Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of reduced application time on bonding durability of universal adhesives to demineralized enamel

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the effect of application time on the microshear bond strength (μSBS) of three universal adhesives in demineralized and sound enamel before and after aging.

Materials and methods

Bovine teeth (192) were prepared where buccal surfaces were ground and divided into two groups (sound enamel and demineralized enamel). The specimens in each group were divided into 12 subgroups by combining 3 adhesive agents (All-Bond Universal, Scotchbond Universal, and Tokuyama Universal Bond) × 4 adhesion strategy. Each adhesive was applied with either prolonged (PA) or reduced (RA) application time in etch-and-rinse or self-etch mode. Bonded composites were subjected to μSBS testing after 24-h or 2-year water storage. The results were evaluated using four-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test (α = 0.05).

Results

The μSBS of adhesives to sound enamel in both etching modes was mostly similar to demineralized enamel, regardless of application time and aging time. At 24-h, all adhesives with PA in self-etch mode showed higher μSBS when compared with RA, except Tokuyama Universal Bond, but after 2-year aging, no significant difference was found in μSBS between RA and PA. The μSBS of adhesives with PA in etch-and-rinse mode depended on used adhesive and enamel condition compared to RA, regardless of μSBS testing time.

Conclusions

PA of adhesives did not reveal a significant difference in μSBS to enamel, regardless of substrate type and etching mode.

Clinical relevance

After 2-year aging, the bond strength of universal adhesives presented no significant difference between PA and RA treatments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wong J, Tsujimoto A, Fischer NG, Baruth AG, Barkmeier WW, Johnson EA, Samuel SM, Takamizawa T, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2020) Enamel etching for universal adhesives: examination of enamel etching protocols for optimization of bonding effectiveness. Oper Dent 45:80–91. https://doi.org/10.2341/18-275-L

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Siqueira F, Cardenas AM, Gutierrez MF, Malaquias P, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Perdigao J (2016) Laboratory performance of universal adhesive systems for luting CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Adhes Dent 18:331–340. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a36519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tsujimoto A, Shimatani Y, Nojiri K, Barkmeier WW, Markham MD, Takamizawa T, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2019) Influence of surface wetness on bonding effectiveness of universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse mode. Eur J Oral Sci 127:162–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Saikaew P, Matsumoto M, Chowdhury A, Carvalho RM, Sano H (2018) Does shortened application time affect long-term bond strength of universal adhesives to dentin? Oper Dent 43:549–558. https://doi.org/10.2341/17-205-L

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Saikaew P, Chowdhury AF, Fukuyama M, Kakuda S, Carvalho RM, Sano H (2016) The effect of dentine surface preparation and reduced application time of adhesive on bonding strength. J Dent 47:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.02.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tokuyama Dental Corp. (2017) Tokuyama universal bond technical report Ver. 1.2. https://www.tinmandental.com/estore/images/Tokuyama%20Universal%20Bond%20-%20Technical%20Report.pdf. Accessed 21 February 2017

  7. Reis A, de Carvalho CP, Vieira LC, Baratieri LN, Grande RH, Loguercio AD (2008) Effect of prolonged application times on the durability of resin-dentin bonds. Dent Mater 24:639–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.06.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Paul SJ, Leach M, Rueggeberg FA, Pashley DH (1999) Effect of water content on the physical properties of model dentine primer and bonding resins. J Dent 27:209–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712(98)00042-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL (2011) State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 27:17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sai K, Takamizawa T, Imai A, Tsujimoto A, Ishii R, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2018) Influence of application time and etching mode of universal adhesives on enamel adhesion. J Adhes Dent 20:65–77. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a39913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schwendicke F, Stolpe M, Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S, Dorfer CE (2013) Cost-effectiveness of one- and two-step incomplete and complete excavations. J Dent Res 92:880–887. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513500792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maltz M, Koppe B, Jardim JJ, Alves LS, de Paula LM, Yamaguti PM, Almeida JCF, Moura MS, Mestrinho HD (2018) Partial caries removal in deep caries lesions: a 5-year multicenter randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig 22:1337–1343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2221-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kidd EA, Fejerskov O (2004) What constitutes dental caries? Histopathology of carious enamel and dentin related to the action of cariogenic biofilms. J Dent Res 83:C35–C38. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408301s07

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pires CW, Lenzi TL, Soares FZM, Rocha RO (2019) Bonding of universal adhesive system to enamel surrounding real-life carious cavities. Braz Oral Res 33:e038. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF (2015) Bond strength of universal adhesives: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 43:765–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Loguercio AD, de Paula EA, Hass V, Luque-Martinez I, Reis A, Perdigao J (2015) A new universal simplified adhesive: 36-month randomized double-blind clinical trial. J Dent 43:1083–1092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Loguercio AD, Luque-Martinez IV, Fuentes S, Reis A, Munoz MA (2018) Effect of dentin roughness on the adhesive performance in non-carious cervical lesions: A double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Dent 69:60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.09.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cakir NN, Demirbuga S (2019) The effect of five different universal adhesives on the clinical success of class I restorations: 24-month clinical follow-up. Clin Oral Investig 23:2767–2776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2708-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. ten Cate JM, Duijsters PP (1982) Alternating demineralization and remineralization of artificial enamel lesions. Caries Res 16:201–210. https://doi.org/10.1159/000260599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tedesco TK, Soares FZ, Grande RH, Filho LE, Rocha Rde O (2014) Effect of cariogenic challenge on bond strength of adhesive systems to sound and demineralized primary and permanent enamel. J Adhes Dent 16:421–428. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a32662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yoshiyama M (2002) Two modes of nanoleakage expression in single-step adhesives. J Dent Res 81:472–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910208100708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Loguercio AD, Munoz MA, Luque-Martinez I, Hass V, Reis A, Perdigao J (2015) Does active application of universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode improve their performance? J Dent 43:1060–1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fowler CS, Swartz ML, Moore BK, Rhodes BF (1992) Influence of selected variables on adhesion testing. Dent Mater 8:265–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90097-v

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Arango-Santander S, Montoya C, Pelaez-Vargas A, Ossa EA (2020) Chemical, structural and mechanical characterization of bovine enamel. Arch Oral Biol 109:104573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2019.104573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shimada Y, Tagami J (2003) Effects of regional enamel and prism orientation on resin bonding. Oper Dent 28:20–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Armstrong S, Geraldeli S, Maia R, Raposo LH, Soares CJ, Yamagawa J (2010) Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of "micro" bond strength test methods. Dent Mater 26:e50–e62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Braga RR, Meira JB, Boaro LC, Xavier TA (2010) Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of “macro” test methods. Dent Mater 26:e38–e49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Perdigao J, Geraldeli S (2003) Bonding characteristics of self-etching adhesives to intact versus prepared enamel. J Esthet Restor Dent 15:32–41; discussion 42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2003.tb00280.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Yoshioka M, Snauwaert J, Abe Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Okazaki M (2001) Adhesion to and decalcification of hydroxyapatite by carboxylic acids. J Dent Res 80:1565–1569. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345010800061701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, Coutinho E, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2007) Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 28:3757–3785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Sai K, Tsujimoto A, Imai A, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2018) Influence of different smear layers on bond durability of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 34:246–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.11.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Imai A, Takamizawa T, Sai K, Tsujimoto A, Nojiri K, Endo H, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2017) Influence of application method on surface free-energy and bond strength of universal adhesive systems to enamel. Eur J Oral Sci 125:385–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Huang XQ, Pucci CR, Luo T, Breschi L, Pashley DH, Niu LN, Tay FR (2017) No-waiting dentine self-etch concept-Merit or hype. J Dent 62:54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.05.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cardoso P, Loguercio A, Vieira L, Baratieri L, Reis A (2005) Effect of prolonged application times on resin-dentin bond strengths. J Adhes Dent 7:143–149

    Google Scholar 

  35. Schmidlin PR, Zehnder M, Pasqualetti T, Imfeld T, Besek MJ (2004) Penetration of a bonding agent into De- and remineralized enamel in vitro. J Adhes Dent 6:111–115

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Irinoda Y, Matsumura Y, Kito H, Nakano T, Toyama T, Nakagaki H, Tsuchiya T (2000) Effect of sealant viscosity on the penetration of resin into etched human enamel. Oper Dent 25:274–282

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Suzuki T, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Endo H, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2016) Influence of etching mode on enamel bond durability of universal adhesive systems. Oper Dent 41:520–530. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-347-L

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Scheidel DD, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2015) Effect of phosphoric acid pre-etching on fatigue limits of self-etching adhesives. Oper Dent 40:379–395. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-252-L

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Van Landuyt KL, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2006) Bond strength of a mild self-etch adhesive with and without prior acid-etching. J Dent 34:77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.04.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Tsujimoto A, Iwasa M, Shimamura Y, Murayama R, Takamizawa T, Miyazaki M (2010) Enamel bonding of single-step self-etch adhesives: influence of surface energy characteristics. J Dent 38:123–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.09.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang Z, Wang X, Zhang L, Liang B, Tang T, Fu B, Hannig M (2013) The contribution of chemical bonding to the short- and long-term enamel bond strengths. Dent Mater 29:e103–e112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.04.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Van Landuyt KL, Yoshida Y, Hirata I, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Okazaki M, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2008) Influence of the chemical structure of functional monomers on their adhesive performance. J Dent Res 87:757–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808700804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Feitosa VP, Pomacondor-Hernandez C, Ogliari FA, Leal F, Correr AB, Sauro S (2014) Chemical interaction of 10-MDP (methacryloyloxi-decyl-dihydrogen-phosphate) in zinc-doped self-etch adhesives. J Dent 42:359–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.01.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B (2004) Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 83:454–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Torii Y, Ogawa T, Osaka A, Meerbeek BV (2012) Self-assembled nano-layering at the adhesive interface. J Dent Res 91:376–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034512437375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Fujita Nakajima K, Nikaido T, Arita A, Hirayama S, Nishiyama N (2018) Demineralization capacity of commercial 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate-based all-in-one adhesive. Dent Mater 34:1555–1565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.06.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Hayakawa S, Nagaoka N, Irie M, Ogawa T, Van Landuyt KL, Osaka A, Suzuki K, Minagi S, Van Meerbeek B (2011) Nanolayering of phosphoric acid ester monomer on enamel and dentin. Acta Biomater 7:3187–3195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.04.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Makishi P, Andre CB, Ayres A, Martins AL, Giannini M (2016) Effect of storage time on bond strength and nanoleakage expression of universal adhesives bonded to dentin and etched enamel. Oper Dent 41:305–317. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-163-L

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Suzuki S, Takamizawa T, Imai A, Tsujimoto A, Sai K, Takimoto M, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2018) Bond durability of universal adhesive to bovine enamel using self-etch mode. Clin Oral Investig 22:1113–1122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2196-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, Watanabe H, Johnson WW, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2016) Influence of duration of phosphoric acid pre-etching on bond durability of universal adhesives and surface free-energy characteristics of enamel. Eur J Oral Sci 124:377–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. McLean DE, Meyers EJ, Guillory VL, Vandewalle KS (2015) Enamel bond strength of new universal adhesive bonding agents. Oper Dent 40:410–417. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-287-L

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Carvalho RM, Manso AP, Geraldeli S, Tay FR, Pashley DH (2012) Durability of bonds and clinical success of adhesive restorations. Dent Mater 28:72–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Garcia-Godoy F, Kramer N, Feilzer AJ, Frankenberger R (2010) Long-term degradation of enamel and dentin bonds: 6-year results in vitro vs. in vivo. Dent Mater 26:1113–1118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.07.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ikeda T, De Munck J, Shirai K, Hikita K, Inoue S, Sano H, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2005) Effect of evaporation of primer components on ultimate tensile strengths of primer-adhesive mixture. Dent Mater 21:1051–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.03.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ito S, Hashimoto M, Wadgaonkar B, Svizero N, Carvalho RM, Yiu C, Rueggeberg FA, Foulger S, Saito T, Nishitani Y, Yoshiyama M, Tay FR, Pashley DH (2005) Effects of resin hydrophilicity on water sorption and changes in modulus of elasticity. Biomaterials 26:6449–6459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Cho BH, Dickens SH (2004) Effects of the acetone content of single solution dentin bonding agents on the adhesive layer thickness and the microtensile bond strength. Dent Mater 20:107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(03)00071-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Zheng L, Pereira PN, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J (2001) Relationship between adhesive thickness and microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent 26:97–104

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Miyazaki M, Ando S, Hinoura K, Onose H, Moore BK (1995) Influence of filler addition to bonding agents on shear bond strength to bovine dentin. Dent Mater 11:234–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80055-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Pashley EL, Agee KA, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2002) Effects of one versus two applications of an unfilled, all-in-one adhesive on dentine bonding. J Dent 30:83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712(02)00002-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53100, Rize, Turkey

    Muhammet Karadas

Authors
  1. Muhammet Karadas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammet Karadas.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karadas, M. Influence of reduced application time on bonding durability of universal adhesives to demineralized enamel. Clin Oral Invest 25, 6843–6855 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03972-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03972-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation