemiology. Report of an FDI Working Group. Int Dent J 42:411–426

    Google Scholar 

  4. (1982) An epidemiological index of developmental defects of dental enamel (DDE Index). Commission on Oral Health, Research and Epidemiology. Int Dent J 32:159–167

  5. Gerreth K, Opydo-Szymaczek J, Borysewicz-Lewicka M (2020) A study of enamel defects and dental caries of permanent dentition in school children with intellectual disability. J Clin Med 9:1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9041031

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Yusoff N, Jaafar N, Razak IA et al (2008) The prevalence of enamel opacities in permanent teeth of 11–12 year-old school children in Kuala Lumpur. Malaysia Commun Dent Health 25:55–58

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mackay TD, Thomson WM (2005) Enamel defects and dental caries among Southland children. N Z Dent J 101:35–43

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Forrest J, James P (1965) A blind study of enamel opacities and dental caries prevalence after eight years of fluorination water. Adv Fluorine Res 21:233–239

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Alousi W, Jackson D, Compton G, Jenkins OC (1975) Enamel mottling in a fluoride and in a non-fluoride community. A study. Br Dent J. 1975 Jan 21;138(2):56-60. Br Dent J 138:56–60

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ngoc VTN, Huong LT, Van Nhon B et al (2019) The higher prevalence of developmental defects of enamel in the dioxin-affected region than non-dioxin-affected region: result from a cross-sectional study in Vietnam. Odontology 107:17–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-018-0358-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Weerheijm KL, Jälevik B, Alaluusua S (2001) Molar-incisor hypomineralisation. Caries Res 35:390–391. https://doi.org/10.1159/000047479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vargas-Ferreira F, Peres MA, Dumith SC et al (2018) Association of pre- peri- and postnatal factors with developmental defects of enamel in schoolchildren. J Clin Pediatr Dent 42:125–134. https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-42.2.8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Elcock C, Lath DL, Luty JD et al (2006) The new enamel defects index: testing and expansion. Eur J Oral Sci 114:35–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00294.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thomson WM, Williams SM (2002) Partial- or full-mouth approaches to assessing the prevalence of and risk factors for periodontal disease in young adults. J Periodontol 73:1010–1014. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2002.73.9.1010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Peres MA, Peres KG, Cascaes AM et al (2012) Validity of partial protocols to assess the prevalence of periodontal outcomes and associated sociodemographic and behavior factors in adolescents and young adults. J Periodontol 83:369–378. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2011.110250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dutra ER, Chisini LA, Cademartori MG et al (2018) Accuracy of partial protocol to assess prevalence and factors associated with dental caries in schoolchildren between 8–12 years of age. Cad Saude Publica 34:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00077217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. IBGE (2020) Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e estatística. https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/rs/pelotas/panorama. Accessed 25 Jan 2020

  18. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2014) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg 12:1495–1499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Barros AJD, dos Santos I, da S, Victora CG, et al (2006) The 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort: methods and description. Rev Saude Publica 40:402–413. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102006000300007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Barros AJD, Santos IS, Matijasevich A et al (2008) Methods used in the 1982, 1993, and 2004 birth cohort studies from Pelotas, Rio Grande do sul State, Brazil, and a description of the socioeconomic conditions of participants’ families. Cad Saude Publica 24:371–380. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-311x2008001500002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Eke PI, Thornton-Evans GO, Wei L et al (2010) Accuracy of NHANES periodontal examination protocols. J Dent Res 89:1208–1213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510377793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nelson DE, Holtzman D, Bolen J et al (2001) Reliability and validity of measures from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system (BRFSS). Sozial- und Präventivmedizin 46:S3-42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Casanova-Rosado AJ, Medina-Solís CE, Casanova-Rosado JF et al (2011) Association between developmental enamel defects in the primary and permanent dentitions. Eur J Paediatr Dent 12:155–158

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao D, Dong B, Yu D et al (2018) The prevalence of molar incisor hypomineralization: evidence from 70 studies. Int J Paediatr Dent 28:170–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ravindran R, Saji AM (2016) Prevalence of the developmental defects of the enamel in children aged 12–15 years in Kollam district. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 6:28–33. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.175407

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Brazilian Agency for the Improvement of Higher Educational Personnel (CAPES) for the PhD course scholarship granted. This article is based on data from the “Pelotas Birth Cohort, 2004” study conducted by the Graduate Program in Epidemiology at the Federal University of Pelotas, with collaboration from the Brazilian Public Health Association (ABRASCO). From 2009 to 2013, the Welcome Trust supported the 2004 birth cohort study. The World Health Organization, National Support Program for Centers of Excellence (PRONEX), Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq), Brazilian Ministry of Health, and Children’s Pastorate supported previous phases of the study.

Funding

This study was performed with collaboration from the Brazilian Public Health Association (ABRASCO).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception. Data collection was supervised by Flávio Fernando Demarco. Material preparation and analysis were performed by Ivam Freire da Silva Júnior, Francine dos Santos Costa, and Marina Sousa Azevedo. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Ivam Freire da Silva Júnior, and all authors revised and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marina Sousa Azevedo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 16 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

da Silva Júnior, I.F., dos Santos Costa, F., Correa, M.B. et al. Validity of partial protocols to evaluate the prevalence of developmental defects of enamel in permanent dentition: a birth cohort study in Southern Brazil. Clin Oral Invest 27, 1605–1612 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04784-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04784-4

Keywords

Navigation