Skip to main content

Retrospective fractal analyses of one-year follow-up data obtained after single-visit nonsurgical endodontic retreatment on periapical radiographs

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of retrospective study was to evaluate the changes to the periapical bone sites after non-surgical endodontic retreatment by using fractal analysis on periapical radiographs.

Materials and methods

Thirty patients whose teeth had periapical lesions and underwent primary endodontic treatment were selected for nonsurgical single-visit endodontic retreatment. Two radiographs were taken, the first immediately after retreatment and the second at the 1-year follow-up. An identical region of interest close to the infected root apex was selected from each radiograph. FD was measured using the box-counting method. Periapical status was evaluated using the periapical index (PAI). Treatment outcomes were categorized into healed (PAI < 3), or not healed (PAI ≥ 3) based on radiographic criteria.

Results

The mean FD value significantly increased at the 1-year follow-up compared to baseline. No significant sex biases were apparent. According to the PAI, retreatment after 1 year resulted in a 63.3% healed.

Conclusion

The extent of periapical trabecular bone evident radiographically increased, as revealed by FD data, 1 year after endodontic retreatment.

Clinical relevance

The use of fractal analysis as a quantitative method to evaluate changes in periapical trabecular bone (such as healing and inflammation) after endodontic retreatment can be an important marker in determining the prognosis of endodontic retreatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. 1.

    Barrieshi-Nusair KM (2002) Gutta-percha retreatment: effectiveness of nickel-titanium rotary instruments versus stainless steel hand files. J Endod 28:454–456. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200206000-00009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Rodríguez G, Patel S, Durán-Sindreu F, Roig M, Abella F (2017) Influence of cone-beam computed tomography on endodontic retreatment strategies among general dental practitioners and endodontists. J Endod 43:1433–1437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.04.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Salehrabi R, Rotstein I (2010) Epidemiologic evaluation of the outcomes of orthograde endodontic retreatment. J Endod 36:790–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Zandi H, Petronijevic N, Mdala I, Kristoffersen AK, Enersen M, Rôças IN, Siqueira JF Jr, Ørstavik D (2019) Outcome of endodontic retreatment using 2 root canal irrigants and influence of infection on healing as determined by a molecular method: a randomized clinical trial. J Endod 45:1089–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2019.05.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sathorn C, Parashos P, Messer H (2008) The prevalence of postoperative pain and flare-up in single-and multiple-visit endodontic treatment: a systematic review. Int Endod J 41:91–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01316.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ashraf H, Milani AS, Asadi SS (2007) Evaluation of the success rate of nonsurgical single visit retreatment. Iran Endod J 2:69–72 (PMID: 24327818)

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Vera J, Siqueira JF Jr, Ricucci D, Loghin S, Fernández N, Flores B, Cruz AG (2012) One-versus two-visit endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a histobacteriologic study. J Endod 38:1040–1052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.04.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Yoldas O, Topuz A, Isçi AS, Oztunc H (2004) Postoperative pain after endodontic retreatment: single-versus two-visit treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 98:483–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.03.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Eyuboglu TF, Olcay K, Özcan M (2017) A clinical study on single-visit root canal retreatments on consecutive 173 patients: frequency of periapical complications and clinical success rate. Clin Oral Investig 21:1761–1768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1957-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Weiger R, Rosendahl R, Löst C (2000) Influence of calcium hydroxide intracanal dressings on the prognosis of teeth with endodontically induced periapical lesions. Int Endod J 33:219–226. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00298.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Gill G, Bhuyan A, Kalita C, Das L, Kataki R, Bhuyan D (2016) Single versus multi-visit endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: an in vivo study with 1-year evaluation. Ann Med Health Sci Res 6:19–26. https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.180265

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Soikkonen K (1995) Endodontically treated teeth and periapical findings in the elderly. Int Endod J 28:200–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1995.tb00300.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Chugal N, Mallya SM, Kahler B, Lin LM (2017) Endodontic treatment outcomes. Dent Clin North Am 61:59–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2016.08.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ruttimann UE, Webber RL, Hazelrig JB (1992) Fractal dimension from radiographs of peridental alveolar bone: a possible diagnostic indicator of osteoporosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 74(1):98–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(92)90222-c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Zeytinoğlu M, İlhan B, Dündar N, Boyacioğlu H (2015) Fractal analysis for the assessment of trabecular peri-implant alveolar bone using panoramic radiographs. Clin Oral Investig 19:519–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1245-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Jolley L, Majumdar S, Kapila S (2006) Technical factors in fractal analysis of periapical radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35:393–397. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/30969642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Yu Y-Y, Chen H, Lin C-H, Chen C-M, Oviir T, Chen S-K, Hollender L (2009) Fractal dimension analysis of periapical reactive bone in response to root canal treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 07:283–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.05.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Aydın ZU, Toptaş O, Bulut DG, Akay N, Kara T, Akbulut N (2019) Effects of root-end filling on the fractal dimension of the periapical bone after periapical surgery: retrospective study. Clin Oral Investig 23:3645–3651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02967-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Aktuna Belgin C, Serindere G (2020) Evaluation of trabecular bone changes in patients with periodontitis using fractal analysis: a periapical radiography study. J Periodontol 91:933–937. https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.19-0452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Huang C, Chen J, Chang Y, Jeng J, Chen C (2013) A fractal dimensional approach to successful evaluation of apical healing. Int Endod J 46:523–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Chen S-K, Oviir T, Lin C-H, Leu L-J, Cho B-H, Hollender L (2005) Digital imaging analysis with mathematical morphology and fractal dimension for evaluation of periapical lesions following endodontic treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 100:467–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.05.075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Apolinário AC, Sindeaux R, de Souza FPT et al (2016) Dental panoramic indices and fractal dimension measurements in osteogenesis imperfecta children under pamidronate treatment. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 45(4):20150400. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20150400

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ørstavik D, Kerekes K, Eriksen HM (1986) The periapical index: a scoring system for radiographic assessment of apical periodontitis. Dent Traumatol 2:20–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1986.tb00119.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Friedman S, Abitbol S, Lawrence HP (2003) Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto study. Phase 1: initial treatment. J Endod 29:787–793. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200312000-00001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Sansare K, Singh D, Karjodkar F (2012) Changes in the fractal dimension on pre-and post-implant panoramic radiographs. Oral Radiol 28:15–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-011-0075-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Wong R (2004) Conventional endodontic failure and retreatment. Dent Clin North Am 48:265–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2003.10.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Alharmoodi R, Al-Salehi S (2020) Assessment of the quality of endodontic re-treatment and changes in periapical status on a postgraduate endodontic clinic. J Dent 92:103261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kvist T, Reit C (1999) Results of endodontic retreatment: a randomized clinical study comparing surgical and nonsurgical procedures. J Endod 25:814–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80304-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Torabinejad M, Corr R, Handysides R, Shabahang S (2009) Outcomes of nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic surgery: a systematic review. J Endod 35:930–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Orhan EO, Dereci Ö, Irmak Ö (2017) Endodontic outcomes in mandibular second premolars with complex apical branching. J Endod 43:46–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.09.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    He J, White RK, White CA, Schweitzer JL, Woodmansey KF (2017) Clinical and patient-centered outcomes of nonsurgical root canal retreatment in first molars using contemporary techniques. J Endod 43:231–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Uğur Aydın Z, Ocak M, Bayrak S, Göller Bulut D, Orhan K (2021) The effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus on changes in the fractal dimension of periapical lesion in teeth after root canal treatment: a fractal analysis study. Int Endod J 54:181–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Cakur B, Şahin A, Dagistan S, Altun O, Caglayan F, Miloglu Ö, Harorli A (2008) Dental panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Inter Med Res 36:792–799. https://doi.org/10.1177/147323000803600422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Saeed SS, Ibraheem UM, Alnema MM (2014) Quantitative analysis by pixel intensity and fractal dimensions for imaging diagnosis of periapical lesions. Inter J Enhanced Res Sci Technol Eng 3:138–144

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Bollen A, Taguchi A, Hujoel P, Hollender L (2001) Fractal dimension on dental radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 30:270–275. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Bayrak S, Bulut DG, Orhan K, Sinanoğlu EA, Çakmak EŞK, Mısırlı M, Ankaralı H (2020) Evaluation of osseous changes in dental panoramic radiography of thalassemia patients using mandibular indexes and fractal size analysis. Oral Radiol 36:18–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-019-00372-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Sánchez I, Uzcátegui G (2011) Fractals in dentistry. J Dent 39:273–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.01.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    White SC, Rudolph DJ (1999) Alterations of the trabecular pattern of the jaws in patients with osteoporosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 88:628–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1079-2104(99)70097-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Pothuaud L, Benhamou C, Porion P, Lespessailles E, Harba R, Levitz P (2000) Fractal dimension of trabecular bone projection texture is related to three-dimensional microarchitecture. J Bone Miner Res 15:691–699. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.4.691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Arsan B, Köse TE, Çene E, Özcan İ (2017) Assessment of the trabecular structure of mandibular condyles in patients with temporomandibular disorders using fractal analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 123(3):382–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2016.11.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Demiralp KÖ, Kurşun-Çakmak EŞ, Bayrak S, Akbulut N, Atakan C, Orhan K (2019) Trabecular structure designation using fractal analysis technique on panoramic radiographs of patients with bisphosphonate intake: a preliminary study. Oral Radiol 35:23–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-018-0321-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Göller Bulut D, Bayrak S, Uyeturk U, Ankarali H (2018) Mandibular indexes and fractal properties on the panoramic radiographs of the patients using aromatase inhibitors. Br J Radiol 91:20180442. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20180442

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Ince Yusufoglu S, Ugur Aydin Z, Tulumbaci F, Bayrak S (2020) Evaluation of different apexification treatments of teeth with immature apices and apical periodontitis on the fractal dimensions of trabecular bone. Aust Endod J. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Ling H, Yang X, Li P, Megalooikonomou V, Xu Y, Yang J (2014) Cross gender–age trabecular texture analysis in cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 43:20130324. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.2013032

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Magat G, Sener SO (2019) Evaluation of trabecular pattern of mandible using fractal dimension, bone area fraction, and gray scale value: comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography. Oral Radiol 35:35–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-018-0316-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Hayek E, Aoun G, Bassit R, Nasseh I (2020) Correlating radiographic fractal analysis at implant recipient sites with primary implant stability: an in vivo preliminary study. Cureus 12:e6539. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6539

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Shrout MK, Potter BJ, Hildebolt CF (1997) The effect of image variations on fractal dimension calculations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 84:96–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1079-2104(97)90303-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Shrout M, Farley B, Patt S, Potter B, Hildebolt C, Pilgram T, Yokoyama-Crothers N, Dotson M, Hauser J, Cohen S (1999) The effect of region of interest variations on morphologic operations data and gray-level values extracted from digitized dental radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 88:636–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1079-2104(99)70098-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Baksi BG, Fidler A (2011) Fractal analysis of periapical bone from lossy compressed radiographs: a comparison of two lossy compression methods. J Digit Imaging 24:993–998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-011-9383-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Amer ME, Heo M-S, Brooks SL, Benavides E (2012) Anatomical variations of trabecular bone structure in intraoral radiographs using fractal and particles count analyses. Imaging Sci Dent 42:5–12. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2012.42.1.5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Hande Şenol for her assistance as statistical analyzer.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samet Tosun.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The study was approved by the Pamukkale University Ethics Committee (approval number E-60116787–020–4352).

Consent to participate

The need for informed patient consent was waived because we used only anonymized retrospective data.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tosun, S., Karataslioglu, E., Tulgar, M.M. et al. Retrospective fractal analyses of one-year follow-up data obtained after single-visit nonsurgical endodontic retreatment on periapical radiographs. Clin Oral Invest 25, 6465–6472 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04079-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Fractal
  • Diagnostic imaging
  • Dental radiograph
  • Retreatment
  • Retrospective studies