Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of the three-dimensional (3D) position of cervical vertebrae in individuals with unilateral posterior crossbite

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the three-dimensional (3D) position of the cervical vertebrae of growing subjects with unilateral posterior crossbite (UPC).

Materials and methods

In this cross-sectional study, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 1455 patients were screened, and ultimately 58 scans (26 patients with UPC and 32 controls with normal occlusion) were included after imposing inclusion/exclusion criteria. Roll, yaw, and deviation of the geometric center of C1, C2, and C3 vertebrae were measured and compared between groups. A correlation between these parameters and different variables on mandibular positioning was also carried out.

Results

A statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) was observed between groups for the deviation of pogonium (Pog), mandibular plane roll, and C3 roll, and patients with UPC showed higher cant or deviation. A significant correlation was reported for the roll of C2 and C3 with the deviation of Pog, a roll of the occlusal plane, and roll of the mandibular plane (p < 0.05). The greater the deviation of the Pog to one side, the greater the roll of the vertebrae with this same side up. The same tendency was observed between the roll of the occlusal plane or the mandibular plane with the roll of these cervical vertebrae.

Conclusions

There is a positive correlation between transverse occlusal changes and positional deviations of the cervical vertebrae, especially C2 and C3.

Clinical relevance

The study results do not allow us to infer the clinical/functional consequences of these deviations, as well as if malocclusion’s treatment would result in an improvement of intervertebral relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brin I, Ben-Bassat Y, Blustein Y, Ehrlich J, Hochman N, Marmary Y, Yaffe A (1996) Skeletal and functional effects of treatment for unilateral posterior crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 109:173–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Harrison JE, Ashby D (2001) Orthodontic treatment for posterior crossbites. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD000979

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thilander B, Pena L, Infante C, Parada SS, de Mayorga C (2001) Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in children and adolescents in Bogota, Colombia. An epidemiological study related to different stages of dental development. Eur J Orthod 23:153–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nerder PH, Bakke M, Solow B (1999) The functional shift of the mandible in unilateral posterior crossbite and the adaptation of the temporomandibular joints: a pilot study. Eur J Orthod 21:155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Piancino MG, Farina D, Talpone F, Merlo A, Bracco P (2009) Muscular activation during reverse and non-reverse chewing cycles in unilateral posterior crossbite. Eur J Oral Sci 117:122–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McNamara JA (2002) Early intervention in the transverse dimension: is it worth the effort? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 121:572–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Michelotti A, Iodice G, Piergentili M, Farella M, Martina R (2016) Incidence of temporomandibular joint clicking in adolescents with and without unilateral posterior crossbite: a 10-year follow-up study. J Oral Rehabil 43:16–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Di Vece L, Faleri G, Picciotti M, Guido L, Giorgetti R (2010) Does a transverse maxillary deficit affect the cervical vertebrae? A pilot study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137:515–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bedoya A, Landa Nieto Z, Zuluaga LL, Rocabado M (2014) Morphometry of the cranial base and the cranial-cervical-mandibular system in young patients with type II, division 1 malocclusion, using tomographic cone beam. Cranio 32:199–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. D’Attilio M, Caputi S, Epifania E, Festa F, Tecco S (2005) Evaluation of cervical posture of children in skeletal class I, II, and III. Cranio 23:219–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fink M, Wähling K, Stiesch-Scholz M, Tschernitschek H (2003) The functional relationship between the craniomandibular system, cervical spine, and the sacroiliac joint: a preliminary investigation. Cranio 21:202–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sonnesen L, Kjær I (2007) Cervical column morphology in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion and mandibular overjet. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 132:7–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sonnesen L, Kjær I (2008) Cervical column morphology in patients with skeletal open bite. Orthod Craniofacial Res 11:17–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McGuinness NJ, McDonald JP (2006) Changes in natural head position observed immediately and one year after rapid maxillary expansion. Eur J Orthod 28:126–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Watanabe M, Yamaguchi T, Maki K (2010) Cervical vertebra morphology in different skeletal classes. A three-dimensional computed tomography evaluation. Angle Orthod 80:531–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Korbmacher H, Koch L, Eggers-Stroeder G, Kahl-Nieke B (2007) Associations between orthopaedic disturbances and unilateral crossbite in children with asymmetry of the upper cervical spine. Eur J Orthod 29:100–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Prager A (1980) Vergleichende Untersuchungen über die Häufigkeit von Zahnstellungs- und Kieferanomalien bei Patienten mit Deformitäten der Wirbelsäule. Fortschr Kieferorthop 41:163–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hirschfelder U, Hirschfelder H (1983) Auswirkungen der Skoliose auf den Gesichtsschädel [Effects of scoliosis on the facial bones]. Fortschr Kieferorthop 44:457–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huggare J, Pirttiniemi P, Serlo W (1991) Head posture and dentofacial morphology in subjects treated for scoliosis. Proc Finn Dent Soc 87:151–158

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Saccucci M, Tettamanti L, Mummolo S, Polimeni A, Festa F, Tecco S (2011) Scoliosis and dental occlusion: a review of the literature. Scoliosis 6:15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. D’Attilio M, Filippi MR, Femminella B, Festa F, Tecco S (2005) The influence of an experimentally-induced malocclusion on vertebral alignment in rats: a controlled pilot study. Cranio 23:119–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kamal AT, Fida M (2019) Evaluation of cervical spine posture after functional therapy with twin-block appliances: A retrospective cohort study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 155:656–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Veli I, Uysal T, Ozer T, Ucar FI, Eruz M (2011) Mandibular asymmetry in unilateral and bilateral posterior crossbite patients using cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 81:966–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sureka B, Mittal A, Mittal MK, Agarwal K, Sinha MTB (2018) Morphometric analysis of cervical spinal canal diameter, transverse foramen, and pedicle width using computed tomography in Indian population. Neurol India 66:454–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Evangelopoulos D (2012) Computerized tomographic morphometric analysis of the cervical spine. Open Orthop J 6:250–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Plackett TP, Wright F, Baldea AJ, Mosier MJ, Thomas C, Luchette FA, Ton-That HH, Esposito TJ (2016) Cervical spine clearance when unable to be cleared clinically: a pooled analysis of combined computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Surg 211:115–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Patcas R, Tausch D, Pandis N, Manestar M, Ullrich O, Karlo CA, Peltomäki T, Kellenberger CJ (2013) Illusions of fusions: assessing cervical vertebral fusion on lateral cephalograms, multidetector computed tomographs, and cone-beam computed tomographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 143:213–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Armond MC, Generoso R, Falci SGM, Ramos-Jorge ML, Marques LS (2012) Skeletal maturation of the cervical vertebrae: association with various types of malocclusion. Braz Oral Res 26(2):145–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Largo RH, Gasser T, Prader A, Stuetzle W, Huber PJ (1978) Analysis of the adolescent growth spurt using smoothing spline functions. Ann Hum Biol 5:421–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hagner W, Ba̧k D, Hagner-Derengowska M (2011) Changes in body posture in children between the 10th and 13th years of age. Polish Ann Med 18:76–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lippold C, Moiseenko T, Drerup B, Schilgen M, Végh A, Danesh G (2012) Spine deviations and orthodontic treatment of asymmetric malocclusions in children. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 13:151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Šidlauskas M (2015) Relationships between malocclusion, body posture, and nasopharyngeal pathology in pre-orthodontic children. Med Sci Monit 21:1765–1773

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work was done and supported by the University of Sao Paulo and Joana De Gusmao Children Hospital, Brazil.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nandakumar Janakiraman.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cardinal, L., da Silva, T.R., Andujar, A.L.F. et al. Evaluation of the three-dimensional (3D) position of cervical vertebrae in individuals with unilateral posterior crossbite. Clin Oral Invest 26, 463–469 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04020-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04020-5

Keywords

Navigation