Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Retreatability of BC Sealer and AH Plus root canal sealers using new supplementary instrumentation protocol during non-surgical endodontic retreatment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of supplementary techniques (ultrasonic tip/XP-endo Finisher R) in removing remaining filling materials (gutta-percha/AHPlus/BCSealer) from oval-shaped root canals during non-surgical endodontic retreatment.

Material and methods

Twenty-eight distal roots of human mandibular molars with single and oval-shaped canals were initially shaped with a R40 instrument and filled with gutta-percha points and AH Plus (n = 14) or BC Sealer (n = 14) followed by an initial micro-CT scanning. Initial filling material removal was performed in all 28 samples with an R50 instrument, and all samples submitted to a second micro-CT. Supplementary techniques with ultrasonic tips or XP-endo Finisher R instruments were performed in each sealer group, and all samples submitted to a third micro-CT. The volume of remaining filling material was calculated for the entire canal as well as for the coronal, middle, and apical thirds. Statistical analyses were performed using T, ANOVA 3-way, and Tukey tests.

Results

Lower values of remnant filling material were found for BC Sealer (16.06 ± 14.34) compared to AH Plus (28.30 ± 10.54) (P < 0.001), and considering the supplementary technique, lower values of remnant filling material were found for the ultrasonic tip (18.95 ± 11.05) compared to XP-endo Finisher R (25.41 ± 15.81) (P = 0.025). Ultrasonic instruments significantly reduced the percentage of remaining filling material for both AH Plus (P = 0.04) and BC Sealer (P = 0.02) while XP-endo Finisher R was effective for AHPlus only (P = 0.04). The remaining filling material was observed in all samples regardless the filling material or the supplementary technique employed.

Conclusions

Supplementary techniques increased filling material removal; however, none of them was able to render root canals completely free from root fillings. Ultrasonic tips should be considered a good option for endodontic retreatment, especially for bioceramic cases.

Clinical relevance

Supplementary instrumentation techniques are effective tools to reduce the amount of filling materials during root canal retreatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Crozeta BM, Silva-Sousa YT, Leoni GB, Mazzi-Chaves JF, Fantinato T, Baratto-Filho F, Sousa-Neto MD (2016) Micro-computed tomography study of filling material removal from oval-shaped canals by using rotary, reciprocating, and adaptive motion systems. J Endod 42:793–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zuolo AS, Mello JE Jr, Cunha RS, Zuolo ML, Bueno CE (2013) Efficacy of reciprocating and rotary techniques for removing filling material during root canal retreatment. Int Endod J 46:947–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alves FR, Marceliano-Alves MF, Sousa JC, Silveira SB, Provenzano JC, Siqueira JF Jr (2016) Removal of root canal fillings in curved canals using either reciprocating single- or rotary multi-instrument systems and a supplementary step with the XP-endo Finisher. J Endod 42:1114–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr, Bate AL, Pitt Ford TR (2009) Histologic investigation of root canal-treated teeth with apical periodontitis: a retrospective study from twenty-four patients. J Endod 35:493–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bernardes RA, Duarte MA, Vivan RR, Alcalde MP, Vasconcelos BC, Bramante CM (2015) Comparison of three retreatment techniques with ultrasonic activation in flattened canals using micro-computed tomography and scanning electron microscopy. Int Endod J 49:890–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. De-Deus G, Belladonna FG, Zuolo AS, Cavalcante DM, Carvalhal JCA, Simoes-Carvalho M, Souza EM, Lopes RT, Silva E (2019) XP-endo Finisher R instrument optimizes the removal of root filling remnants in oval-shaped canals. Int Endod J 52:899–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Keles A, Alcin H, Kamalak A, Versiani MA (2014) Oval-shaped canal retreatment with self-adjusting file: a micro-computed tomography study. Clin Oral Investig 18:1147–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cavenago BC, Ordinola-Zapata R, Duarte MA, del Carpio-Perochena AE, Villas-Boas MH, Marciano MA, Bramante CM, Moraes IG (2014) Efficacy of xylene and passive ultrasonic irrigation on remaining root filling material during retreatment of anatomically complex teeth. Int Endod J 47:1078–1083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jiang S, Zou T, Li D, Chang JW, Huang X, Zhang C (2016) Effectiveness of sonic, ultrasonic, and photon-induced photoacoustic streaming activation of NaOCl on filling material removal following retreatment in oval canal anatomy. Photomed Laser Surg 34:3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Martins MP, Duarte MA, Cavenago BC, Kato AS, da Silveira Bueno CE (2017) Effectiveness of the ProTaper next and reciproc systems in removing root canal filling material with sonic or ultrasonic irrigation: a micro-computed tomographic study. J Endod 43:467–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Keles A, Simsek N, Alcin H, Ahmetoglu F, Yologlu S (2014) Retreatment of flat-oval root canals with a self-adjusting file: an SEM study. Dent Mater J 33:786–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Solomonov M, Paque F, Kaya S, Adiguzel O, Kfir A, Yigit-Ozer S (2012) Self-adjusting files in retreatment: a high-resolution micro-computed tomography study. J Endod 38:1283–1287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Silva E, Belladonna FG, Zuolo AS, Rodrigues E, Ehrhardt IC, Souza EM, De-Deus G (2018) Effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher and XP-endo Finisher R in removing root filling remnants: a micro-CT study. Int Endod J 51:86–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Keles A, Arslan H, Kamalak A, Akcay M, Sousa-Neto MD, Versiani MA (2015) Removal of filling materials from oval-shaped canals using laser irradiation: a micro-computed tomographic study. J Endod 41:219–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. de Siqueira ZA, Zuolo ML, da Silveira Bueno CE, Chu R, Cunha RS (2016) Evaluation of the efficacy of TRUShape and Reciproc File systems in the removal of root filling material: an ex vivo micro-computed tomographic study. J Endod 42:315–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hess D, Solomon E, Spears R, He J (2011) Retreatability of a bioceramic root canal sealing material. J Endod 37:1547–1549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Neelakantan P, Grotra D, Sharma S (2013) Retreatability of 2 mineral trioxide aggregate-based root canal sealers: a cone-beam computed tomography analysis. J Endod 39:893–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Oltra E, Cox TC, LaCourse MR, Johnson JD, Paranjpe A (2017) Retreatability of two endodontic sealers, EndoSequence BC sealer and AH plus: a micro-computed tomographic comparison. Restor Dent Endod 42:19–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Romeiro K, de Almeida A, Cassimiro M, Gominho L, Dantas E, Chagas N, Velozo C, Freire L, Albuquerque D (2019) Reciproc and Reciproc blue in the removal of bioceramic and resin-based sealers in retreatment procedures. Clin Oral Investig 25:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  20. Uzunoglu E, Yilmaz Z, Sungur DD, Altundasar E (2015) Retreatability of root canals obturated using Gutta-Percha with bioceramic, MTA and resin-based sealers. Iran Endod J 10:93–98

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Akbulut MB, Akman M, Terlemez A, Magat G, Sener S, Shetty H (2016) Efficacy of twisted file adaptive, Reciproc and ProTaper universal retreatment instruments for root-canal-filling removal: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Dent Mater J 35:126–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Monguilhott Crozeta B, Damiao de Sousa-Neto M, Bianchi Leoni G, Francisco Mazzi-Chaves J, Terezinha Correa Silva-Sousa Y, Baratto-Filho F (2016) A micro-computed tomography assessment of the efficacy of rotary and reciprocating techniques for filling material removal in root canal retreatment. Clin Oral Investig 20:235–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. De-Deus G (2012) Research that matters - root canal filling and leakage studies. Int Endod J 45:1063–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Versiani MA, Leoni GB, Steier L, De-Deus G, Tassani S, Pecora JD, de Sousa-Neto MD (2013) Micro-computed tomography study of oval-shaped canals prepared with the self-adjusting file, Reciproc, WaveOne, and ProTaper universal systems. J Endod 39:1060–1066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Saghiri MA, Asatourian A, Garcia-Godoy F, Gutmann JL, Sheibani N (2013) The impact of thermocycling process on the dislodgement force of different endodontic cements. Biomed Res Int 2013:317185

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Tanomaru-Filho M, Tanomaru JM, Leonardo MR, da Silva LA (2009) Periapical repair after root canal filling with different root canal sealers. Braz Dent J 20:389–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Paravina RD, Ontiveros JC, Powers JM (2004) Accelerated aging effects on color and translucency of bleaching-shade composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 16:117–126 discussion 126-117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. de Mello JE, Cunha RS, Bueno CED, Zuolo ML (2009) Retreatment efficacy of gutta-percha removal using a clinical microscope and ultrasonic instruments: part I-an ex vivo study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 108:E59–E62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Macedo RG, Verhaagen B, Fernandez Rivas D, Gardeniers JG, van der Sluis LW, Wesselink PR, Versluis M (2014) Sonochemical and high-speed optical characterization of cavitation generated by an ultrasonically oscillating dental file in root canal models. Ultrason Sonochem 21:324–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wiesse PEB, Silva-Sousa YT, Pereira RD, Estrela C, Domingues LM, Pecora JD, Sousa-Neto MD (2018) Effect of ultrasonic and sonic activation of root canal sealers on the push-out bond strength and interfacial adaptation to root canal dentine. Int Endod J 51:102–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Carvalho CN, Grazziotin-Soares R, de Miranda Candeiro GT, Gallego Martinez L, de Souza JP, Santos Oliveira P, Bauer J, Gavini G (2017) Micro push-out bond strength and bioactivity analysis of a bioceramic root canal sealer. Iranian Endod J 12:343–348

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gade VJ, Belsare LD, Patil S, Bhede R, Gade JR (2015) Evaluation of push-out bond strength of endosequence BC sealer with lateral condensation and thermoplasticized technique: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 18:124–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ozkocak I, Sonat B (2015) Evaluation of effects on the adhesion of various root canal sealers after Er:YAG laser and Irrigants are used on the dentin surface. J Endod 41:1331–1336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sousa-Neto MD, Silva Coelho FI, Marchesan MA, Alfredo E, Silva-Sousa YT (2005) Ex vivo study of the adhesion of an epoxy-based sealer to human dentine submitted to irradiation with Er : YAG and Nd : YAG lasers. Int Endod J 38:866–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhou HM, Shen Y, Zheng W, Li L, Zheng YF, Haapasalo M (2013) Physical properties of 5 root canal sealers. J Endod 39:1281–1286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kim H, Kim E, Lee SJ, Shin SJ (2015) Comparisons of the retreatment efficacy of calcium silicate and epoxy resin-based sealers and residual sealer in dentinal tubules. J Endod 41:2025–2030

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We affirm that we have no financial affiliation (e.g., employment, direct payment, stock holdings, retainers, consultantships, patent licensing arrangements or honoraria), or involvement with any commercial organization with direct financial interest in the subject or materials discussed in this manuscript, nor have any such arrangements existed in the past three years.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Crozeta, B.M., Lopes, F.C., Menezes Silva, R. et al. Retreatability of BC Sealer and AH Plus root canal sealers using new supplementary instrumentation protocol during non-surgical endodontic retreatment. Clin Oral Invest 25, 891–899 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03376-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03376-4

Keywords

Navigation