Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Antiplaque and antigingivitis efficacy of medicated and non-medicated sugar-free chewing gum as adjuncts to toothbrushing: systematic review and network meta-analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

This network meta-analysis (NMA) assessed the antiplaque and anti-inflammatory efficacy of different sugar-free chewing gums (SFCG) as adjuncts to toothbrushing.

Material and methods

PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases were searched up to February 2021 to identify randomized controlled trials, involving adults, comparing antiplaque and anti-inflammatory effects of SFCG, with different active ingredients, as adjunctive to mechanical control of biofilm, with a minimum of 7-day of follow-up. Plaque and gingival indexes were assessed. The risk of bias assessment was performed with the RoB 2.0 tool. NMA, and pairwise meta-analyses were performed for both dental plaque and gingival indexes.

Results

Twelve studies were included, comprising 850 (antiplaque) and 1459 (gingival inflammation) subjects randomized into 9 interventions: (1) chlorhexidine; (2) chlorhexidine + xylitol (CHX+Xyl); (3) green tea + xylitol (GT+Xyl); (4) magnolia; (5) Lactobacillus reuteri; (6) vitamin C + xylitol; (7) vitamin + carbamide; (8) eucalyptus; and (9) negative control, sorbitol, gum base only, or no chewing gum. No statistically significant differences were detected among SFCG, with different active ingredients, for both antiplaque and anti-inflammatory efficacy (p > 0.05). However, SFCG with GT+XyL outperformed negative control gums regarding antiplaque efficacy (SMD, − 2.93; 95% CrI, − 0.45 to − 5.38). The SUCRA results showed that SFCG containing GT+Xyl was ranked first, for both antiplaque and anti-inflammatory outcomes.

Conclusion

SFCG containing GT+Xyl showed better antiplaque effect over negative controls. However, cautious interpretation is required due to the low number of direct comparisons arms. These shortcomings underscore the need for RCTs with mostly head-to-head comparison that provide more conclusive evidence.

Clinical relevance

There is no robust evidence for the clinical indications of sugar-free chewing gums as adjunct to toothbrushing for the control of biofilm or the treatment of gingivitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Curtis MA, Diaz PI, Van Dyke TE (2020) The role of the microbiota in periodontal disease. Periodontol 83:14–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Joseph S, Curtis MA (2021) Microbial transitions from health to disease. Periodontol 86:201–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Loe H, Theilade E, Jensen SB (1965) Experimental gingivitis in man. J Periodontol 36:177–187. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1965.36.3.177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mosaddad SA, Tahmasebi E, Yazdanian A, Rezvani MB, Seifalian A, Yazdanian M et al (2019) Oral microbial biofilms: an update. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 38:2005–2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03641-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Seidgh L, DiMassa V, Harrington A, Lynch SV, Kapila YL (2021) The oral microbiome: Role of key organisms and complex networks in oral health and disease. Periodontol 2000 87:107–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Slot DE, Wiggelinkhuizen L, Rosema NA, Van der Weijden GA (2012) The efficacy of manual toothbrushes following a brushing exercise: a systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg 10:187–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5037.2012.00557.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar S, Tadakamadla J, Johnson NW (2016) Effect of Toothbrushing Frequency on Incidence and Increment of Dental Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Dent Res 95:1230–1236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516655315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carra MC, Detzen L, Kitzmann J, Woelber JP, Ramseier CA, Bouchard P (2020) Promoting behavioural changes to improve oral hygiene in patients with periodontal diseases: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 47(Suppl 22):72–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Scannapieco FA, Gershovich E (2020) The prevention of periodontal disease – an overview. Periodontol 2000 84:9–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Addy M (2008) Oral hygiene products: potential for harm to oral and systemic health? Periodontol 2000(48):54–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00253.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Keukenmeester RS, Slot DE, Putt MS, Van der Weijden GA (2014) The effect of medicated, sugar-free chewing gum on plaque and clinical parameters of gingival inflammation: a systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg 12:2–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.12026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Keukenmeester RS, Slot DE, Putt MS, Van der Weijden GA (2013) The effect of sugar-free chewing gum on plaque and clinical parameters of gingival inflammation: a systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg 11:2–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5037.2012.00562.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Muniz FW, Friedrich SA, Silveira CF, Rösing CK (2017) The impact of chewing gum on halitosis parameters: a systematic review. J Breath Res 11:014001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/aa5cc2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Newton JT, Awojobi O, Nasseripour M, Warburton F, Di Giorgio S, Gallagher JE et al (2020) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of sugar-free chewing gum in dental caries. JDR Clin Trans Res 5:214–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/2380084419887178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Higgins J, Thomas J (2019) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.0: Draft. [updated March 2019]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Lingström P, Fure S, Dinitzen B, Fritzne C, Klefbom C, Birkhed D (2005) The release of vitamin C from chewing gum and its effects on supragingival calculus formation. Eur J Oral Sci 113:20–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00177.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Twetman S, Derawi B, Keller M, Ekstrand K, Yucel-Lindberg T, Stecksen-Blicks C (2009) Short-term effect of chewing gums containing probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri on the levels of inflammatory mediators in gingival crevicular fluid. Acta Odontol Scand 67:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350802516170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lu G, Ades AE (2004) Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons. Stat Med 23:3105–3124. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1875

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, Chaimani A, Schmid CH, Cameron C et al (2015) The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med 162:777–784. https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-2385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schwarzer G, Carpenter J, Rücker G (2010) Empirical evaluation suggests Copas selection model preferable to trim-and-fill method for selection bias in meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 63:282–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.05.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I et al (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366:l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bonner A, Alexander PE, Brignardello-Petersen R, Furukawa TA, Siemieniuk RA, Zhang Y et al (2018) Applying GRADE to a network meta-analysis of antidepressants led to more conservative conclusions. J Clin Epidemiol 102:87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Puhan MA, Schünemann HJ, Murad MH, Li T, Brignardello-Petersen R, Singh JA et al (2014) A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis. BMJ 349:g5630. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g5630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brignardello-Petersen R, Bonner A, Alexander PE, Siemieniuk RA, Furukawa TA, Rochwerg B et al (2018) Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 93:36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Chandler J, Welch VA, Higgins JP et al (2019) Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:ED000142. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.ED000142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Martins CC, Firmino RT, Riva JJ, Ge L, Carrasco-Labra A, Brignardello-Petersen R et al (2020) Desensitizing toothpastes for dentin hypersensitivity: a network meta-analysis. J Dent Res 99:514–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034520903036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dias S, Welton NJ, Caldwell DM, Ades AE (2010) Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Stat Med 29:932–944. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Veroniki AA, Vasiliadis HS, Higgins JP, Salanti G (2013) Evaluation of inconsistency in networks of interventions. Int J Epidemiol 42:332–345. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Akgül Ö, Topaloğlu Ak A, Zorlu S, Öner Özdaş D, Uslu M, Çayirgan D (2020) Effects of short-term xylitol chewing gum on pro-inflammatory cytokines and Streptococcus mutans: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Int J Clin Pract 74:e13623. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.13623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Al-Haboubi M, Zoitopoulos L, Beighton D, Gallagher JE (2012) The potential benefits of sugar-free chewing gum on the oral health and quality of life of older people living in the community: a randomized controlled trial. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 40:415–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2012.00685.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mitrakul K, Srisatjaluk R, Vongsawan K, Teerawongpairoj C, Choongphong N, Panich T et al (2017) Effects of short-term use of xylitol chewing gum and maltitol oral spray on salivary Streptococcus mutans and oral plaque. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 48:485–493

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nagata H, Inagaki Y, Tanaka M, Ojima M, Kataoka K, Kuboniwa M et al (2008) Effect of eucalyptus extract chewing gum on periodontal health: a double-masked, randomized trial. J Periodontol 79:1378–1385. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Simons D, Brailsford S, Kidd EA, Beighton D (2001) The effect of chlorhexidine acetate/xylitol chewing gum on the plaque and gingival indices of elderly occupants in residential homes. J Clin Periodontol 28:1010–1015. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.281104.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Behfarnia P, Aslani A, Jamshidian F, Noohi S (2016) The efficacy of green tea chewing gum on gingival inflammation. J Dent (Shiraz) 17:149–154

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cagetti MG, Cocco F, Carta G, Maspero C, Campus G (2020) Long-term efficacy of Magnolia Bark Extract and Xylitol administered through chewing gums on caries in adults: a 2-year randomized controlled intervention trial. J Funct Foods 68:103891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Campus G, Cagetti MG, Cocco F, Sale S, Sacco G, Strohmenger L et al (2011) Effect of a sugar-free chewing gum containing magnolia bark extract on different variables related to caries and gingivitis: a randomized controlled intervention trial. Caries Res 45:393–399. https://doi.org/10.1159/000330234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Oza S, Patel K, Bhosale S, Mitra R, Gupta R, Choudhary D (2018) To determine the effect of chewing gum containing xylitol and sorbitol on mutans streptococci and lactobacilli count in saliva, plaque, and gingival health and to compare the efficacy of chewing gums. J Int Soc Prev Commun Dent 8:354–360. https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_54_18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Smith AJ, Moran J, Dangler LV, Leight RS, Addy M (1996) The efficacy of an anti-gingivitis chewing gum. J Clin Periodontol 23:19–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1996.tb00499.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ly KA, Milgrom P, Rothen M (2008) The potential of dental-protective chewing gum in oral health interventions. J Am Dent Assoc 139:553–563. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Aslani A, Rostami F (2015) Medicated chewing gum, a novel drug delivery system. J Res Med Sci 20:403–411

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Wessel SW, van der Mei HC, Maitra A, Dodds MW, Busscher HJ (2016) Potential benefits of chewing gum for the delivery of oral therapeutics and its possible role in oral healthcare. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 13:1421–1431. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2016.1193154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Muniz FW, Vidal TC, Rego RO, Moreira MM, Martins RS, Carvalho RS (2016) Perception and level of knowledge about halitosis among students and patients. Full Dent Sci 7:99–103

    Google Scholar 

  44. Chapple IL, Bouchard P, Cagetti MG, Campus G, Carra MC, Cocco F et al (2017) Interaction of lifestyle, behaviour or systemic diseases with dental caries and periodontal diseases: consensus report of group 2 of the joint EFP/ORCA workshop on the boundaries between caries and periodontal diseases. J Clin Periodontol 44(Suppl 18):S39–S51. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hancock S, Zinn C, Schofield G (2020) The consumption of processed sugar- and starch-containing foods, and dental caries: a systematic review. Eur J Oral Sci 128:467–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kaae JK, Stenfeldt L, Eriksen JG (2016) Xerostomia after radiotherapy for oral and oropharyngeal cancer: increasing salivary flow with tasteless sugar-free chewing gum. Front Oncol 6:111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2016.00111

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Rosenberg M (1996) Clinical assessment of bad breath: current concepts. J Am Dent Assoc 127:475–482. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Nasseripour M, Newton JT, Warburton F, Awojobi O, Di Giorgio S, Gallagher JE et al (2021) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of sugar-free chewing gum on Streptococcus mutans. BMC Oral Health 21:217. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01517-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Chapple IL, Van der Weijden F, Doerfer C, Herrera D, Shapira L, Polak D et al (2015) Primary prevention of periodontitis: managing gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol 42(Suppl 16):S71–S76. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Figuero E, Roldán S, Serrano J, Escribano M, Martín C, Preshaw PM (2020) Efficacy of adjunctive therapies in patients with gingival inflammation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol 47(Suppl 22):125–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lie MA, Timmerman MF, van der Velden U, van der Weijden GA (1998) Evaluation of 2 methods to assess gingival bleeding in smokers and non-smokers in natural and experimental gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol 25:695–700. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02509.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Gomes SC, Piccinin FB, Susin C, Oppermann RV, Marcantonio RA (2007) Effect of supragingival plaque control in smokers and never-smokers: 6-month evaluation of patients with periodontitis. J Periodontol 78:1515–1521. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.060462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Oliveira SC, Slot DE, Celeste RK, Abegg C, Keijser BJ, Van der Weijden FA (2015) Correlations between two different methods to score bleeding and the relationship with plaque in systemically healthy young adults. J Clin Periodontol 42:908–913. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Chapple ILC, Mealey BL, Van Dyke TE, Bartold PM, Dommisch H, Eickholz P et al (2018) Periodontal health and gingival diseases and conditions on an intact and a reduced periodontium: Consensus report of workgroup 1 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Clin Periodontol 45(Suppl 20):S68–S77. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12940

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Jones CG (1997) Chlorhexidine: is it still the gold standard? Periodontol 2000(15):55–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1997.tb00105.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Cabrera C, Artacho R, Giménez R (2006) Beneficial effects of green tea--a review. J Am Coll Nutr 25:79–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2006.10719518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Wheeler DS, Lahni PM, Hake PW, Denenberg AG, Wong HR, Snead C et al (2007) The green tea polyphenol epigallocatechin-3-gallate improves systemic hemodynamics and survival in rodent models of polymicrobial sepsis. Shock 28:353–359. https://doi.org/10.1097/shk.0b013e3180485823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Taylor PW, Hamilton-Miller JM, Stapleton PD (2005) Antimicrobial properties of green tea catechins. Food Sci Technol Bull 2:71–81. https://doi.org/10.1616/1476-2137.14184

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Radafshar G, Ghotbizadeh M, Saadat F, Mirfarhadi N (2015) Effects of green tea (Camellia sinensis) mouthwash containing 1% tannin on dental plaque and chronic gingivitis: a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial. J Investig Clin Dent 8:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Tafazoli A, Tafazoli Moghadam E (2020) Camellia Sinensis Mouthwashes in Oral Care: a Systematic Review. J Dent (Shiraz) 21:249–262. https://doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2020.83204.1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Kumar S, Sogi SH, Indushekar KR (2013) Comparative evaluation of the effects of xylitol and sugar-free chewing gums on salivary and dental plaque pH in children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 31:240–244. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.121822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Loimaranta V, Mazurel D, Deng D, Söderling E (2020) Xylitol and erythritol inhibit real-time biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans. BMC Microbiol 20:184. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01867-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Park E, Na HS, Kim SM, Wallet S, Cha S, Chung J (2014) Xylitol, an anticaries agent, exhibits potent inhibition of inflammatory responses in human THP-1-derived macrophages infected with Porphyromonas gingivalis. J Periodontol 85:e212–e223. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2014.130455

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank GODeC Initiative (Global Observatory for Dental Care - https://wp.ufpel.edu.br/godec/en/home/) as this systematic review was conducted to answer a clinical question for a clinical practice guideline developed by GODeC and Brazilian Ministry of Health. FWMGM and AFM are members of the GODeC Initiavtive.

Funding

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES). The authors self-funded the other part of the study. 

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Wilker Mustafa Gomes Muniz.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 1238 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muniz, F.W.M.G., Zanatta, F.B., Muñoz, M.d. et al. Antiplaque and antigingivitis efficacy of medicated and non-medicated sugar-free chewing gum as adjuncts to toothbrushing: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Clin Oral Invest 26, 1155–1172 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04264-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04264-1

Keywords

Navigation