Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of periapical lesions on the repeatability of two electronic apex locators in vivo

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the influence of periapical lesions on the repeatability of two electronic apex locators (EALs), Root ZX II, and RomiApex A-15, in maxillary anterior teeth, in vivo.

Materials and methods

After approval by the local ethics committee, 43 maxillary anterior teeth scheduled for root canal therapy were assigned to two groups. The periapical lesion (PAL) group included 21 teeth with necrotic pulps and radiographically visible periapical lesion, and the normal periapex (NPA) group consisted of 22 teeth with vital pulps and no periapical lesion. In each canal, Root ZX II and RomiApex A-15 were used to determine working length defined as the “zero” reading on the display. Two consecutive measurements were performed with each EAL on each tooth and a second operator measured the endodontic file with a digital caliper without knowledge of the EAL being used or the tooth diagnosis. The absolute value of the difference between the first and second measurement (measurement pairs) was calculated. Repeatability was evaluated by the Bland-Altman method, and an aligned ranks transformation ANOVA was conducted to compare the EALs.

Results

The median absolute difference between measurement pairs was significantly lower (p < 0.001) and the limits of agreement were narrower in the NPA group. Among the EALs, median absolute differences were significantly smaller for Root ZX (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Measurements were more repeatable when no periapical lesion was present. Root ZX showed better repeatability than RomiApex.

Clinical relevance

Periapical lesions seem to influence successive in vivo measurements with EALs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Association of Endodontists (2016) Glossary of endodontic terms. http://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/aae/endodonticglossary2016/index.php#/4. Accessed 4 May 2019

  2. Ng Y-L, Mann V, Gulabivala K (2011) A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment: part 1: periapical health. Int Endod J 44:583–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01872.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nekoofar MH, Ghandi MM, Hayes SJ, Dummer PMH (2006) The fundamental operating principles of electronic root canal length measurement devices. Int Endod J 39:595–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01131.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schell S, Judenhofer MS, Mannheim JG et al (2017) Validity of longitudinal sections for determining the apical constriction. Int Endod J 50:706–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Olson DG, Roberts S, Joyce AP et al (2008) Unevenness of the apical constriction in human maxillary central incisors. J Endod 34:157–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.11.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ravanshad S, Adl A, Anvar J (2010) Effect of working length measurement by electronic apex locator or radiography on the adequacy of final working length: a randomized clinical trial. J Endod 36:1753–1756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bohay RN (2000) The sensitivity, specificity, and reliability of radiographic periapical diagnosis of posterior teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89:639–642. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2000.105908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Keratiotis G, Kournetas N, Agrafioti A, Kontakiotis EG (2018) A comparative evaluation of two working length determination methods. Aust Endod J 45:331–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tselnik M, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG (2005) An evaluation of root ZX and elements diagnostic apex locators. J Endod 31:507–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yılmaz F, Kamburoğlu K, Şenel B (2017) Endodontic working length measurement using cone-beam computed tomographic images obtained at different voxel sizes and field of views, periapical radiography, and apex locator: a comparative ex vivo study. J Endod 43:152–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.09.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vasconcelos BC, Bastos LM, Oliveira AS et al (2016) Changes in root canal length determined during mechanical preparation stages and their relationship with the accuracy of root ZX II. J Endod 42:1683–1686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.07.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Piasecki L, Carneiro E, da Silva Neto UX et al (2016) The use of micro-computed tomography to determine the accuracy of 2 electronic apex locators and anatomic variations affecting their precision. J Endod 42:1263–1267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.04.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Laux M, Abbott PV, Pajarola G, Nair PNR (2000) Apical inflammatory root resorption: a correlative radiographic and histological assessment. Int Endod J 33:483–493. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00338.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Saatchi M, Aminozarbian MG, Hasheminia SM, Mortaheb A (2014) Influence of apical periodontitis on the accuracy of 3 electronic root canal length measurement devices: an in vivo study. J Endod 40:355–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.11.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Piasecki L, Carneiro E, Fariniuk LF et al (2011) Accuracy of root ZX II in locating foramen in teeth with apical periodontitis: an in vivo study. J Endod 37:1213–1216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.06.00616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Trajković G (2008) Measurement: accuracy and precision, reliability and validity. In: Kirch W (ed) Encyclopedia of Public Health. Springer, Netherlands, Heidelberg, pp 888–892

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Haupt F, Hülsmann M (2018) Consistency of electronic measurements of endodontic working length when using multiple devices from the same manufacturer-an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig 22:3107–3112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2404-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. D’Assunção FLC, Albuquerque DS, Salazar-Silva JR et al (2010) Ex vivo evaluation of the accuracy and coefficient of repeatability of three electronic apex locators using a simple mounting model: a preliminary report. Int Endod J 43:269–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01674.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fretes VR, Pedrozo A, Gamarra J et al (2019) Estudio preliminar sobre la repetibilidad in vivo de tres localizadores apicales electrónicos. Rev Cuba Estomatol 56:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  20. Miletic V, Beljic-Ivanovic K, Ivanovic V (2011) Clinical reproducibility of three electronic apex locators. Int Endod J 44:769–776. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01897.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jung I-Y, Yoon B-H, Lee S-J, Lee SJ (2011) Comparison of the reliability of “0.5” and “APEX” mark measurements in two frequency-based electronic apex locators. J Endod 37:49–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ørstavik D, Kerekes K, Eriksen HM (1986) The periapical index: a scoring system for radiographic assessment of apical periodontitis. Dent Traumatol 2:20–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1986.tb00119.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet Lond Engl 1:307–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Core Team R (2019) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hoer D, Attin T (2004) The accuracy of electronic working length determination. Int Endod J 37:125–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00764.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dunlap CA, Remeikis NA, BeGole EA, Rauschenberger CR (1998) An in vivo evaluation of an electronic apex locator that uses the ratio method in vital and necrotic canals. J Endod 24:48–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80214-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Duran-Sindreu F, Gomes S, Stöber E et al (2013) In vivo evaluation of the iPex and Root ZX electronic apex locators using various irrigants. Int Endod J 46:769–774. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kobayashi C, Suda H (1994) New electronic canal measuring device based on the ratio method. J Endod 20:111–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80053-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Altunsoy M, Ok E, Nur BG et al (2014) A cone-beam computed tomography study of the root canal morphology of anterior teeth in a Turkish population. Eur J Dent 8:302–306. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.137630

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. da Silva EJNL, de Castro RWQ, Nejaim Y et al (2016) Evaluation of root canal configuration of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth using cone beam computed tomography: an in-vivo study. Quintessence Int Berl Ger 1985 47:19–24. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a34807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Estrela C, Bueno MR, Leles CR et al (2008) Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic and periapical radiography for detection of apical periodontitis. J Endod 34:273–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.11.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. de Paula-Silva FWG, Wu M-K, Leonardo MR et al (2009) Accuracy of periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography scans in diagnosing apical periodontitis using histopathological findings as a gold standard. J Endod 35:1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Patel S, Brown J, Semper M et al (2019) European Society of Endodontology position statement: use of cone beam computed tomography in Endodontics. Int Endod J 52:1675–1678. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vier-Pelisser FV, de Figueiredo JAP, Só MVR et al (2013) Apical resorption in teeth with periapical lesions: Correlation between radiographic diagnosis and SEM examination. Aust Endod J 39:2–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.2009.00196.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Vier FV, Figueiredo JAP (2004) Internal apical resorption and its correlation with the type of apical lesion. Int Endod J 37:730–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00830.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Goldberg F, Silvio ACD, Manfré S, Nastri N (2002) In vitro measurement accuracy of an electronic apex locator in teeth with simulated apical root resorption. J Endod 28:461–463. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200206000-00011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Basmadjian-Charles CL, Farge P, Bourgeois DM, Lebrun T (2002) Factors influencing the long-term results of endodontic treatment: a review of the literature. Int Dent J 52:81–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Broon NJ, Palafox-Sánchez CA, Estrela C et al (2019) Analysis of electronic apex locators in human teeth diagnosed with apical periodontitis. Braz Dent J 30:550–554. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201902705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Connert T, Judenhofer MS, Hülber-J M et al (2018) Evaluation of the accuracy of nine electronic apex locators by using Micro-CT. Int Endod J 51:223–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12814

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gulabivala K, Ng Y-L (2014) 8 - Non-surgical root-canal treatment. In: Gulabivala K (ed) Endodontics, 4th edn. Mosby, pp 174–236

  41. Oliveira TN, Vivacqua-Gomes N, Bernardes RA et al (2017) Determination of the accuracy of 5 electronic apex locators in the function of different employment protocols. J Endod 43:1663–1667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sübay RK, Kara Ö, Sübay MO (2017) Comparison of four electronic root canal length measurement devices. Acta Odontol Scand 75:325–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2017.1307447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Piasecki L, José Dos Reis P, Jussiani EI, Andrello AC (2018) A micro-computed tomographic evaluation of the accuracy of 3 electronic apex locators in curved canals of mandibular molars. J Endod 44:1872–1877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.09.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. de Vasconcellos BC, de M Bueno M, Luna-Cruz SM et al (2013) Accuracy of five electronic foramen locators with different operating systems: an ex vivo study. J Appl Oral Sci 21:132–137. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757201302188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Myles PS, Cui J (2007) I. Using the Bland–Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures. BJA Br J Anaesth 99:309–311. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aem214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Supported by a research grant awarded by the Directorate-General for Scientific and Technological Research of the National University of Asuncion. The authors deny any conflicts of interest.

Funding

Supported by a research grant awarded by the Directorate-General for Scientific and Technological Research of the National University of Asuncion, Asunción, Paraguay.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: Carlos G. Adorno, Vicente R. Fretes

Methodology: Carlos G. Adorno, Patricia M. Escobar, Vicente R. Fretes

Investigation: Sandra M. Solaeche, Ileana E. Ferreira, Andrea Pedrozo

Formal analysis: Carlos G. Adorno

Writing—original draft preparation: Carlos G. Adorno

Writing—review and editing: Carlos G. Adorno, Sandra M. Solaeche, Ileana E. Ferreira, Andrea Pedrozo, Patricia M. Escobar, Vicente R. Fretes

Funding acquisition: Vicente R. Fretes, Carlos G. Adorno

Resources: Andrea Pedrozo, Sandra M. Solaeche, Ileana E. Ferreira

Supervision: Vicente R. Fretes, Patricia M. Escobar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos G. Adorno.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adorno, C.G., Solaeche, S.M., Ferreira, I.E. et al. The influence of periapical lesions on the repeatability of two electronic apex locators in vivo. Clin Oral Invest 25, 5239–5245 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03831-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03831-w

Keywords

Navigation