Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is the quality of root canal filling obtained by cone-beam computed tomography associated with periapical lesions? A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

To evaluate the influence of root canal filling quality on periapical lesion status using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Materials and Methods

The bibliographic search was conducted in electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science without restrictions related to the year of publication and language. Inclusion criteria were prospective or retrospective cohort studies that followed periapical pathosis for, at least, 1 year. Three reviewers independently evaluated the eligibility for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. The quality of the studies was based on the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the quality of treatment by the homogeneity and apical extension of the filling.

Results

Of the 1179 studies initially recovered, six cohort studies were included, out of which four were considered with a low risk of bias. The results showed that the absence of gaps in the filling reduced the chance of unhealed periapical lesions by 2.39 times (RR = 2.39; 95% CI: 1.62–3.53; p < 0.00001; I= 55%). An apical filling extension of 0–2 mm below the apex also contributed significantly to the absence of unhealed periapical lesions (RR = 1.49; 95% CI: 1.15–1.94; p = 0.003; I= 2%).

Conclusion

The homogeneity and apical extension of the filling influenced the presence of unhealed periapical lesions in endodontically treated teeth evaluated using CBCT.

Clinical relevance

Apical extension of the filling ranging between 0 and 2 mm short of the apical foramen and the homogeneity of the filling without gaps are directly related to the success rate of root canal treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davies A, Patel S, Foschi F, Andiappan M, Mitchell PJ, Mannocci F (2016) The detection of periapical pathoses using digital periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography in endodontically retreated teeth - part 2: a 1 year post-treatment follow-up. Int Endod J 49(7):623–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Patel S, Wilson R, Dawood A, Foschi F, Mannocci F (2012) The detection of periapical pathosis using digital periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography - part 2: a 1-year post-treatment follow-up. Int Endod J 45(8):711–723. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02076.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Metska ME, Parsa A, Aartman IH, Wesselink PR, Ozok AR (2013) Volumetric changes in apical radiolucencies of endodontically treated teeth assessed by cone-beam computed tomography 1 year after orthograde retreatment. J Endod 39(12):1504–1509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.08.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Patel S, Durack C, Abella F, Shemesh H, Roig M, Lemberg K (2015) Cone beam computed tomography in endodontics - a review. Int Endod J 48(1):3–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Patel S, Horner K (2009) The use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics. Int J Endod 42(9):755–756. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01607.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Venskutonis T, Plotino G, Tocci L, Gambarini G, Maminskas J, Juodzbalys G (2015) Periapical and endodontic status scale based on periapic bone lesions and endodontic quality evaluation using cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod 41(2):190–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.10.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Patel S, Puri T, Mannocci F, Navai A (2021) Diagnosis and management of traumatic dental injuries using intraoral radiography and cone-beam computed tomography: an in vivo investigation. J Endod 47(6):914–923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2021.02.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Keerthana G, Singh N, Yadav R, Duhan J, Tewari S, Gupta A et al (2021) Comparative analysis of accuracy of periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography in diagnosing complex endodontic pathoses using a gold standard reference - a prospective clinical study. Int Endod J 54(9):1448–1461. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pereira B, Martins JNR, Baruwa AO, Meirinhos J, Gouveia J, Quaresma SA et al (2020) Association between endodontic treated maxillary and mandibular molars with fused roots and periapical lesions: a cone-beam computed tomography cross-sectional study. J Endod 46(6):771-777.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.03.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kfir A, Mostinsky O, Elyzur O, Hertzeanu M, Metzger Z, Pawar AM (2020) Root channel configuration and root wall thickness of first maxillary premolars in an Israeli population. A Cone-beam computed tomography study. Sci Rep 10(1):434. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56957-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Fu Y, Deng Q, Xie Z, Sun J, Song D, Gao Y et al (2020) Coronal root canal morphology of permanent two-rooted mandibular first molars with novel 3D measurements. Int Endod J 53(2):167–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bhatt M, Coil J, Chehroudi B, Esteves A, Aleksejuniene J, MacDonald D (2021) Clinical decision-making and importance of the AAE/AAOMR position statement for CBCT examination in endodontic cases. Int Endod J 54(1):26–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Costa FFNP, Pacheco-Yanes J, Siqueira JF Jr, Oliveira ACS, Gazzaneo I, Amorim CA et al (2019) Association between missed canals and apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 52(4):400–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. do Carmo WD, Verner FS, Aguiar LM, Visconti MA, Ferreira MD, Lacerda MFLS et al (2021) Missed canals in endodontically treated maxillary molars of a Brazilian subpopulation: prevalence and association with periapical lesion using cone-beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig 25(4):2317–2323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03554-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Caetano AP, Sousa TO, Oliveira MR, Evanglista K, Bueno JM, Silva MA (2021) Accuracy of three cone-beam CT devices and two software systems in the detection of vertical root fractures. Radiol dentomaxillofac 50(3):20200334. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20200334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Candemil AP, Mangione F, Vasconcelos KF, Oenning AC, Jacobs R, Freitas DQ et al (2021) Influence of the exomass on the detection of simulated root fracture in cone-beam CT - an ex-vivo study. Radiol dentomaxillofac 50(4):20200450. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20200450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Silva LR, de Lima KL, Santos AA, Leles CR, Estrela C, de Freitas Silva BS et al (2021) Dentin thickness as a risk factor for vertical root fracture in endodontically treated teeth: a case-control study. Clin Oral Investig 25(3):1099–1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03406-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wanderley VA, Nascimento EHL, Gaêta-Araujo H, Oliveira-Santos C, Freitas DQ, Oliveira ML (2021) Combined use of 2 cone-beam computed tomography scans in the assessment of vertical root fracture in teeth with intracanal material. J Endod 47(7):1132–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2021.04.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rodrigues CT, Jacobs R, Vasconcelos KF, Lambrechts P, Rubira-Bullen IRF, Gaêta-Araujo H et al (2021) Influence of CBCT-based volumetric distortion and beam hardening artefacts on the assessment of root canal filling quality in isthmus-containing molars. Radiol dentomaxillofac 50(5):20200503. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20200503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Di Filippo G, Sidhu SK, Chong BS (2014) Apical periodontitis and the technical quality of root canal treatment in an adult sub-population in London. Br Dent J 216(10):E22. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Meirinhos J, Martins JNR, Pereira B, Baruwa A, Gouveia J, Quaresma SA et al (2020) Prevalence of apical periodontitis and its association with previous root canal treatment, root canal filling length and type of coronal restoration - a cross-sectional study. Int Endod J 53(4):573–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. European Society of Endodontology (2006) Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J 39(12):921–930. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01180.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liang YH, Li G, Wesselink PR, Wu MK (2011) Endodontic outcome predictors identified with periapical radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography scans. J Endod 37(3):326–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.11.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Liang YH, Li G, Shemesh H, Wesselink PR, Wu MK (2012) The association between complete absence of post-treatment periapical lesion and quality of root canal filling. Clin Oral Investig 16(6):1619–1626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0671-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Al-Nuaimi N, Patel S, Austin RS, Mannocci F (2017) A prospective study assessing the effect of coronal tooth structure loss on the outcome of root canal retreatment. Int Endod J 50(12):1143–1157. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fernández R, Cardona JA, Cadavid D, Álvarez LG, Restrepo FA (2017) Survival of endodontically treated roots/teeth based on periapical health and retention: a 10-year retrospective cohort study. J Endod 43(12):2001–2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.08.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Restrepo-Restrepo FA, Cañas-Jiménez SJ, Romero-Albarracín RD, Villa-Machado PA, Pérez-Cano MI, Tobón-Arroyave SI (2019) Prognosis of root canal treatment in teeth with preoperative apical periodontitis: a study with cone-beam computed tomography and digital periapical radiography. Int J Endod 52(11):1533–1546. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang MM, Fang GF, Chen XT, Liang YH (2021) Four-year outcome of nonsurgical root canal retreatment using cone-beam computed tomography: a prospective cohort study. J Endod 47(3):382–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.10.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Candemil AP, Salmon B, Vasconcelos KF, Oenning AC, Jacobs R, Freitas DQ et al (2021) Cone beam CT optimisation for detection of vertical root fracture with metal in the field of view or the exomass. Sci Rep 27 11(1):19155. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98345-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Moher D, Liberati A, Tezlaff J, Altman DG (2009) PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Orstavik D, Kerekes K, Eriksen HM (1986) The periapical index: a scoring system for radiographic assessment of apical periodontitis. Dent Traumatol 2(1):20–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1986.tb00119.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Estrela C, Bueno MR, Azevedo BC, Azevedo JR, Pécora JD (2008) A new periapical index based on cone beam computed tomography. J Endod 34(11):1325–1331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.08.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tifooni A, Al-Nuaimi N, Dawood A, Mannocci F, Patel S (2019) Validation of the effectiveness of the dental practicality index in predicting the outcome of root canal retreatments. Int Endod J 52(10):1403–1409. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lofthag-Hansen S, Huumonen S, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG (2007) Limited cone-beam CT and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of periapical pathology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 103(1):114–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.01.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Low KM, Dula K, Bürgin W, von Arx T (2008) Comparison of periapical radiography and limited cone-beam tomography in posterior maxillary teeth referred for apical surgery. J Endod 34(5):557–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.02.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bornstein MM, Lauber R, Sendi P, von Arx T (2011) Comparison of periapical radiography and limited cone-beam computed tomography in mandibular molars for analysis of anatomical landmarks before apical surgery. J Endod 37(2):151–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.11.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Estrela C, Bueno MR, Porto OC, Rodrigues CD, Pécora JD (2009) Influence of intracanal post on apical periodontitis identified by cone-beam computed tomography. Braz Dent J 20(5):370–375. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-64402009000500003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Moura MS, Guedes OA, De Alencar AH, Azevedo BC, Estrela C (2009) Influence of length of root canal obturation on apical periodontitis detected by periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography. J Endod 35(6):805–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.03.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nur BG, Ok E, Altunsoy M, Ağlarci OS, Çolak M, Güngör E (2014) Evaluation of technical quality and periapical health of root-filled teeth by using cone-beam CT. J Appl Oral Sci 22(6):502–508. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720140110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gomes AC, Nejaim Y, Silva AI, Haiter-Neto F, Cohenca N, Zaia AA et al (2015) Influence of endodontic treatment and coronal restoration on status of periapical tissues: a cone-beam computed tomographic study. J Endod 41(10):1614–1618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.07.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cakici EB, Yildirim E, Cakici F, Erdogan AS (2016) Assessment of periapical health, quality of root canal filling, and coronal restoration by using cone-beam computed tomography. Niger J Clin Pract 19(5):673–677. https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.188697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Van der Veken D, Curvers F, Fieuws S, Lambrechts P (2017) Prevalence of apical periodontitis and root filled teeth in a Belgian subpopulation found on CBCT images. Int Endod J 50(4):317–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nascimento EHL, Gaêta-Araujo H, Andrade MFS, Freitas DQ (2018) Prevalence of technical errors and periapical lesions in a sample of endodontically treated teeth: a CBCT analysis. Clin Oral Investig 22(7):2495–2503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2344-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Gambarini G, Piasecki L, Miccoli G, Gaimari G, Nardo DD, Testarelli L (2018) Cone-beam computed tomography in the assessment of periapical lesions in endodontically treated teeth. Eur J Dent 12(1):136–143. https://doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_320_17

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Bonfanti E, Maddalone M, Pellegatta A, Citterio CL, Baldoni M (2019) Digital orthopantomography vs cone beam computed tomography-part 2: a CBCT analysis of factors influencing the prevalence of periapical lesions. J Contemp Dent Pract 20(6):664–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Gaêta-Araujo H, Fontenele RC, Nascimento EHL, Nascimento MDCC, Freitas DQ, de Oliveira-Santos C (2019) Association between the root canal configuration, endodontic treatment technical technical errors, and periapical hypodensities in molar teeth: a cone-beam computed tomographic study. J Endod 45(12):1465–1471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2019.08.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. de Sousa Gomide Guimarães MRF, Samuel RO, Guimarães G, Nalin EKP, Bernardo RT, Dezan-Júnior E et al (2019) Evaluation of the relationship between obturation length and presence of apical periodontitis by CBCT: an observational cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Investig 23(5):2055–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2623-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Nascimento EHL, Nascimento MCC, Gaêta-Araujo H, Fontenele RC, Freitas DQ (2019) Root canal configuration and its relationship with endodontic technical errors in premolar teeth: a CBCT analysis. Int Endod J 52(10):1410–1416. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Bürklein S, Schäfer E, Jöhren HP, Donnermeyer D (2020) Quality of root canal fillings and prevalence of apical radiolucencies in a German population: a CBCT analysis. Clin Oral Investig 24(3):1217–1227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02985-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Gudac J, Hellén-Halme K, Venskutonis T, Puisys A, Machiulskiene V (2020) Comparison of selected anatomical and treatment-related diagnostic parameters estimated by cone-beam computed tomography and digital periapical radiography in teeth with apical periodontitis. J Oral Maxillofac Res 11(2):e4. https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2020.11204

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Siqueira JF Jr, Antunes HS, Pérez AR, Alves FRF, Mdala I, Silva EJNL et al (2020) The apical root canal system of teeth with posttreatment apical periodontitis: correlating microbiologic, tomographic, and histopathologic findings. J Endod 46(9):1195–1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.05.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Villa-Machado PA, Restrepo-Patiño DM, Calvo-Trejos JP, Restrepo-Restrepo FA, Tobón-Arroyave SI, Provenzano JC et al (2020) Cone-beam computed tomographic and micro-computed tomographic evaluations of the root apexes of teeth with posttreatment apical periodontitis. J Endod 46(11):1695–1701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.07.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Shah N, Logani A (2012) SealBio: A novel, non-obturation endodontic treatment based on concept of regeneration. J Conserv Dent 15(4):328–332. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.101889

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Shetty H, Shetty S, Kakade A, Mali S, Shetty A, Neelakantan P (2021) Three-dimensional qualitative and quantitative analyses of the effect of periradicular lesions on the outcome of regenerative endodontic procedures: a prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Investig 25(2):691–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03583-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Fernández R, Cadavid D, Zapata SM, Alvarez LG, Restrepo FA (2013) Impact of three radiographic methods in the outcome of nonsurgical endodontic treatment: a five-year follow-up. J Endod 39(9):1097–1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.04.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Estrela C, Holland R, Estrela CR, Alencar AH, Sousa-Neto MD, Pécora JD (2014) Characterization of successful root canal treatment. Braz Dent J 25(1):3–11. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201302356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Pereira Junior W, Moura MS, Guedes AO, Decurcio RA, Estrela C (2010) Analysis of criteria of success in endodontics and implant dentistry. Rev Odontol Bras Central 19(49):108–118

    Google Scholar 

  58. Alharmoodi R, Al-Salehi S (2020) Assessment of the quality of endodontic re-treatment and changes in periapical status on a postgraduate endodontic clinic. J Dent 92:103261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Mareschi P, Taschieri S, Corbella S (2020) Long-term follow-up of nonsurgical endodontic treatments performed by one specialist: a retrospective cohort study about tooth survival and treatment success. Int J Dent 8855612. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8855612

  60. Ray HA, Trope M (1995) Periapical status of endodontically treated teeth in relation to the technical quality of the root filling and the coronal restoration. Int Endod J 28(1):12–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1995.tb00150.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K (2011) A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment: part 1: periapical health. Int J Endod 44(7):583–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01872.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Gupta R, Dhingra A, Panwar NR (2015) Comparative evaluation of three different obturating techniques lateral compaction, thermafil and calamus for filling area and voids using cone beam computed tomography: an in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res 9(8):ZC15-7. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/12218.6279

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. de-Jesus-Soares A, Prado MC, Nardello LCL, Pereira AC, Cerqueira-Neto ACCL, Nagata JY et al (2020) Clinical and molecular microbiological evaluation of regenerative endodontic procedures in immature permanent teeth. J Endod 46(10):1448–1454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.07.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Sluis LWM, Wu M-K, Wesselink PR (2005) An evaluation of the quality of root fillings in mandibular incisors and maxillary and mandibular canines using different methodologies. Mr J Dent 33(8):683–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Wu M-K, Bud MG, Wesselink PR (2009) The quality of single cone and laterally compacted gutta-percha fillings in small and curved root canals as evidenced by bidirectional radiographs and fluid transport measurements. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 108(6):946–951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.07.046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Patel S, Brown J, Pimentel T, Kelly RD, Abella F, Durack C (2019) Cone beam computed tomography in endodontics - a review of the literature. Int J Endod 52(8):1138–1152. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. García-Guerrero C, Delgado-Rodríguez CE, Molano-González N, Pineda-Velandia GA, Marín-Zuluaga DJ, Leal-Fernandez MC et al (2020) Predicting the outcome of initial non-surgical endodontic procedures by periapical status and quality of root canal filling: a cohort study. Odontology. 108(4):697–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-020-00494-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Williams CB, Joyce AP, Roberts S (2006) A comparison between in vivo radiographic working length determination and measurement after extraction. J Endod 32(7):624–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Yılmaz F, Kamburoğlu K, Şenel B (2017) Endodontic working length measurement using cone-beam computed tomographic images obtained at different voxel sizes and field of views, periapical radiography, and apex locator: a comparative ex vivo study. J Endod 43(1):152–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.09.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Abidi SYA, Azfar M, Nayab T, Shaukat A, Hasan M, Baig NN et al (2020) Accuracy of working length measurement with endo motor having built-in apex locator and comparison with periapical radiographs. J Pak Med Assoc 70(3):437–441. https://doi.org/10.5455/JPMA.302464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Ricucci D, Russian J, Rutberg M, Burleson JA, Spångberg LSW (2011) A prospective cohort study of endodontic treatments of 1369 root canals: results after 5 years. Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontics 112(6):825–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Prati C, Pirani C, Zamparini F, Gatto MR, Gandolfi MG (2018) A 20-year historical prospective cohort study of root canal treatments. Multilevel analysis Int Endod J 51(9):955–968. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Pope O, Sathorn C, Parashos P (2014) A comparative investigation of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography in the diagnosis of a healthy periapex. J Endod 40(3):360–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Kruse C, Spin-Neto R, Reibel J, Wenzel A, Kirkevang LL (2017) Diagnostic validity of periapical radiography and CBCT for assessing periapical lesions that persist after endodontic surgery. Radiol dentomaxillofac 46(7):20170210. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20170210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Rosenberg PA, Frisbie J, Lee J, Lee K, Frommer H, Kottal S et al (2010) Evaluation of pathologists (histopathology) and radiologists (cone beam computed tomography) differentiating root cysts from granulomas. J Endod 36(3):423–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.11.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Kanagasingam S, Lim CX, Yong CP, Mannocci F, Patel S (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography in detecting apical periodontitis using histopathological findings as a reference standard. Int Endod J 50(5):417–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Paula-Silva FW, Wu MK, Leonardo MR, da Silva LA, Wesselink PR (2009) Accuracy of periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography scans in diagnosing apical periodontitis using histopathological findings as a gold standard. J Endod 35(7):1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Spin-Neto R, Kruse C, Hermann L, Kirkevang LL, Wenzel A (2020) Impact of motion artefacts and motion-artefact correction on diagnostic accuracy of apical periodontitis in CBCT images: an ex vivo study in human cadavers. Int J Endod 53(9):1275–1288. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Gillen BM, Looney SW, Gu LS, Loushine BA, Weller RN, Loushine RJ et al (2011) Impact of the quality of coronal restoration versus the quality of root canal fillings on success of root canal treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 37(7):895–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.04.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Boubaris M, Chan KL, Zhao W, Cameron A, Sun J, Love R et al (2021) A volume-based novel cone-beam computed tomographic periapical index. J Endod 47(8):1308–1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2021.04.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Tyndall DA, Kohltfarber H (2012) Application of cone beam volumetric tomography in endodontics. Aust Dent J 57(Suppl 1):72–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01654.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Kojima K, Inamoto K, Nagamatsu K, Hara A, Nakata K, Morita I et al (2004) Success rate of endodontic treatment of teeth with vital and nonvital pulps. A meta-analysis. Oral surg, oral med, oral pathol, oral radiol, and endod 97(1):95–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Schaeffer MA, White RR, Walton RE (2005) Determining the optimal obturation length: a meta-analysis of literature. J Endod 31(4):271–274. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000140585.52178.78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M et al (2011) GRADE Working Group. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence–indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol 64(12):1303–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support received from Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel, CAPES Brazil, nº 33002029032P4 and São Paulo Research Foundation, FAPESP, nº 2018/14450-1.

Funding

The work was supported by Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel, CAPES Brazil, nº 33002029032P4 and by São Paulo Research Foundation, FAPESP, nº 2018/14450–1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Guilherme N. Alves dos Santos: Conceptualization; methodology; data curation; formal analysis; investigation; writing, original draft; project administration. André L. F. Silva, Vitor L. Ribeiro, Laís L. Pelozo and Amanda P. Candemil: Data curation, formal analysis, investigation, writing—review and editing. Matheus L. Oliveira and Fabiane C. Lopes: Visualization, investigation, writing—review and editing. Jardel F. Mazzi-Chaves and Manoel D. Sousa-Neto: Conceptualization; methodology; visualization; investigation; writing, review and editing; supervision; project administration.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manoel Damião Sousa-Neto.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent to participate

For this type of study, formal consent is not required. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alves dos Santos, G.N., Faria-e-Silva, A.L., Ribeiro, V.L. et al. Is the quality of root canal filling obtained by cone-beam computed tomography associated with periapical lesions? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Invest 26, 5105–5116 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04558-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04558-y

Keywords

Navigation