Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of medications on salivary flow rate in patients with xerostomia: a retrospective study by the Xeromeds Consortium

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

This study evaluates the impact of systemic medications and polypharmacy on unstimulated (UWS) and chewing-stimulated whole saliva (SWS) flow rates in patients with xerostomia.

Material and methods

This cross-sectional multicenter study is based on data of patients referred to five oral medicine outpatient practices in Europe and USA from January 2000 and April 2014. Relevant demographic, social, medical history and current medications were collected.

Results

The study included 1144 patients, 972 (85%) females, with a mean (SD) age of 59 (14.1) years. In unmatched patients, the UWS flow rate was lower in patients taking a medication (vs. not taking a medication) from the following drug categories: opioid analgesics, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, antihypertensives, benzodiazepines, corticosteroids, diuretics, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and hormones. There was a greater negative effect on SWS flow rate in patients taking (vs. not taking) anticonvulsants, antidepressants, benzodiazepines, corticosteroids, and DMARDs. In matched patients, both UWS (0.22 vs. 0.19 ml/min; p = 0.03) and SWS (0.97 vs. 0.85 ml/min; p = .017) flow rates were higher in patients on non-opioid analgesics (vs. not taking). The UWS flow rate was lower in patients taking antidepressants (vs. not taking) (0.16 vs. 0.22 ml/min p = .002) and higher (and within normal range) in patients taking sex hormones (vs. not taking) (0.25 vs. 0.16 ml/min; p = .005). On the other hand, SWS was lower in patients taking corticosteroid (vs. not taking) (0.76 vs. 1.07 ml/min; p = .002), and in patients taking DMARDs (vs. not taking) (0.71 vs. 0.98 ml/min; p = .021).

Finally, differences in medians of both UWS and SWS were statistically significant in patients taking 1 or more than 1 opioid analgesic (vs. not taking, p ≤ .0001 and p = .031, respectively), 1 or more than 1 anticonvulsants (vs. not taking, p = .008 and p = .007), 1 or more than 1 antidepressants (vs. not taking, p < .0001 for both), 1 or more than 1 DMARDs (vs. not taking, p = .042, and p = .003).

Conclusions

A greater negative impact on UWS and SWS flow rates was seen in patients taking more than one medication from the same drug class. Intake of antidepressants, corticosteroids and DMARDs is associated with lower whole saliva flow rates.

Clinical relevance

Salivary flow rate can be modified by some specific medications, mostly by polypharmacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Some data may not be made available because of privacy or ethical restrictions.

References

  1. Saleh J, Figueiredo MA, Cherubini K, Salum FG (2015) Salivary hypofunction: an update on aetiology, diagnosis and therapeutics. Arch Oral Biol 60:242–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2014.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jensen SB, Pedersen AM, Vissink A, Andersen E, Brown CG, Davies AN, Dutilh J, Fulton JS, Jankovic L, Lopes NN, Mello AL, Muniz LV, Murdoch-Kinch CA, Nair RG, Napenas JJ, Nogueira-Rodrigues A, Saunders D, Stirling B, von B, I, Weikel DS, Elting LS, Spijkervet FK and Brennan MT, (2010) A systematic review of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies: prevalence, severity and impact on quality of life. Support Care Cancer 18:1039–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. von Bultzingslowen I, Sollecito TP, Fox PC, Daniels T, Jonsson R, Lockhart PB, Wray D, Brennan MT, Carrozzo M, Gandera B, Fujibayashi T, Navazesh M, Rhodus NL, Schiodt M (2007) Salivary dysfunction associated with systemic diseases: systematic review and clinical management recommendations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 103(57):e1-15

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wolff A, Zuk-Paz L, Kaplan I (2008) Major salivary gland output differs between users and non-users of specific medication categories. Gerodontology 25:210–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2008.00223.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fox PC, Busch KA, Baum BJ (1987) Subjective reports of xerostomia and objective measures of salivary gland performance. J Am Dent Assoc 115:581–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dawes C (1987) Physiological factors affecting salivary flow rate, oral sugar clearance, and the sensation of dry mouth in man. J Dent Res 66:648–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Villa A, Wolff A, Narayana N, Dawes C, Aframian DJ, Lynge Pedersen AM, Vissink A, Aliko A, Sia YW, Joshi RK, McGowan R, Jensen SB, Kerr AR, Ekstrom J, Proctor G (2016) World Workshop on Oral Medicine VI: a systematic review of medication-induced salivary gland dysfunction. Oral Dis 22:365–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.12402[doi]

  8. Wolff A, Joshi RK, Ekstrom J, Aframian D, Pedersen AM, Proctor G, Narayana N, Villa A, Sia YW, Aliko A, McGowan R, Kerr AR, Jensen SB, Vissink A, Dawes C (2017) A guide to medications inducing salivary gland dysfunction, xerostomia, and subjective sialorrhea: a systematic review sponsored by the World Workshop on Oral Medicine VI. Drugs R D 17:1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40268-016-0153-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Navazesh M, Brightman VJ, Pogoda JM (1996) Relationship of medical status, medications, and salivary flow rates in adults of different ages. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 81:172–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu AJ, Ship JA (1993) A characterization of major salivary gland flow rates in the presence of medications and systemic diseases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 76:301–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ichikawa K, Sakuma S, Yoshihara A, Miyazaki H, Funayama S, Ito K, Igarashi A (2011) Relationships between the amount of saliva and medications in elderly individuals. Gerodontology 28:116–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2009.00358.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Narhi TO, Meurman JH, Ainamo A, Nevalainen JM, Schmidt-Kaunisaho KG, Siukosaari P, Valvanne J, Erkinjuntti T, Tilvis R, Makila E (1992) Association between salivary flow rate and the use of systemic medication among 76-, 81-, and 86-year-old inhabitants in Helsinki, Finland. J Dent Res 71:1875–1880. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345920710120401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Scelza MF, Silva Dde F, Ahiadzro NK, Da Silva LE, Scelza P (2010) The influence of medication on salivary flow of the elderly: preliminary study. Gerodontology 27:278–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2009.00326.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leal SC, Bittar J, Portugal A, Falcao DP, Faber J, Zanotta P (2010) Medication in elderly people: its influence on salivary pattern, signs and symptoms of dry mouth. Gerodontology 27:129–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2009.00293.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jansen AC, van Aalst-Cohen ES, Hutten BA, Buller HR, Kastelein JJ, Prins MH (2005) Guidelines were developed for data collection from medical records for use in retrospective analyses. J Clin Epidemiol 58:269–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Navazesh M (1993) Methods for collecting saliva. Ann N Y Acad Sci 694:72–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Smidt D, Torpet LA, Nauntofte B, Heegaard KM, Pedersen AM (2011) Associations between oral and ocular dryness, labial and whole salivary flow rates, systemic diseases and medications in a sample of older people. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 39:276–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2010.00588.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Smidt D, Torpet LA, Nauntofte B, Heegaard KM, Pedersen AM (2010) Associations between labial and whole salivary flow rates, systemic diseases and medications in a sample of older people. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 38:422–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2010.00554.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Navazesh M, Kumar SK (2008) Measuring salivary flow: challenges and opportunities. J Am Dent Assoc 139(Suppl):35S-40S. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0353

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Dr. Giulio Fortuna received an American Academy of Oral Medicine Research Advancement Committee Award to support this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to the study conception or design, or the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data for the work; and drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content. Details regarding author contributions are as follows:

study conception or design: GF, SW, KS, IA, AAR, AMLP, AV, OF, MA, DJJ, JN, SBJ, AW, MTB; acquisition of data: GF, SW, IA, AAR, AMLP, AV, OF, DJJ, JN, SBJ, AW, MTB; analysis or interpretation of data: GF, KS, IA, AAR, AMLP, AV, OF, MA, DJJ, SBJ, AW, MTB; drafting the work: GF, KS, MA, AW, MTB; editing/revising the work: GF, SW, KS, IA, AAR, AMLP, AV, OF, MA, DJJ, JN, SBJ, AW, MTB. All authors gave final approval of the version to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. The corresponding author attests that all listed authors meet authorship criteria and that no others meeting the criteria have been omitted.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael T. Brennan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Appropriate Ethics Board approval was obtained for patients assessed in the present study. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Conflict of interest

All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organization for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Permission to reproduce material from other sources and Clinical Trial Registration

Not applicabl.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fortuna, G., Whitmire, S., Sullivan, K. et al. Impact of medications on salivary flow rate in patients with xerostomia: a retrospective study by the Xeromeds Consortium. Clin Oral Invest 27, 235–248 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04717-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04717-1

Keywords

Navigation