Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of the clinical efficacy of concentrated growth factor and advanced platelet-rich fibrin in the treatment of type I multiple gingival recessions: a controlled randomized clinical trial

  • Original article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to compare and evaluate the clinical effects of concentrated growth factor (CGF) and advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) applied together with coronally advanced flap (CAF) technique using a microsurgical approach in the treatment of type I multiple gingival recessions (GR).

Materials and methods

Sixteen patients with multiple recession defects (Cairo type I) were included in this randomized and controlled study. Forty-five gingival recession defects were randomly equally divided into three groups (n = 15): CAF + CGF (test site); CAF + A-PRF (test site), and CAF alone (control site). Clinical attachment level (CAL), vertical gingival recession (VGR), horizontal gingival recession (HGR), gingival thickness (GT), width of keratinized gingiva (KGW), percentages of the mean (MRC), and complete root coverage (CRC), patient esthetic score (PES), and hypersensitivity score (HS) were recorded at baseline and 6 months after surgery. Patient comfort score (PCS) was evaluated at the day of surgery.

Results

Significant improvements were determined in CAL, VGR, HGR, KGW, and GT at 6 months when compared to baseline levels in intra-group comparisons for all groups, and also GT was increased in CAF + A-PRF and CAF + CGF compared to CAF alone at 6 months in intergroup comparisons (p < 0.05). At 6 months, MRC was detected 85.66 ± 22.68% in the CAF + CGF, 90.88 ± 20.87% in the CAF + A-PRF, and 75.10 ± 32,37% in the CAF alone, and a significant increase was detected in the CAF + A-PRF group compared to CAF alone (p < 0.05). CRC in CAF + CGF was 66.66%, in CAF + A-PRF 80% and in CAF alone was 53.33% (p > 0.05). PES and HS values showed significant improvement from baseline to 6 months for all groups and also in CAF + CGF and CAF + A-PRF compared to CAF alone at 6 months in intergroup comparisons (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The present study showed that the use of A-PRF and CGF membranes in GR therapy may have an additional benefit in GT increase and also A-PRF may increase the percentages of MRC. The use of A-PRF and CGF membranes may be beneficial in terms of improving patient-related parameters.

Clinical relevance

A-PRF and CGF may be superior to CAF alone in terms of patient-related parameters and GT increase in multiple recession defects.

Trial Registration Number: 17578e02-00a9-4a41-8c8d-42a637143531.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zucchelli G (2000) Mounssif I (2015) Periodontal plastic surgery. Periodontol 68(1):333–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zucchelli G, Tavelli L, Ravidà A et al (2018) Influence of tooth location on coronally advanced flap procedures for root coverage. J Periodontol 89:1428–1441. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.18-0201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Moraschini V, dos Barboza E, SP, (2016) Use of platelet-rich fibrin membrane in the treatment of gingival recession: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol 87(3):281–290. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2015.150420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cairo F, Nieri M, Pagliaro U (2014) Efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures in the treatment of localized facial gingival recessions. A systematic review J Clin Periodontol 41:44–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Graziani F, Gennai S, Roldán S et al (2014) Efficacy of periodontal plastic procedures in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions. J Clin Periodontol 41(Suppl 15):S44-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zuhr O, Bäumer D, Hürzeler M (2014) The addition of soft tissue replacement grafts in plastic periodontal and implant surgery: critical elements in design and execution. J Clin Periodontol 41:123–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eren G, Atilla G (2014) Platelet-rich fibrin in the treatment of localized gingival recessions: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 18:1941–1948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1170-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cordaro L, di Torresanto VM, Torsello F (2012) Split-mouth comparison of a coronally advanced flap with or without enamel matrix derivative for coverage of multiple gingival recession defects: 6- and 24-month follow-up. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 32(1):e10-20. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.00.1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahmedbeyli C, Ipçi ŞD, Cakar G et al (2014) Clinical evaluation of coronally advanced flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft on complete defect coverage for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions with thin tissue biotype. J Clin Periodontol 41(3):303–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Gaveglio L (2014) Coronally advanced flap with and without a xenogenic collagen matrix in the treatment of multiple recessions: a randomized controlled clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 34:97–102. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.1605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang L-H, Neiva REF, Soehren SE et al (2005) The effect of platelet-rich plasma on the coronally advanced flap root coverage procedure: a pilot human trial. J Periodontol 76(10):1768–1777. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.10.1768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Aroca S, Keglevich T, Barbieri B et al (2009) Clinical evaluation of a modified coronally advanced flap alone or in combination with a platelet-rich fibrin membrane for the treatment of adjacent multiple gingival recessions: a 6-month study. J Periodontol 80(2):244–252. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Keceli HG, Kamak G, Erdemir EO et al (2015) The adjunctive effect of platelet-rich fibrin to connective tissue graft in the treatment of buccal recession defects: results of a randomized, parallel-group controlled trial. J Periodontol 86(11):1221–1230. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2015.150015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bozkurt Doʇan Ş, Öngöz Dede F, Balli U et al (2015) Concentrated growth factor in the treatment of adjacent multiple gingival recessions: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 42:868–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Choukroun J, Diss A, Simonpieri A et al (2006) Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): a second-generation platelet concentrate Part V: Histologic evaluations of PRF effects on bone allograft maturation in sinus lift. Oral Surgery Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology 101(3):299–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.07.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Masuki H, Okudera T, Watanebe T et al (2016) Growth factor and pro-inflammatory cytokine contents in platelet-rich plasma (PRP), plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF), advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF), and concentrated growth factors (CGF). Int J Implant Dent 2(1):19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-016-0052-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li R, Liu Y, Xu T et al (2019) The additional effect of autologous platelet concentrates to coronally advanced flap in the treatment of gingival recessions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int 25:2587245. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2587245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ghanaati S, Booms P, Orlowska A et al (2014) Advanced platelet-rich fibrin: a new concept for cell-based tissue engineering by means of inflammatory cells. J Oral Implantol 40(6):679–689. https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-14-00138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Isobe K, Watanebe T, Kawabata H et al (2017) Mechanical and degradation properties of advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF), concentrated growth factors (CGF), and platelet-poor plasma-derived fibrin (PPTF). Int J Implant Dent 3(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-017-0081-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gruber R, Varga F, Fischer MB, Watzek G (2002) Platelets stimulate proliferation of bone cells: involvement of platelet-derived growth factor, microparticles and membranes. Clin Oral Implants Res 13(5):529–535. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130513.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuka S, Ipci SD, Cakar G, Yılmaz S (2018) Clinical evaluation of coronally advanced flap with or without platelet-rich fibrin for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions. Clin Oral Investig 22(3):1551–1558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2225-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cross N (2012) Plastic-esthetic periodontal and implant surgery: a microsurgical approach. Br Dent J 213:484. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Burkhardt R, Lang NP (2005) Coverage of localized gingival recessions: comparison of micro-and macrosurgical techniques. J Clin Periodontol 32:287–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00660.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Andrade PF, Grisi MFM, Marcaccini AM et al (2010) Comparison between micro- and macrosurgical techniques for the treatment of localized gingival recessions using coronally positioned flaps and enamel matrix derivative. J Periodontol 81(11):1572–1579. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jain R, Kudva P, Kumar R (2014) Periodontal microsurgery- magnifying facts, maximizing results. J Adv Med Dent Sci Res 2:24–34

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bittencourt S, Del Peloso RÉ, Sallum EA et al (2012) Surgical microscope may enhance root coverage with subepithelial connective tissue graft: a randomized-controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol 83:721–730. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2011.110202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Akcan SK, Ünsal B (2020) Gingival recession treatment with concentrated growth factor membrane: a comparative clinical trial. J Appl Oral Sci 28:e20190236. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Korkmaz B, Balli U (2021) Clinical evaluation of the treatment of multiple gingival recessions with connective tissue graft or concentrated growth factor using tunnel technique: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 25(11):6347–6356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03935-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tazegül K, Doğan ŞB, Ballı U, et al (2022) Growth factor membranes in treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a randomized clinical trial. Quintessence Int 14;53(4):288–297. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b2407765

  30. Jepsen S, Caton JG, Albandar JM et al (2018) Periodontal manifestations of systemic diseases and developmental and acquired conditions: consensus report of workgroup 3 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Clin Periodontol 45:219–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.17-0733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cairo F, Nieri M, Cincinelli S et al (2011) The interproximal clinical attachment level to classify gingival recessions and predict root coverage outcomes: an explorative and reliability study. J Clin Periodontol 38:661–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01732.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. O’Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE (1972) The plaque control record. J Periodontol 43(1):38. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1972.43.1.38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Löe H (1967) The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems. J Periodontol 38(6):610–616. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1967.38.6.610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gibson JA, Wade AB (1977) Plaque removal by the bass and roll brushing techniques. J Periodontol 48(8):456–459. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1977.48.8.456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Löe H, Silness J (1963) Periodontal disease in pregnancy I. Prevalence and severity Acta Odontol Scand 21:533–551. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016356309011240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Silness J, Löe H (1964) Periodontal disease in pregnancy II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontol Scand 22:121–135. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016356408993968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Savitha B, Vandana K (2005) Comparative assesment of gingival thickness using transgingival probing and ultrasonographic method. Indian J Dent Res 16(4):135–139. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.29908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ozenci I, Ipci SD, Cakar G, Yilmaz S (2015) Tunnel technique versus coronally advanced flap with acellular dermal matrix graft in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions. J Clin Periodontol 42(12):1135–1142. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gould D, Kelly D, Goldstone L, Gammon J (2001) Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: developing and using illustrated patient simulations to collect the data. J Clin Nurs 10(5):697–706. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2702.2001.00525.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tammaro S, Wennström JL, Bergenholtz G (2000) Root-dentin sensitivity following non-surgical periodontal treatment. J Clin Periodontol 27(9):690–697. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027009690.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Agarwal SK, Jhingran R, Bains VK et al (2016) Patient-centered evaluation of microsurgical management of gingival recession using coronally advanced flap with platelet-rich fibrin or amnion membrane: a comparative analysis. Eur J Dent 10(1):121–133. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.175686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Dohan DM, Choukroun J, Diss A et al (2006) Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): a second-generation platelet concentrate Part II: Platelet-related biologic features. Oral Surgery Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 101(3):e45-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.07.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. McGuire MK, Scheyer ET (2010) Xenogeneic collagen matrix with coronally advanced flap compared to connective tissue with coronally advanced flap for the treatment of dehiscence-type recession defects. J Periodontol 81(8):1108–1117. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.090698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Cheng YF, Chen JW, Lin SJ, Lu HK (2007) Is coronally positioned flap procedure adjunct with enamel matrix derivative or root conditioning a relevant predictor for achieving root coverage? A systemic review J Periodontal Res 42(5):474–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.2007.00971.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Jahnke PV, Sandifer JB, Gher ME et al (1993) Thick free gingival and connective tissue autografts for root coverage. J Periodontol 64(4):315–322. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1993.64.4.315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Jankovic S, Aleksic Z, Klokkevold P et al (2012) Use of platelet-rich fibrin membrane following treatment of gingival recession: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 32(2):e41-50. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.00.1048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Perelli M, Abundo R, Corrente G, Arduino PG (2019) The creeping attachment induced technique (CAIT) in natural and restored teeth: case reports with 24 months of follow-up. Case Rep Dent 29:5828423. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5828423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Kumar A, Bains VK, Jhingran R et al (2017) Patient-centered microsurgical management of gingival recession using coronally advanced flap with either platelet-rich fibrin or connective tissue graft: a comparative analysis. Contemp Clin Dent 8(2):293–304. https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_70_17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Clauser C, Nieri M, Franceschi D et al (2003) Evidence-based mucogingival therapy Part 2: Ordinary and individual patient data meta-analyses of surgical treatment of recession using complete root coverage as the outcome variable. J Periodontol 74(5):741–56. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.5.741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Chekurthi S, Tadepalli A, Parthasarathy H et al (2021) Evaluation of clinical efficacy of advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) in the management of gingival recession defects: case series. Clin Adv Periodontics. https://doi.org/10.1002/cap.10160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Shieh A-T, Wang H-L, O’Neal R et al (1997) Development and clinical evaluation of a root coverage procedure using a collagen barrier membrane. J Periodontol 68(8):770–778. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1997.68.8.770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Gupta S, Banthia R, Singh P et al (2015) Clinical evaluation and comparison of the efficacy of coronally advanced flap alone and in combination with platelet rich fibrin membrane in the treatment of Miller Class I and II gingival recessions. Contemp Clin Dent 6(2):153–160. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.156034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Thamaraiselvan M, Elavarasu S, Thangakumaran S et al (2015) Comparative clinical evaluation of coronally advanced flap with or without platelet rich fibrin membrane in the treatment of isolated gingival recession. J Indian Soc Periodontol 19(1):66–71. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.145790

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study has been supported by the Scientific Research Fund of Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey (Project No: HD-1726).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception and design: F.O.D. and Ş.B.D. Analysis and interpretation of the data: F.O.D., K.Ç., and N.S.C. Data collection: F.O.D., S.Ç., and E.T.D. Drafting of the manuscript: F.O.D. and Ş.B.D. All authors gave their final approval and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Figen Öngöz Dede.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

The study protocol was confirmed by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey, according to the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (Protocol ID: 2017–161, Clinical Trial. org- NCT05319938).

Informed consent

All participants gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Öngöz Dede, F., Bozkurt Doğan, Ş., Çelen, K. et al. Comparison of the clinical efficacy of concentrated growth factor and advanced platelet-rich fibrin in the treatment of type I multiple gingival recessions: a controlled randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Invest 27, 645–657 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04775-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04775-5

Keywords

Navigation