Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of propolis mouth rinse on oral microorganisms — a randomized controlled trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate and compare the efficacy of prepared propolis mouth rinse with Chlorhexidine mouthwash on oral pathogens and also the plaque and gingival index scores.

Material and methods

A triple-blind, concurrent parallel randomized controlled trial was conducted on 120 participants randomized to 4 mouth rinse study groups: (1) Hot Ethanolic Propolis extract; (2) Cold Ethanolic Propolis extract; (3) Chlorhexidine and (4) Distilled water. After a washout period of two weeks, oral prophylaxis and polishing was performed. Participants rinsed twice a day for 3 months. Saliva was collected at baseline, 5 min and 1 h for microbiological analysis. Plaque and Gingival index were recorded at baseline, 15 days, 1 month and 3 months. Repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results

A decline in the concentration of S. mutans was observed in samples collected after the use of mouth rinse (p < 0.05). In comparison with baseline, L. acidophilus and S. mutans count decreased simultaneously when exposed to Hot Ethanolic mouthwash group (5.5 × 102) and Chlorhexidine mouthwash (5.8 × 102) respectively. At the end of 3 months, similar reduction in plaque scores was found in Chlorhexidine (0.45), Cold Ethanolic (0.46), Hot Ethanolic (0.47) mouthwash groups.

Conclusion

Propolis was found to be as efficient as Chlorhexidine in reducing plaque, gingivitis and dental caries pathogens.

Clinical relevance

Common microorganisms implicated in oral disease are S. mutans and L. acidophilus. There is great paucity of information on antimicrobial activity of propolis, against these microorganisms. Hence, the present study has been taken up to assess the effects of propolis on these oral pathogens.The effects of propolis on oral health have been proved which is obviously a new finding of significance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. George J, Hegde S, Rajesh KS, Kumar A (2009) The efficacy of a herbal-based toothpaste in the control of plaque and gingivitis: a clinico-biochemical study. Indian J Dent Res 20(4):480–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pannuti CM, Mattos JP, Ranoya PN, Jesus AM, Lotufo RF, Romito GA (2003) Clinical effect of a herbal dentifrice on the control of plaque and gingivitis: a double-blind study. Pesqui Odontol Bras 17(4):314–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Park YK, Alencar SM, Aguiar (2002) Botanical origin and chemical composition of Brazilian propolis. J Agric Food Chem 50(9):2502–2506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Paroliya A, Thomas MS, Kundabala M, Mohan M (2010) Propolis and its potential uses in oral health. Int J Med Med Sci 2(7):210–215

    Google Scholar 

  5. Koo H, Rosalen PL, Cury JA, Park YK, Bowen WH (2002) Effects of compounds found in propolis on Streptococcus mutans growth and on glucosyltransferase activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46(5):1302–1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ophori EA, Eriagbonye BN, Ugbodaga P (2010) Antimicrobial activity of propolis against Streptococcus mutans. Afr J Bio 9(31):4966–4969

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bascones A, Morante S, Mateos L, Mata M, Poblet J (2005) Influence of additional active ingredients on the effectiveness of non-alcoholic chlorhexidine mouthwashes: a randomized controlled trial. J Periodontol 76(9):1469–1475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nazeri R, Ghaiour M, Abbasi S (2019) Evaluation of antibacterial effect of propolis and its application in mouthwash production. Front Dent 16(1):1–12

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Daugsch A, Moraes CS, Fort P, Park YK (2008) Brazilian red propolis—chemical composition and botanical origin. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 5(4):435–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ozan F, Sümer Z, Polat ZA, Er K, Ozan U, Deger O (2007) Effect of mouthrinse containing propolis on oral microorganisms and human gingival fibroblasts. Eur J Dent 1(4):195–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Löe H, Silness P (1963) Periodontal disease in pregnancy I. Acta Odontol Scand 21:533–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Silness P, Löe H (1964) Periodontal disease in pregnancy II. Acta Odontol Scand 22:121–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bowen WH, Burne RA, Wu H, Koo H (2018) Oral biofilms: pathogens, matrix, and polymicrobial interactions in microenvironments. Trends Microbiol 26(3):229–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Drago L, Mombelli B, De Vecchi E, Fassina MC, Tocalli L, Gismondo MR (2000) In vitro antimicrobial activity of propolis dry extract. J Chemother 12(5):390–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sforcin JM (2016) Biological properties and therapeutic applications of propolis. Phytother Res 30(6):894–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wagh VD, Borkar RD (2012) Indian propolis: a potential natural antimicrobial and antifungal agent. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 4(4):12–17

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sforcin JM, Fernandes A Jr, Lopes CA, Bankova V, Funari SR (2000) Seasonal effect on Brazilian propolis antibacterial activity. J Ethnopharmacol 73(1-2):243–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bankova VS, de Castro SL, Marcucci MC (2000) Propolis: recent advances in chemistry and plant origin. Apidologie 31(1):3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ncube NS, Afolayan AJ, Okoh AI (2008) Assessment techniques of antimicrobial properties of natural compounds of plant origin: current methods and future trends. Afr J Biotechnol 7(12):1797–1806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hidaka S, Okamoto Y, Ishiyama K, Hashimoto K (2008) Inhibition of the formation of oral calcium phosphate precipitates: the possible effects of certain honeybee products. J Periodontal Res 43(4):450–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ansorge S, Reinhold D, Lendeckel U (2003) Propolis and some of its constituents down-regulate DNA synthesis and inflammatory cytokine production but induce TGF-beta1 production of human immune cells. Z Naturforsch C J Biosci 58(7-8):580–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Silva BB, Rosalen PL, Cury JA, Ikegaki M, Souza VC, Esteves A, Alencar SM (2008) Chemical composition and botanical origin of red propolis, a new type of Brazilian propolis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 5(3):313–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Trusheva B, Trunkova D, Bankova V (2007) Different extraction methods of biologically active components from propolis: a preliminary study. Chem Cent J 1:13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Anauate-Netto C, Anido-Anido A, Leegoy HR, Matsumoto R, Alonso RC, Marcucci MC, Paulino N, Bretz WA (2014) Randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled clinical trial on the effects of propolis and chlorhexidine mouthrinses on gingivitis. Braz Dent Sci 17(1):11–15

  25. Ozan F, Polat ZA, Er K, Ozan U, Deger O (2007) Effect of propolis on survival of periodontal ligament cells: new storage media for avulsed teeth. J Endod 33(5):570–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ozaki F, Pannuti CM, Imbronito AV, Pessotti W, Saraiva L, de Freitas NM, Ferrari G, Cabral VN (2006) Efficacy of a herbal toothpaste on patients with established gingivitis — a randomized controlled trial. Braz Oral Res 20(2):172–177

  27. Hayacibara MF, Koo H, Rosalen PL, Duarte S, Franco EM, Bowen WH, Ikegaki M, Cury JA (2005) In vitro and in vivo effects of isolated fractions of Brazilian propolis on caries development. J Ethnopharmacol 101(1-3):110–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the study participants and their parents for their participation and kind cooperation throughout the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramesh Nagarajappa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Author SB declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author RN declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author GR declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author KB declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bapat, S., Nagarajappa, R., Ramesh, G. et al. Effect of propolis mouth rinse on oral microorganisms — a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Invest 25, 6139–6146 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03913-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03913-9

Keywords

Navigation