Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison between a xenogeneic dermal matrix and connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions: a randomized controlled clinical trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

To compare the outcomes of modified coronally advanced flap (mCAF) combined with either xenogeneic dermal matrix (XDM) or connective tissue graft (CTG) for the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions (MAGRs).

Materials and methods

Forty-two patients, in whom 130 maxillary (MAGRs) of type (RT1) were found, were randomly allocated to the two groups. Clinical, esthetic, and patient-centered outcomes were evaluated at baseline, 6, and 12 months post-treatment.

Result

Group CAF+ CTG exhibited a higher mean root coverage value (mRC) (91.79%) (primary outcome variable) than group CAF+XDM (80.19%) without statistically significant difference at 12 months (p=0.06). The control group also had significantly higher percentage of teeth in which complete root coverage (CRC) and mean gain of gingival thickness (GT) were achieved, than the test group (p<0.05). With respect to patient-centered outcomes, patients of the test group reported having experienced significantly less pain than those of the control group until 7 days (p<0.05). Both surgical approaches were capable of significantly decreasing dentin hypersensitivity (p<0.05). No difference between groups was found in the esthetic score analysis (p>0.05). Mean surgical time was lower in the test group (p<0.05).

Conclusion

The two treatments showed similar mRC. However, CAF+CTG was superior to CAF+XDM in providing CRC and in gaining GT. CAF+XDM demonstrated advantages over CAF+CTG with regard to patient morbidity and surgical time.

Clinical relevance

Application of XDM provided a better patient experience and shortened the time to recovery after coronally advanced flaps for coverage of multiple adjacent recessions. However, CTG resulted in improved percentages of complete root coverage.

Trial registration

Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (REBEC) number: RBR-974c9j

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jepsen S, Caton JG, Albandar JM, Bissada NF, Bouchard P, Cortellini P, Demirel K, de Sanctis M, Ercoli C, Fan J, Geurs NC, Hughes FJ, Jin L, Kantarci A, Lalla E, Madianos PN, Matthews D, McGuire MK, Mills MP, Preshaw PM, Reynolds MA, Sculean A, Susin C, West NX, Yamazaki K (2018) Periodontal manifestations of systemic diseases and developmental and acquired conditions: consensus report of workgroup 3 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Periodontol 89:S237–S248. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.17-0733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Cairo F, Rasperini G, Shedden K, Wang HL (2019) The effect of time on root coverage outcomes: a network meta-analysis. J Dent Res 98:1195–1203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034519867071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rasperini G, Acunzo R, Pellegrini G, Pagni G, Tonetti M, Pini Prato GP, Cortellini P (2018) Predictor factors for long-term outcomes stability of coronally advanced flap with or without CTG in the treatment of single maxillary gingival recessions: 9 years. J Clin Periodontol 45:1107–1117. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12932

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Prato GPP, Franceschi D, Cortellini P, Chambrone L (2018) Long-term evaluation (20 years) of the outcomes of subepithelial connective tissue graft plus coronally advanced flap in the treatment of maxillary single recession-type defects. J Periodontol 89:1290–1299. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.17-0619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahmedbeyli C, Dirikan Ipçi S, Cakar G, Yilmaz S, Chambrone L (2019) Coronally advanced flap and envelope type of flap plus acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of thin phenotype multiple recession defects. A randomized clinical trial J Clin Periodontol 46:1024–1029. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zucchelli G, De Sanctis M (2000) Treatment of multiple recession-type defects in patients with esthetic demands. J Periodontol 71:1506–1514. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.9.1506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chambrone L, Tatakis DN (2015) Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: a systematic review from the AAP regeneration workshop. J Periodontol 86:S8–S51. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2015.130674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bertl K, Spineli LM, Mohandis K, Stavropoulos A (2021) Root coverage stability: a systematic overview of controlled clinical trials with at least 5 years of follow-up. Clin Exp Dent Res Feb 9 https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.395

  9. Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Ravidà A, Ju oh T, Wang HL (2019) What is the safety zone for palatal soft tissue graft harvesting based on the locations of the greater palatine artery and foramen? A systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 77:271.e1–271.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Buff LR, Bürklin T, Eickholz P, Mönting JS, Ratka-Krüger P (2009) Does harvesting connective tissue grafts from the palate cause persistent sensory dysfunction? A pilot study. Quintessence Int 40:479–489

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tavelli L, McGuire MK, Zucchelli G et al (2020) Extracellular matrix-based scaffolding technologies for periodontal and peri-implant soft tissue regeneration. J Periodontol 91:17–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.19-0351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tonetti MS, Cortellini P, Pellegrini G, Nieri M, Bonaccini D, Allegri M, Bouchard P, Cairo F, Conforti G, Fourmousis I, Graziani F, Guerrero A, Halben J, Malet J, Rasperini G, Topoll H, Wachtel H, Wallkamm B, Zabalegui I, Zuhr O (2018) Xenogenic collagen matrix or autologous connective tissue graft as adjunct to coronally advanced flaps for coverage of multiple adjacent gingival recession: Randomized trial assessing non- inferiority in root coverage and superiority in oral health-related quality of life. J Clin Periodontol 45:78–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Di Gianfilippo R et al (2019) Acellular dermal matrix and coronally advanced flap or tunnel technique in the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions. A 12-year follow-up from a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 46:937–948. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Gaveglio L (2012) Treatment of gingival recession defects using coronally advanced flap with a porcine collagen matrix compared to coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol 83:321–328. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2011.110215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rotundo R, Genzano L, Patel D, D’Aiuto F, Nieri M (2019) Adjunctive benefit of a xenogenic collagen matrix associated with coronally advanced flap for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a superiority, assessor-blind, randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 46:1013–1023. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pabst AM, Wagner W, Kasaj A, Gebhardt S, Ackermann M, Astolfo A, Marone F, Haberthür D, Enzmann F, Konerding MA (2015) Synchrotron-based X-ray tomographic microscopy for visualization of three-dimensional collagen matrices. Clin Oral Investig 19:561–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1312-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schmitt CM, Matta RE, Moest T, Humann J, Gammel L, Neukam FW, Schlegel KA (2016) Soft tissue volume alterations after connective tissue grafting at teeth: the subepithelial autologous connective tissue graft versus a porcine collagen matrix - a pre-clinical volumetric analysis. J Clin Periodontol 43:609–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cairo F, Nieri M, Cincinelli S, Mervelt J, Pagliaro U (2011) The interproximal clinical attachment level to classify gingival recessions and predict root coverage outcomes: an explorative and reliability study. J Clin Periodontol 38:661–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01732.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Harris RJ (1992) The connective tissue and partial thickness double pedicle graft: a predictable method of obtaining root coverage. J Periodontol 63:477–486. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1992.63.5.477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cairo F, Cortellini P, Pilloni A, Nieri M, Cincinelli S, Amunni F, Pagavino G, Tonetti MS (2016) Clinical efficacy of coronally advanced flap with or without connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions in the aesthetic area: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 43:849–856. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12590

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ainamo J, Bay I (1975) Problems and proposals for recording gingivitis and plaque. Int Dent J 25:229–235

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cairo F, Rotundo R, Miller PD, Pini Prato GP (2009) Root coverage esthetic score: a system to evaluate the esthetic outcome of the treatment of gingival recession through evaluation of clinical cases. J Periodontol 80:705–710. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Moreira ARO, Santamaria MP, Silvério KG, Casati MZ, Nociti Junior FH, Sculean A, Sallum EA (2016) Coronally advanced flap with or without porcine collagen matrix for root coverage: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 20:2539–2549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1757-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. De Oliveira BH, Nadanovsky P (2005) Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile - short form. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 33:307–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2005.00225.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zucchelli G, Tavelli L, McGuire MK et al (2020) Autogenous soft tissue grafting for periodontal and peri-implant plastic surgical reconstruction. J Periodontol 91:9–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.19-0350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cieślik-Wegemund M, Wierucka-Młynarczyk B, Tanasiewicz M, Gilowski Ł (2016) Tunnel technique with collagen matrix compared with connective tissue graft for treatment of periodontal recession: a randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol 87:1436–1443. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2016.150676

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Suzuki KT, de Jesus Hernandez Martinez C, Suemi MI, Palioto DB, Messora MR, de Souza SLS, Novaes AB Jr, Chaves Furlaneto FA, Taba M Jr (2020) Root coverage using coronally advanced flap with porcine-derived acellular dermal matrix or subepithelial connective tissue graft: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 24:4077–4087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03280-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pietruska M, Skurska A, Podlewski Ł, Milewski R, Pietruski J (2019) Clinical evaluation of Miller class I and II recessions treatment with the use of modified coronally advanced tunnel technique with either collagen matrix or subepithelial connective tissue graft: a randomized clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 46:86–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Nguyen TVN, Tattan M, Ravidà A, Wang HL (2018) Efficacy of tunnel technique in the treatment of localized and multiple gingival recessions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol 89:1075–1090. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.18-0066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Aroca S, Barbieri A, Clementini M, Renouard F, de Sanctis M (2018) Treatment of class III multiple gingival recessions: prognostic factors for achieving a complete root coverage. J Clin Periodontol 45:861–868. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12923

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zucchelli G, Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Stefanini M, Rasperini G, Valles C, Nart J, Wang HL (2019) The influence of tooth location on the outcomes of multiple adjacent gingival recessions treated with coronally advanced flap: a multicenter re-analysis study. J Periodontol 90:1244–1251. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.18-0732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Vincent-Bugnas S, Borie G, Charbit Y (2017) Treatment of multiple maxillary adjacent class I and II gingival recessions with modified coronally advanced tunnel and a new xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix. J Esthet Restor Dent 30:89–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cosgarea R, Juncar R, Arweiler N, Lascu L, Sculean A (2016) Clinical evaluation of a porcine acellular dermal matrix for the treatment of multiple adjacent class I, II, and III gingival recessions using the modified coronally advanced tunnel technique. Quintessence Int 47:739–747. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a36565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Atieh MA, Alsabeeha N, Tawse-Smith A, Payne AGT (2016) Xenogeneic collagen matrix for periodontal plastic surgery procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontal Res 51:438–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.12333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. AlSarhan MA, Al Jasser R, Tarish MA, AlHuzaimi AI, Alzoman H (2019) Xenogeneic collagen matrix versus connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Dent Res 5:566–579. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.210

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Barootchi S, Tavelli L, Zucchelli G, Giannobile WV, Wang HL (2020) Gingival phenotype modification therapies on natural teeth: a network meta-analysis. J Periodontol 91:1386–1399. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.19-0715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chambrone L, Tatakis DN (2016) Long-term outcomes of untreated buccal gingival recessions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol 87:796–808. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2016.150625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Stefanini M, Jepsen K, de Sanctis M, Baldini N, Greven B, Heinz B, Wennström J, Cassel B, Vignoletti F, Sanz M, Jepsen S, Zucchelli G (2016) Patient-reported outcomes and aesthetic evaluation of root coverage procedures: a 12-month follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 43:1132–1141. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pelekos G, Lu JZ, Ho DKL, Graziani F, Cairo F, Cortellini P, Tonetti MS (2019) Aesthetic assessment after root coverage of multiple adjacent recessions with coronally advanced flap with adjunctive collagen matrix or connective tissue graft: randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 46:564–571. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cairo F, Pagliaro U, Buti J, Baccini M, Graziani F, Tonelli P, Pagavino G, Tonetti MS (2016) Root coverage procedures improve patient aesthetics. A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis J Clin Periodontol 43:965–975. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cairo F, Barootchi S, Tavelli L, Barbato L, Wang HL, Rasperini G, Graziani F, Tonetti M (2020) Aesthetic-And patient-related outcomes following root coverage procedures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol 47:1403–1415. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All the authors have made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study. JMM was involved in data collection. MF and PMD were involved in data interpretation. JMM, JG, PMD, LT, GR, and MF were involved in drafting the manuscript. All the authors critically revised and approved the final version of the manuscript to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcelo de Faveri.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The study was conducted in compliance with the principles outlined in the experimentation involving human subjects in the Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association (2013). The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the School of Dentistry of the University of Guarulhos (protocol CAAE 74045317.7.0000.5506), and registered at ensaiosclinicos.gov.br (RBR-974c9j).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meza-Mauricio, J., Cortez-Gianezzi, J., Duarte, P.M. et al. Comparison between a xenogeneic dermal matrix and connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Invest 25, 6919–6929 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03982-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03982-w

Keywords

Navigation